E-Book By A. S. Leese
THE object of
this pamphlet is to prove that Bolshevism is Jewish. Bolshevism represents
one of the final stages in the deliberate Jewish programme for World
Domination. It is not in the scope of this pamphlet to describe the earlier
stages of the programme, in which Liberalism, Masonry and Marxism prepared
the ground for Bolshevism; that part of the subject is dealt with in our
pamphlet, “The Era of Democracy: the Era of World Ruin,” price 2½d, post
free.
Communism is not
Bolshevism. In Bolshevik Russia, there is no common ownership of land, goods
and money; nor is there equal pay for all. These two utterly impracticable
ideals have, under the name Communism, been the means through which the
Russian people have been duped into accepting something quite different,
i.e., Bolshevism.
Then what is Bolshevism?
It is State
Capitalism, run by Jews in the Jewish interests. The Jews being a
non-creative and unproductive nation have failed utterly in the grand farce
of the Five-Year-Plan, because it was never in them to create but only to
exploit what has been created by the work of others; in this case, they
tried to create, and of course, failed.
The seemingly
strange predilection for Bolshevism which is noticeable in unexpected
places in Britain to-day, is explained at once when it is realized that
Bolshevism is a Jewish weapon; for the idea of Communism which prepares the
“underdog” for Bolshevism, is backed by the Jewish Money Power itself, the
existence of which as a political power is now becoming known even to the
most unsuspecting Briton. AND BOLSHEVISM.
In exposing this
alliance, we will quote the Jew Disraeli, in his work of history, “The Life
of Lord George Bentinck,” written in 1852, at a time when revolutionary
upheavals were convulsing Europe. “The influence of the Jews,” he writes,
“may be traced in the last outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe.
An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against
religion and property. Destruction of the Semitic principle, extirpation of
the Jewish religion, whether in the Mosaic or the Christian form, the
natural equality of men and the abrogation of property are proclaimed by the
Secret Societies which form Provisional Governments, and men of Jewish Race
are found at the head of every one of them. The people of God co-operate
with atheists; the most skilful accumulators of property ally themselves
with Communists; the peculiar and chosen Race touch the hand of all the scum
and low castes of Europe; and all this because they wish to destroy that
ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and whose tyranny
they can no longer endure.”
Surely, no higher
authority is possible; what was true in 1852 is true to-day.
The first victim
was Russia. The reason she was chosen was that she was the only country
which defended herself by laws framed to prevent the Jew from contaminating
and controlling her. Bolshevism is revenge on the part of the Jewish nation
on Russia, actuated by Asiatic hate and tyranny.
The Jews, chose
their ground well. The Slav is by nature not individualistic; he is patient,
inured to hardship and fatalistic. He accepted the idea of Communism; and he
got the fact of Bolshevism. He accepted the idea of equal wages for
all and property held in common; and he got a toll of 20
million lives, double the blood-bill of the Great War, as the price of his
own starvation and slavery under Jews.
The first direct
blow was organized by the Jew Parvus, alias Helphand, in conjunction with
the German General Staff; the “Sisson Report,” published by the American
Committee on Public Information, 1918, conclusively establishes the
connection between the Jew Bankers of Germany and the financing of Lenin and
Trotsky for the Revolution. Among other items printed in documents published
by the U.S.A. Government, is the following letter:—
Stockholm,
21st Sept., 1917.
Mr. Raphael
Scholan. Haparanda.
Dear Comrade,
The office of the
Banking House M. Warburg has opened in accordance with telegram from
president of Rheinish-Westphalian Syndicate an account for the undertaking
of Comrade Trotsky. The attorney (agent) purchased arms and has organised
their transportation and delivery up to Luleo & Varde. Name to the
office of Essen & Son in Luleo, receivers, and a person authorised to
receive the money demanded by Comrade Trotsky.
J. Furstenberg.
(Furstenberg was
a Jew and later, under the name Ganetsky became a prominent member of the
Soviet Government.)
