| To list of all questions on Website | Should true Christians today be upset at the state of the churches?
"No-name-given" writes:
Answer: Hello, you wrote:
You say, a "Christian world" ? Is that what you see
in the so-called churches today, a
Christian world? What you are seeing today (and what I am set against) is
the formation of antichrist's church, not the Church that Jesus
Christ started.
You've read Apostle Paul's letters to the
churches of his time, and how he was critical of them at their swift
corruption into error. Can you even begin to imagine what Paul would say to
the churches today if God sent him back to us again in our time? Priests
raping little boys; people speaking in demonic languages (talking in
tongues) and being "slain in the spirit" by demons in the
churches; joint-fellowship with antichrist religions like Judaism and
Islam, etc.;
ordaining openly homosexual Bishops and Priests by the POPULAR vote of the
laity (the people)!; etc. et al. ad nauseam.
I think that Paul would vomit.
So, as we Christians read the Scriptures today
and look out over the churches of the end-time, can we really feel anything other
than disgust? We have let God down, we (the Christian churches) have
utterly failed Him. Or could it be that you are steeped in churchianity
rather than Christianity? If so, then it is no wonder that I offend you,
for I speak of you, and you perceive it. Below is your "Christian
world" soon:
Do I write angry? Yes I do. I am angry.
I am angry because this is my world too, it is my Christianity too, and I
don't like what satan and his minions on Earth are doing to it; even though
I know from the Scriptures that it must come to pass.
I still don't have to like it, nor do I have to coddle it. Does that target Christians like me for persecution and execution? If God allows it, they shall. But I say that it is better to die free in Christ Jesus than to live a slave to spiritual whoredoms; better to be a hunted rebel than a bribed sympathizer of wickedness in spiritual places. My flesh had no life before God sent me here, nor did yours, and after I'm gone my flesh shall return to the dust. It is what we do while in this flesh tabernacle that we take with us. How are you doing friend? Fighting satan or licking his hand? It is nigh unto the time for true Christians to rebel against the filth that we are being made to coexist-with in this degenerate world of satan's. The so-called Christian church is absolutely no hindrance to satan any longer. What's next? You figure it out, or, read of it in the book of Revelation starting at chapter thirteen. Chapter thirteen is the final state of this world's religion. God shall be completely replaced by satan. And weak-bellied politically correct Christians like you are enabling it. Here is the final state of your church:
Paul wasn't just whistling Dixie here,
here was prophesying under the Authority of the Holy Spirit of God. The above
events are written, they MUST come to pass! It cannot be
stopped, it shall happen; and unless you are very old or very sick, you
shall live it. But you have a personal choice to make, everybody has
individual choices to make. On these we shall all be judged.
Many misguided Christians (sheep without Shepherds, or better stated: sheep
with wolves for shepherds) today are "Politically-Correcting" their churches
to hell. What happens to them when their church goes to hell?
"For where your treasure is, there will your heart be
also." (Matt 6:21). Back to list of questions at top of page Will one who has never heard of Jesus Christ be judged for not believing? A reader writes:
All shall have heard.
But
you ask of all those who had died before hearing? Or the so-called
"what if
they grew up on a deserted island and hadn't heard of God nor Jesus Christ"
question?
They are free:
Since
Jesus said clearly, "If ye
were blind, ye should have no sin",
ergo, those who never had the opportunity to see the truth of Messiah Jesus
Christ are faultless. God judges who did have a chance, and who did not have
a chance. And God is not a man that He can be fooled. Don't
worry, God has this well in hand.
There
are very few today who have not heard that one came claiming to be the
Messiah of God and was crucified two-thousand years ago. The Bible is
spread throughout all the Earth. And in the end-time, the message will be
fully spread when the persecutions are witnessed by the world.
Remember, the Two Witnesses lie dead in Jerusalem for three days and a half
while the world rejoices over their execution. The world
shall have heard them testify prior to their deaths, and they shall have
testified to the truth―there shall be no innocent ones at that time―all
shall have heard. Who, after witnessing the below, could honestly say
that they have not heard the message?
What people do with this info is between them and God; they shall answer on that day for what they did with the truth, whether they believed it or whether they had rejected it. Let's let God do the judging, let's let God worry about His children, He has forgotten not a one of them. Some He will remembered to rewards, some to eternal death, but He hasn't forgot a single one of them.
God
bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name!
Nick Goggin Back to list of questions at top of page Sexuality, Marriage, and Pornography [A Wife] asks:
Hello, thank you for your
frank and mature question, for it raises
some issues that others may be dealing with but are too shy to come
right out and ask. There are several issues that I see in your letter.
But first:
And before we get into your question's specifics, allow us to supply a simple guideline regarding all pornography viewing. Many men indulge in this activity, so many wonder where to draw the line. Understand this first, there is a great difference between looking at pictures of a nude woman, compared to looking at pictures of graphic sex scenes. Below we explain some of the many pitfalls with viewing hard-core pornography. But the viewing of the human nude is not a sin unto itself. However, the viewing of pornography may or may not be a sin depending upon the individual content. Understand that when you buy, rent, or view pornography you are enabling it. You become partakers in it.
So if it is sinful activity, i.e., adultery (Wanton Wives or Wife Swapping type content), then you are a partaker in that adultery; the penalty for that in the Old Testament is death (Leviticus chapters 18 & 20 have the morality and sexuality laws). And if it contains Lesbianism (which most do―this is the greatest pitfall to men―men ever like to watch this type of content), then you are a partaker in the sin of homosexuality; the penalty for that is also death. Now since in our modern-day diverse society we do not execute the ungodly, God shall deal with them as He sees fit when they pass-away and meet Him for their trial on Judgment Day.
The list goes on and on...things unimagined by the un-possessed mind go on in these pornographic movies: Incest themes―outlawed in the Bible (Lev 18:6); Bestiality themes―outlawed in the Bible (Lev 20:16); Rape-fantasy themes―also outlawed in the Bible (Deut 22:25).... And I don't want to appear to be some kind of porn expert, but I am a man, have lived on this good Earth for forty-four years, and I do know what is going on within it, as do most of you readers. In other words, depending on the content of the material, lies the sin. Now if it were just a film of a full-age, committed male and female couple, having consensual sex, then it is not a sin. But as you know, there is not much of a market for clean sex in the porn Industry. Sex was never outlawed in the Bible, it just has specific rules attached to it. A Simple guideline So, guys
(and girls), if what you are viewing contains scenes of a sinful activity
(such like as those mentioned above, and also those contained in Leviticus
chapters eighteen & twenty), then you are sinning by viewing it for your
pleasure. Enough about that. On to the reader's question/answer: First and foremost, I must say to your husband: When you say that you go to "teen porn sites," what age are referring to? I ask this because a "teen" 18 years and older is an adult; however, a "teen model," 17 years and younger, is child pornography, punishable by fines and imprisonment. Everyday you hear of stories of people being arrested for downloading pictures of girls under 17 (kiddy-porn). So if you are unsure of the girls ages you should not go to those sites, you could get caught-up in an investigation that you really didn't, perhaps, belong in. The Internet always has a searchable history trail, especially after 911.
