Reducing hate: Slavery, Servitude, and the Forgotten Complexities of Pre-Civil War America

Babylon vs Christendom, Colonial America, Dixie and Restoration, Fighting Communism (CDL), Legitimist Philosophy, Friedensinstitut, Perpetual Confederation (for Christ), Pre Colonial America, Priorat von Salem, Protectorates, Public Representation, State Assemblies, Usurped Incorporated States
Verbreite die Liebe

Slavery, Servitude, and the Forgotten Complexities of Pre-Civil War America

Priorat von Salem, Institut für Friedensforschung

Introduction
Slavery is often portrayed today in overly simplified terms—as a purely racial evil, uniquely inflicted by white Europeans upon Africans. Yet the true story of slavery in America, and of labor exploitation more broadly, is far more complex. From the early systems of indentured servitude, to landmark court decisions that racialized lifetime bondage, to the post-abolition struggles of all races under new economic constraints, this article aims to provide a fuller historical picture.

1. Early Definitions of Servitude in Colonial America
In the 17th century, labor in the American colonies began primarily through indentured servitude. Men and women from Europe and Africa signed contracts to work for a set number of years in exchange for passage to the New World or the promise of land. Initially, this system did not discriminate by race. European, African, and even Native American servants could work their way to freedom.

This changed with the 1655 court case of Anthony Johnson v. John Casor. Johnson, a free African landowner in Virginia, successfully argued that Casor, another African, was his property for life. This marked the first legal recognition of lifetime racialized chattel slavery in what would become the United States.

2. State-by-State Legal Evolution
While slavery expanded in the South, several states began to push back. Yet even in states moving toward emancipation, the picture was not entirely clear-cut.

State Year Settled Slavery Definition Pre-Civil War Races Affected Legal Challenges (Dates & Cases/Laws)
Virginia 1607 Lifetime chattel slavery (by 1655 court case) Primarily Black 1655 Johnson v. Casor legalizes lifetime slavery
Maryland 1632 Lifetime chattel slavery (after 1655) Primarily Black 1664 Law formalizes lifetime slavery for Blacks
Delaware 1638 Mixed status, leaning toward abolition Black/White 1776 Constitution bans slave importation
Tennessee 1796 Lifetime chattel slavery Primarily Black 1796 Constitution legalizes slavery
North Carolina 1653 Lifetime chattel slavery Primarily Black 1741 Slave Code formalizes chattel slavery
Georgia 1732 Initially banned, later legalized Primarily Black 1751 Slavery ban repealed, full legalization
Kentucky 1792 Lifetime chattel slavery Primarily Black 1792 Constitution legalizes slavery
Missouri 1821 Lifetime chattel slavery Primarily Black 1820 Missouri Compromise allows slavery
New Jersey 1664 Gradual abolition starting 1804 Black/White 1804 Gradual Abolition Act
New York 1624 Gradual abolition completed in 1827 Black/White 1799 Gradual Emancipation Act, completed 1827
Pennsylvania 1681 Gradual abolition starting 1780 Black/White 1780 Gradual Abolition Act
Massachusetts 1620 Judicial abolition by 1783 Black/White 1783 Quock Walker case ends slavery

3. Lincoln and the Real Motivations of the Civil War
Despite popular belief, slavery was not the initial cause of the Civil War. President Lincoln stated repeatedly that his primary goal was to preserve the Union, not to abolish slavery. His early war efforts were focused on collecting federal taxes and tariffs from the seceding states. The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 came two years into the war, reframing the conflict to include the abolition of slavery as a Union war aim.

4. Solutions Considered for Freed Slaves
Throughout U.S. history, multiple solutions for integrating or relocating freed Black Americans were proposed:

Solution Type Description Supported By Ergebnis
Gradual Emancipation Slow release of slaves over time Northern states Achieved in several states
Colonization (Liberia) Creating a Black homeland in Africa Jefferson, Lincoln, ACS Poorly funded, few took the offer
Repatriation/Deportation Requiring freed Blacks to leave the U.S. Jefferson, Lincoln Politically unpopular, largely abandoned
Federal Protections Freedmen’s Bureau, Reconstruction programs U.S. Congress post-Civil War Ended with Reconstruction collapse
Global Anti-Slavery Wars Britain and U.S. military efforts to end African slave trade Britain, U.S. Navy Limited success, slavery continues today

5. Post-Abolition Labor Systems and Community Survival
While formal slavery ended, coercive labor systems continued in various forms:

  • Indentured servitude for European immigrants persisted.
  • Apprenticeship laws kept freed Black children in dependency.
  • Sharecropping und company towns trapped workers in debt cycles.

These systems were not unique to any one race. European, Black, and other communities all faced economic models that mimicked servitude. Even today, many live in crowded homes or participate in informal labor arrangements that resemble quiet contracts of mutual dependency.

Such practices, while sometimes exploitative, are often rooted in community survival and mutual support. Yet they also face increasing legal and regulatory barriers, making it harder for communities to help each other without risking legal consequences.

Conclusion: Toward a Balanced Historical Understanding
America’s history of labor is not a simple story of white oppressors and Black victims. It is a complex narrative of human struggle, involving all races, all regions, and all economic classes. Recognizing this broader picture can help society move beyond racial guilt narratives and toward true empowerment, economic self-determination, und community resilience for all.

The fight to end slavery was real, costly, and led by the very nations often vilified today. The challenge now is to recognize that while the laws have changed, human dependency systems—both voluntary and coerced—still shape our society. Understanding these patterns is the first step toward building a more honest and sustainable future for everyone.