QUESTION LIST #25:
| To list of all questions on Website |

  1. Is Medical Marijuana wrong by Biblical standards?

  2. What are the consequences of 'embellishing' to prove God and the Bible?

  3. Which Bible version is God's Word, the King James Bible or the New International Version?

  4. One body, One Spirit, One God = The Holy Trinity (Godhead)

  5. Anatomy of a seduction; the Rapture "doctrine's" subtle pulling

  6. Where is the Truth???

  7. O

  8. Can satan read our minds/listen in to silent prayers?

  9. A man asks about his wife's new dabbling with Witchcraft (Wicca).

| To list of all questions on Website |


Question #1
| Back To Top |

Is Medical Marijuana wrong by Biblical standards?

 

A reader asks about Medical Marijuana:

Answer:

Hi Xxxxxx.  I see nothing wrong Biblically with Medical Marijuana.  I read that it helps with certain medical problems such as Glaucoma, etc.  Just like drinking a few beers is no sin -- the sin entering in when one drinks a 'few gallons' and thereby is tempted into transgression by the lowered inhibitions.  'Everything' (legal) in moderation.  Excess of alcohol tends to make women whores and men violent - among many other problems.  And addiction tends to make some women into prostitutes and some men into thieves to feed their demons (addictions).
 
And I suspect that your life is not a scene out of Cheech & Chong.
 
Sorcery was referring to the narcotic-induced trances by which they communed with the (evil) spirit world, just like the Acid-trippers did in the 1960's, and like many New Ager's do today.
 
I suspect that this is not what you are engaging in.
 
Your taking some Medical Marijuana is not the same thing as sorcery.  Likewise, even a little bit of non-medical Marijuana is not sorcery -- though I am not advocating recreational drug use (and do not myself use any drug other than casual alcohol and caffeine and nicotine).  I am against recreational drug use because of the addictive qualities of it, and the illegality of it (Paul did say that we are to abide by the laws of the Government - Romans chapter 13).  It doesn't look good for Christians to be out in the back alleys 'scoring drugs.'
 
I'm just saying that it is not, of itself, sorcery.  Sorcery has spiritual overtones as well.  For the will is made weak in satanic religions like Voodoo (and some Native-American and Eastern Religions ceremonies) when certain hallucinogens are administered and then the subject, rendered into a drug induced trance, is easily entered into by the evil spirits (which they perceive to be 'helping spirits' but are really demons.  All the 'famed' Satanists were into drug-induced meditations (Alester Crowley, Anton Lavey, Helena Blavatski, Adolph Hitler, etc.)
 
Now if your use of Medical Marijuana causes you to sin, then it is sin unto you; if it does not cause you to sin, then it is not sin unto you.  (Since you're Medical Marijuana is legal -- but there becomes a problem for one without a prescription because of the admonitions against breaking the laws of the land in Romans chapter 13.)
 
Many people who condemn casual alcohol drinkers think nothing of popping their own sleeping pills, drinking their coffee, being sedated for Surgery & Dentist work, or taking morphine when in labor, pain pills when they hurt their back, etc.  Never will you find a greater gathering of self-righteous hypocrites than in a church.
 
But if you still feel convicted against Medical Marijuana, feeling that it is not right in someway -- there are alternatives that contain the active ingredient THC in a form that is not "smoking a joint."  I.e., they have pills with the THC extracted from the Cannabis Sativa (Marijuana) plant.  This may be an option to you for conscience sake.  Also, a weaker Christian may see you 'taking your medicine' and it may become a stumbling block to him.  Then, in that case, for his/her conscience sake you should not medicate in their presence.
1 Cor 8:9
9 But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak.  (KJV)
(See 1st Corinthians chapter eight for a thorough explanation of this.)
 
Pray on it.
 
God bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ' name!
Nick Goggin (Editor)
 

Back to list of questions at top of page


Question #2
| Back To Top |
 

What are the consequences of 'embellishing' to prove God and the Bible?