This proves the
Bolshevik connections of the Jew Banker, Max Warburg, brother of Paul
Warburg, of Kuhn Loeb & Co., New York, who was the brother-in-law of Jacob
Schiff, the head of that all-Jewish firm, who hated Russia so virulently
that he would not render the Allies any help in raising loans, until Russia
was out of the war. If any further proof of the interworking of Jewish finance with the Bolsheviks is needed, the case of the Bolshevik non-Jew Krassin (married to a Jewess), can be cited. Krassin had been involved in a revolutionary plot in 1907; he was then employed by Siemens Schuckert which is affiliated to the A.E.G., the big electrical combine, of which the Jew Rathenau was President. In 1909, Krassin became director of the St. Petersburg Branch. In 1917, he was in Stockholm with the Jew Furstenberg (signatory of the letter quoted above) and travelled with him to Berlin, and when the Bolshevik Revolution broke out, he took up his old job with Siemens Schuckert, whilst at the same time, Lenin placed him at the head of five Soviet Government Departments, including transport and food supply. The intermingling of this Soviet official with Jewish financiers outside Russia is thus proved up to the hilt.
So highly did the
Soviet Government prize the assistance of Kuhn Loeb & Co., the Jewish
Bankers of New York, that they gave royal welcomes to the super-capitalist
representatives of that firm when Felix Warburg visited Russia in 1927, and
Mrs. Otto Kahn in 1931. The alliance of Jewish Finance with Bolshevism was
as complete as it was when Disraeli wrote in 1852, as above quoted.
A significant
statement was made by Lord Apsley in the House of Commons on 23rd March,
1938; after pointing out that Russia was now the second greatest
gold-exporting country in the world, he went on:—
“The shortage of gold of a few years ago had
been overtaken and with the dismissal from office and power of M. Trotsky,
who always kept in close co-operation with those who were interested in
the production of gold, Russia reversed her policy of keeping her
gold-mines out of employment, and became a great producer of gold.”
Who are “those
interested in the production of gold”? The answer must be RICH JEW BANKERS.
(Trotsky is a Jew, of course.)
Not only was this
Bolshevik Jew, then, “in close co-operation” with rich Jews, but he had
acted as a brake upon Russian production of gold to maintain the virtual
monopoly of production of that metal under their control.
On 4th April,
1919, this was admitted in “The Jewish Chronicle,” which stated,
“There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many
Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many
points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.”
Israel Zangwill,
in an address praised “the race which has produced a Beaconsfield, a
Reading, a Montagu, a Klotz, a Kurt Eisner, a Trotsky.”
In Russia, “anti-semitism” is a crime
punishable by death.
On 9th August,
1918, Lenin signed an order of the Council of People's Commissars
instructing “all Soviet Deputies to take uncompromising measures to tear
the anti-Semitic movement out by the roots. Pogromists and pogrom-agitators
are to be placed outside the law.”
All that is because Bolshevism is Jewish.
The Jews, trying
to prevent the recognition of this elementary fact, have from time to time
published false stories about the hardships endured by the Jews at the hands
of the Soviet. Chief Rabbi Gluskin and five other Rabbis, however, denied
these tales in an appeal to Jews throughout the world not to support foreign
agitation against the Soviet Government of Russia; this appeal was published
at Moscow, on 27th February, 1930, and contained the following
statements:—“The Soviet Government is the only one conducting an open fight
against anti-semitism”; “it abolished the shameful laws which limited Jewish
rights.” The reader is reminded of the Christian persecutions in
Russia under the Soviet.
Huge areas in the
Crimea and Biro Bidjan have been allotted for exclusive settlement by Jews;
these new “Homes for the Jews” have been failures, because the Jew cannot
work; but, nevertheless, the intention of the Soviet is clear. The Jews have
been specially favoured.
1n February,
1932, the Jew I. Montagu spoke in Manchester on “Russia” under the auspices
of the “Friends of Soviet Russia.” He stated that the alleged oppression of
the Jews there by the Soviet was an offensive lie. The Soviet had liberated
all Jews from the disabilities imposed under the Tsar. Again, speaking
before the Jewish Literary Society, 14th October, 1934, he said that Jews
were given priority in employment on new works in the Soviet Union.
Every Russian
soldier under the Soviet, bears upon his cap the Jewish symbol of control,
the five-pointed star. The same emblem has now replaced the double-headed
eagles on the pinnacles of the towers of the Kremlin at Moscow. The Secret Council of War of the Bolsheviks, October 1917, consisted of seven Jews and five others, and the Jew Sverdlov presided over it. The “others” included Lenin, whose origin is doubtful although Russian authorities consider him to be a Jew.