So I will assume that you husband is not
in violation of the "statutory-rape laws."
Why do I refer to it as "statutory
rape" laws?
Because many of the girls in these porn sites are "white slaves"
(no race intended - that's just what they call it.) They are
not doing this because they are sex freaks simply getting paid to do
what they love; they do it because they are
forced or coerced, either by threat or induced-narcotic addictions. Most are European women
(Russian, Ukraine, etc.) who have been caught in the global Jewish sex slave trade. (Yes,
Virginia,
the global sex trade is a very Kosher affair). Below is a
current news item:
We could supply piles of documentation on Jewish slavers. For instance, in his book Prostitution and Prejudice: The Jewish Fight Against White Slavery, 1870-1939, Jewish historian Edward Bristow revealed that "the center of the Jewish slave trade in Gentile women from Poland and surrounding regions was a small town called Oswiecim." The German name for this town (Oswiecim) is Auschwitz. The irony! As a side note: The work camp in Auschwitz‑Birkeneu (Oswiecim) in WWII was fabled to be an "extermination" camp. At the end of the war, the "reports" were that 8,000,000 (eight million) Jews died at Auschwitz alone. Over time, and without public fan-fare or awareness, that number was gradually lowered. Until finally, with the break-up of the Soviet Empire (which had held secret war documents and archives from WWII): in the autumn of 1989, the Soviet President, Mikhail Gorbachev, opened Soviet archives; and the public saw for the first time, the complete register of deaths at Auschwitz ‑ which speaks as a key document of 74,000 dead. [from ALL causes].
Why would they lie by inflating the numbers geometrically? Answer: War Reparation$ and their free acquisition of the state of I$rael! There is also new book out, called The New Natashas that shows that Russian women, beautiful, young, are lured overseas with offers of "working as a maid for a rich family overseas, etc.," only to be turned into a sex slave in brothels globally. These girls are also forced to perform in the most hard-core porno movies (including sex with animals. Human/animal sex is strictly forbade in Lev 20:15-16! "And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast. And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."). I haven't read the book, only skimmed it, but I am quite sure that the Jewish connection is hidden, as it is in all human debauchery. According to the back coverpiece of the book, the girls are bought for $10,000 each from the kidnappers, and forced to "work-off" the money; though they never seem to be able to fully pay. However, their masters make the $10,000 back in a weeks time; after that, everything is pure profit for them. They are forced to work until they (the sex slaves) are all used up―then they are thrown away. Many commit suicide, die of drug overdoses (which they are induced to become dependant-upon, as one means of controlling them), or they "simply disappear." There were two kinds of slavery that God did allow in the Old Testament, voluntary slavery (to repay a debt or to live a kept life―Ex 21:5-6) and spoil of war slavery―Duet 20:14; 1st Chron 5:21; Num 31:35. But the kind that goes on in the Porn industry is forced sexual slavery. In the New Testament we see this mentioned regarding the end times (it is called men stealing (no gender implied), i.e., kidnapping persons into any form of slavery)
What does God think of those who kidnap for slavery?
We see that this is not a thing of the past, for we even see it going on well into the Tribulation:
There is much more that I could offer to document that the global sex trade is run by International Jews, recent stuff also (do an Internet search if you doubt it―insert "Jews" and "Pornography" into any Internet Search Engine. Some day those key search words will return a blank page, or worse, send someone to your home to arrest you on a trumped-up so-called AntiSemitism charge. That day is coming to America, it is already there in Canada, England, Germany, Australia, etc.). Anyone who engages in watching pornography on the Internet is guilty for providing a lucrative market for these slavers. Through your fees, many other young (sometimes as young as 12 years old and even younger, male and female!) shall be enslaved and forced to perform, for your pleasure, sex acts stunning to the civilized and rational mind. Though you do not beat and kidnap these girls (and boys) yourself, you are not guiltless. You provide the demand, they provide the supply―you are partners, one not able to operate without the other.
Think about the
implications of that last line: human trafficking ... victims ...
escape the next time you "get yourself
in the mood" through this type of Porn.
My next comment would be that rape carries the
same penalty as murder according to God:
Through coercion, threat, and drugging, these
Internet sex "performers" are being raped on your dollar.
Therefore:
Far more
than bidding them God speed, you are paying to enable it. No
money, and they stop; much money, and they expand operations, "recruiting" more girls,
making the scenes more hard-core, the action more filthy and bizarre. How do you feel about that, Mr.
Christian? Got a daughter of your own? Well, Isn't it just her
luck that you don't live in a country were the Jewish Human-Trafficking
Mafias (white slavery) are strong? Or else, some other pervert would
be getting his kicks watching your daughter be forced into the most vile sex
scenes that rip out her soul and wholly corrupt her.
Hey, but she is smiling in the scenes, you say? If she doesn't, she gets beat and starved. You'd learn to smile for the camera too―after a week without food nursing a beating in a locked room; kidnapped and taken to a strange land, cut off from all that you once knew, finding yourself quite in hell, all alone. Pray, you would tell her? She's never alone, you would say? Why don't Christian's like you pray for her between "scenes?" And, oh, yes, boys are abducted for this as well―the Gay Community lusts for youth, the young "lover," so to speak. You mentioned that the fact that it was "taboo" made it "exiting to you." As "exiting" as it is for the victims? Or how about the abductee's families, do you think that they find it quite as "exiting" as you do? Enough of that. Enough of beating you over the head with this, you get the message, and if you don't, then you're hopelessly lost already. Jesus told us what to do at times like this: Repent, and sin no more. He forgives the repentant believer. That's what He died for, but let's not make His sacrifice to be repetitious payment for this! Now to you, "Mrs. Wife," I will say this: Your husband isn't exactly telling you the whole truth. He doesn't need the teen sex sites to get "in the mood." You said that he has: "admitted to me that he has to fantasize in order to get in the mood."
Well, let me tell you from a man's perspective: If
your dear hubby "does without" for a while he shall have absolutely
no trouble "getting in the mood." He is not in need of porn, he is enslaved
by it, he is it's servant, it is his master. He is just making excuses for his
debauched habits. He needs to force himself off of it, with much prayer for
strength. Like Eve, he has tasted the forbidden fruit, and he likes
it, he craves it; like an animal in heat he drives to it. But it is an
abomination to God.
