Title:
WHO IS TRUE ISRAEL? by the late Col. Jack Mohr, U.S. Army, Ret.
Date:
Jan 10, 2007. Source:http://www.scripturesforamerica.org/html2/jm0060.htm
Synopsis of relevance: Explains by Scripture why
today's so-called self-styled "Jews" cannot be the Israel
and/or Judah peoples of the Bible. Also shows by those same
fulfilled prophecies in Scripture, which exclude so-called "Jews," that
the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, and kindred peoples are the true descendants
of the Israel peoples of the Bible.
Commentary to follow after the below article.
WHO IS TRUE
ISRAEL? by [the late] Col. Jack Mohr U.S. Army, Ret.
Whenever it is declared that the United
States, Britain and other Nordic countries are Israelites, and
that they are the Chosen People of God, most Christians call
this false and without foundation. However, it is interesting to
note, that they refuse to give any Scriptures to prove this
reasoning is wrong. They always put us on the defensive by
demanding proof for our claims and in response, we give them
evidence from Scripture, history, etymology and heraldry. As a
reaction to the usual tactics of our opponents, the order has
been reversed in what you are about to read.
In I Peter 3:15, the Apostle admonished
Christians to ''be ready always to give an answer to every
man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you, with
meekness and fear." I'm afraid, that sometimes, we who know
the Identity truth, have a tendency to get "mean" and
"sarcastic," instead of remaining meek in our answers. The true
meaning of our Identity, should not engender a spirit of
superiority in us. Instead, it should bring a great deal of
humbleness, as we realize the tremendous responsibility God has
placed on us to spread this marvelous truth.
So let me ask - not with sarcasm, but with
humility. Can those who disagree with our belief that white
Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic and related peoples are the "true
Israel" of God, can they PROVE from the Scriptures that WE are
not Israel and that the people we now know as Jews are? Man's
answer to be true, MUST come from God Himself. It must not be
something he learned in a seminary, or from some man with a D.D.
behind his name. The only criteria we have MUST be, does God's
Word teach it?
That this issue may be clear at the start:
most Christians state that the Jew's and Israel are one and the
same; that the United States, the British Commonwealth nation,
and the Nordic nations are Gentile (in the sense of heathen)
nation, If their claim is true and the Jews, are the "Israel of
God," then they MUST FULFILL EVERY SCRIPTURE WHICH GOD SAID
ISRAEL WOULD FULFILL.. So let me ask you the following question.
I do not ask you to believe what I say, but be honest enough to
read and believe what the Word of God says:
1 - Have the Jews blessed all the nations
of the earth. Genesis, 12:3: 22:18?
2 - Have the Jews ever been circumcised
in heart? Deut. 10:16: 30:6; Rom. 2:28, 29: Phil. 3:3; Co.
2:9, 11.
3 - Have the Jews ever glorified Jesus
Christ? Has Christ been recognized by the Jewish nation?
Isaiah 41:16; Luke 1:32; 7:16.
4 - Do the Jews declare that Christ is
the GOD of Israel of the Old Testament? Isaiah 43:10-12;
44:8; 49:3, 6; 52:6: Acts 1:8.
5 - Do the Jews show forth the praise of
Jesus Christ? Isaiah 43:21.
6 - Have the Jews carried the gospel to
all the world? Have they witnessed for Jesus Christ? Have
they opened the Bible for the world? Gen. 28:14; Isa. 43:10;
44:21; 49:3, 6; Acts 1:8. Who has carried the Word of God
into all the world? Who has published the Bible, or portions
of it in over 1,000 language', and dialects? Who has been
responsible for over 95% of all the world missionary
activity? Which nations of the earth have based their laws
on God's laws? There is only one answer and you know it. It
has been the United States of America and the British
Commonwealth.
7 - Do the Jews have God's Spirit and the
Word of God in their mouth and their uttermost being? Isaiah
59:21. Oh no, my Christian friend, their religion is based
on a heathen book called the Babylonian Talmud, which
repudiates everything the Bible teaches. It is the work of
Satan himself.
8 - Was the New Covenant written only to
the Jews? The Bible states that it was made with the House
of Israel and the House of Judah. Jer. 31:33; Hebrews
8:8-10; Matt. 26:28.
9 - Are the Jews the SHEEP of the House
of Israel? Ezek. 34:11, 12; Ps. 78:52; 95:1,6,7; Isa. 53:6;
John. 10:26, 27; Matt. 15:24. In the passage from John 10,
our Lord clearly states to the Jewish rulers: "Ye believe
not, because ye are not my sheep." How much plainer must
the Word of God be for you to believe?
10 - Are the Jews the "children of God
scattered abroad?" John 11:52; 10:16; 7:35. Certainly the
Israelites "scattered abroad among the Gentiles," were not
Jews. When Jesus said in Matt. 10:6 and 15:24, that He was
sent only to the "Lost sheep of the House of Israel,
"He was not speaking of being spiritually lost. The word for
lost, as used here, is the Greek word: "appolumi," it
comes from two root words: "apo", meaning "separation,"
and "ollumi" meaning "death or punishment." Put the two
together and you have: "those who are banished or put
away for punishment. "This could only have had reference
to the ten tribes of Israel who had been taken captive into
Assyria, as punishment for their idolatry.
11 - Is Jesus being glorified in the
Jews? Isa. 49:3; Rom 8:28, 29; 11:1, 2; 9:4. Always
remember, there is a vast difference made in Scripture
between Israelites and Jews. They are not one and the same,
as your preachers have told you. To say they are is
"intellectual dishonesty'' of the worst sort!
12 - Are the Jews the SERVANTS of God?
Isa.41:8; 43:10; 49:3. The Jewish leaders them-selves say
that their God is "materialism." They do not believe in the
God of the Bible and their Talmud repudiates the God of
Abraham. Isaac and Jacob.
13 - Are the Jews a Holy Nation, a Chosen
generation, a royal priesthood, a peculiar people? (The word
peculiar means: "set aside for a special purpose.")Ex. 19:5, 6; 1 Peter 2:9, 10; 1:1, 2. Notice especially,
how Peter addresses his Epistle "To the strangers
scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Asia, and Bithtnia,"
in others words Asia Minor. These were not Jews, but
Israelites.
14- Are the Jews the great characters
mentioned in the "faith chapter" of the Bible, Hebrews) 11?
Abel was not a Jew, neither Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Jacob,
Sarah, Isaac, Joseph, Moses, Gideon, Barak, Samson, David,
Samuel. None of these were Jews. There were no people known
by the name of Jews, until 2 Kings 16:6, where the name is
used for the first time. This was in 742 B.C. at least 1,100
years after the death of Abraham. Oh I know that your pastor
has called Moses a Jew, but this is not what the Bible says.
15 - Are the Jews a "righteous nation?"
Isa. 26:2. If you will honestly check the record of history,
you will find that the Jews have always been a wicked,
unrighteous people. They have not been persecuted because
Satan hates them, as Jerry Falwell will tell you, for John
8:44 tells us that thy are of "their father the devil."
Satan will not persecute his own children. The Jews have
been kicked out of every nation in Europe at some time or
other and always for the same reason. Their wickedness,
their avarice, and their greed. I challenge you to look at
every evil which is destroying America, which is strangling
our freedom and at the top you will find Jewish names in
charge. This has been the indictment of all history against
these evil people they never have been a "righteous nation."
16 - Are the Jews bringing forth the
"fruits of the Kingdom of God?" Hosea 14:8; Matt. 21:43. In
the Matthew passage, Jesus speaking to the Jews clearly
states that the "kingdom of God (this refers to God's
earthly Kingdom) shall he taken from you (JEWS) and given
to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof."
Certainly the ungodly crew which is now in Palestine, is not
bringing forth ''the fruits of the Kingdom.
17- Are the Jews kind to strangers? Lev.
19:33, 34; Matt. 25:31-46. Today in Palestine, if are not a
Jew, you have no rights in the nation of Israeli. A
Christian has no rights and a foreigner, unless he is one of
the gullible Christians who is being brainwashed by a visit
to the Holy Land, is treated as dirt under the feet of the
Israeli.
18 - Are the Jews called the "sons of the
living God?" Hosea 1:10. They have absolutely no right to
this title.
19 - Do the Jews tell us that they are
"not God's People?" Hosea 1:10. No, they boast that they are
God's Chosen and that is why they have the right to the Land
of Palestine. But the Bible says: "in the place where it
was said unto them, Ye are not my people, there it shall be
said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living God."
20 - Do the Jews have all of God's Word?
Romans 9:3-5; Ps. 147:19, 20; Deut. 33:4. The Jews do not
have the Laws of Moses, for they have been superseded by the
heathen Babylonian Talmud, which is the Jew's Bible.
21 - Are the Jews a great and mighty
nation? Gen. 18:18. They number less than 3-million in
Palestine and more Jew's are leaving than are coming in.
