Canonical History and Ecclesiastical Succession of ROCOR and RTOC
I. Introduction The 20th century saw a great fracture in Russian Orthodoxy due to the violent upheavals of the Bolshevik Revolution and the rise of the Soviet regime. The faithful Orthodox bishops and clergy who refused collaboration with the atheist state either fled abroad or went underground. From this spiritual resistance were born two key ecclesiastical bodies: the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (ROCOR) та Russian True Orthodox Church (RTOC), each striving to preserve the Orthodox faith in purity and apostolic succession.
II. The Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia (ROCOR)
ROCOR was founded by hierarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church who escaped Bolshevik Russia and rejected any compromise with the Soviet authorities. Established in 1920, ROCOR maintained canonical ties with the pre-revolutionary Russian Church and held its first council in Sremski Karlovci, Serbia.
Key Primates and Jurisdictions:
| First Hierarch | Tenure | Jurisdiction/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky) | 1920–1936 | Founder; led Synod in exile from Serbia |
| Metropolitan Anastasy (Gribanovsky) | 1936–1964 | Oversaw ROCOR through WWII and Cold War; moved Synod to NY |
| Metropolitan Philaret (Voznesensky) | 1964–1985 | Strongly anti-ecumenist; emphasized purity of doctrine |
| Metropolitan Vitaly (Ustinov) | 1986–2001 | Opposed union with Moscow; traditionalist leader |
| Metropolitan Laurus (Skurla) | 2001–2008 | Led reconciliation with the Moscow Patriarchate |
| Metropolitan Hilarion (Kapral) | 2008–2022 | Oversaw continued traditional practice post-reunion |
| Metropolitan Nicholas (Olhovsky) | 2022–Present | Current First Hierarch; continues ROCOR global ministry |
ROCOR Global Dioceses:
- Eastern American Diocese
- Western American Diocese
- Canadian Diocese
- Australian & New Zealand Diocese
- German Diocese
- Great Britain and Western Europe
III. The Russian True Orthodox Church (RTOC)
RTOC is a successor to the Catacomb Church which rejected Metropolitan Sergius’s 1927 declaration of loyalty to the Soviet regime. RTOC holds that true apostolic succession was preserved by bishops who went underground, many of whom were later killed or exiled.
Founding and Hierarchs:
- Formally organized in 2002 by Archbishop Lazar (Zhurbenko) і Bishop Benjamin (Rusalenko)
- Consecrated bishops include clergy of Catacomb origin with ties to Andrewite and Josephite traditions
- Архієпископ Tikhon (Pasechnik) became Primate in 2005 and leads the Synod today
Key Dioceses and Bishops:
- Omsk-Siberian Diocese – Archbishop Tikhon
- Black Sea-Kuban Diocese – Archbishop Benjamin
- Gomel-Bryansk Diocese – Bishop Germogen
- Pallini and West Europe – Bishop Philaret
RTOC does not recognize the canonical authority of the Moscow Patriarchate and views the 1943 re-establishment of the patriarchate by Stalin as invalid.
IV. Tables of Succession
A. ROCOR Succession Table
| Period | Notable Figures / Successors | Communion / Note |
|---|---|---|
| 1920s | Met. Anthony (Khrapovitsky), Abp. Anastasy | Canonical Russian bishops in exile |
| 1930s–1960s | Met. Anastasy, Abp. Vitaly Maximenko, Bp. Seraphim Ivanov | Preservation of pre-revolutionary traditions |
| 1964–1985 | Met. Philaret, Abp. Averky, Bp. Nektary | Heightened defense against modernism |
| 1986–2001 | Met. Vitaly | Rejection of Moscow compromise |
| 2001–2008 | Met. Laurus | Reunion with MP; controversial in traditional circles |
| 2008–Present | Met. Hilarion, Met. Nicholas | Post-reunion preservation of ROCOR identity |
B. RTOC Succession Table
| Period | Notable Figures / Successors | Communion / Note |
|---|---|---|
| 1589–1897 | Moscow Patriarchate and Kazan Hierarchs: from Patriarch Job through Filaret, Innocent, Leontii Lebedinsky, Dimitri I & II | Line of canonical succession leading to ROCOR and Catacomb roots |
| 1897 | Leontii Lebedinsky and Abp. Dimitri Sambikin consecrate Antonii (Khrapovitsky) | Antonii later leads ROCOR |
| 1905 | Antonii consecrates Abp. Dimitri II (Sambikin) | Successor in Kazan |
| 1907 | Abp. Dimitri II consecrates St. Andrew (Ufa) | Third vicar of Kazan; key Catacomb figure |
| 1923 | St. Andrew & Nicolas Ipatoff consecrate Abbakum (Borovkoff) | Continued Ufa Catacomb line |
| 1928 | St. Andrew & Job (Grechisvkin) consecrate Amphilochius (Shibanov) | Bishop of Tyumen, later in Chita |
| 2002–2005 | Abp. Lazar, Bp. Benjamin | Reconstitution of RTOC Synod from Catacomb lines |
| 2005–Present | Abp. Tikhon, Abp. Benjamin, Bp. Germogen | Modern RTOC Synod; claims Catacomb succession |
V. Conclusion Both ROCOR and RTOC stand as heirs to the suffering and faithfulness of the Orthodox Church under Soviet persecution. While their trajectories have diverged—ROCOR now in communion with Moscow, and RTOC standing apart—each maintains a portion of the historic Orthodox witness. RTOC, especially, continues the spiritual resistance of the Catacomb Church, and ROCOR preserves an institutional memory of the Church in exile. Both lines are critical to understanding the complexity of modern Orthodoxy in the post-Soviet world.
Further Reading:
Ukrainian 
English 
German 
Dutch 
Polish 
Swedish 
French