Alexandre writes:

"...I have been looking for archeological information on Bible
events and I found the following information which I found amazing too.

http://www.wyattmuseum.com/

What do you think about these information ? Have you heard about them and
how reliable do you think they are ?

I am surprised that this kind of information is almost unknown (at least to
me and most Christian sites I visited as they place the Red Sea crossing in
a different area) as this would be a solid base to confirm key events from
the Bible to any rational mind ?
 

ANSWER:

Hi, nice to meet you.  Regarding Wyatt's Website; i.e., the below article:
 

Fiber Optics on Noah's Ark ?
A Picture is worth a thousand Words 
Wyatt Archaeological Research photos tell the story

 FIBERS FROM NOAH'S ARK
[animal hair fibers]

 

Well, I like to think myself well informed (though I do not claim to be perfectly up to speed on everything), but to my knowledge there has been no breaking-news discovery of Noah's Ark.  And most certainly not in the well-preserved condition indicated by the photo.  Wouldn't you think that it would make the evening news if the Ark of Noah (a Biblical event believed upon by Christians, Jews, and Muslims world-wide) was found and such a detailed photo available to splash on TV Screens at five o'clock?  Yeah, I think that it might be a tad newsworthy.  But we have not seen it, have we?

 
'Funny' how the Wyatt site has the world's only known well-preserved Ark photos that they are selling $100.00 DVD Documentaries on.  You know what I mean?
 
And really, they are playing up to Christian's with their "animal hair found on the Ark" bit.  Truth be known, many sea vessels of antiquity transported animals, as many do today.
 
is everything wrong on the Wyatt site?  Probably not.  Is there some good groundbreaking discoveries there?  Even a stopped watch is correct twice in a day.  My point is that when they $ell $torie$ like the above one they destroy any credibility that they may have enjoyed in my eyes.  For if we cannot believe them on the above hoax, then how can we know what to believe that is also presented by them?
 
P.S.:  You should know that Wyatt died some time ago and 'others' continue his site in his name (as I remember it was his widow and staff at the first; as to now I do not know), selling his work and doing new 'work' in his name.  I don't like that, personally.  Sounds like 'someone' has found a way to finance their lifestyles.
 
But you judge, for you have read more of the site than I.
 
Listen, I know that we Christians love to uncover evidences of God, of the Bible; but when 'we' as Christians manufacture such evidence, and 'we' are discovered, then no one will believe us when we present real evidence.  I think that that is satan's design behind a lot of seemingly faith-lifting stories that are later proven hoaxes.
 
Is Noah's Ark real?  Yep, every word on it in the Bible is accurate God-breathed narrative on the matter.  Will we find it?  We may already have through W.W.II aerial surveillance photos, but the politics of the region (read: hidden forces) will not let expeditions to unearth it.  So what we have is that we are not allowed to prove the true, and in place of the true we are fed a lie that shall be debunked.  Satanic genius, no?  Evil genius, but genius just the same.
 
Another site along the same lines of deception is Ken Ham's Answers in Genesis Website.  He is doing irreparable harm under the guise of, proving, as he says "the Bible true from the first verse of Genesis" (their little motto).  
 
He is lying to the people lies that are easy to (and shall be) proven false - thus overthrowing the faith of many who came to the Lord through Ken Ham's Ministry.  Ham even presents drawings of Adam & Eve cavorting with (pet) dinosaurs in the Garden of Eden.  OK, whatever....
 
Satan never sleeps, and he does his 'best' work from behind 'enemy' lines; i.e., he infiltrates ministries and with the lure of fame and riches causes many a man to subvert the faith.  Though some of them may have meant so well.
 
