The Four Kinetons/Kingtons of the Ardens: Vicecomital Nobility and Templar Co-Administration in Warwickshire
By Dr Stephen M. K. Brunswick, Ph.D., Th.D.
(Priory of Salem – St Andrew’s OCC Educational Series / Watchman News Historical Division)
I. Introduction — A Forgotten Earldom in the Heart of England
Among the lost constructs of early English nobility stands the Earldom of Kineton, an estate of such breadth that Sir William Dugdale, in The Antiquities of Warwickshire Illustrated, called it “a dignity of earldom dimensions.” Its origins reach to the royal charter of King Edgar to Ælfwold (969 AD) — a ten-hide estate granted as “an everlasting inheritance” (eternal hereditas) at Cyngtune meaning King’s estate (latest transcription of such lands were written as Kineton and Kingston). This Saxon bequest became a cornerstone of the ancient Arden family, that remnant of Anglo-Saxon high nobility which alone survived the Norman conquest with baronial holdings intact.
Within this broad territory emerged four distinct but inter-related Kinetons (Kingtons) — localized seats that persisted through the Norman, Angevin, and Plantagenet ages as administrative anchors of Arden land:
-
Kineton in Claverdon Hundred, later associated with the Knights Templar of Temple Balsall;
-
Kington in Solihull (Bickenhill), forming the ecclesiastical link with the priory of Markyate;
-
Packington (Pa-Cyngtun), the western extension of the royal estate;
-
Preston Bagot (Kington adjacent), held conjointly by the le Notte and Bagot families.
Together they constituted what contemporaries called the “Four Kinetons of the Ardens.” Each bore the memory of the ancient cyng-tūn — the King’s enclosure — and each stood within the same cultural geography bounded by the Forest of Arden, Oxfordshire, and the marches of Worcestershire.
II. The Vicecomital Heritage of the le Notte Family
le le Notte (Nott) lineage arose from the vicecomital — that is, sheriff-earl — house of William of Oxford (d’Oilly) and his sons. In feudal terminology, comes denoted an Earl; vicecomes, his deputy or hereditary sheriff. By the reign of Henry I, William’s heirs received from the Crown the lands of Kineton, Warwick, and Worcester; one son, Milo de Kineton, is styled Vicecomes Oxoniæ in Dugdale’s transcripts of royal charters.
Keats-Rohan’s Domesday Descendants (p. 288-308) confirms this sequence: Godwin Reeve of Oxford → Eilwi → Henry of Oxford (d’Oilly) → Richard of Oxford who married Æthelgifu (Aillena) daughter of Guthmund of Packington. From that union issued the feudal line of Milo de Kineton and ultimately John le Notte de Arden (1140-1190), whose descendants held the four Kinetons in hereditary succession.
By the thirteenth century, these vicecomital descendants functioned not as mere local gentry but as noble lords of knight’s-fee rank — that is, tenants-in-chief or sub-in-chief required to maintain a fully armed knight for royal service, and thereby counted among the formal nobility of England.
III. The Earldom Charter and the Eternal Inheritance
King Edgar’s 969 charter (S 773 — Sawyer Archive, Cambridge) granted Ælfwold ten hides “in Cyngtune” as an everlasting inheritance (in æce eardunga æhta). Witnessed by Archbishops Dunstan and Oscytel, it delineated borders consistent with the later Kineton Hundred. This is the earliest attested legal expression of an “eternal inheritance” in English land law — a clause echoed centuries later when the le Notte descendants reappear as holders of hereditary knight’s fees (feoda militum) in the same district.
Dugdale saw this continuity and deemed the district a “species of earldom.” Keats-Rohan refined that understanding by tracing the vicecomital descent from Godwin Reeve of Oxford to Milo de Kineton, showing uninterrupted noble service from the tenth to the thirteenth century.