22 - Are the Jews today as innumerable as
the stars of the heaven and the sands of the sea? Of course
not. They number about 16-million, the same number as were
alive in the time of Solomon.
23 - Do the Jew's "possess the gates of
their enemies?" Gen. 22:17; 24:60. Of course they don't.
They do not control the Suez Canal, or the Straits of
Gibraltar. They control only a tiny bit of real estate in
Palestine. They would collapse within six months if the
United States did not underwrite them. Their own leaders
admit that it is our aid that keeps them alive.
24 - Are the Jews a nation and a company
of nations? Gen. 35:11; 48:19. The Zionist State in
Palestine does not represent all Jews world-wide and it is
certainly not a "company of nations." The only group that
qualifies here is the Anglo-Saxon and related peoples.
25 - Are the Jew's above all people on
the face of the earth? Deut. 7:6; 12:2; Ps. 135:4; Amos 3:2.
There is no question that they would like to be. Their
leaders for centuries have preached Jewish superiority. But
today they are struggling to stay alive.
26 - Are the Jews now or have they ever
been "God's battle axe?" Num. 24:8, 9; Isa. 41:15,
16; Jer. 51:20-23. The "true Israel" of God was to be a
group of nations which would always war against evil. This
has never been true of the Jews, they have always been the
source of world evil. If you don't want to accept this, I
challenge you to look at the names of those who were behind
the Communist Revolution; over 90% were Russian Jews.
(Interestingly enough - Jew's who had not one drop of
Abraham's blood flowing in their veins, as is the case of
the vast majority of those who are now in Palestine.)
27 - Have the Jews had an earthly king
down through the centuries, who has been of the lineage of
David? If they are Israel, the Bible says there must be a
Davidic king among them somewhere. Ps. 89:27-29, 35-37; Jer.
33.17.They have not had a king since Jerusalem was destroyed
in 70 A.D. But there is a people who have had royalty dating
back to David. Whether you are willing to accept it or not;
they can be found in the British royal family. You or your
pastor may not want to accept this, but the proof is in the
archives in London.
28 - Are the Jews called today through
Isaac? (The word Saxons, is a derivative of the Hebrew words
which means "sons of Isaac.") Gen. 21:12; Amos 7:16; Rom.
9:7; Heb. 11:18.
29 - Do today's Jews claim to have lost
their identity? Hosea 1:9, 10; 2:6; Isa. 1:3; 42:19; Deut.
32:26; Jer. 50:6, 7; Hosea 8:8; 9:17. The Jews brag that
they are God's Chosen People but the Bible says that very
few' of "true Israel" will realize who they are.
30 - Do the Jew's have a new' name today?
Isa. 62:2; 65:15; Hosea 1:10; Rom. 9:25, 26; 1 Peter 2:10;
Acts 11:26. The people we now know as Jews, have been called
by that name since 742 B.C. But God's "true Israel," will
not only have a new name, but a new language, Isa. 28:11.
(And by the way, this is not speaking here of "glossolalia"
- "speaking in tongues.'')
31 - Are the heathen nations aligned
against the Jew's alone? Joel 3:9; Ps. 83. If you will take
time to do some honest studying, you will find that the
Communist nations of the world have not built up their
tremendous armaments to fight against tiny Israeli. They are
aligned against the white Christian world. This you know!
32 - Are the Jews described nationally as
a "great lion?" Gen. 49:9; Num. 23:24, 24:9. No, this
designation is made of only one group of nations, the
British Commonwealth.
33 - Did the Jews deliver Jerusalem from
the Turks in 1917? Luke 21:24. This occurred on the date
predicted in Haggai 2:18, 19, 22 -December 9, 1917, which
was predicted 604 years before the birth of Christ. It was
numbered from the first assault against Jerusalem made by
Nebuchadnezzar, plus 2500 years, see Lev. 26:18, 21, 24, 28;
Ezek. 4:6; Rev. 2:3; 12:6, 14. It was the "lions of Great
Britain" who rescued Jerusalem, another plus for the Israel
Identity people, but not recognized by a majority of our
preachers.
34 - Have the Jew's ever been called
"Great?" Gen. 12:2. Only one nation has, "Great Britain."
35 - Have the Jews released those who
have been in slavery? Isa. 42:7; 58:6. No, they have always
been "slave traders." It was the Jews who brought the blacks
to America in the first place and it was Jewish money, that
fought a phony war in 1860, over the slavery issue. It was
Great Britain who first abolished slavery, followed by her
younger brother America in 1865.
36 - Have the Jew's ever been a
colonizing people? Isa. 35:1; 49:8; Gen. 28:14. Only the
Anglo-Saxon and related peoples have been known as
colonizers, as they spread out to the east and west, north
and south as promised in Gen. 28:14. The Jew's have never
been great for going to desolate places and building them
up; they were always content to move in on established
places and cling to them like some bloodsucking leech.
37 - Lastly, do the Jew's recognize Jesus
Christ as God? The Bible says the "True Israelites" would.
Isa. 43:10, 12; Luke 1:68; 1 Tim 3:16; Acts 3:14. There are
many more proofs I could give. But if you are not willing to
accept these, no amount of proof would get you to change
your mind and it is under the control of a Satanic power
which will keep you from ever knowing the truth.
The separation of the twelve tribes of Israel
into the two kingdoms of Israel and Judah, seems to be the major
stumblingblock for our preachers and teachers. Few seem to
understand that these were distinct and very different peoples.
For about 400 years, all thirteen tribes (counting Ephraim and
Manasseh) were under one head, but after the death of Solomon,
when he had turned from God by marrying heathen wives, God told
him that the kingdom would be taken from him and given to
Jeroboam.
The Kingdom was split over excessive
taxation, with Judah, Benjamin and half of Levi, forming the
Southern Kingdom of Judah and the Northern Kingdom of Israel,
called Ephraim or Samaria. This Northern Kingdom was taken into
captivity into Assyria and was scattered beyond the Euphrates
River (2 Kings 17:6). The major part of Judah went with them (2
Kings 18:13). The remainder, except for a small portion known as
the "bad figs" of Jer. 24:8-10; were taken to Babylon. Of the
total number, only 42,660 at one time (Ezra 2:64; Neh. 7:66) and
about 5.000 at another time (Ezra 8:3-20) ever returned. Of this
group, many were not Judaites.
Those of Judah taken with Israel trekked
westward after Ephraim (Hos. 12:1; Micah 2:12, 13.) (The "good
fig" portion of Jer. 24:5-7 are probably Germany, as an incident
taking place in 1914 at the Battle of Mons, when 10,000 German
cavalry, charging British lines, saw the "White Cavalry" and
stopped, quivering. The riders were frightened, the horses
blinded and destroyed as predicted in Zech. 12:4.) The German
people have always been noted for their industrial and
scientific achievements and military poweress
[prowess?-WBSG] (See Gen. 49:8). World War I and 11, was
a fulfillment of Isa. 9:19-21 and Zech. 12:6.
All of the royal houses of Europe except one,
are of Germanic origin (Gen. 49:10; 35:11). The breach I between
these two branches of Israel will be healed as promised in Isa.
11:13; Jer. 3:18. German safety will come before that of England
and the United States to show us that we are not the only object
of God's favor. (See Zech. 12:7). (And this Judah, is not the
people we now call Jews.) In this connection, it might be well
for you readers to know, that according to Jewish sources, more
than 90% of the people in Palestine who go by the name of Jew,
have not one drop of Abraham's blood in their veins. They are
Khazar Jews from Russia and are Turco-Mongolians who were
converted to Talmudic Judaism in the Eighth Century.
If you are honest, there is only one
conclusion you can draw after researching the Scriptures and
history; this is that the people we now call Jews cannot be the
House of Israel, or the House of Judah and that they are not
now, nor ever have been Israelites. The modern day Jews are
frauds and imposters, who would like to steal back the
"birthright" their father Esau lost to his brother Jacob many
centuries ago. They are the "false Jews" of Rev. 2:9; 3:9, who
"say they are Jews and are not, but are of the synagogue of
Satan."
Who are you going to believe? Your pastor,
who has lied to you all these years, (very possibly not
knowingly, but he has lied nevertheless) or Jesus Christ the Son
of God, as revealed in the Bible? Choose today, who you are
going to follow!
The End
WBSG commentary, by Nick Goggin:
This is what is known as
British-Israelism and the now the almost-pejorative term:
Christian Identity teachings. The later term is swiftly
becoming a pejorative because the KKK and other White Supremacist groups
have adopted the teaching. But the teaching (lost Israel found in
Britain, America, etc.) is sound, regardless of what group
finds it true. The International Judaics have had a field day
destroying this teaching by linking it to "Hate Groups." Watch out
for that "guilt by association" tactic," the Judaics love to
utilize it, they even manufacture it falsely because it works so well.