“The power of the
Government lies in the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party and its
composition in 1918 was nine Jews and three Russians.” (R. Wilton, Times
correspondent, in Les derniers jours des Romanof, Paris 1921, p.
136.) By 1920, the Government of the Soviet Russia was made up as follows:—
Council of Commissaries
of the people22ofwhich17wereJews Commissariat of
War 43 „ „ 33 „ „
Foreign
Affairs16„„13„„
Finance 30 „ „ 24 „ „
Justice 21 „ „ 20 „ „
Public Instruction 53 „ „ 42 „ „
Social
Assistance6„„all„„
Commissariat of Work8„„7„„
Commissaries of the Provinces23„„21„„
Journalists41„„all„„
Among the
best-known Jews of the Soviet Government were Sverdlov, Trotsky, Kamenev,
Sokolnikoff, Uritsky, Litvinoff, Zinoviev, Radek and Kaganovitch. Stalin's
wife is a Jewess.
In no Department
of Government was the proportion of Jews less than 76 per cent., and
generally it was much more. This state of things has continued until 1938;
Foreign Affairs, Agriculture, Commerce, Traffic Control, Food (i.e.,
the absence of it), and Finance, were entirely under Jewish mis-management.
At the time of writing (Feb. 1939) it is evident that a gradual change is
taking place; a large number of Jewish officials have been “liquidated”
(executed) and the situation is obscure; the Jew Litvinoff remains at the
Foreign Office and the Jew Kaganovitch (Stalin's father-in-law) at Stalin's
right-hand. Meanwhile it is obvious that the Red Army has deteriorate to the
extent that it can no longer be regarded seriously as a fighting-force.
However, there are plenty of Jewish officials working up front below.
The
representatives of the Soviet Government abroad are always Jews; we in
Britain have been treated to a succession of these Jews, and at the time of
writing the Soviet Ambassador is the Jew Maiski. (1939).
As the Daily
Telegraph remarked on 9th April, 1937:—“Since M. Litvinoff ousted
Chicherin, no Russian has ever held a high post in the Commissariat for
Foreign Affairs.” The newspaper seems to he unaware that, according to the
late Russian General Netchvolodow, Chicherin's mother was a Jewess!
When the Soviet
Government ceases to be Jewish, it will cease to be Bolshevik!
How is it then,
that this plain fact has not been generally known to the British public?
Because the Jews have the money to suppress the truth, as they are doing
to-day (1939) about Hitler in Germany. Judge the extent of this power, and the evil of it, froth the following authoritative statements which have passed the Jewish censorship:—
(1) A British
Government White Paper, entitled “Russia. No. 1. A Collection of Reports on
Bolshevism in Russia,” was published in April, 1919. This contained a Report
from M. Oudendyk, the Netherlands Minister at Petrograd during the Bolshevik
revolution. This report was dated 6th September, 1918, and was sent by M.
Oudendyk to our Minister in Norway, Sir M. Findlay, who passed it on to Mr.
Balfour. The report contained these words:—“I consider that the immediate
suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not
even excluding the War, which is still raging, and unless as above stated,
Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to spread in one
form or another over Europe and the whole world, as it is organised and
worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy
for their own ends the existing order of things.” (Our Italics). So the Foreign Office knew in 1918 that Bolshevism is Jewish; M. Oudendyk at the time of writing his report was acting officially for the protection of British interests, as our own man had been murdered by the Bolsheviks.
But that is not the whole story. There is more.
This White Paper
speedily became unobtainable; and an abridged edition wits issued in
which the passage above quoted, but very little else, was eliminated from
the Netherlands Minister's Report. Photostats of the page in question
can be supplied to order from the I.F.L. at 2s. 6d. post free.
(2) The Jew M.
Cohen, writing in “The Communist,” Kharkoff, 12th April,
1919:—“Without exaggeration, it may be said that the great Russian
revolution was indeed accomplished by the hands of Jews——It is true that
there are no Jews in the ranks of the Red Army as far as Privates are
concerned, but in the committees and in the Soviet organisations, as
Commissars, the Jews are gallantly leading the masses of the Russian
proletariat to victory—the symbol of Jewry has become also the symbol of the
Russian proletariat which can be seen in the fact of the adoption of the Red
five-pointed star, which in former times was the symbol of Zionism and
Jewry.”