IV. The Four Kinetons/Kingtons of the Ardens
1. Kineton (Claverdon Hundred)
le Domesday Book (1086) lists 1½ hides in Kington held of the Earl of Warwick, once the property of Britmod. By 1235 this estate was held by Henry le Notte de Kineton in conjunction with Preston Bagot — “forming with Preston Bagot one knight’s fee.” (Bk. of Fees I 508).
By 1316 the fee appears “in the hands of the Master of Grafton,” representing the Knights Hospitaller, (Rot. Hund. II 226), but the record of 1235–42 shows it was still the le Notte family’s Templar-aligned half-fee before that transference. Henry le Notte’s grant of lands “from the stream which comes from Preston by the brook of Chelewellesiche” to Bordesley Abbey (1275 entry) demonstrates an independent lordship co-operating with monastic orders.
2. Kington (Solihull / Bickenhill)
In 1199 Henry le Notte acquired a virgate in Kington from Richard son of Richard; his grandson Henry gave the advowson of Kington church to the Prioress of Markyate in 1221 and was still transacting land in 1235. Later generations — Thomas le Notte (1305–1314) and Henry his son (1332) — executed settlements “in Kington and Lyndon” with remainders to John and Prudence le Notte, confirming continuous hereditary tenure for two centuries.
This Kington was the spiritual seat of the family, lying within the Solihull parish where the Templar influence from Balsall was strongest.
3. Packington (Pa-Cyntun / Pakington)
Linguistically, Pa-Cyntun signifies the enclosure at the hill of the King. The prefix Pa- (Old English pæc / paec, “hill or ridge”) combined with cyngtūn (king’s estate) yields “King’s ridge town.” This matches its landscape atop the Arden upland.
Guthmund of Packington, whose daughter Ailena married Richard of Oxford (grandson of Godwin Reeve of Oxford), united the Mercian and Arden lines — forming the genealogical hinge between the Arden earldom and the le Notte vicecomital descent.
4. Preston Bagot (Kington adjacent)
This manor arose from Turbern’s five hides held under the Earl of Warwick. By the early 1200s Simon Bagot and Henry le Notte held it jointly as one knight’s fee. When Simon Bagot died (1242–3) his portion had already been disposed to sub-tenants, and the record states that the land “had passed to the Knights Hospitallers, who held intermediately between the Earl of Warwick and the heirs of Simon Bagot.” (Bk. of Fees II 957).
Henceforth the Bagot moiety was Hospitaller, while the le Notte moiety remained Templar, forming together a single fiscal unit until the Orders’ suppression.
V. Temple Balsall and the Templar Order in Warwickshire
Founded in the mid-12th century, the Commandery of Balsall served as the central house of the Knights Templar in Warwickshire. It governed estates across Balsall, Claverdon, Rowington, Kineton, and beyond, with a preceptory, chapel, and grange system linking the region’s manorial lords. Records in the Rotuli Hundredorum show the Templars holding of the Earl of Warwick the lands “in Kington and Preston adjacent,” directly overlapping the le Notte estates.
Thus the le Notte family were not mere tenants, but co-administrators and noble knights-fee holders within the Templar jurisdiction, their lands forming part of the Balsall commandery’s military-monastic system. Each knight’s fee represented the support of a fully armed knight for the king’s service, signifying formal noble rank in feudal law.
The Hospitaller Succession
When Simon Bagot’s heirs came under the Hospitallers mid-13th century, Warwickshire thus contained both Orders in juxtaposition — Templar on the le Notte side, Hospitaller on the Bagot. After the Papal Bull Ad Providam (1312) and its royal execution (1313–1314), Temple Balsall and its dependent manors — including the le Notte half of Kineton — were transferred to the Knights Hospitaller. This ended the dual administration formally, though locally the families continued in hereditary possession as lay lords.
The Cultural Order
The Templar presence brought not only fortification but civic development: market charters, sheep drives, cider presses, and fair rights administered through their preceptories. For noble families like the le Nottes, integration with the Order meant elevated status — participation in a trans-European network linking Warwickshire to the Holy Land.