As stated at the
preface of this, I draw a
distinction between willing adult women submitting to nude photos, and
hard-core pornography. One is a simple nude, the other is all manner
(much of it forbidden in the Bible) of sexual perversions.
And it is true that pornography, per sey, is not mentioned in the Bible (they really didn't have extra expensive parchments for vain drawings, nor were they wired for the Internet at that time). But then, also, nowhere in the Bible does it say that you cannot expose yourself naked to young children, nor is wife-beating specifically mentioned―but common sense, inborn decency, and conscience, let us know that it is a wrong and sinful (and illegal) thing to do. God gives us a conscience to cover areas that are not clearly delineated in the Scriptures. It is a disingenuous thing to do to say that, since the Bible doesn't speak specifically of your particular kink, therefore it is OK for you to do it. You have a conscience and you know right from wrong when you encounter it. The Holy Spirit residing in every Christian tells you so. God is not mocked; keep playing games with Him, Christian.... While it does not literally say "Thou shalt not view sinful hard-core sexual activity on the screen," it is nevertheless not at all stretching it to say that the below Scriptures allude quite strongly to the type of inordinate "affections" that porn provides to sexually bewitched men. Ask your Christian hubby how he reasons his porn addiction with the below Scriptural admonishments? Why do I call it an addiction? Because he can't even make love to the woman that he loves and married without his 'fix.' That is an addiction, any way that you slice it. He has created an alternative reality in his own mind where these young nubile beauties are happily and lustfully performing for him. Oh, if he only knew the truth of the matter, and the sorry condition of these girls! He would vomit out his shame. Or would he?
Now I understand that every marriage has it's dynamics, and what is
considered "too much" for one couple, is acceptable to another, but the main
thing is that you should both feel comfortable with your particular relationship behind closed doors. Many things are simply not addressed in
the Bible, oral sex for instance, and, as you pointed out, masturbation (See
our Is
sex within marriage only for having children?).
This tells me that God doesn't have any great problem with it. For if He
did, He would have told us so. However, He does expect all sexual
relations to be in a decent manner.
Some Scriptures regarding sexual activity and marriage:
So what are you, "Miss Wife," to do? Tell him to cease and desist or you will insist that he enlist in pervert counseling. And he made you certain implied promises when he said "I do" in his wedding VOWS. He is breaking those promises. True, we are to follow the Bible, but we were also instructed in Scripture to follow the laws of the land. He is voiding the marriage contract.
I can only imagine your pain in all of this; I can understand how this all must be making you feel. No mature woman can compete with the body of a teenage woman (nor probably can your perverted husband compete with the body of a younger man). So I am sure that you feel that while he is using your body in bed, his mind is far from you on the Internet somewhere in some fantasy teenage sex tryst. That must almost make you feel dirty. And if you don't do something about it, it shall always be that way. Is that what you envisioned when you married the man of your dreams? To be a warm receptacle for him to release himself into after he's had his fill of leering and lusting after young "sex stars" on the cold dead screen??? No, he betrayed you. And he certainly couldn't give a da*n about your feelings, or he wouldn't be doing this to you. Once you are gone, he can masturbate in front of his computer to the sex slaves and kidnapped & doped children all day and all night, until the last vestige of decency is stripped from his assaulted soul. What the pornographers are doing to the teen sex-slave's bodies, the devil is doing to your husband's soul. Then he is satan's. If you do not wish to leave him, then pray for him; we serve a God who is an answerer of prayers. Am I an advocate for divorce? No, I myself am divorced, and know how much it hurts all involved and how destructive it is. Have I never looked at any pornographic images? All men have, but I don't make a hobby of it. And I know that it is wrong and to be repented of; does your husband? And if so, then what the heck is he doing with his serial-porn habits?!? He has crossed a line with what he is doing. He has taken it too far, this thing is going to consume him from the inside out. This is not harmless entertainment, there are victims, and you are one of them, the Internet girls two, last of all he makes three; and if you have children, add them forth on the list. He needs to pray for himself, and get his head out of his rear-quarter. How blessed he is to have a Christian wife―he just doesn't know how blessed he is. So, suppose that he wants to stop, how does he go about it? My advise to him would be that after he repents, that he pray for strength, then: he has to cleanse his computer of all porn images. (And throw out all printed material on the offending subject.) He may need to get a new hard drive (and throw the old one away), and reload all his programs and operating system from scratch; as many porn sites hack files into your computer to send you back to their site or to draw their e-mail. He probably will have to change his e-mail address, as he will be receiving mail from the pornographers who have stolen his address with E-mail traps (and sold it to other pornographers). He is probably on many porn lists (including the governments if he is downloading child-porn.) Now he has a fresh start, clean inside and out. He will now have no external temptations to go back to these sites. The rest is internal, he must be strong and refrain from even a single contact with those sites. If he sneaks back once then it will be easier to slip again, and again (kind of like breaking a diet). And finally, pray to God for strength. See also the below reader's question in Question #4. God
bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name! [For questions on sexual matters, see
our: Is
sex within marriage only for having children? and
Masturbation, does the Bible speak against it?
and Sexuality, Marriage,
and Pornography and
"Suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp
authority over the man," was God just kidding? Also:
Feminism/Lesbianism/whoredom/abortion
and Does the Bible prohibit
birth control?]
Back to list of questions at top of page Masturbation, does the Bible speak against it?
A reader writes:
First please allow me to re-post a portion of another question/answer that I feel relates directly too your situation/question:
Masturbation Hi, this is something that many people, men and women, wonder about, but are too embarrassed to ask. I have left your name off, not because you asked, you did not, but because this subject is uncomfortable to many, and I wasn't sure if you knew that the questions sent to the Editor here (me) many times end up on a Question & Answer page for all to see. So I am very careful about using people's names, and I often edit out information that it is personal. I think that you would greatly benefit from reading the Q&A directly above this one, first, as it lays a lot of groundwork that I am not going to repeat in this answer. Anyway, what it comes down to is this: Is masturbation against the Bible? If we masturbate are we sinning? No we are not sinning if we masturbate. In Is sex within marriage only for having children? we covered the Scriptures that people often misconstrue into being against masturbation, but are not. In Sexuality, Marriage, and Pornography we covered illegal Porn (kiddy-porn and other forms of Bible-banned activity). But your question is more directed at legal "Porn," actually not Porn, per sey, but the female nude. I perceive that you are speaking of, say, a Playboy magazine or something of that nature, and not hard core porn that goes into areas that are forbidden by the Bible (such as Lesbianism, and even worse lately, the Jewish porn masters are of late throwing bestiality in as porn―they have such sick minds). Both of the previous two things are forbade in the Bible, so that if one where to engage in viewing them, he would become part of the act. If a consensual adult allows herself to be photographed in provocative poses, freely of her own will, and then you look at those pictures for mental stimulation―you have not sinned (by any Bible verse that I ever saw). But remember, it is not too becoming for a Christian to become obsessed by these things.