I do not subscribe to the idea that we must lie for God nor embellish the story to draw people in.  I ask, Into what?  Deception!  And when the truth is found out God is mocked.
I Jn 2:21
21 I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth.  (KJV)

Luke 6:43
43 For a good tree bringeth not forth corrupt fruit; neither doth a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.  (KJV)
 
James 3:11
11 Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter?  (KJV)
Truth, my friend, that is what God desires.  And if there be anything that we do not know or cannot prove, then let us believe it on faith.  For such is pleasing to God.  If we believe a little on faith He will show us a lot by evidence; but if we believe nothing by faith He will show us nothing by evidence.
 
He's pretty smart, huh?  That's how He weeds out the play-actor Christians.
 
:o)
 
The 'funny' thing is that those who are show great evidences aren't the ones that need see them, for they believed before it was proven; preferring to trust the Scriptures of God over their own eyes and ears.  And those whom would not believe lest they saw, rarely are ever shown.
 
Ironic, no?
Rom 11:33-36
33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out!
34 For who hath known the mind of the Lord? or who hath been his counsellor?
35 Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed unto him again?
36 For of him, and through him, and to him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen.  (KJV)
I have seen when I really needn't have seen.
 
God bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ' name!
Nick Goggin
 

Back to list of questions at top of page


Question #3
| Back To Top |


Which Bible version is God's Word, the King James Bible or the New International Version?

 

No name given writes:

"How would you respond to the following statement about the KJV, especially since the NASB and ESV are widely regarded as a more accurate "word - for - word" translation from the most recent discoveries of ancient manuscipts?

 KJV:

This, the most famous of English versions, is named after King James I of England who initiated the work. It is basically a revision of previous translations: Tyndale's, Coverdale's, the Great Bible and the Geneva Bible. Over fifty scholars worked on the project, which started in 1607. It was finished in 1611.

"The King James Version, known in England as the Authorized Version because it was authorized by the king, has become an enduring monument of English prose because of its gracious style, majestic language, and poetic rhythms. No other book has had such a tremendous influence on English literature." (Comfort, pp. 48-49)

However, the KJV translators had access to only a few ancient manuscripts. Since their day many older manuscripts have been discovered, resulting in a more reliable Greek and Hebrew text. In addition, many words in the KJV are now obscure; others cannot be traced back to the most reliable manuscripts. While IBS is glad to provide the historic KJV, we feel the NIV is both more accurate and more readable for today's audience.""


ANSWER:

Ah, words off of the tongues of the serpent's scribes themselves, huh?  (I refer to the excerpt you supplied, not to you)

You asked me how would I respond?  What you presented above is a lie; that is how I would respond. 

How would I back-up that bold claim?  By directing you to a detailed Bible study on our site that systematically cuts through every lie that you have just presented in your above. 

See our: Adulterations in the Newer Bible Versions (NIV, NASB...); Proof that the King James Bible (KJV) is the True Word of God 

Peace, Nick Goggin

Back to list of questions at top of page


Question #4
| Back To Top |

 

Back to list of questions at top of page


Question #5
| Back To Top |

Anatomy of a seduction; the Rapture "doctrine's" subtle pulling

 

Below represents some of our Internet Forum work.

Anatomy of a seduction.  A seducing doctrine, that is.

(To show charity of heart and kindness, I shall change the names of the two people to whom I refer. One shall herein be called “Jack” and the other “Jill”). Their real names are unimportant and defaming them not the point.

What is my point, then? My point is to help any newer to middle Bible student see just how easy it is to be seduced into false doctrine. heck, these two (Jack and Jill) may not even realize that they have been seduced by false doctrine. I do not say that they do what they wittingly, but that there is definitely spirits at work in the methods employed by them.

An issue came up on another regarding that Jill had expressed a desire to know if it was only her and Jack’s beliefs regarding the Trinity that I disagreed with, or if there where other of their doctrines that I found unsound.

Well there are others, one being the so-called Rapture ‘doctrine.’

Though they would both vehemently deny it (as with other questionable doctrines that say they don’t believe in but espouse it’s very core tenants), and through word-play or just plain fooling themselves, Jack and Jill believe in the Rapture doctrine.