After all, if, say, an "I love Adolph Hitler Website" says that
the sky is blue, you yourself would be hard-pressed to declare publicly
the sky is truly blue, because the International Judaics would say "Look,
this fellow believes what Nazi's believe, he quotes things found on
Hitler Websites! He must be a closeted neo-Nazi!" Never
mind that the sky really is blue. Now it probably has to be the
Judaicly-Correct "the sky is off-green." Er, I mean
Politically-Correct.
Pardon the indulgence, please.
However, there is some truth behind my above "slip of the tongue"
regarding the origins of Political-Correctness.
Political-Correctness is a concept lifted right off the pages of the
Jewish Talmud, where the sages (rabbis) debate and justify and
warp any argument or fact until right is wrong and up is down. Did
you know that in the Talmud, offering your children to Moloch is
actually justified? Moloch worship (called "passing [children]
through the fire") is the ancient practice of emolliating (kill by fire)
your first-born child as an offering to the (false) god Moloch; the same
false god Moloch which was written of in the Bible (where it is spelled
both as Moloch and as Molech variously). I really do
kid you not. Ask me, I shall produce the Talmud tractate to
prove what I said is true. Below is how God feels about this evil
practice:
Jeremiah 32:35 35 And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley
of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters
to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them
not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this
abomination, to cause Judah to sin. KJV
See also Leviticus 18:21,
Leviticus 20:2, 1 Kings 11:7, 2 Kings 23:10, Amos 5:26, and Acts 7:43,
for more Scripture on this false god Molech/Moloch, whose worship is
permitted in the Talmud.
Oh, why not take a moment and
document the point, I suppose; lest anyone think that I just sit around
here and make this stuff up (as though I ever could). But I am
tending to digress here a bit; after all, this is supposed to be about
Col. Mohr's article. Anyway, below are some pictures from my
upcoming book, The Coming Storm Called The Great Tribulation.
There is more on this in my book, but it is not ready for consumption, I
still feel that editing must be done before I start sharing sub-chapters
(which I do plan to pre-release on this Website, here and there, some
day).
Child Sacrifice Allowed
Today in the Jewish Babylonian
Talmud
In other words, by Talmudic logic, if a father brings
his child to the sacrifice site, but does not place the
child in the fire himself, but rather has (an idolatrous)
Jewish priest actually lay the child on the fire, then both
he and the priest are innocent; for, neither of them
preformed the necessary BOTH actions—one to give the child,
and two to lay him/her on the inferno. The rabbis
close their commentary at the bottom of the above facsimile
by saying "...proving that giving one's seed
[child] to Molech is not idolatry."
Didn't they consider that it was cold-blooded murder?
No matter how you slice it, their Talmud is pure
unmitigated satanic evil!
Back to our subject: Anyway, once
attuned to the Int. Judaic's tactic of (false) guilt-by-association, you
shall catch them using variations of this tactic against anyone
who exposes their world-conquest-for-satan goals. And neo-Nazi's
don't do us Christians any favors by believing certain truths, because
they smear us all by their agreement with us on some certain matters.
For this cause many of these so-called "neo-Nazi" (new Nazi) and "White
Power" groups are actually false-flag operations funded and controlled
secretly by Judaics, who put up an Aryan (White) front man for public
consumption. And that is why these KKK and neo-Nazi groups do some
of the stupidest and brazen things publicly (like marching around in
white sheets and hoods on the [Judaic] Jerry Springer's show, or
carrying signs saying "death to Jews," etc.)—it is the Int.
Judaic's way of defaming all White Christian groups. All Christian
groups, for sure, but most urgently the White Christian groups, because
of the eternal struggle between true-Israel and the "Jews," the roots of
which struggle reach all the way back to the Garden of Eden.
This is the same method that the
International Judaics use with Black groups, such as with Rev. (sic)
Jesse Jackson and the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition; Rev. (sic) Al
Sharpton, who is busy again trying to start Race Riots in New York as we
speak; and Rev. (sic) Martin Luther King, the Judaic-handled and
confirmed Marxist Communist, now American hero—as was Rosa Parks, by the
way. Both were "card-carrying" Communists. The famous "bus
incident" with Rosa Parks was staged, as was the case staged that struck
down the Texas Sodomy Law and almost catapulted in Gay-Marriage in its
wake (the Gay-sex scene was staged for Police to "discover;" doors wide
open, howling Sodomy in the bedroom, defiance and challenge once Police
broke them apart, and the disappearing "mysterious third man" in the
kitchen who called Police initially to the scene and left immediately
after Police rushed by him). And the the Roe-v-Wade case was
a manipulation of poor Miss "Roe" from to start to finish; she was
unwittingly hand selected for their test case (she is now a
public ANTI-Abortion activist, but the Judaic-controlled media gives her
no public exposure now. She has been used-up and cast aside, like
so many others).
And all the "lone Atheists" that
you see filing court challenges to have Christian symbols removed from
public venues because "Jesus offends their sensibilities"? They
are there in name only, chosen for their non-Jewishness, and paraded in
front of the television cameras leaving court (you've seen them) for all
the world to see that he is a weird looking "Gentile," and not a
Christ-hating Judaic. The Judaic-run (and founded) ADL of B'nai
B'rith, which is the principle (and I dare say lone) actor
(organization) in these cases against Christianity uses "Gentile"
front-men, but they finance the litigation, they select
the target, and then get an indifferent non-Jewish-looking guy to use
his name on the lawsuit (of course he is compensated for his time,
overtly or covertly). And worse, they have manipulated the laws
through their control of Law Makers, so that now after they win a case
having a Christian symbol removed, they get to bill the Government for
their "expenses" at God-knows-what per hour!
Get this: So what we have here, is
that the government (i.e., YOUR tax money, dear Christian) of
this Christian-founded Nation, is paying Jewish lawyers of a Jewish
not-for-profit (tax exempt) group, to fight "Atheist" "Gentile"
front-man's cases against Christianity, Christ, and any symbol of Him
and the religion. Smart little devils, aren't they? They
destroy the religion that they hate and provide tons of jobs for their
lawyer brethren to boot (oh, they place "Gentiles" in the high-profile
positions—they aren't that stupid. Although, ironically,
the leader is the Judaic, Abraham Foxman).
But all of these above things were
planned and used by the International Judaics to effect social change. Why social change, you ask? Because, after all,
the America (and world) of thirty years ago was nowhere close to
accepting antichrist (satan); but how about now? Or how about
after forty-two months of Great Tribulation? You know the sad
answer, friend. "We're" getting pretty close as a nation and
world, aren't "we?"
The method: First they remove
Christ and God, then they can insert their god satan in His place; in
fulfillment of (negative) prophecy, I might add. It really is that
easy. Can't be done, impossible, you say? Well consider
this: did not God Himself even muse: "Hath a
nation changed their gods, which are yet no gods? but my people have
changed their glory for that which doth not profit." (Jer 2:11).
Jesus echoed the thought: "I tell you that he will
avenge them speedily. Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh, shall he
find faith on the earth?" (Lk 18:8).
And the beat goes on....
On a side note regarding Jack
Mohr, the good Colonel who authored the above article is now deceased.
He was a mighty servant of the Lord Jesus Christ, and may our God bless
him and his departed wife in the eternity—in Jesus Christ's precious and
powerful name. Col. Mohr is recognized as a bold giant in the
truth department, fearlessly writing twenty years ago of some of the
same things that we write here today. He was a true pioneer.
Was he perfect? Is anyone? Does WBSG agree one-hundred
percent with all his work. Of course not, that is not possible
with anybody. In fact, perhaps many of you here do not agree
with all that is written at WBSG, but you still read here.
And that is fine, I believe that every man and woman should have their
own mind and come to their own educated conclusions. And I also
believe that conclusions must change when and as new information comes
to light. So, work such as this is never-ending. Put down by
one, picked up by another, put down by him, picked up by still yet
another...on and on it goes until God says that it is time and all is
completed. For a list of more of the Colonel's written works, go
to The
Watchman's Corner, from where I have retrieved this present article.
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
________________________________________________________________________ [P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our
MAILING LIST]
God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful
name! Nick Goggin
Title:
[AIPAC] The Israeli Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy
(w/video)
Date:
Jan 10, 2007.
Synopsis of relevance: To put it succinctly:
Whoever controls our politicians, controls the government. Whoever
controls the government controls the entire nation. Whoever
controls America controls a great part of the planet Earth.
Often we can find ourselves making statements like "The
International Judaics control all media," or, "The International Judaics
control American policy and government—both parties," or, "They control all
money supplies through their global banking networks," or, "They control all
media in the Western Nations and a great portion of it in other nations,"
or, "Social Movements/Revolutions; Major Wars; Big Pharma;
Micro-Biology; Agriculture; Education; FEMA/Homeland Security, including
their counterparts in European and other Western 'Christian' Nations; etc.," without stopping every now and again and offer some documentary
evidence for those claims. Long-time readers here at WBSG (and many
many other informed people who do not happen to read here) have seen the
many lists and articles and documents, and other indisputable (and
overwhelming) evidence for these types of statements; but we who do
know these things must remember that there are always new people coming
on-board who do not have that solid foundation of fact and information to
draw upon.