Is it that I am some kind of advocate for masturbation? No, it is just that I know from letters that many Christians (male and female) do or have done it, and they want to know where they stand with God on the matter. They want to know if this is something that they should be be repenting of, or just doing in silence not mentioning it to Him. I think that it is a mature realistic question. Guilt Well, if it is not a sin, which it isn't, then why repent of it? And if you feel like repenting of it, them maybe it isn't something that you should do, because it separates you from God. I know that the churches (especially the Catholic Church) teach that it is a sin. But what has the priest-craft of the Catholic Church replaced it with? Pedophilia. So we see that when one tampers with the Commandments of God, and adds onto them like the Catholics and the Pharisees have, we see all kinds of perversion spring up. As far as girly pictures, well, men are visually stimulated, they get exited sexually by what they see. Women are different, they are emotionally stimulated, they get exited at what they think and feel inside. That is why most porn is directed at males and most romance novels directed at women. And don't be fooled, women can tell you those so-called romance novels, and also the women's magazines, can get pretty steamy (just looking at the covers, and reading the article headings, in the supermarket check-out line is enough to make me ask why they are on display in public where children are present.) Yet they will read them and frown at you for looking at a Playboy centerfold. Women generally, regarding sexual matters, are quite the hypocrites, and not at all honest. There is another dimension that I feel needs be mentioned regarding masturbation. Often times masturbation can relieve the sexual need that would otherwise be relieved by a sinful activity. What I mean is that when we are, what, how do I say this decently, "horny," or perhaps better worded, "amorous," or "in the mood" so to speak, we will do things that we know are wrong to satisfy a drive that is temporarily overpowering us. The sex drive is very powerful in some people, in male and female alike, but the more powerful seems to be in the male. What do I mean when I say that often times masturbation can relieve the sexual need that would otherwise be relieved by a sinful activity? Observe the below example of what I mean (this of course is directed to men, but women can easily adjust the below for how it would apply to them). Women, work with me here.
Every guy out there knows the correct answer. And I suspect that the women are not ignorant to this. Guys understand that we do things that seemed like 'bright ideas' when we are "horny," but that we are ashamed of after we ejaculate. Sorry to be so blunt, but reality is reality. You asked a mature question, you get a mature answer. Likewise, women do things that they aren't proud of. What I am saying is that when people are "horny" (or amorous kinder said), they are susceptible to lowering their moral values momentarily (which is why the enemy bombards us with so much sexual imagery). There are many sexual sins that people do when they are amorous, to satisfy a drive that is temporarily overpowering them, that could be alleviated by keeping "the need" at bay. After people have an orgasm, they tend to get back to normal thinking, so to speak. Is there anything in the Bible that prohibits masturbation? No. Is there anything that in the Bible that prohibits looking at naked pictures while masturbating? No. Does that mean that a Christian is to become some little pervert? No, of course not, look what happened to the Christian husband in question #3 above (Sexuality, Marriage, and Pornography). As a Christian you have a operating conscience and good judgment instilled within you―exercise them wisely, and you shall be fine. It is best, though, for a man (or a woman) to marry. And it is acceptable for a man and his wife to engage in all forms of consensual one-on-one sex in the marriage bed (need I elaborate?). So, find a wife; women find a husband; then you won't have to burn with passion all the time:
And for those who are unmarried, and yet burn with desire, ...well...you read the article.... [For questions on sexual matters, see our: Is sex within marriage only for having children? and Masturbation, does the Bible speak against it? and Sexuality, Marriage, and Pornography and "Suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man," was God just kidding? Also: Feminism/Lesbianism/whoredom/abortion and Does the Bible prohibit birth control?] After having posted the above question/answer, a reader from a Christian talk-forum wrote us the below question:
Answer:
Hi [Reader]. No problem...mature subject...no
problem. I just love those hypocrites who drop a jaw when topics
like this are mentioned, then go home and do it. You might be surprised how
many people write in and ask about this. It seems that most people have
done/do this thing.
Anyway, masturbation is not a sin. I have searched high and low
throughout the Bible and have not found one Scripture that even refers to
the act, much less frown upon it. There is not one. If you find one, I
will respect the Scriptures and examine it.
I believe the Scriptures to be the operating instructions that come with
man. The Bible is God's words to man on how he is to be operated safely.
It is also a warrantee. But as with any warrantee, we must register the
product; we register by believing. All Christians are registered, all
non-Christians are not covered by the warrantee: when they break (die) they
are discarded. But when the Christian dies he is renewed forever. Why?
Because they have the guaranty from God through Christ Jesus. An immutable
warrantee on life, and that life eternal.
Say hello to all for me.
OK, in your letter, [name withheld] said:
The above has absolutely nothing to do with masturbating. The very fact
that a second party (the woman) is mentioned should had directed him, in
context, away from a solo act. It is referring to the male ejaculate; and
that both man and woman are to wash it off of them and any clothing, etc.
It does not say at all how it (semen) "got there." Contact with semen
made one unclean, no matter if it was during the marital act, masturbation,
or even as in the below--what we today refer to as "a wet dream":
A woman was unclean while she was menstruating, that did not mean that
she had sinned:
There were many ways to become unclean:
As you see, masturbation just simply isn't the topic.
Why do Christians want so desperately to make masturbation a
sin? Probably from the good of their hearts, masturbation just seems
naughty to them. We are told from an early age that it is wrong. We
make jokes about men who do it getting hairy palms. It's just that it is
embarrassing, and people feel that every embarrassing thing must be wrong,
and therefore a sin.
Christians like to make everything a sin, things are not a sin they like
to make a sin; like smoking cigarettes, drinking alcoholic beverages (in
some semblance of moderation), etc.
Regarding drinking alcohol, because I know that the pew-warmers, those
Christians who go to church but entertain themselves with false made-up
doctrines of vain men―instead of studying God's Bible, love to chastise a
Christian who takes drink: even the Priests of Israel were allowed to drink
alcohol, EXCEPT when they entered into the Temple to do service. Jesus had
a drink or two in His time, His first miracle was to turn water into wine at
the wedding reception, when they ran out of wine (not grape juice, like the
pew warmers say it was - see John chapter two and see that alcohol is the
drink, not Kool-Aid.).