The particular flavor of Rapture doctrine that they ascribe to is what is known in ‘Rapture circles’ as the Pre-Wrath Rapture Doctrine.

Why am I doing this, why am I posting such a dissertation? Because newer Bible students will read what these two write here, see the disclaimers that they issue right before directly contradicting the promises in those disclaimers, and then be fed raw Rapture doctrine clandestinely that they may absorb into their mind – thus messing them and their proper understanding of prophecy up for years to come.

Well we don’t have a whole lot of “years to come” before the Tribulation anymore. It is too late in the day to be toying with false doctrines.

Observe and read between the lines into not what they say but what they mean when they explain their beliefs:

Jack begins by covering his ‘backside’:

Quote:


“It boils down to this: Will there be a "rapture"? Yes
Use that word or gathering or whatever, yes, there is one.
Will it occur before or during the trib? No.
After the trib? Yes.”


Sounds good right? Jack is basically saying that what he teaches looks like a Rapture, acts like a Rapture, happens like a Rapture; but magically is not a Rapture. It’s ‘all in the timing’ Jack says.

Jill then chimes in:

Quote:


“There is one other view that came out a few years ago (I am actually not sure how long it has been around). There is a book called The Pre-Wrath Rature of the Church, Marvin Rosenthal. He actually gets pretty close.

He postulates that Christians will be raptured before God pours out his wrath on the world but that Christians will remain to endure the tribulation up til that point. The problem is that he has the trib at 7 years long and the "rapture" happening at about 2/3 of the way through it.



Here we have introduced into the mind of the reader that the mere idea of a Rapture doctrine, per say, is not errant, for as Jill informs us “He actually gets pretty close.” So the reader is now reverted back to Jack’s thought that perhaps a Rapture will happen and the only controversy is over the timing. Jill in the above affirms that the only controversy is over the timing of the rapture, for she says “The problem is that he has the trib at 7 years long and the "rapture" happening at about 2/3 of the way through it.”. well that's not the only problem with it, Jill.

Jack then goes a little further into his doctrine:

Quote:


“I recently have been using the word "rapture" in order to reach those pre-tribbers and try to convince them the "rapture" does not happen before or during the tribulation. We with SC have shied away from that word, and villianized it but really its not the word or its meaning that is the problem, it's the timing associated with its most common teaching.”



The nail driven home! The poor word “Rapture” has been ‘vilified!’ For now we ‘know’ by Jack that there shall be a Rapture but it is only the timing of it that is in error, for as Jack says “using the word "rapture" in order to reach those pre-tribbers and try to convince them the "rapture" does not happen before or during the tribulation.”

So it would seem from that statement that Jack is saying that the Rapture happens after the Tribulation. But that is not at all what he saying, it only appears that way (by design). This statement is designed to set off guard those who know that the Tribulation ends at the Second Advent. Jack is reaching out here to those who do not believe in a Rapture by making it plausible that the Rapture is simply another definition of the Second Advent gathering. Minds are being softened at this point, lines being blurred; till what was once a ‘bad word’ to Chapel students and others who know that the Rapture is a lie from satan is now somehow less evil.

But that (Rapture = Second Advent) is not at all what Jack believes. let's see what it is exactly that Jack (and Jill) teach and believe.

In our next excerpt Jack pretty much comes clean:

Quote:


Well, the gathering to Christ is pre-wrath. The first thing that Christ does after returning is to send angels to gather the elect, then comes the wrath upon the wicked.”



So then, from Jack we have just 'learned' that Christians (Jack specifically uses the word 'Elect') are gathered before the Seven Vials of God's Wrath are poured out in Revelation 16:2-17. And that God's Elect are no longer present for the remaining events upon the Earth. But Jack and Jill will assure you that "this is not a Rapture doctrine."

Jill gives Jack’s above statement a second witness: herself. Thus leading the newer student who is reading on to believe that this is fact sound doctrine:

Quote:


“Right, that is why I say he comes pretty close but the times are wrong.”