It is for that reason that I am going
to be populating these new (revived) News and Current Events pages
with foundational research, articles and evidences of the many things that
we speak of here, as those mentioned in the paragraph above. That way,
when any reader finds a statement or premise a little to hard to believe, or
simply would like to have a place to refer others to, we can simply direct
them here to an article or study that will clear the matter up for him/her
without having to constantly repeat information in the many different
articles on the Website. That should help to avoid the "topic-drift"
that seems to me to permeate the studies here. Although there is a
certain value in redundancy, which is why God gave us four Gospels, where
man would have put it all into one. God is so much smarter than man,
is He not?
Anyway, all that most everyday-people, those who get
their information from the main networks and large newspapers (i.e.,
the controlled-media) have to go on is the propaganda and lies of those who
are trying to conceal their activities, and to conceal even their very
existence as an organized operable group, working in tandem, over
generations, with an articulatable plan to overthrow this world and bring
her under the heel of satan, the not long-in-coming antichrist. (That,
by the way, is a classic definition of a C O N S P I R A C Y, though I know
that people have been brainwashed into running as far away as possible from
anyone using the "conspiracy" word. But there truly is a conspiracy.
We must combat that ignorance and disinformation with truth and evidence.
Those who support us here take a hand in that noble work. Thank you.
We here at WBSG have many new readers, all in different
stages of knowledge and understanding regarding these endtime matters.
Some readers are advanced and could write informative articles here; others,
newer, just sit looking at their computer monitor with their mouth gapping
open in wonder. It is in that frame of mind that I offer the below
video which I feel is significant in illustrating the awesome power of
"Jewish money" in American politics. The notorious AIPAC (American
Israel Public Affairs Committee", the Israeli lobbying group) is
highlighted in this video; which is well, as it is one of the most visible
tentacles of the Judaic political-control octopus, almost or as powerful
perhaps than even the JudeoCons (i.e., NeoCons, who are themselves
predominantly Judaic, with a smattering of "Gentile-Zionists" thrown into
the spotlight for public consumption). This video is of all the more
value, I feel, for its impartial and reserved stance—as no mention of
AIPAC's many run-ins with intelligence and law enforcement agencies is
mentioned (see:
FBI
Investigation of AIPAC Reportedly Has Been "Expanded").
"Izoshy," who hosts this video on YouTube, supplies
the video's description at right. Running time:
10:13 Minutes.
You can read the transcript of the interview at:
Study Alleging Dominant Influence of Israeli
Lobby Sparks Heated Fallout (May 24th, 2006).
VIDEO's
DESCRIPTION
In the recent study "The Israel Lobby and
U.S. Foreign Policy", the authors of the paper, Professor Stephen Walt of
Harvard University and John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, charge
that the United States has willingly set aside its own security and that of
many of its allies in order to advance the interests of Israel.
In addition the study accuses the pro-Israeli lobby,
particularly AIPAC of manipulating the U.S. media, policing academia and
silencing critics of Israel by labeling them as anti-Semitic.
A new article in the New York Review of Books examines the controversial
report and the reaction to it. It's called "The Storm Over the Israel
Lobby." It was written by media critic Michael Massing, who joins Amy
Goodman for the interview.
Michael is a contributing editor of the Columbia Journalism Review and
frequently writes for the New York Review of Books.
However, it isn't just clandestine lobbying (bribery)
outlets, but now they have infiltrated our government to the highest levels.
Below is a screen-capture of the
web version of the
article from the January 9th, 2007 edition of the Jewish news agency, Haaretz; and below the picture is the text of the original article
itself. (Note: the name of the news agency Haaretz means in
Hebrew literally "
THE
Land" i.e., Israel in this case. " haa'
" [
] being the definite article (The, This; as opposed to a, or an, );
and "erets" [Strong's Heb. #776] being
variously: land, ground, place, nation, world.)
Complete text of the above article:
First thought on most Jewish Congress
ever: Wow.
Second thought: Oy
By Shmuel Rosner, Haaretz
Correspondent Tue., January 09, 2007 Tevet 19, 5767 Source:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/810011.html
Notes from the first day of
the most Jewish Congress
ever: It was an exhausting day of celebration for the party
(you know which party), the Jewish activists, the new members.
Forty-three Jewish legislators in Congress, but who's counting?
Notes from the first day of the most Jewish Congress
ever: It was an exhausting day of celebration for the party (you
know which party), the Jewish activists, the new members.
Forty-three Jewish legislators in Congress, but who's counting?
Record First thought: Wow,
so many Jews in Congress. A
record number: 43. That's huge. No wonder people are so
excited about it.
Second thought:
Isn't it too much?
Just 2 percent of the population and
13 senators out of 100?
Two percent of the
population and 30 congressmen? Aren't they going to draw the
attention of all the anti-Semites, conspiracy theorists, Walt and
Mersheimers of the world? Maybe a lower profile would have been
preferable?
Third thought: Is worrying the Jewish way of
celebrating or what? As they used to say - start worrying, details
to follow.
Six Six new
Jewish lawmakers, all Democrats, were sworn in
today on Capitol Hill. They come from different places and from
different backgrounds. Some represent areas heavily populated by
Jews, some areas with a negligible number of Jews. Will they thrive?
Will they survive? Today they seem mostly happy to be there.
Democrats Did we mention all the new
members are Democrats? Twenty-nine out of 30 Jewish members of the
House are Democrats, nine out of 13 Jewish senators are Democrats,
two are independents caucusing with the Democrats and two are
Republicans. Those who attended the
National Jewish Democratic Council
reception, House majority leader Steny Hoyer
included, will not forget this. If you had any doubt, most Jews are
also still Democrats (not that anyone had any doubts).
Jewish Nancy Pelosi
became the first woman speaker of the House, but that's not the most
remarkable thing about her (if you ask NJDC). She is the first
speaker to have Jewish grandchildren. That's history.
Women
And speaking of women, new congresswoman
Gabrielle Giffords
is the "first Jewish woman from Arizona" to be
elected to the House. She is also, well, how should I put it? It's
always nice to be reminded again that not all Jewish legislators are
older, balding, mustachioed men (did I just make an anti-Semitic
remark?).
Caucus
Some people think being Jewish is fashionable
now, and maybe that's why so many elected them as their
representatives. There's a reason to believe that the colorful
Giffords ("What is the
most interesting
or unique thing no one knows about you?:
Either that I used to race motorcycles or that I lived in a Mexican
Mennonite colony. Not at the same time, of course") can make it even
more so. She is engaged to an
astronaut
(bald, mustachioed) and generally cool. Maybe
she ought to join this new sub-caucus of cool Jewish women
legislators. Current member:
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (who also had a
reception this week,
attended by many Jewish activists).
Kosher
NJDC offered kosher food for their guests, and that's not very
surprising. But how about
Hillary Clinton making it kosher? [WBSG Note: there is evidence that
Hillary Clinton is a secret Jewess (crypto-Jew) on her grandmother's
side. See note below] Nathan Diament of the
Orthodox Union, celebrating his
new blog, was thankful. It is a "clear
mark of sensitivity," he wrote.
I wonder how is this going to work: Diament is
the lobbyist for the OU, and now also a blogger. Good lack Nathan,
that's a thin line to walk.
Israel Is it good for Israel to
have so many Jewish legislators? The Israeli ambassador to
Washington, attending the NJDC reception, got a warm introduction.
The Jewish legislators are
pro-Israel, they said. And the ambassador, Salai Meridor,
said that these are people who are committed - pay attention to the
order - to America, to the Jewish people and to Israel. That's more
than enough.
[End of article]
Note from above: Below is some documentation from
Texe Marrs regarding Hillary Clinton's crypto-Jewish roots. That would
explain Hillary's strong Socialist/Communist leanings (her book: It takes
a Village [to raise a child], and her push for Universal Heath Care; i.e., socialized medicine). Judaism
is
Socialism/Communism/Marxism/Bolshevism, or vice versa, better stated.
Documentation from Jewish sources:
"Some call it Marxism -- I call
it Judaism."
— The American Bulletin, Rabbi S. Wise, May 5,
1935.
"The Communist soul is the soul
of Judaism. Hence it follows that, just as in the Russian revolution the
triumph of Communism was the triumph of Judaism, so also in the triumph
of fascism will triumph Judaism."— A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry
Waton, p. 143-144.
"The Bolshevist revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way
in Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish
dissatisfaction, and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same
Jewish mental and physical forces, become a reality all over the world."— The American Hebrew September 10, 1920.
"According to the data furnished by the Soviet
press, out of 556 important functionaries of the Bolshevik State
[the USSR]
. . .there were in 1918-1919: 17 Russians, 2 Ukrainians, 11
Armenians, 35 Lets, 15 Germans, 1 Hungarian, 10 Georgians, 2 Poles,
2 Finns, 1 Karaim, 457 Jews.
As the decades past
by--after the fateful year 1917--Judaized Khazars kept a firm hand
on the helm of the government in the occupied land of Russia.