Pew warmers say that drinking alcohol is a sin, the Bible only
admonishes against excess, drunkenness. God knows that when man or woman
are falling down drunk they are easily led into sin, such as inappropriate
sexual conduct, violence, thievery, slander and irresponsible gossip,
etc. When we are drunk we are not at out best Christian selves, and satan
has an easier time leading us astray when our inhibitions are lowered due to
alcohol influence. When drunk, men tend to get rotten, and women tend to
play the whore.
So God's people are instructed, if they so desire, to imbibe in alcohol
in moderation and with control of their faculties. Ironically, it was the
Kenites who had the tradition of not drinking any alcohol whatsoever, not
the Israelites. But today's Christians admonish us, God's children through
Christ, like the Kenites admonished their children:
Such is the way whenever man tried to place his own thoughts
into the Scriptural thought.
Hey, there are enough ways to sin, why invent more? Did not also the
Pharisees overburden the people with so many laws that no one could know
which way to turn without the Talmud? Jews and Judeo-Christians, traditions
of man, making void God's Word, oh my!
This leaves a final question: Why did all these things make one
unclean? There two kinds of uncleanness, one spiritual, one fleshly;
we shall concern ourselves here with the flesh. So why the time of
separation? Because you will notice that the time of separation correlates
with the safe-time that the sperm can live outside the human body. Also
with the time that bacteria can live outside the body.
God knew nature long before man figured it out. It wasn't
until W.W.I that we even knew about bacteria. During W.W.I, the Doctors
would wash their hands in a common bowl of water, dry them with the same
towel, as they went from patient to patient in the battlefield operating
tents. Thus, most died from infection, not from their accual battle
wounds.
Observe below how God knew about infections millennia before man's
greatest minds figured it out. I include this for the dull-heads who
do not believe that the Bible is the written word of God, and who
incessantly babble about how that it was just some men who wrote the
Bible thousands of years ago, and who then claimed that God had
told them what to say.
Below, observe God teaching about bacteria, infectious disease, and
biological contamination―and all this written circa 1490 BC. That's 3500
years ago that God spoke of bacteria; man didn't figure it out till not even
a hundred years ago from today. Yet dimwits don't believe the Bible.
Of special note, observe that in verse eight above, that not only were
we not to touch the puss or whatever that came out of a sore, nothing that
came in contact with the infected, but that even the spittle of that
infected man was contaminated. The Bible knew 3500 years ago that infection
spreads from the wound or sore, through the bloodstream, and contaminates
everything, even all manner of bodily fluids. Man knew nothing of bacteria
for another 3400+ years after that writing of God. Yet foolish men (which
includes most of our so-called greatest Scientists) doubt and deny the Bible
as being the written word of God. Go figure!
If I had the time, I could present a Bible study that documents, beyond
a reasonable doubt, that the Bible knew about DNA. I just don't have the
time. (Actually, to date this, Oct 2004, and to document that I am not
back-engineering science to make it look like the Bible knew it first before
man did―let me simply say that women have a portion of their DNA that is
blank, men do not have this. "Married" women do not have this. When a
woman is inseminated she is forever a new creature.
Our genius Geneticists shall stumble upon this in a couple of
years. Please, no more on this for now. Our greatest minds in Genetics are
nothing more than the naughty school boy who copies another's work. They
are men who simply look into God's code of life, and then claim to create,
when they simply mimic and alter; man can create nothing living, he can only
corrupt the seeds and building blocks of life from God. Only God can
CREATE)
And for those who deny the Written words of God in the Bible: someday
the Word of God is going to deny them. Then they will be crying 'foul,'
begging God for a second chance to believe. There is to be a foul all
right―them―they are foul. And like the foul ball in a baseball game, they
shall be hit off the playing field, no longer mattering in the game, no
longer participating, forgotten, replaced, gathered by another not in the
game, cast down; never again to be a big-league ball. What a price to pay
for straying off course.
You may share this correspondence how you see fit.
Peace to you and God bless.
______________________________________________________________________
God bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name! Nick Goggin Back to list of questions at top of page "Suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp
authority over the man,"
Answer:
Hello [xxxxxx].
This is a timely question, I think, because we see so many female preachers,
priests, and pastors, springing-up in the churches, all across a broad
spectrum of denominations. What I see in the 'new drift' towards women taking
leadership roles in the churches is, in part, a direct end-result of the ungodly
Radical Feminist - Militant Lesbian Movement.
That is not to say that female clergy are all feminist or lesbian, but that they share something in common with feminists and lesbians―disobedience. Disobedience to God and man. How do I make that connection? The ultimate disobedience to her God is for a woman to disobey His Scriptural admonishments; the ultimate disobedience to her church is for a woman to be clergy over it; the ultimate disobedience to her man is for a woman to be a Feminist; the ultimate expression of Feminism is Lesbianism.
Nature itself tells you that women shouldn't
preach in church. But let's start with some Scripture from the Word of
God, then we can
discus what this all has brought about regarding the end times. Scripture
is very clear (as you pointed out)
that a woman is not to preach in the congregation:
But the disobedient have found many ways to try to
overthrow the very clear Scriptural admonishments, changing the truth for a
lie, and then doing whatever they want to do. One way that they
operate is that they blatantly add lies to Scripture, or allude that the
"whole truth" has been filtered out of the Bible by "chauvinistic men."
And once the validly of the New Testament is called into question in the mind of droves of New Age self-empowered women, then it is no great thing that the Old Testament is also cast aside as just so much folklore. Then we have a Scripture-less people. Without the Scriptures, we know not how to act, we know not good from evil; we are then following man's religion and man's ideas, not God's. In this we can see the hand of satan. Because satan has a whole new religion for us in the Tribulation. Today we see it forming it's roots, raising a trunk, sprouting leaves. On such example is a woman named
Virginia Mollenkott.
Now here is the poster child for the New Age girl-empowered Religion, if ever there was one.
She is everything wrong with women's authority in matters Scriptural and
doctrinal. Ms. Mollencott was an Editor on
the New International
Version Bible (NIV), she is also a proud, admitted, full-blown Lesbian.
Lesbianism is the ultimate expression of Feminism. Here's what she, an
Editor of a Christian Bible version, said (in her book Omnigender), as she attempts to destroy the Bible in
her bid to unashamedly practice her unnatural brand of girl-power;
followed by some male counterparts who also share her warped New Age
Luciferian views:
So much for the Bible, huh? We can just throw it away if it gets in the way of mankind's lusts? The Feminist Movement works hand-in-hand with the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Trans-Gendered Movement (GLBT). And why not, they are both Jewish brainchilds designed to destabilize society and draw people away from the God of the Bible, into the blossoming New Age religion of the antichrist, the Jews god satan:
But back to the "woman's place." Below we see that Jesus, when He was talking to the Samaritan woman, told her run and go get her husband.