Jill was referring to her earlier statement “There is a book called The Pre-Wrath Rature of the Church, Marvin Rosenthal. He actually gets pretty close.”.

Next we something odd. We have Jack responding to and quoting from a post of mine that has since “disappeared.” But Jack saves it for posterity by quoting from it.

Jill “disappears’ a lot my posts when they dare criticize Jack or expose his legion of false doctrines (There at least two of my posts on that one thread that have been "disappeared,” not to mention an entire thread disappeared from the “Heated Discussions” section where it had been moved because it showed Jack’s errors just a little too clearly.) it’s easy, Jill just declares a post or a thread inappropriate, argumentative, mean-spirited – you fill in the blank - and disappears it, that way Jack saves face. What spiritual hold Jack have on Jill, one can only wonder

But anyway. In it I try to tell Jack that he is in error and is in fact promoting a Rapture doctrine.

Jack's post (to me):

Quote:


“Nick,
Quote [from me (Nick) to Jack]:
Jack, with roundabout words (your speciality) what you are teaching IS a Rapture; they even have a name for it, it is referred to as the Pre-Wrath Rapture Theory. (I think that Jill tried to point that out to you in that thread). But any way you slice it, it is a Rapture belief.
-------------------------------

[Jack responds] “…When Christ returns, he will send angels to rapture/gather/catch up the elect. They shall be moved physically from where they were, to another place which I believe is Mt Zion Rev 14.””



Now it becomes even more odd and confused. Jack in the below responds to my statement that he quotes.

Jack's post:

Quote:


“Nick,
Quote [of my (Nick’s) post]:
-----------------------
No Jack. Jesus is coming here, we are not going anywhere.
-----------------------

[Jack responds]: Yes Jesus is coming here, but you are wrong that some arent "going anywhere". Read:

Mark 13:26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory.
Mark 13:27 And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven.

They are gathered from the uttermost parts of the earth, which means from all over the globe, and they are taken "to the uttermost part of heaven"

So Nick teaches:
"we are not going anywhere"


Scripture teaches:
"to the uttermost part of heaven"

Nick is wrong.

Now, the uttermost part of heaven means the furtherest reach of the literal kingdom of heaven, which will be Mt Zion, which is why the elect are shown to be gathered together there with Christ!”



Jack has here misinterpreted the simple Scripture, this has magnified his error. The Scripture is NOT saying that the Elect are gathered from the Earth AND TAKEN TO Heaven, but that they are gather from everywhere, everywhere in the Earth and everywhere in the Heavens. In other words there are Elect from days gone by that are dead and in Heaven at the Second Advent. They are gathered as well.

Mark 13:27
27 And then shall he send his angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven. (KJV)


Matthew explains the same event:

Matt 25:31-32
31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:
32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: (KJV)


At this point Jack was being challenged (disagreed with) by several posters regarding his veiled Rapture doctrine, not the least of all by me (in my now 'disappeared' posts). So at that Jill and Jack scuttled the debate by saying that I was being mean to Jack. Then they finished off the thread with some eight or so posts expounding on my posting demeanor. The conversation has rested at that point for some four or five days now.

Epilog:

Please be careful what you read on the WWW. Anyone can set him/herself up a teacher and overthrow the faith of many tender ears. Satan never told Eve that she would die for partaking of the forbidden fruit; he just told her that taking it was simply another option. She took and did die; her who would have been eternal, died. Likewise, there are many doctrines and interpretations that are being peddled as simply "another way to look at things." Truth has become relevant anymore in Bible study circles; everyone's 'truth' is equal now. Not! Truth is absolute and quite jealous.

Jack and Jill expound a Pre-Wrath Rapture doctrine; that much is clear from their very own words, but they will deny to the end that they teach anything like a Rapture.

So we have their words and then we have their denials – but in the end, from them, we have a Pre-Wrath Rapture doctrine in it’s most pristine form.