In due time they built a bureaucracy to their heart's desire."— Robert Wilton, a long time Russia correspondent for the London
Times, in his book The Last Days of the Romanovs.
"The Communists are against
religion (Christianity), and they seek to destroy religion; yet, when we
look deeper into the nature of Communism, we see that it is essential
nothing else than a religion (Judaism)."— A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Rabbi Harry
Waton, p. 138.
Naturally and as could be expected,
the International Judaics have unleashed a defamation campaign (frivolous
charges of AntiSemitism, of course) against Texe Marrs for having made this
information public, and have pulled the chains of their accomplices and
intellectual-prostitutes in the media to flood the internet with articles to
the contrary. Received by myself from Texe Marrs' mailing list on
6/Feb/2007 is this article:
Dear
Friends:
This is an email message that Texe received and
replied to, and we felt that you all might be
blessed by this information.
Jerry Barrett
From: <osu> To: <prophecy@texemarrs.com> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:10 AM Subject: Hillary
Dear Mr. Marrs: On your web site you claim that Hillary Clinton admitted
that she is jewish. I looked all over the Internet
and I can not find a source that says that she admitted
it. Do you have a source? Here is the only
article that I could find:
http://www.gothamgazette.com/books/livinghistory.php
Peace Maynard
[Marrs replies:]
Dear Maynard,
Please go to
the search engine google.com and type in these key
words: hillary clinton jewish yiddish grandmother della
rosenberg.
You will find a
large number of website citings of Hillary's Jewish
heritage, including the Jews' top publication, Forward (Aug 8, 1999),
The New York Times
(Aug 6, 1999), The Atlantic, The New Yorker,
randomhouse.com, etc.
Hillary first
proudly told a New York state Jewish audience that her
Jewish grandmother, Della Rosenberg, constantly spoke
yiddish around her home. But later, after word spread of
Hillary's Jewish roots, her campaign people tried to
ameliorate the situation by claiming that HIllary's
grandmother, Della Murray, married a Jewish man, Max
Rosenberg, but that Rosenberg was only Hillary's
"step-grandparent."
In actuality,
both the Murrays and Rosenbergs were Jewish, and that's
why Della Murray spoke predominantly in yiddish.
Of course, Bill
Clinton two years ago told a Jewish group in Great
Britain that if Israel were ever attacked by Arab foes,
he would personally enlist in the IDF (Israeli Defense
Forces) and fight on the frontlines as an IDF soldier.
Makes one wonder about old Bill's bloodline, too,
doesn't it? (Note that Draft Dodger Clinton refused to
serve in the United States army!)
All God's Best,
Texe Marrs
If
you would like to be removed from our mailing list,
please reply with REMOVE in the subject line.
Interesting if true! Why? Need the reader
really ask? And as a side note, in my own research for my upcoming
book I came across evidence that Hillary Rodham (Clinton) is blood-related
to F.D.R. (Pres. Roosevelt)—a known crypto-Jew US President. I just
don't have that information at my fingertips right this moment to document
it here for the reader. But even without Hillary—my what a small world
this is! Jews claim to only constitute 2% of the population of the
United States of America [per correspondent Shmuel Rosner;
Haaretz],
yet we find Judaics and crypto-Jews all over the upper echelon of U.S.
government (Defense, Immigration, Homeland Security, Cabinet officials, the
spy/intelligence agencies, White House, monetary positions, military,
courts, Congress, budget, foreign diplomat corps, round table groups, think
tanks, exploratory committees, annalists, Political Action Committees, fund
raisers, lobbyists, "special interest" groups, and the often nameless
all-important but hidden "advisors" and "staff," etc.)—just as was
the case in France, Russia, Germany, Poland, England, etc, before
their national and political disasters in times gone by. Does history
not indeed repeat itself? And why is it that the same remarkable
people always show up in a nation's leadership and control apparatus right
before that perspective nation collapses internally and/or externally?
Internally like Russia, and externally like Poland.
Ecclesiastes 1:9-11 9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is
done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the
sun. 10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath
been already of old time, which was before us. 11 There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any
remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.
KJV
Peace to
you in Christ Jesus.
________________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our
MAILING LIST]
God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful
name!
Nick Goggin
Title:The current state of draconian Germany-style
"Hate-Crime" (Hate-Speech) Laws pending in the U.S. Congress
Source of original article: E-mail alert from
National Prayer Network (NPR).
Date:
February 23, 2007.
Synopsis of relevance: Most Americans
generally—and way too many Christians—are unaware that there is an
on-going effort to sneak "Hate-Crime" legislation into American law,
where it will then be enforced for dubious purposes by Judaic
functionaries within the U.S. Government.
Hate Laws sound good on the
outside; after all, who isn't against hate? However, The problem
comes in with who is defining what is and is not "hate
speech." All countries' Hate Crime legislation begins with
Hate ACTS, but saddled onto the various bills is Hate SPEECH, or
as they define it: "anything that may cause an unbalanced person to act
out violently or discriminatory." That cuts a wide swath, does it
not? After all, anything can cause some people to go
off—look at the "tree-huggers" who sabotage trees with hidden nails so
as to injure the lumberjacks whose chainsaw blades fling off upon
hitting one; and how about the Spotted Owl crowd? But these Hate
Laws are ever-expanding their scope, so that now it is a Hate Crime if
one merely "offends" a protected group. Note: Christians are never
a protected group in these legislations.
Canada already has heavy
Hate Crime Laws in place, pushed by the same Judaics (B'nai B'rith
[Sons of the Covenant] and its Anti-defamation League [ADL]) as that
pushed them into law in Germany, Australia, etc., and who have
currently entered legislation for German-style hate Laws in the entire
European Union body, and who are pushing paid-off ("lobbied")
Congressman in America to keep sending Hate-bill after Hate-bill for
vote, hoping to wear down American lawmakers into finally passing one.
In Canada TODAY, Christian pastors are being arrested and (presently
only) fined upwards of $5,000.00 for reading Old Testament passages at
their pulpit in their churches. The problem?
God's banning of homosexual sex in the book of Leviticus.
And make no mistake it; or rather,
make no mistake about two things about it; one, it
is almost exclusively Judaics who are behind getting these laws instated
globally; and two, these laws, while covering a growing
number of "protected groups" have as their core goal the destruction of
Christianity by first outlawing Christian values. This all feeds
into the endtime scenario of the Bible, where we don't see a discernable
Christian church in existence in the endtime, and the Christians that
are left then are heavily persecuted—even unto death. Observe some
recent developments, then after laying this groundwork we shall move to
the main article of this segment which covers the current state of these
"Hate" Laws in America in 2007:
LAW OF THE LAND Diss a 'gay'? Go to jail! Activists warn
Christians targeted under new 'hate crimes' proposal
February 15, 2007
By Bob Unruh World Net Daily
Two Christians in
Australia have been indicted for criticizing Islam, and another
for criticizing Zionism. A filmmaker has been threatened with
arrest for using the word "homosexual" rather than "gay." Now a
German priest faces jail time for publicly criticizing
abortionists, and in Holland, "fornicators" and "adulterers" are
protected classes and cannot be criticized.
All courtesy of the
concept of federal "hate crimes" legislation, which unless
defeated soon could be mandatory in the United States,
warns a rising chorus of critics.
"All that matters
are the delicate feelings of members of federally protected
groups," said Michael Marcavage, director of
RepentAmerica.com
"Truth is not allowed as evidence in hate crimes trials. … A
homosexual can claim emotional damage from hearing Scripture
that describes his lifestyle as an abomination. He can press
charges against the pastor or broadcaster who merely reads the
Bible in public. The 'hater' can be fined thousands of dollars
and even imprisoned!". . . .
...Worse yet,
there are some key phrases that open doors wide that many people
don't want opened. For example, Pike said, the bill is to
"prevent and respond to alleged violations," meaning "the
government does not even have to wait until a hate crime has
been committed but may act pre-emptively to 'prevent' crime."
Such cases
already have developed in other nations, where the "progressive"
effort to "advance" anti-discrimination laws are further down
the road, he noted.
Peter
LaBarbera, of
Americans for Truth,
noted that in Canada and France both, legislators
have been fined for publicly criticizing homosexuality. Three
years ago, a Swedish hate crimes law was used to put Pastor Ake
Green, who preached that homosexuality is a sin, in jail for a
month.
"And recently,
a British couple told how they were denied the chance to adopt
because it was determined that their Christian faith might
'prejudice' them against a homosexual child put in
their care," LaBarbera added.
Already in
the United States, Catholic Charities of Boston halted all
adoption operations in the state after being told under
Massachusetts' pro-'gay' nondiscrimination law, only agencies
that placed children in homosexual-led households would get
licensed by the state.
... Continued at link.