Now there is a Pastor that I respect (many of
you know who I am speaking of), who teaches that the above episode is a
testament to woman power in 'preaching.' For that teacher says,
that by the above woman, a whole town was brought to Christ. That is not at
all what the Scriptural message was, and teaching it that way further
suborns women to rebellion. What good does it do to stretch the truth
to build self-esteem in women, if that newfound power causes them to be
led astray?
In these end-times women have become grossly
disobedient. And if you thought that women preaching in churches isn't
disobedient enough, you would be amazed to find that 1/3 (some say 1/2―which
is closer to the truth) of married women have had extramarital
sex―adultery! A capital offense in the Bible! And how many women today are
killers? Most every woman, in her mid-late twenties on up to, say, her
mid-late forties, that I personally know, has had at least one
abortion. (Abortion, one of satan's greatest triumphs, performed by mostly
Jewish Doctors in Jewish owned or financed clinics, was legalized in five
states in 1970, and in the entire nation in 1973 with Roe verses Wade.)
Oh, you didn't know of the Jewish connection with abortion? I don't
know how you missed it; here, let a (disenchanted) Jewish writer tell you
what I have just said:
Satan deceived women, he told them in the
1960's that if it feels good, do it; with whoever the heck you
want; with as many as you desire, as often as you please. And in the 1970's
he gave them legalized abortion if they came up pregnant. So while these lost
disobedient women were burning their bras and throwing open their legs, satan
was making legal a way for them to kill the fruit of their soiled and
defiled wombs. For, as satan would say, a baby in the womb isn't really a
baby.
But God thinks that a baby in the womb is a
real baby:
How many Christian daughters has satan turned
into killers! The beauty of the children of God turned to ugliness and
excess! But most do so unawares, and can repent either way, if they be so
inclined (see our
When a Christian takes a
life).
And the men are not guiltless in the woman's sins, not the least of all in the act of abortion. When they OK it, coerce the woman to do it, pay for it, or turn the other way while they do it―they are part of the sin, a very big part. But like the Bible says: Repent in Jesus Christ's name and be washed clean; then stop doing it. That is the simple formula for life regarding all sins.
I do not write here to beat up on broken
sinners, for who am I, but rather I write hard things for people who have hardened
their hearts, and who say within themselves that their sins are
not sins, and that they will continue to have pleasure
in them. It is to these disobedient that I write. Why, you ask?
Because if they believe satan's lies, that a sin is not a sin, then they
won't repent of it; and worse, they will do more of it, separating
themselves more and more from God.
I am not being Mr. holier-than-thou, I am no angel myself. We are all trying to do our best. But if we have been lied to, and if we believe that what we are doing is not a sin, when in fact it is; then we become more and more corrupt until the below Scripture could be said of us. And no current issue, in contemporary society, is more applicable to the below Scripture, than the growing government's and the corrupt priest-craft's support of the so-called "Homosexual, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Trans-gendered" movement that we see ripping this nation and the mainstream Christian denominations to shreds:
And it seems that (so-called Christian) women
take the incident where Jesus forgave the adulteress, as an excuse to run
around committing adultery. I really don't think that that was what Jesus
had in mind. They have forgotten what Jesus said to her as He forgave her: "...Woman,
where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee? She said, No
man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go,
and sin no more." (John 8:10-11).
But satan is always right around the corner to
pervert judgment.
Most younger women today (35 years old and
below) have had a least five to ten "lovers" (a very
conservative figure!) before they get
married. (What an incorrect and abused term to call them "lovers," love
has nothing to do with it―we should call them what they are―sex partners,
jockey's on a mount, the lust of lost whorish women.) That was not how they were supposed to
be. Satan has ruined women in this final generation, just as he ruined Eve
long ago. And yes, it was all about the sex:
And you thought that Eve was eating apples? Hardly! That's what your Preacher told you? Don't listen to foolishness. Eve lost her virginity to satan (the serpent); see our, What was the Real sin in the garden of Eden?. Most of the sins of the woman tend to revolve around her sexuality (premarital sex, wantonness/whoredoms, prostitution, abortion/infanticide, adultery, lesbianism/bisexuality). The sins of the man are mostly this: Violence and robberies; but now with satan's corrupting and feminization of the male, the male's sins are evermore becoming sexual as well (homosexuality, pedophilia), and then there was always the ever-present adultery (having sexual relations with another man's wife). Sadly, these describe so many of the Clergy. And why not, that is where satan sets up his operation―at the pulpit. Why should this seem such an odd thing for satan to aspire to? Corrupt the churches, and you corrupt the religious, he would say. But there were a few strong women leaders in the Bible
And it was to men's shame that He needed to find a woman (Deborah), because no men would standup (no man had revelation from God because that they had all backslid into idolatry), and only after they perceived that God was with Deborah, would they they go up and fight. "And she [Deborah] said, I will surely go with thee: notwithstanding the journey that thou takest shall not be for thine honour; for the LORD shall sell Sisera into the hand of a woman." (Judg 4:9). Can you not see that men today are being turned into wimps who are incapable of making a stand? It was Christian men that sat on their hands while God and Christ were taken out of the Schools. So now whole generations of children are ever the more Godless. I could supply literally dozens of such examples. But this article is about women.
So, yes, disobedient women are a sign of the
end-times, as are weak men (one causes the other, and one is the final ruin
of the other). Perhaps that is the unwritten condition of Eve and
Adam. Yes, I believe that it is.
Paul made no provisions for a female preacher,
for they (church ministers) were to be the "husband of one wife."
This (women usurping men in the church) is
just another signpost along the way on the church's final road to ruin.
Just as the woman Eve usurped the man Adam in the Garden and partook of that
which she was forbade: so to today do disobedient women usurp the men in the home―which,
as we see, has been the ruin of the family
(better than 50% divorce rate, most always initiated by the wife "who wants
a change" that she is sure will free her―free her from what?―Free
herself from her life as a wife). Satan is the author of both
perversions of the natural order.
What's my point? My point is that this is the sad fate of the modern-day family: irresponsible, impulsive women, egged-on, guided, and enabled, by people and social trends which seek to destroy God's model for a family and the man/woman/children relationship. Not it spreads it's destructive unto the pulpit in the play-Christian end time churches!