God bless, in Jesus Christ' precious name!
Nick Goggin

Back to list of questions at top of page


Question #6
| Back To Top |

 Where is the Truth???

 

A reader writes:

Nick,
 
In comparison to most who claim to be Christians I consider my understanding of God's word as very good. But when it comes to differences in teachings of people like L. Ray Smith (who I believe backs his teaching very well scripturally) and yourself, I don't have the knowledge to sort through the truth.
 
I am confused and getting frustrated. It is easier for me to believe that there are some errors in all Bible translations, than that the Authorized King James Version is the only one without errors. I have known even you, throughout your writings, to correct passages in the King James and go back to the Hebrew and Greek for clearer meaning of a verse or word. E. W. Bullinger devoted his Companion Bible to correcting opaque translation of the King James. If the King James is without error, why do we need to go back to Greek or Hebrew to correct it or reword it?
 
I do believe that the original text, as written by the authors (Moses, Paul, Etc.), is error free and the inspired words of God. It is when man steps in as a translator that we get errors and multiple versions. How can I get to the end of this problem? I just want to understand the pure word of God, but where can I find it? Do I have to exhaustively research every verse, and every word that I apply to my understanding of God's purpose and plan written in the Bible? Do I have to use concordances, Greek dictionaries, Hebrew dictionaries, English Dictionaries, computer programs, commentaries, etc.(all of which  I do use) to understand the Bible?
 
Do I need to be a Greek scholar, Hebrew scholar, historian, etc. To understand what God has inspired in his word? Is it really as hard as I am making it????
 
Frustrated. Where is the Truth???
 
Brad

 

Answer:

Hi Brad, I understand where you are coming from in this, I really do.  I see what is going on in the world of Bible study.  I feel for the poor new student who must wade through an unceasing quagmire to get to the pure waters of Scriptural teaching.  "An enemy hath done this" (Mat 13:28).
 
You said:
"I have known even you, throughout your writings, to correct passages in the King James and go back to the Hebrew and Greek for clearer meaning of a verse or word."
       I would not call that "correcting errors" but simply clarifying translation.  Many words in 1611 A.D. do not have the same weight that they have today.  To correct an error would be to say that this verse or that sentence or this word or that chapter does not belong in the Bible.  I consider what I do to be explaining the Bible, expound on the Bible, not "correcting Biblical error." 
 
       Perhaps in my older writings I given this impression; but I have, with the Grace of God, grown in my writings, in my understandings.  Would to God that I had the time to rewrite all those older studies, revisions if you will, to clarify what I mean more perfectly, to cleanup typos and misstatements, etc.  But not yet do I find that time.  And then in a year I would just have to do it all over again, for knowledge increases in these end times exponentially  "But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased." (Dan 12:4).
 
       There is a great difference, I believe, in what I do, and in "Bible-correcting."  I certainly hope that that is clear to those who read me.  I shall be more diligent in the future to be clear about that when I supply an explanation of a Greek or Hebrew word or idiom as it is used in that specific passage. 
 
       But you are correct, though; many, many, today set out to correct the Word, not to teach it; to make it align with their beliefs rather than to align their beliefs with it: and in the end all they accomplish is to destroy that which they claim to serve. 
 
       Please don't charge God with that error, please don't have the Bible to lose it's power by the lies of those who claim to teach it but only destroy everywhere that which they set their hands upon.  Man is never revealed so vain than when he places his fingerprint on God's Word.
 
       Now if you can understand the Old English terms and English translation of Hebrew & Greek metaphor and figures, then you are fine on your own.
 
       Where to find the truth, you ask?
 
       In the King James Bible is where you find the written Word of our God.  See our: Adulterations in the Newer Bible Versions (NIV, NASB...); Proof that the King James Bible (KJV) is the True Word of God 
 
       You do not need any Concordance, any Dictionary, and Lexicon, any Commentary to understand God's Word, but often times it speeds things up, it helps (if the source for those aids is accurate).
 