And again:
FAITH UNDER
FIRE
Pastors' convictions for quoting Quran overturned Case was
brought under version of 'hate crimes' legislation December 28, 2006 World Net Daily
Two Australian
pastors who were convicted of "vilifying" Muslims when they
quoted from the Quran during a seminar on jihad have had
their appeals upheld by the Victorian Supreme Court.
And while that means
they will return to a lower court for another trial, that
actually is a good result, according to a new report from Voice
of the Martyrs.
"In a sense we are
happy with this decision… It means this case will be kept alive
in the public consciousness," Pastor Danny Nalliah said in a VOM
report. "There's a need to keep these vilification laws in
sharp focus to reveal the problems this law is creating."
The Australian law was
imposed in order to prevent the denigration of people based on
their race or religion, and similar laws also have been
approved in Canada, where critics of the law say they include
sexual orientation and forbid pastors from condemning
homosexuality as a sin.Many of the "hate crimes"
proposals in the United States are based on a similar concept:
designating as "crimes" the statements people make about their
own beliefs or convictions. ...
Continued at link.
And it's not just Canada and
Australia, the Judaics are stealthily sneaking in these type of laws in all
the Christian Western Nations; observe Sweden in the below:
Today, I am asking
believers around to world to join me in praying for the trial of
Swedish Pastor Ake Green (left) before the Swedish Supreme
Court this Wednesday, November 9th. Pastor Green has been
charged with committing a “hate crime” for preaching a sermon
which presented the biblical position on homosexual behavior.
(At ADF, we are suspending all work for a few minutes to pray
for Pastor Green).
Unfortunately, this
“remote” case – on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean – may
directly impact you and your church – much sooner than you
think!
Pastor Green
preached a sermon in his small church in Borgholm,
Sweden, in which he discussed what the Bible has to say about
homosexual behavior. His sermon (which can be read at:
www.akegreen.com/sermon_transcript.htm) concluded with a strong
message of God’s grace and love for those trapped in sexual
confusion. He said: “What these people need, who live under
the slavery of sexual immorality, is an abundant grace. It
exists. Therefore we will encourage those who live in this
matter to look at the grace of Jesus Christ. We cannot condemn
these people. Jesus never belittled anyone. He offered them
grace.”
The sermon was
published in a local newspaper and very shortly thereafter
Pastor Green was prosecuted under Sweden’s “hate crime” law
for “causing offense” to the homosexual community. The
prosecutor, Kjell Yngvesson, said: “One may have whatever
religion one wishes, but this is an attack on all fronts against
homosexuals. Collecting Bible citations on this topic as he does
makes this hate speech.”
On June 29, 2004,
Pastor Green was sentenced by a district court to one month’s
imprisonment for his sermon. Soren Andersson, the president
of the Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and
Transgender Rights, said that Green’s jail sentence
demonstrated that religious freedom could never be used as a
reason to “offend people.” ... Continued at link.
They want Christians to basically
throw away their Bibles—or go to jail defending them! Persecution,
anyone? There are literally scores of stories like the above that most
Christians are unaware of because the Judaic-controlled media gives them no
attention in the mainstream media outlets (just like there is near-zero
coverage of the thousands of Christians being persecution to death in
Africa, Asia, and the Middle East in mainstream media globally). And
it is not just the Old Testament that the Judaics wish to do away with, nor
is it only Homosexual agendas and pro-Islam protection that are driving
these Hate laws, nor is it far from home; observe:
Evangelical lovers of Israel would never believe that our
government could consider them anti-Semitic. Yet the U.S.
State Department's new "Department of Global Anti-Semitism"
now defines anti-Semitism in a way that makes Bible-believing
Christians into anti-Semites. Here's how:
The State Department's 40-page Report on Global Anti-Semitism
cites a recent example of "anti-Semitism" in Poland.
"...the pastor of St. Brigid Church in Gdansk told parishioners
during services that Jews killed Jesus and the prophets."
(p.22) What's wrong with that? According to Jewish leadership:
plenty. Jewish leaders say it was this millennia-old accusation
that ultimately led to the Holocaust: to millions of Jewish
"Christ killers" being herded into the prison camps and gas
chambers of Auschwitz, Dachau, etc. "You can't get any more
anti-Semitic than that!" they protest.
[Wait till the rest of (non-Jewish) world wakes
up to the fact that there were no Homicidal Gas Chambers!
Now you can understand the Judaic's great urgency behind the
world-wide "Holocaust-Denial" laws and the witch hunts of
credible Historians, Chemists, and WWII Revisionists who present
absolute evidence against the "Six Million Gassed Jews"
$cam! The Holocaust
exaggeration is being exposed daily, all over the world thanks
to the Internet, and the more that the Judaics try to cover it
up with draconian silencing-laws, the more that they alarm
sensible people to the inconsistencies of the story. the
Internet today represents the International Judaic's worst
nightmare—freedom of speech. But not for long, as we see
in these articles and those below.]
IS
THE NEW TESTAMENT "HATE LITERATURE?"
Yet,
think about it. Isn't that accusation exactly what Mel Gibson
portrayed in "The Passion of the Christ?" Isn't that exactly
what the New Testament teaches in passages too numerous to list
here? Scripture says evil Jewish leaders, helped by Jews
gathered at the Feast of the Passover, collectively pressured
the Romans to crucify Christ.
From
the Book of Acts alone come powerful indictments of the Jews.
"...let all the house of Israel know for certain that God has
made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom ye crucified."
Acts 2:36. "Men of Israel...this man...you nailed to the cross
by the hands of godless men and put him to death." Acts 2:22,3.
"Men of Israel...Jesus, the one whom you delivered up...you
disowned...put to death the Prince of Peace" Acts 3:12-15. "The
God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye had put to death by
hanging him on a cross." Acts 8:30.
These
words - that the Jews killed Jesus - were spoken by the pastor
of St. Brigid Church in Gdansk, Poland. If he is anti-Semitic
according to the US State Department, then so is the New
Testament! So are you as a Bible-believing Christian!
NO
CHRISTIANS ARE SAFE
Most
Christians "spiritualize" the above Scriptures, saying we are
"all" guilty for the crucifixion. Yet it is clear that as long
as any Christians believes the "anti-Semitic" New Testament to
be the inspired word of God, he, also, is not safe from being
labeled "anti-Semitic" by our government. Christians can also
expect such derision from Jewish "civil liberties" organizations
such as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, which is
always eager to marginalize Christians into those our "tolerant"
society should disapprove of.
Even
Mel Gibson, who believes personally that we are all guilty of
the crucifixion, was not immune from attack by ADL as
anti-Semitic.
This is ominous for Christians because in countries dominated by
hate laws, such as Canada, public criticism of matters Jewish,
or "anti-Semitism," is a hate crime punishable by harsh fines
and imprisonment.
IS
PERSECUTION COMING FROM ADL/B'nai B'rith?
The State Department's Report on Global Anti-Semitism was not
written by the State Department. It was "ghosted" by the
international Jewish religious, educational, fraternal and
charitable organization, B'nai B'rith and its Anti-defamation
League. Only they could marshal such an extensively detailed
report from 50 countries, utilizing their worldwide "hate
crimes" statistics-gathering capacities.
Far
from being a "far left" kooky Jewish minority, not representing
mainstream Jewish attitudes, B'nai B'rith International
describes itself as the "body and soul" of organized Jewry.
Its half million Jewish members constitute a powerful
lobbying base, setting up anti-hate bureaucracies (and ending
free speech) in many of the more than 50 countries in which
B'nai B'rith is established. This anti-Christian, international
Jewish religious organization, uniting synagogue and state, is
creating a federal hate-crimes Gestapo. Its "Department of
Global Anti-Semitism" is laying down outrageous definitions of
the "hate crime" of anti-Semitism that make Bible-believing
Christians into anti-Semitic "haters." ...
Continued at link.
Mainstream Christian leaders and
Christian denomination governing bodies aren't talking about this, they
are instead pushing for Israeli support and sending money to Israel to
bring Russian Jews "back" to the State of Israel. And the Israeli
government compensates those Christian leaders quite well. Jerry
Falwell even got a free Lear Jet from Israel for his support of the
antichristian state.
The way that the Judaics have been
able to exploit out legal system is that when one of their "Hate Laws"
fails, they just resuscitate it under a new name with slightly different
wording, and find ($$$) another
Congressman to put his name on it and introduce it into the House and
Senate. On and on it goes, they keep creating Bill after Bill
until finally one day they shall get one passed. They are nearing
success now that the Republicans have lost control of Congress due to
political fallout over the Iraq War. Observe below:
For the pasteight years, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith
has tried unsuccessfully to pass its Orwellian federal
"anti-hate" bill. It has failed largely for one reason:
Republican control of Congress.
...Since no Democrat in
Congress has ever voted against the hate bill, it will pass.
Pres. Bush has said he will sign a "modified" hate bill. If he
does, free speech in America will quickly come to an end.