(3) W. Ramsbotham,
writing in “The Morning Post,” 24th Sept., 1919, from Odessa,
states:—“Some two hundred Bolshevist Commissaries were tried by
Court-martial (by the White Russians, A.S.L.). All of them were Jews.”
(4) Mr. R.
Wilton, Russian correspondent of “The Times,” for 17 years, and
living in Russia through the revolutionary period, wrote “The Jewish
domination is supported by certain Russians. They are all mere screens and
dummies behind which the Sverdlovs and the thousand and one Jews of Sovdepia
continue their work of destruction.” (The Last Days of the Romanovs,
p. 148.) (5) Quisling, in “Russia and Ourselves,” p. 56, 1931, states “ordinary people in Russia, look upon Jews and Bolshevists as practically synonymous.”
(6) “One of the
facts we marked very soon in our adventurous career was the large number of
Jews who occupy positions of trust and influence in the Revolutionary
Administration.” (Mrs. Philip Snowden in Through Bolshevik Russia, p.
27.)
(7) The “Jewish
Chronicle,” 6th January, 1933, p. 19, says:—“Over one-third of the Jews
(in Russia) have become officials.”
(8) The following
are extracts from an address by Major M. Schuyler on 11th January, 1920 at
the Church of St. John the Evangelist, New York City, he having just
returned from service in the U.S.A. Army in Siberia, where it was supposed
to be assisting the White Russian Admiral Kolchak against the Red Army of
Revolution:—“The Government of Russia is almost entirely Jewish, and our
U.S.A. Army in Siberia was full of Bolshevist Jews straight from Moscow.
They lead entered the U.S. and enlisted in the U.S. Army going to Siberia.
General Graves the Commander, had a staff that was almost entirely Jewish.”
“Owing to the Bolshevist Jews in our army, all information that should have
reached Kolchak went straight to Moscow.” (Major Schuyler was three times
Consul-General for the U.S. during the old regime.)
(9) John Pollock
says in his The Bolshevik Adventure (Constable, 1919), p. 27: “The
Bolsheviks are for the most part not Russians at all, but Jews who had
suffered persecution at the hands of the Russian Government.”
p. 104: “By such
means (Bolshevism), the Russian nation has been reduced to a condition of
complete subservience to the rule of a comparatively small number of men of
almost exclusively Jewish extraction; aliens, that is, in blood, in
education, in ideals, and supported by alien force. The extent to which this
is generally recognized is shown by the common gibe in Petrograd: ‘Are you a
Commissar, or do you belong to the orthodox religion?’”
(10) “No less
than 82 per cent. of the Bolshevik Commissars were known to be Jews.” (Daily
Express correspondent, J. E. Hodgson, in With Denikin's Armies,
p. 55.)
(11) “When one
lives in contact with the officials who are employed by the Bolshevik
Government, a remarkable fact strikes one: they are all, or nearly all,
Jews. I am far from being an anti-semite, but I must state what I notice
everywhere in Petrograd, in Moscow, in the Provinces, in all the
commissariats, in the district offices, at Smolny, in the former ministries,
in the soviets, I have met Jews and yet again Jews. The more one studies
this second revolution, the more one is convinced that Bolshevism is a
Jewish movement . . . “ (L'Enfer Bolchevik à Petrograd, 1919, Paris,
by R. Vaucher, correspondent of L'Illustration.) In the German Marxist Revolutions of 1918, the Jews were the directors and strategists; the Soviet Republic of Munich was led by the Jews Liebknecht, Luxembourg and Eisner; the German Cabinet was dominated by the Jews Haase and Landsberg, assisted by the Jews Kautski, Alzech, Kohn and Hertzfeld, with the Jews Schiffer and Bernstein in charge of Finance, and the Jews Preuss and Freund occupying the Secretariat of the Interior. In Prussia, the Ministry of Justice was all Jewish, headed by Rosenfeld; the Interior and Finance Ministries were held respectively by the Jews Hirsch and Simm. In Saxony, the leading lights of the Government were the Jews Lipinski and Schwartz; in Wurttemberg, the Jews Talheimer and Heimann; in Hesse, the Jew Fulda. The Jew Kurt Eisner boasted that he and ten other Jews had made the revolution; Lowenberg, Rosenfeld, Wollheim, Rothschild, Arnold, Kranold, Rosenhek, Birenbaum, Reis and Kaiser. The chiefs of Police of Berlin, Frankfort, Munich and Essen, and the heads of most of the Soldiers' and Workmen's Councils were Jews.