        For instance, who needs outside works to understand the most important verse in the Bible?  Nobody!  Any 'unchurched' third grader can explain the below Scripture:
John 3:16-18
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.  (KJV)
       Sometimes we reach so far into the greater depth of God's Word that we forget the simple truth, the most important truths understandable to even a child.
 
       Pray, Brad, pray believing; that is how you can understand.  Ask Him to show you the way, ask Him whom to trust, if to trust, what Bible to believe, what is the true interpretation of a Scripture.  You do believe that He will help you, don't you?  Then why haven't you asked Him?  And if you have then why haven't you trusted Him?
 
       We are 'funny little creatures,' Brad; sometimes we seek that which we already have found.  God will help you in this.  Trust Him and do your part by being sober-minded in your study of Scripture, not being carried away with every wind of (strange) doctrine.
 
God bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ' name!
Nick Goggin

 

Back to list of questions at top of page


Question #7
| Back To Top |

 

 

Back to list of questions at top of page


Question #8
| Back To Top |

 

Can satan read our minds/listen in to silent prayers?

 

Bev writes:

Nick, 
Here is a question.  Can satan hear me pray  aloud to Father?  Can satan hear me pray silently to Father?  How can I know this? 
Bev


Answer:

Hi, the answer to your question is, No, satan cannot read your mind nor discover your inner thoughts.  Only God (and Jesus Christ, naturally) can read your heart (mind).
 
 
Documentation that God can "read our minds":
1 Sam 16:7
7 But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.  KJV
 
Ps 139:1-4
O LORD, thou hast searched me, and known me.
2 Thou knowest my downsitting and mine uprising, thou understandest my thought afar off.
3 Thou compassest my path and my lying down, and art acquainted with all my ways.
4 For there is not a word in my tongue, but, lo, O LORD, thou knowest it altogether.  KJV
 
Documentation that Jesus Christ, which was "God with us" (Mat 1:23) can "read our minds":
John 2:24-25
24 But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men,
25 And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man. KJV
 
Documentation that none other than God can "read our minds":
1 Kings 8:39
39 Then hear thou in heaven thy dwelling place, and forgive, and do, and give to every man according to his ways, whose heart thou knowest; (for thou, even thou only, knowest the hearts of all the children of men;) KJV
Second witness to ensure that we are interpreting correctly:
2 Chron 6:30
30 Then hear thou from heaven thy dwelling place, and forgive, and render unto every man according unto all his ways, whose heart thou knowest; (for thou only knowest the hearts of the children of men:) KJV
 
God bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ' name!
Nick Goggin


Back to list of questions at top of page


Question #9
| Back To Top |

 

A man asks about his wife's new dabbling with Witchcraft (Wicca)

 

Mark writes:

Editor:
 
My ex-wife is now into Wiccan.  Are you familiar with any materials, not written by a supporter, nor by a staunch detractor, of Wicca, that I might read?
 
Thank you,
Mark

 

Hello, your wife is dabbling in a dangerous thing.  It is satanic in it's depths but clothed with nature worship and eco-justice on the visible surface (for Earth and all in it is 'god' to them).  
 
She is being indoctrinated slowly into satan worship, though she is now being trained to look at comments such as that by people such as me as, "uninspired foolish words of the uninitiated."  She is being programmed, and slowly walls are being brought down in her conscience, she is being spiritually beguiled by the father of lies (satan).  I don't know how far along in the deception she has fallen, but wherever she is, know that she is always being drawn deeper (initiated into it's mysteries).  Soon she will not listen to you, but would rather convert you.  If unable to convert you she will leave you.
 
Also, Wicca is a harvest ground for Feminists and Lesbians, for the Wicca movement is very sexual at it's core, and very women-empowering; and it subtly places the "Feminine" in a position of deity.  Not "feminine" in the sense of soft and gentle, mind you, but more in the sense of androgyny [gender blurring]).
 