VI. Heraldry and Lineage of the le Notte Lords
The arms borne by John Nott, Lord Mayor of London (1363–64) — Azure a bend or between three lions’ faces or; crest, a talbot sejant ducally gorged ermine or — were authenticated by the College of Arms in 1575 as those of the descendant house of Nott-Arden. These same arms are carved and painted in the church and manor buildings of Shelsley Beauchamp, confirming the continuity of the line.
The heraldic devices carry ancient significance:
-
le bend or on azure — one of the oldest and most exclusive English charges — denoted royal service under the kings of Mercia and later under Arthurian legendary tradition.
-
The three lions’ faces recall the arms of England itself, symbolizing watchful loyalty and kinship to the royal line.
-
The talbot crest, collared with ermine ducal fleurs, signals a formerly reigning royal house by right of blood.
From John Nott VI of Thornbury-Kington (m. Anne Jeffreys, daughter of the High Sheriff of Worcester) descended the Shelsley lords who migrated to America in the seventeenth century — John Nott of Wethersfield, Connecticut, recorded in Connecticut state encyclopedias as “grandson of Lord John Nott of Nottingham.” These trans-Atlantic records preserve the family’s noble identity long after the formal titles were absorbed.
VII. The Arden Continuity and Anglo-Celtic Heritage
The Arden house represents the last native English baronial line to survive the Norman conquest. While other Saxon families were dispossessed, the Ardens — and their cadet branches such as the le Notte family — retained lands “of baronial dimensions.” Their blood is traceable to the Mercian and West-Saxon royal line through Cuthwine, Ingild, and Aethelwulf. By inter-marriage with Celtic (Welsh) princesses as mandated by King Ine’s law, the Ardens formed the Celtic-Saxon noble synthesis that defined England’s Christian aristocracy.
That heritage was carried forward in their service to the Templar Order — a religious-military institution that itself embodied the union of faith and knighthood.
VIII. Significance of the Kineton Pattern
The repetition of four Kinetons (or Kingtons) under one vicecomital house cannot be dismissed as coincidence. Their distribution aligns with:
-
the bounds of the ancient Kineton Hundred,
-
the estates enumerated under the Templar and Hospitaller rolls, et
-
the linguistic markers of cyngtūn — the king’s estate — throughout Arden.
This pattern affirms the existence of a coherent noble jurisdiction stretching from Packington in the west to Kineton-on-Edgehill in the east, forming a microcosm of Mercian and early English governance.
Through the le Notte and Bagot co-administration, we glimpse a model of continuity — a bridge between Saxon, Norman, and ecclesiastical sovereignties — preserved in the layered record of feudal England.
IX. Conclusion — The Mandate of Memory
The evidence drawn from Book of Fees I 508; II 957; Rotuli Hundredorum II 226; and Dugdale’s Antiquities compels renewed attention to the Four Kinetons of the Ardens. Here was no scattered coincidence of manorial names, but a surviving earldom of eternal inheritance, managed by vicecomital lords of Templar association who embodied both the Saxon and Norman ideals of chivalric governance.
The suppression of the Templars dispersed their institutional framework, yet the memory of their Warwickshire commandery — intertwined with the le Notte family — endures in the landscape and parish stones of Kineton, Packington, Solihull, and Preston Bagot.
Today, as heraldic emblems are rediscovered in Shelsley Beauchamp and the genealogical line traced across continents, the mandate of this history is clear: to restore awareness of England’s oldest surviving noble house — the Ardens and their cadet branch, the le Nottes of Kineton — whose stewardship of the land, faith, and crown was neither extinguished by conquest nor forgotten by time.
References (inline):
-
Book of Fees, Vol. I, p. 508; Vol. II, p. 957.
-
Rotuli Hundredorum, Vol. II, p. 226.
-
Dugdale, The Antiquities of Warwickshire Illustrated (1656).
-
Keats-Rohan, Domesday Descendants (2002), pp. 288–308.
-
Inquisitiones post dissolutionem Templi, 1313–1314.
-
Charters of King Edgar (S 773), British Library & Sawyer Archive.