Since I am surely winning points here
with the women, let me continue forward. It might not be a popular thing to
say, but women's voting has been the ruin of this country. Most women, by
nature, are very liberal, weak, easily swayed by irrational feelings and
pleas of inclusion, equality, compromise. Women, generally, are not capable
of making the hard decisions, detached from emotion, that must often be made.
Keep in mind that Hitler's preference for an emotion-based oratory was for
influencing women, whose vote had ushered him into power.
And ironically, it was the emotive female vote that reelected the philandering husband, creep, liar, President Bill Clinton in 1996. Go figure that one out! You'd think that many in the locker-room or in some seedy tavern that Clinton might have gotten high-fives for cheating on his wife and having a (Jewish) whore on the side; but who could have ever suspected that mainstream American women would have voted-in a man who so abused women? Oh, but Bill Clinton is good-looking, I have heard them say. That is an excellent illustration of why women should not be in leadership positions in the church. The fallen angels are going to "look pretty good," to them also. That is why the Scriptures state that "For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels." (1 Cor 11:10). Women are to be protected, not be leading congregations in Ministry. Remember Eve? Or how about Margaret MacDonald (the Rapture heresy), and Mary Eddy Baker (the Church of Chirst, Scientist heresy)? Of Madam Helena Patrovna Blavatsky (the Theosophy heresy)? or our example from earlier, Virginia Ramey Mollenkott, (Lesbian Editor of the corrupted NIV Bible) and Author of the New Age Homoerotic books: Omnigender, and Sensual Spirituality? And just when it wasn't confusing enough, Bill Clinton's wife, Hillary (whom he cheated on), is a (not so) closeted Lesbian. So we see the powerful combination of closely related characteristics and how they, in tandem, overthrow the Feminist/Lesbian/Empowered disobedient woman of our day. Nowhere is this more evident than in the destroying of her own family. Am I giving Bill Clinton a pass? No, but maybe if his wife wasn't spending her evenings on midnight romps with her young female "assistants," Bill might have been a better man. But anyway, I said earlier that women vote with their (easily taken advantage of) emotions, rather than by reason. I said: "Most women, by nature, are very liberal, weak, easily swayed by irrational feelings and pleas of inclusion, equality, compromise." To that, I would reply: Christianity is not a compromise, it is hard-set rules and dictates from the King of Angels (you believe in Jesus, you live; you don't, you die). And what equality do the godless heathen, pedophiles, homosexuals, and all other evils have with Christians in a Christian Nation? And Inclusion? What's that? Inclusion is giving the rightful place of the qualified to the unqualified, thereby leaving the qualified out of the process and weakening the whole lump. This undermines a societies ability to be it's best, to survive, to compete, and to be strong. It also foments resentments and divisions "...Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and a house divided against a house falleth." (Luke 11:17). Satan likes that, he seeks to destroy what God has ordained; it helps him bring in his New World Order, replete with a new government, new "family" structure, new gender-roles, new sexuality, new religion, and ultimately, for a little while, a new god―satan.
Women are readily influenced by their fathers, husbands and boyfriends, politically and otherwise; this is an undisputable fact. So satan had to do something about that; he spawned the Women's Liberation Movement, with it's sister, the Gay/Lesbian Movement. And ever since then, the male influence over the female has greatly diminished: with the breakdown of the family and weakening commitments to long-term relationships; a decline of males' influence on their women corresponds exactly with the rise of social pathologies. God had a plan for a man's place, and a woman's place, but through social-engineering, and void-of-God liberal agendas, satan, through his surrogates on this earth, has wholly corrupted God's plan. The final nail in this coffin shall be the new breed of preacher, the New Age Spirituality Movement's obstinate & rebellious female and apostate male, Homosexual/Lesbian preachers. You have absolutely seen nothing yet, compared to the final state of the clergy! Can't you even see a hint of it yet? Why not? It is there, clear as day, building strength, gaining steam, while you slept, Christian, while you slept. So far has it come, that even now, me, a man who has simply stated Biblical position, would be considered a thought-criminal in the New World Order perversion of reality. I would be labeled Chauvinistic, Homophobic, and judgmental. How satan has you all doing his bidding! We are to judge right from wrong, and to chose the right. But not in this up-side down world, no, here everything and anything goes. Truth here is relevant, your truth, my truth, everybody's 'truth" has equal legitimacy in satan's New World Order. The criminals and dregs in the end-time world of satan are to be the Bible believing Christians. Hence: Scriptural Evidences That Christians Shall Die In The Great Tribulation. That's what God's got to look forward to in His end-time church, unless He raises up some good men. The church in it's present state is all but packaged-up, ready for disposal in the refuse pile. We are so far along the way in this, that time can be marked in years, not decades. (Examples follow later in this study.) If women could not vote there would not be a Liberal Democratic Party in this land (though now, weak men have become as women (emotive), and further the party). And in case you missed it, the Liberal Democrats have done the most damage to Christianity in this Christian Nation (if you could even call this a Christian Nation anymore!). They have separated God from His Christian citizens in America. The same is true for all Western, Christian-founded nations; look at Canada and England―they are well ahead of us on this path to social, moral, and freedom destruction. Satan has long ago singled out the Christian Western nations for intense assault, that assault presently is coming in the so-called "hate-speech" and "hate crime" legislation which is sweeping the Christian nations faster than Christianity once did. And for a social barometer: what is happening today in England and Canada, shall happen here in America tonight.
Our children must fear to even mumble God or
Jesus' name, even under their breath, in school. ...Wouldn't want to offend
the Jews, Muslims, and other heathen religions, ya know. So we willingly
betray God to appease those who He has set to destroy―the irony! And where
will it all end up? You know. Or if you don't, I do. I read of it in the
Bible: "And the remnant were slain with
the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his
mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh." (Rev 19:21).
It's not just Democrats that betray Christ, every party in America (and the world) has been corrupted by International Jewish (satanic) influence. Even our Republican so-called Christian President G.W. Bush has betrayed Christ. Observe his speech, broadcast globally, days after the 911 attacks:
What does the scripture really say?
Why was Bush ashamed of Christ Jesus? Why did he omit the last line of his prayer that specifically mentions Jesus Christ (in any Bible version that you search)? Because you wouldn't want to offend the Jews, Muslims, and other heathen religions, ya know. Well, Jesus had a word for ol' Dubya.
Oh how the family, the nation, the church
would have faired so much better had women not become disobedient to the
Word of God! But they have become disobedient, so corrupt (Biblically) have they become, that the below Scriptures seem to them
almost to be evil, oppressive, chauvinistic! How satan has beguiled
them! They have changed the word of God for a lie, and now worship the
creature (themselves) more than the Creator.