That is why
Hitler cleanses Germany of Jews; but you cannot learn that from our
Jew-controlled Press.
The Hungarian
Bolshevik Revolution, too, was Jewish. There were only 1½ million Jews in
the population of 22 millions, but 18 out of the 26 Commissaries of the
Soviet Government in Hungary were Jews. Bela Kun (Cohen) was the Jewish
beast who led them.
The Chinaman is
not built for “Communism.” The brigandage which masqueraded under the name
of Communism in China, was run from Moscow and the principal agents were the
Jews Borodin and Abraham Cohen. Japan will stamp it out; that is why the
Jew-run Press of the world does all it can to discredit Japan in the minds
of its readers.
The Spaniard,
too, is not built for “Communism.” But the ground for it was prepared under
the Republic by the Jews Zamora, Maura and De los Rios, who controlled the
Government just as Kerensky, another Jew, prepared the way, financed by
Jacob Schiff, head of the Jew banking firm of Kuhn Loeb & Co. of New York,
for the Lenin Government in Russia. It was the Jew Bela Kun, already
mentioned above in connection with Hungary, that directed the beheading of
priests and the raping of young girls in the streets of Madrid; he and other
Jews sent from Russia instigated the outrages that made the great patriot
General Franco take up arms to save his country's civilisation. The full
story will come out when Franco has won all Spain. Hitler, in his speech on
14th September, 1937, said:—“The great Russian Empire fell a victim to a
handful of Jews who in Spain are directing the civil war through the
Valencia Government usurpers.” Red Spain has been armed by international
Jewry, and even the International Brigade Command has been Jewish, General
Kleber's real name being Lazar Fekete-Schwartz. A very large proportion of
the Brigade itself is Jewish, and the American Hebrew, 7th January,
1938, admits that there were 3,000Jews in it and that one-third of the
Abraham Lincoln Brigade on the Madrid front consists of Jews. The Red
Government is nicknamed in Spain the “Committee of Wandering Jews.” Finally,
the reason why the British reader is hardly ever able to hear a good
word about Franco, and why he hears nothing of the Bolshevik bestiality of
the Jewish Reds, is itself Jewish; the Jews govern the Press, the ships that
Franco bombs are chiefly Jewish, not British, and even our Consuls in
Franco's Spain are Jewish as the names connected with the Consular Bag
affair indicate. (See our pamphlet, Jewish Press Control, 2½d. post
free.) ALWAYS, JEWISH MASONRY HAS
PREPARED THE DEBACLE.
That is why
Hungary, Italy, Germany, Portugal, Turkey, Poland and other countries have
stamped out Masonry. See our pamphlets,Freemasonry(3½d. post free)
and The Growing Menace of Freemasonry (4½d. post free). Bolshevism is Jewish. Its object is to gain world control for Jews, through the combined and allied forces of Jewish Finance and Jewish Marxism. In Russia, revenge has been the moving factor. (End of Book)
THE ERA OF WORLD RUIN! (The Era of Democracy)
The claim of the Jews that they installed Democracy for the express purpose of ruining the Gentile world.