...Today, from Canada to
California, to Europe and Australia, ADL-inspired "thought
crime" laws are stripping nations of free speech. In Canada
and many European countries, it is a crime punishable by
heavy fines and even imprisonment to make use of the
internet to criticize federally protected groups, such as
homosexuals and Muslims.
A top Canadian "hate laws" senior
policy advisor recently described the power of her country's
"speech crime" tribunal courts: "The Canadian Human Rights
Tribunal is a quasi-judicial body. It can force a web to
shut down or risk a $10,000 fine--$20,000 in extreme cases.
If one ignores the Tribunal, one can be tried in federal
court for contempt, and risk a 9-month jail sentence for a
first-time offense." (Karen Izzard, quoted in Jewish
Tribune, Sept. 21, 2006)
English-Turkish cyber-hate expert
Prof. Yaman Akdeniz, speaking at a B'nai B'rith conference
on how to end dissent on the net, rejoices that David Irving
is behind bars. He said "continental European countries such
as Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Hungary,
Austria and Belgium have strong anti-hate laws, which have
resulted in the imprisonment of hate-mongers. In Holland,
657 websites were removed. And in Germany, more than 700
hate websites were shut down." (ibid)
In England, two men who publicly
described Islam as a "wicked faith" were indicted under
Britain's anti-hate law and are fighting to avoid seven
years in prison. The ADL-influenced British hate law
stipulates that truth cannot be admitted as evidence in
court. Only the complaints by members of specially
protected groups who say their feelings have been hurt will
be allowed. David Irving languishes in an Austrian prison
[for "minimizing the Holocaust"]
primarily because he was forbidden to bring truth to the
court in his defense. ... Continued
at link.
That last sentence above is as
significant as it is true; for, the hate Speech Laws work the same way. The way that Hate Speech Laws work is
that the truth of the matter is no defense for having
committed the "crime." I kid you not! Example: If in
one of these Hate Laws it is determined that saying, say, that "the sun
gives off light" is banned speech; and you should be caught saying that
"the sun gives off light"—you will be arrested, prosecuted and
imprisoned for violation of Hate Speech Laws—even though the sun really
does give off light! That is not an exaggeration, I assure you.
These Hate Laws are intended to alter reality—and to enforce the new
reality. Admittedly, they are only in their infancy now, but when
these laws mature, even speaking of Jesus Christ shall be banned as
"Hate Crime."
One more thing then we will move
to our main article. Earlier, I stated that the Judaics of the
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith are "pushing paid-off
("lobbied") Congressman in America to keep sending Hate-bill after
Hate-bill for vote, hoping to wear down American lawmakers into finally
passing one." But there is another perhaps more likely scenario
for them to get their Hate Bill passed. In times of national
confusion many laws are signed into effect without the public's paying
attention to them; like say, during an Iran attack, or another hotly
contested Presidential vote-count. And then there is always the
Presidential Directives path (Presidential Orders, or PO's), where the
President can sign one of these Hate Laws into law on his own.
Would a President fearing impeachment and criminal charges be obliged to
sign one of these laws into effect if the Judaics promised him it would
avoid that for him? What does he have to lose, what does he have
to gain? He already acts at their request (demand).
So this is definitely a subject
for any watchman to keep an open-eye on. Below is the main and
final article for this segment; I shall supply it without further
commentary. Note: I do not know the below clergyman's
denomination nor doctrine, therefore I cannot support nor object to his
Scriptural teachings, whatever they may be. I supply his below
article for its sheer value regarding the current crisis.
The (E-mail alert)
Article:
Subject:
ALERT- "Conyers May Introduce New Hate Bill in Congress" -Ted Pike Date:
2/22/2007 10:10:20 P.M. Pacific Standard Time
EMERGENCY ALERT!!
[2/22/2007]
CONYERS MAY INTRODUCE NEW HATE BILL IN CONGRESS
By Rev. Ted Pike
A "dear colleague" letter to members of the House, intercepted by
Focus on the Family, indicates that Rep. John Conyers (who heads the
House Judiciary Committee) is about to pull a fast one on America.
Conyers is soliciting co-sponsorship for his bill, The Local Law
Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007, (LLEHCPA). This
is the same hate bill that passed the House overwhelmingly in 2005,
but not the Senate. LLEHCPA is a much larger bill than The David
Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act, H.R. 254, and 8 pages longer.
It gives the federal government even more power to create a
bias motivation justice system, turning America into a police state.
1
I think H.R. 254 may be a decoy, designed to absorb the bulk of
protest from Christians and conservatives. Because of massive
protest, it may be voted down or set aside in Judiciary soon. But
Conyers will then substitute the bill that’s really wanted by the
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, architect of this
legislation.
So far, protest against H.R. 254 has come primarily from far right
alternative talk radio listeners. Conyers probably hopes these
activists are exhausted from calling since early January and won’t
significantly oppose LLEHCPA. Busy House members will thus receive
far fewer calls against his even more treacherous bill. Thinking it
is less controversial legislation, lawmakers will be inclined to
pass it.
Jewish
Activists Embrace New Hate Bill
Already, Jewish activists have abandoned H.R. 254 and speak of
LLEHCPA as their desired bill. The powerful Jewish Council for
Public Affairs (JCPA) instructs its many members and agencies to
meet with House members in their home states during the present
recess of Congress and pressure them to co-sponsor LLEHCPA when they
return to Washington February 26. Any new co-sponsors will then join
the large number of co-sponsors already attached to Conyers' bill in
the last session of Congress.
Conyers could reintroduce this bill very soon. Since Nancy Pelosi
and her compatriots in the House Rules Committee can speed any bill
forward for a House vote, even bypassing Judiciary altogether,
Conyers and Pelosi could almost immediately put LLEHCPA at the head
of the docket and up for a vote in the House.
What do we
do?
Large Christian/conservative organizations are very late in
impacting the House Judiciary Committee against H.R. 254. But, thank
God, protest to Judiciary members against the hate bill has been
heavy over the last 7 weeks. This is due primarily to e-alerts,
broadcasting, and educational tools provided by the National Prayer
Network and its truthtellers.org website. Our protest is now
strengthened by fresh reinforcement from Focus on the Family,
American Family Association, and an increasing number of other new
right Christian/conservative watchdog groups.
Does it matter if Conyers changes the title, bill number, or length
of the hate bill? Judiciary members and their staff are getting the
picture: Heartland America hates the whole idea of hate crime
legislation! Our protest has been a tremendous investment in the
future of freedom, because ADL and the Jewish lobby have at least
several more hate crime bills they intend to pass in this session of
Congress.
For now, our strategy should stand fast: Keep calling your members
of Congress, especially House Judiciary members. Give them the
message we have suggested since November: "Please do not vote for
any hate crimes legislation. Hate laws have taken away free speech
in Canada and many European countries."
If we continue to do our part, I believe Conyers’ plan will fail.
Busy and distracted as members of Congress are, they will recognize
his bill as hate crime legislation -- which a host of their
constituents forbids them to support.
Of course, NPN will closely watch events in Washington and alert you
as soon as Conyers acts. We hope he won't, but all who love freedom
should be ready to phone all 40 members of the Judiciary Committee
immediately and protest LLEHCPA under its new number.
Since Democrats control Congress and the legislative machinery, this
fight for freedom will be the most difficult we have yet seen. The
Jewish community, overwhelmingly liberal and Democrat, supports the
hate bill. So does the vocal and very well-funded homosexual lobby.
They may well attempt to push the hate bill through the House next
week before the conservative/Christian right can catch up. In 2005,
Conyers did successfully pass this legislation in the House in only
45 minutes!
This moment in history demands commitment and action from every
patriot.
But political action alone cannot save freedom. America has wandered
very far from its ancestral devotion to God and His laws. If there
ever was a time for humility before God, for fasting and prayer for
His deliverance, it’s now.
God promised that if His people repent from evil and trust Him, He
will turn back the enemy.
First, we must turn back to Him.
Endnotes:
1 The
entire text of LLEHCPA, with commentary by Rev. Ted Pike, is
available at
www.truthtellers.org. It is listed as bill
S. 1145 from the 109th Congress but identical to the bill Conyers
proposes currently. For the high drama account of how this hate bill
was repeatedly defeated in the Senate last session, click to "How
America Stopped the Hate Bill: Battle Not Over",
"Federal
Hate Bill Virtually Dead" and "Hate
Bill Defeated in Senate, Yet Danger Remains."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
HR 254 is presently assigned to the House Judiciary Committee, but
as a streamlined version of a bill that previously passed in the
House, it could race forward to passage very quickly. Call all 40
members, available at
www.truthtellers.org and protest.
Also call your House member and two state senators at
1-877-851-6437. Send them and their influential legislative aides
Rev. Ted Pike's flyer, "Anti-Hate Laws Will Make You a Criminal."
All this information is available at
www.truthtellers.org.
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
________________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our
MAILING LIST]
God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful
name!