All you disobedient and so-called "liberated"
women out there, read below how God had intended you to be, how your Creator
fashioned you to be. Then compare that with your lives and lusts, both
spiritual, social, and physical:
Sounds foreign, even alien to you, doesn't it,
any little Ms. "liberated women" reading this? You're liberated alright, liberated
from God, right into satan's camp. That is the working of satan in the
children of disobedience, which you are, if you continue contrary to sound
doctrine.
Do I hate women? No, I fear for them, I see
what has been and what is now being done to their souls. Am I angry with
them? Yes, but more disappointed in them than angry, I suppose. But I am
upset at this new reality that we (men, children, and now the
church) must all
suffer because of women's liberation, their finding themselves, their
casting off the shackles of oppressive male-kind which keep them
from realizing their full potential, their empowerment:
all to the hurt of the fruit of their wombs and the men that they once loved
and respected; not to mention their right relationship with God. He sees
them, and as with Eve, He is not well pleased.
All that satan's "women's movement" has done for women today is to turn them into trampy, killing (infanticide), divorcee, lesbian, and rebellious women. Used to be that guys were worse than women in matters of morality and decency; today I can honestly say that the pendulum has swung the other way. Are you upset that I said that about your saving-grace Feminist Movement, Ms. Feminist? I don't care if you are upset; get over it; it is true; and it is about high-time that Christian men started taking Christian women to task for their actions―they're making us all look bad before God.
And we (men) are not innocent, not by a long
shot! The state of the women in any society is a direct reflection of the
state of the men of that society. In hard-core Islamic countries where
the men are murderous, and their (false) religion followed strictly and
mercilessly―the women are humble, obedient― wearing full body covering over
their whole body, even at the beach; in countries like Japan, where
traditional male/female roles are still important, the women walk five feet
behind the men; in America, where anything goes, the women have so degenerated
morally, that
they walk around looking like Victoria's Secret poster girl, having morals
and 'class' to match. In other words, we either make them or
break them, men dictate the type of women their women will be. The dark little secret
(to feminists) is that they are never really liberated
at all, you see. They are merely the reflection of our sin,
weakness, error, and corruption. The sad thing is, to the rest of
the world, America represents a Christian nation. How we have
all failed Him! Men as well as women have failed God.
The greater condemnation against the man, for he was supposed to keep things
right. But like Adam, men today didn't do their job; in fact, we
ate with our Eves.
So during the times of change,
in the 1960's and on forward, when satan's darkness began to get a foothold
on God's once lighted Christian nation America: while the women were burning their bras,
we lit the match; while they threw their legs up, we climbed on; when they
got pregnant, we gave them money for the abortion; when they waxed wanton, it
was almost always at our prodding; now we got what we wanted, we
got whorish disobedient rebellious women: which things drove them away from
Christ. And with them, us.
Ironic, is it not? We, who were to be their leader, the head over the woman, ordained of God by Scriptural decree to bring them and keep them safely in all things Godly―led them away and let them run away from Christ―into a special kind of hell on Earth. Satan was at work in all this, through his surrogates on this earth, the Jewish Talmudists-Cabalists-Satanists-Socialist-Marxist-Communists; i.e., the International Jew Universal. (For a more perfect description of this group (Kenites) hiding within a larger unwitting group (Jewry), see our WBSG's position on AntiSemitism, so-called) That is why I write so angry towards the International Jewish world-masters, so disappointed towards the Christian men, and so ashamed towards the Christian women. I am not innocent in all of this, either. I found delicious the sexual freedom that the sixties brought, I abandoned myself into the irresponsibility of the Seventies, I lusted after the lewdness and riot of the Eighties, idled myself in the irrelevance of the Nineties. For then "I was a child, I spake as a child , I understood as a child, I thought as a child," but now "when I became a man, I put away childish things" (1 Cor 13:11); and I don't at all like the evil of this new Millennium; no, not at all. Cold, dead, dark, Godless; careening headlong into destructions upon destructions. And worse yet, now the enemy is strong and we are weak; they many, we few; they in charge and we servile. But I am not by any means innocent, nor, I trust, are you; for as I ate, so also did many of you eat, we all ate, and enjoyed; but now, as with me, many of your bellies have been made bitter. And what is the end thereof?
Liberated women, we Christian men don't like what you are become, and what you are becoming. We are going to stop marrying you someday (not that many of you even care about that anymore, what's marriage when so many have had you?). We have helped you to destroy yourselves, and now you take us down with you, as did Eve Adam. And after having separated yourselves from all Scriptural models of morality and chasteness, making infanticide (abortion) simply the "choice" of whorish women, distancing yourselves from any semblance of a Bible-based relationship with the males in your lives, casting away your natural inborn instincts to nurture your children and follow your man; now you seek to also destroy the churches by disobeying God and overstepping your role there too? Sorry, but I'm not with you on that. You have gone too far!
And the beat goes on....
For some more info on these matters we offer
the below link. And while we cannot vouch for their Christianity, for we
have not checked into it, we can vouch that the below Website has some
excellent eye-opening articles regarding the Radical Feminist/Militant
Lesbian Movement, and what it is doing to society. (Yes, women: the Lesbian
Movement, which is the ultimate expression of the Feminist Movement, is out
to destroy all that you once held dear. And they are quite succeeding.)
See:
Exposing feminism and the new world order
God
bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name!
Nick Goggin [For questions on sexual matters, see our: Is sex within marriage only for having children? and Masturbation, does the Bible speak against it? and Sexuality, Marriage, and Pornography and "Suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man," was God just kidding? Also: Feminism/Lesbianism/whoredom/abortion and Does the Bible prohibit birth control?] Back to list of questions at top of page | To top |
In
His Service: Contact
Editor | Bible
studies | Newer
students |
Bible Q
& A's
| Study
tools
| Search
our site NOTE: To insure quality and content integrity, these In-depth Bible Studies are © copyrighted and may only be downloaded for study and shared private use. They may not be reproduced or distributed for sale or publication without prior written approval. Other Christian Web sites are welcome to link up to this Website or any page on it. |
Their fist experience in the
Holy Land is a forced march across the Egyptian desert, crossing the
Israeli border through routes used to smuggle weapons and drugs.
Caption:
The market square in a Jewish village in Poland. Jewish mobsters
used under-handed methods to kidnap poor Jewish girls and forced
them to work as prostitutes.
...As
you read this story, about 10,000 people in the United
States are being forced to work against their will
under threat of violence, according to a new report
... Researchers found that almost half of forced laborers
are in prostitution or the sex industry ...
examples of forced labor have been found in at least 90
cities in the United States, most are concentrated in ...
California, Florida, New York and Texas ...