THE words, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity which are sometimes summed up in the word “Liberalism” have a noble sound and appearance. Are they not above criticism? Yes, but only when each one is in its right place: Liberty where Liberty can be exercised with intelligence, Equality where Equality really exists, and so on. And yet, in the domain of politics these words are, as will be shown in the course of this Note, anathema to anyone acquainted with their origin and with the evil purpose to which they have been applied, and with the results of their use. The main result of their use has been the splitting up of countries into warring political parties. These parties are known collectively as Democracy. When Democracy holds an election, it is supposed to produce—at least we flatter ourselves that it produces—a Parliament which represents the best interests of the State. But as the majority of members are forced by their political Association to put the interests of party before that of the State, Democracy fails at the very outset to achieve its main object. So it just carries on in a disjointed manner, in a state of political warfare with itself. After each allotted span of Parliament's life there is a new election. And then we may find that what the State thought was good policy during the last five years was all wrong; at least the new Parliament says so, and proceeds to put things “right.” It seems curious that the State did not know that for five years it was following a wrong course, when it did what the previous Parliament told it to do. The explanation, of course, is that the State is not the custodian of its own mind; it has handed its mind over to Democracy. The State, in fact, throws itself into the melting pot at short recurring intervals, and proves by the condition in which it emerges therefrom that it has no body or consistency of its own, no essential principles, and that it is for ever at war with itself. What are we to say of such a State? That it is no State at all. At the very moment of writing these words, an apt illustration of their truth has presented itself. An election has just taken place in which the issue before the electors was “For the Treaty” or “Against the Treaty,” that is to say, for honouring the country's bond or dishonouring it. The fact that the party for dishonouring the bond has prevailed is not to our point; at the next election the position may be reversed. We are concerned with the position of the State as illustrated by these facts. Where does the State come in? Where does it materialise? The answer is “Nowhere.” When Democracy came in at the door, the State flew out at the window. Paradoxical as it may seem, when the part came in at the door, the whole flew out at the window. How are we to put the State back into its place, not only in Britain but in every country that has any respect for itself? Has this ever been done? Yes, in Italy. This is not going to be a “propaganda” in favour of Italian Fascism, but that is no reason why we should not enquire how Italy managed to achieve the object which we are now seeking. But you may feel inclined to say that Russia also has achieved the non‑party ideal. No; although there is a body of men exercising supreme control over that country without the use of Parties, they are international revolutionaries, many of them of foreign race, who control their subjects by means of terrorism. Their chief aim is world revolution and they are using Russia as a base for interfering in the affairs of every civilised nation. The State controlled by them cannot be called a State in the ordinary sense of the word. So we will return to Italy. and enquire how it managed to transform a country governed by Party into a country governed by itself—that is to say, by the State. What happened was that under the ignorant and futile Party Government of Italy in 1918, the International Communists, supported by Moscow money, were bringing to a head a long course of peaceful penetration of Italy's industrial institutions, and were preparing, indeed they had started, revolution. A group of patriots, calling themselves Fascists, were aware of the danger, and, being also aware of the rottenness, the do‑nothingness of their own Government, prepared to oppose Communism by force and to save Italy. As events turned out, they were called upon to do a lot of fighting and to sacrifice many lives. But they had their reward; they were acclaimed the Saviours of Italy and became the originators of the new régime which has now made the State supreme in Italy. They resolved that there should be no more of that ridiculous form of Government by Party which has wrecked and continues to wreck the body‑politic of many countries which in their ignorance and stupidity still adhere to it. But that is only half the story. The Italian Fascists would have found it difficult to erect the new edifice of State if the other important element in Italian life, Labour, had remained in opposition. But all that was best on the Labour side of Italian life came forward at that juncture on the patriotic side, the National side, the State side. Progressing along a path running parallel with that of the Fascists, the Syndicalists (that is the name by which they were known), had learnt wisdom. They had learnt to hate the Socialists and the Communists, recognising them as the creators of evil, the agents of outside international force, the upsetters of the life of the Nation and the State. On this common ground, Fascism and Syndicalism met, and, finding themselves complementary to each other, became fused into an organisation on which was founded the Italian State as we now know it; a State free from Party; all are now for the State. It is not necessary to give details of the new Constitution; we are only concerned in showing that a change over from Party to State Government can be achieved when the change of heart has taken place; that is to say, when the people, having learnt what is wrong with Democracy and why it has landed them in such an appalling mess, decide to form a State Government, the change of “Heart” will