You can fill in the blanks.  And don't let her try to soften the blow of what she is doing by telling you that she is a White Witch not a Black Witch.  They are both witches.  And all Black Witches begin as White Witches.  Supposedly, Black Witches cast evil spells, and White Witches cast only "good" spells.  The "powers" both come from the same source: Satan.
 
Your wife will be changed, not the least of all spiritually.  She is caught up in the storm that is coming, that being;  The New Age Spirituality Movement which is none other than antichrist's first beachhead in the New World order assault on Biblical Christianity as we know it from the Bible.  (Notice that I cannot even say "Christianity as we know it today," ?  For the "Christianity" of today has, and is now, gone and is now going through a [bad] transformation?)
 
You will lose her over this, and she shall lose herself: if you do not put a stop to it.
 
This is bigger than you; don't you wish now that you had spent some of your life studying Jesus Christ & God and learning all that God had to teach you in the Bible?  It is never too late, my friend.  You must learn before you can teach, you must learn before you can be the spiritual head over your wife.  As it is developing now, she is usurping your role, and left unchecked, she will draw you into the sin (there are male Witches, you know).  That is how satan deceived Adam, he first deceived Eve who then led Adam into the transgression.  Adam didn't lead, but followed; Eve didn't follow, but led; and they both fell into the ditch.  Such shall be your end, if what you do, is nothing.
 
Your wife, in direct disobedience to the Biblical model of husband/wife roles, and in direct disobedience to God's Word on the matter of spirituality, has unwittingly introduced an element into your marriage who's one design is to destroy you both.  Yes, it IS that serious.
 
I am going to be posting some Bible studies (which are in research & development now) in the next few months regarding this matter.  You may sign-up for notification when new studies are posted to be sure to see them.  Yes, it's free; and we don't sell your e-mail address to marketers and money-changers.
 
Wicca is just a nice word for "witch."  The Bible tells us that witches (both male and female, incidentally) are an abomination to Him, for which He reserves the ultimate punishment (both here and in the eternity):
Deut 18:10-12
10 There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,
11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.
12 For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD: and because of these abominations the LORD thy God doth drive them out from before thee.  KJV
 
Ex 22:18-20
18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
19 Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death.
20 He that sacrificeth unto any god, save unto the LORD only, he shall be utterly destroyed.  KJV
 
Gal 5:19-21
19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.  KJV
Try the below book; the webpage below has reviews by ex-witches etc. of the book You may be able to glean some good info there:
Wicca: Satan's Little White Lie
by William Schnoebelen
Pray, my friend, pray.
 
God bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name!
Nick Goggin (Editor)

Back to list of questions at top of page

| To top |

In His Service:
         
     Nick Goggin 
Editor; www.biblestudysite.com
WATCHMEN BIBLE STUDY GROUP

 Contact Editor  | Bible studies  | Newer students  |  Bible Q & A's  Study tools  | Search our site
Library/Bookstore  Statement of faith  New material on site  | Join our mailing list  Home Page | Donate

NOTE: To insure quality and content integrity, these In-depth Bible Studies are © copyrighted and may only be downloaded for study and shared private use.  They may not be reproduced or distributed for sale or publication without prior written approval.  Other Christian Web sites are welcome to link up to this Website or any page on it. 

Watchman News hosts several archives of Bible studies such as these by the Watchmen Bible Study Group. Although we are not affiliated with this or numerous others using the term Watchman in their names, we believe it important keep the full content intact for research and analysis for Bible students of future generations. We keep it available as good members of the body of Christ, for Christian unity. We do so on a non-profit basis. As the original owner's site went offline years ago, no one has paid to keep it online but us. We pray and hope such ministries are more careful about having successors to carry on their works in the future. Although we do not agree on every point of doctrine, we still believe it very important to not edit any of the original contents. Our own statements of beliefs are found at www.CelticOrthodoxy.com, and for example in the book "7th Day Sabbath in the Orthodox Church" etc.