Nick Goggin
Title:The Consequences of an Early Withdrawal from Iraq
Source of original article:
The Consequences of Withdrawal By Ryan Mauro of
WorldThreats.com. FrontPageMagazine.com | January
25, 2007.
Date:
February 25, 2007.
Synopsis of relevance:Below is probably the best analysis I've seen
to date on the consequences of an early withdrawal from Iraq.
The Article:
The Consequences of Withdrawal
By Ryan Mauro
Good news from Iraq is scarce.
Over 3,000 Americans have been killed. Iraqi casualties, depending
on which number you believe, are either in the tens of thousands or
hundreds of thousands. Progress has been stalled, mistakes have been
made, and the purpose of the mission seems unclear. Precipitous
withdrawal from Iraq has never seemed more tempting. But to yield to
this temptation would be a grave mistake. Leaving Iraq now will not
restore order to the country. On the contrary, a premature
withdrawal is likely to result in consequences disastrous not only
for Iraq and the wider region, but also for the cause of combating
Islamic radicalism and the health of the U.S. military.
The success of democracy in Iraq
threatens nearby tyrannies and empowers those fighting within
them. On the other hand, withdrawal would lead to a collapse of the
elected Iraqi government, and all the work done to bring democracy
to Iraq would be in vain. In southern Iraq, the “Islamization”
process would accelerate and sharia law would most likely be
implemented, stripping away individual rights, particularly for
women.
As Iran would grow more powerful,
the chances of a radical Shiite state being created in Iraq would
also increase. Such a state would oppress its own citizens and pose
a regional threat. Sectarian violence would spiral out of control,
killing millions of Iraqis, both Sunni and Shiites. Many
Iraqis would be forced to flee their homes as radical militias would
seek to create homogenous regions. Shiite terrorist groups like
Hezbollah would likely find safe haven and support.
Abandoning Iraq, therefore, means
watching from the sidelines while Iraqis are slaughtered and
neighboring states -- including Iran -- divide the spoils.
If such a scenario were to take
place, Iran -- the main sponsor of terrorism and a home to numerous
al-Qaeda leaders -- would grow in power and become the leader of the
region. It would become easier for Iran’s government, which denies
the Holocaust and has repeatedly called for the destruction of
Israel and the United States, to obtain nuclear weapons. The West
would also find its options to affect Iran’s behavior increasingly
limited. In response to the growth of Iran’s power, countries in the
region like Egypt, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Gulf states would
seek nuclear weapons (in fact, many of these states already indicate
that they plan to develop nukes). Already, Iran’s leadership has
expressed willingness to share its nuclear technology with other
rogue states like Syria and Venezuela.
This nuclear arms race could reach
another key battleground in the war against radical Islam: Africa. A
nuclear arms race triggered by American withdrawal may force Libya,
fearing its nuclear neighbors more than American repercussions, to
re-start its nuclear program. Insurgency in North Africa would
likely expand, as Iran may increase support to organizations like
the GIA in Algeria, furthering the civil war there. The United
States would not have the will to stop the genocide in Sudan. The
Sudanese government, an ally of Iran (and previously of Saddam
Hussein), may find hope in America’s withdrawal and increase their
brutal activities in Darfur.
In Latin America, Venezuela’s
nuclear cooperation with Iran would continue. The weakness of the
United States would further encourage the formation of an
anti-American bloc in South America, led by Cuba and Venezuela, that
would ally itself with Iran, China and Russia.
Asia may appear far removed from
the military theater, but even there the consequences of premature
withdrawal may make themselves felt. The perception of American
weakness could lead to a struggle for supremacy among rival Asian
powers.
With China ascendant, Japan would
have no option but to develop nuclear weapons. Two scenarios could
then arise: China would dominate the Pacific and America’s status as
a superpower would quickly recede; or there would be a region-wide
nuclear stalemate involving Burma, China, India, Pakistan, North
Korea, South Korea, Japan, and possibly Taiwan and Australia.
But most of all, withdrawal from
Iraq may prove very damaging to the U.S. military, as it would
likely lead to the collapse of morale among the troops. Senator John
McCain, a former P.O.W. in Vietnam, said it best recently when he
noted that “the only thing worse than a stressed military, is a
broken and defeated military.” On the policy front, it would
probably translate into a reluctance by the public to support a
responsible military budget.
The disastrous security situation
in Iraq will lead to a terrorist sanctuary that the United States
will in due course have to confront. Our uniformed men and women who
came home the first time will have to enter again under much harsher
and costlier conditions.
In the final analysis, withdrawing
from Iraq would not end the war but prolong it. No compassionate
American wants to see soldiers away from their families and risking
their lives, but short-sighted and emotional calls for
withdrawal obscure the stakes. The time is tough, and the president
has acknowledged ultimate responsibility for the mistakes we have
made in Iraq. But all of these mistakes pale in comparison to the
mistake of ceding victory and the future of Iraq to the terrorists
we came to know on September 11, 2001.
Ryan Mauro is the author of
Death to America: The Unreported Battle
of Iraq and founder of
WorldThreats.com. He is a geopolitical analyst for
Tactical Defense Concepts and for the Northeast Intelligence
Network. He can be contacted at
TDCAnalyst@aol.com.
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
________________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our
MAILING LIST]
God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful
name!
Nick Goggin
A reader writes in with an objection:
Good morning Sr. I read the article by MR. Ryan Mauro, placed in
your biblestudysite. I not in agreement with that assessment. I
believe that this crisis was created by us, and only we can stop it.
lies never lead to anything good. the president which is a person
who does nor regard the truth, has worked for his masters well.
whenever we believers pray 'deliver us from the evil one", and
repent, them may be we can claim the passage in proverbs where it
says that "when a man's ways please the LORD, HE MAKETH EVEN HIS
ENEMIES TO BE AT PEACE WITH HIM" thus it applies to persons as also
nations. I have seing the president going to his talmud studies, or
pictures with a huge talmud under his arms, and also him bowing his
head in the so called wailing wall, or Fort antinim wall left in
jerusalem. what an abomination for a so called believer. Of course
that is his line to beguile the simple. thank you Sr.
Answer:
Hello. Thank you for writing in. I am no fan of
George Bush, but that isn't the point of the article. The article
examines what will happen if we leave Iraq. And it is true. Reasons
why we are there are at this point irrelevant—because we are there.
That is the point. If we leave, all who helped us in Iraq shall be
murdered in the streets for being traitors to greater Islam. The
massacres that you shall see will be unmatched in recent times. Don't
let the "hate Bush" crowd cloud your deeper discernment. Do an Internet
search about what happened to the Kurds after we pulled-out
(prematurely) in 1991. You should feel sick at the betrayal on our
part.
Saddam Hussein's record of brutally suppressing even mild
dissent is well-known. When the March 1991 uprising confronted
his regime with the most serious internal challenge it had ever
faced, government forces responded with atrocities on a
predictably massive scale. The human rights repercussions
continue to be felt throughout the country.
In their attempts to
retake cities, and after consolidating control, loyalist forces
killed thousands of unarmed civilians by firing indiscriminately
into residential areas; executing young people on the streets,
in homes and in hospitals; rounding up suspects, especially
young men, during house-to-house searches, and arresting them
without charge or shooting them en masse; and using
helicopters to attack unarmed civilians as they fled the cities.
One year later, the
fate of thousands of Kurds and Shi'a who were seized during the
suppression of the uprising remains unknown. While many are
believed to be in detention, the government has provided little
information about their location and legal status.
The rebels also
committed gross abuses during the uprising, summarily executing
suspected members of the security forces, including many who
were in custody. Middle East Watch also condemns these abuses,
though we note that they were not so systematic and sustained as
those committed by the government.
Over 100,000 Kurds
and Shi'a who fled cities where the conflicts were particularly
fierce remain displaced inside Iraq, and another 70,000
civilians are in refugee camps in Saudi Arabia, Turkey and
Iran. Despite the harsh life they lead in these camps or as
displaced persons in rebel-held northern Iraq or in the southern
marshes, they have not gone home because they are afraid or
because their homes have been destroyed.
...[continued]
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
_______________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our
MAILING LIST]
God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful
name!
Nick Goggin
Watchman News hosts several archives of Bible studies such as these by the Watchmen Bible Study Group. Although we are not affiliated with this or numerous others using the term Watchman in their names, we believe it important keep the full content intact for research and analysis for Bible students of future generations. We keep it available as good members of the body of Christ, for Christian unity. We do so on a non-profit basis. As the original owner's site went offline years ago, no one has paid to keep it online but us. We pray and hope such ministries are more careful about having successors to carry on their works in the future. Although we do not agree on every point of doctrine, we still believe it very important to not edit any of the original contents.
Our own statements of beliefs are found at www.CelticOrthodoxy.com,
and for example in the book "7th Day Sabbath in the Orthodox Church" etc.
] being the definite article (The, This; as opposed to a, or an, );
and "erets" [Strong's Heb. #776] being
variously: land, ground, place, nation, world.)