come all right, but only if it is preceded by an access of “knowledge.” How can that knowledge be obtained? How did the Italians obtain it? By simple commonsense observation of what was going on around them. It is open to the people of all other countries similarly situated to obtain that same knowledge by the exercise of that same commonsense observation; it does not require any superhuman effort; just a little opening of the eyes and sharpening of the powers of observation. Then it is possible for the people of other nations to see what the observing Italians saw. And what did they see? All the subversive movements for destroying the existing order of things carried out by the agency of Socialists and Communists; the fomenting of interminable strife between the sections of the Community who ought to be co‑operating with each other but are never allowed to co‑operate to any real extent; the “national” strikes which are found to be supported by “international” money from Moscow and elsewhere. And the intelligent observer will not fail to notice that many men occupying high and responsible positions in the Trades Union and Political Organisations, and even in Ministerial positions, are lending their aid to the subverters of the National life, some of them knowingly and for payment, others in consequence of the extreme vacuity of their political mind. The investigator will not find in the books on Italian Fascism any useful information regarding the prime cause lying behind the movements of the Communists. From other sources, however, we are enabled to explain how it came about that schemes of Government based upon the noble ideas contained in the words, “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” have wrecked the world. There is no shortage of wealth in the world; the present is a time of plenty, and the physical and mechanical means for distributing that Plenty are extraordinarily efficient. But the world has become unworkable. Somebody is continually putting on the brake, or throwing sand into the bearings, or interfering with the Works in some sort of way. As there is nothing wrong with the essentials, it must be in one of the auxiliary processes of Industry, Trade or Finance that we shall find the obstruction. A semi‑official account of Italian Fascism will be found in “Survey of Fascism,” the year Book of the International Centre of Fascist Studies, 1928, published by Ernest Benn, Ltd., Bouverie House, Fleet Street, London, .E.C.4. First, however, let us enquire how far and in what respects the Democratic form of government has been responsible for these troubles. That form of government is based on the idea that all men are EQUAL and can be trusted if given full LIBERTY (by means of the Franchise of course), to elect to Parliament men who are capable of upholding the interests of the State, and who are not panderers to the wishes of those outside International wire‑pullers who are for ever trying to destroy the State. As this Democratic form of Government, when put to the test has brought many countries into a condition bordering on chaos, there must be some flaw in the “Equality, Liberty” slogan. Our next step must, therefore, be to trace the authors of the slogan. In quest of this information, we were referred to certain books on Continental revolutions and Freemasonry, showing the connection between the two. In these books, beginning with a few years before the first French Revolution of 1789, we find the history of Europe being shaped by the Members of Secret Societies. All the originators of the revolution of 1789 were Freemasons. We read that on the 10th of August, 1792, the revolutionary leaders made their watchword “LIBERTY, EQUALITY, FRATERNITY.” So that identifies the cry with Freemasonry. But all Continental Freemasonry is Jewish. Dr. Israel Wise has written in the “Israelite of America,” as follows: “Masonry is a Jewish institution whose history, degrees, charges, passwords and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.” So the final identification is “Masonic and Jewish.” Carrying our investigations along that line, we were further advised to read part of a chapter in a book called “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” (a book which has been declared by the Jews to be a forgery), in which we would find the slogan definitely claimed by them as their own invention. We read the portion indicated, beginning with the words:— “Far back in ancient times, we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.’” We were so astonished at the context of these words that we proceeded to read the whole book. And then? Then there was unfolded to our view not only the evil purpose lying behind the misuse of the words, “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” but also the origin of all the world's social, financial and economic troubles. We found from the Protocols that there had been laid down, many centuries ago, an elaborate plot for undermining the power and position of all the Gentile nations so that they might fall into such chaotic confusion financially and economically, that they would in sheer despair allow the Jews to take in hand the Super‑government of the world. The nature of the undermining movements is explained in considerable detail. The invention of the slogan, “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” is only one of those details. We will now complete the quotation regarding its origin and the evil purpose behind it:— “Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words, ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.’ The would‑be wise men of the Gentiles, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractness; did not note the contradiction of their meaning and inter‑relation; did not note that in nature there is no equality and there cannot be freedom; that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters and capacities; never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself . . . . In all corners of the earth the words ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’ brought to our ranks whole legions who bore our banner with enthusiasm. And all the while these words were cankerworms at work boring into the well‑being of the Gentiles, in putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the Gentile States.” The Jews seem to have packed into this small space a whole mine of wisdom. How true their comments on the non-existence of Equality! How true their comments on the cruel use to which the slogan of “Liberty” has been put. Is anyone prepared to question their verdict on the folly of nations allowing themselves to be governed by “upstarts” from the mob? After making a close and detailed examination of what they have to say on the other follies of Gentile administration, we must confess ourselves unable to find a single flaw in their statements. Not only are they stating the unadulterated Truth, but they state it in terms replete with wisdom. But we were told by those who recommended this book to us that it had been branded as a forgery by the Jews. What! Is it possible to forge Truth and Wisdom? Our fears were allayed when we discovered that the charge of forgery was fastened not upon the truth or otherwise of the statements made in the book, but upon the source from which that material had been obtained. The question of source need not stand in our way. The source of “The Wisdom of Solomon” is disputed, but that does not prevent us from reading it to our intellectual and spiritual satisfaction. Similarly it is open to everyone to learn Wisdom from the Protocols; they are full of it! The Protocols deal with three main subjects:— 1. The details of the plan by which the Jews are undermining Gentile dominion. 2. The stupidity of the Gentiles which facilitates the progress of the plan and has now brought it to a successful issue. 3. The form of government which the Jews intend to set up when they attain world dominion. These three subjects are intermingled in a series of lectures which taken collectively form a progress report delivered to the Elders of Zion at Basle in 1897, on the occasion of the first Zionist Conference. The lecturer was Theodore Herzl, the then leader of Zionism. He complained, and left it on record, that his communications had not been kept secret. In 1902, copies of some of his lectures were carried into Russia and in 1905 they were published; they were republished in 1917. As regards the details of the plan we must leave the reader to study the Protocols. He can obtain the Marsden edition from us. For the purpose of this Note we wish to pursue the second main point which is so well brought out in the Protocols, namely, the stupidity of the Gentiles. This is a matter bearing very directly on the question of Democracy which we discussed in the early part of this Note. We showed how Italy had avoided a great national danger by abolishing the idiotic rule of Demos, the rule of Parties. Let us see hat view the Protocols take of this matter:— “A people left to itself, i.e., to upstarts from its midst, brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit of power and honours and the disorders arising therefrom.” “It is necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the instability of the mob, its lack of capacity to understand and respect the conditions of its own life or its own welfare.” “The blind cannot lead the blind without bringing then into the abyss. Consequently members of the mob . . . cannot come forward as leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin.” “The idea of Freedom is impossible of realisation because no one knows how to use it with moderation.” “Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions or whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external forces . . . it is in our power.” And there are many other statements of a similar nature, all of which are true and all of which say, in effect, that Democracy lands the distracted State eventually in the hands of the Jews. And thus we see that the argument which we set out to develop against the Democratic form of Government is found to be in full accordance with Jewish ideas. We could not have come to a more competent authority. In conclusion, let us show the intimate connection that exists between the Socialists, Communists and the Jewish world‑domination movement. When the Bolshevists siezed Russia in 1917 they were assisted by many brands of revolutionaries. By which section did they elect to be represented? By the Communists. Who were the people that the Fascists had to eject from the revolutionary power in Italy? Communists. Can the Protocols throw any light on the connection? Yes, in Protocol No. 3 the Jews refer to:— “our fighting forces—Socialists, Anarchists, Communists—to whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry.” And yet an intelligent (?) country like Great Britain actually gives these people the full freedom of the country, and allows them to be elected to Parliament. It even raises Socialists to the Peerage imagining that “Liberalism” demands the exercise of such stupidity. In this Note we have shown the false nature of the thing called Liberalism. We have shown where its component parts, “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” came from, viz.: from the Jews. Finally let the Italians pour the vials of their contempt mixed with pity upon those peoples who are still so blind that they cannot see the wreckers of their country working their Satanic purpose through the agency of Democracy:— “Those peoples who are still working in the maelstrom of Liberalism, Democracy, elections and Parliaments are for the Italians of to‑day like shipwrecked mariners beyond the reach of succour whose agony may be descried from the shore.” (End of Book)
In
His Service: Contact
Editor | Bible
studies | Newer
students |
Bible Q
& A's
| Study
tools
| Search
our site NOTE: To insure quality and content integrity, these In-depth Bible Studies are © copyrighted and may only be downloaded for study and shared private use. They may not be reproduced or distributed for sale or publication without prior written approval. Other Christian Web sites are welcome to link up to this Website or any page on it. |
