| To list of all questions on Website | Who's who: Adam and/or mankind, variously, in Gen 5:1-3
[xxxx] Ministries writes:
Answer:
Hello [xxxx]
Ministries. I'm glad that you wrote back to me
because I seem to have overlooked your letter.
Referring
to 1st Scripture:
This Scripture is difficult. Not to
understand, necessarily (once the stumbling blocks are removed), but to
prove. I believe that you are close to understanding it, but that you will
not be able to prove that your interpretation is correct, therefore you
cannot defend your position against "attack." I think that we can help out
in that, supplying you with Scriptural documentation to resort to.
First of all, regarding the several
occurrences of the English words "Adam" and "man," there is absolutely no
Manuscript evidence for capitalizing one and use it as a proper name (Adam),
and leaving the other lowercase, using it as a species (mankind), spelling
it "man"
Therefore we must look at context. Here, of
course is where interpretation enters in. And with interpretation there is
always a contracting interpretation from someone else. So ever is that
struggle with the Bible.
If you have the Companion Bible, then you have
seen Bullinger's footnotes on the verses. I wholly disagree with Bullinger
on this. As you know, Bullinger didn't think that there were two separate
creations, he believed that Gen 2 is simply a further account of the
creation of man contained in Gen 1, supplying more info to the same event.
This has shaded all his commentary on the matter. If Bullinger were alive
today, having benefit of the greater evidences that we today have (Bullinger
died in approx. 1914), I personally believe that he would reverse himself on
this. (But, by the way, Bullinger is my favorite Bible teacher, though I
disagree with his interpretation of some matters.)
OK, since we have no usage of the Hebrew
Article or Particle regarding the Hebrew word 'aadaam as found in
Gen 5:1-3, what then are the internal evidences within the Scripture itself
that interpret it for us? They are there, clear as day; in the English
even!
That two subjects are being spoken of in these
three verses is clear. And within that is our key to interpretation. (It
is so nice to be able to do this with the plain English of the King James
Bible, instead of having to take the reader into obscure Hebrew words and
unrepresented-in-English Modifiers [the Hebrew Article and
Particle], requiring the reader to pretty much take our word on it.) I like
this better, the reader shall see with his own eyes, from his own King James
Bible, the proper interpretation, and the reason that it is in fact the
proper interpretation.
OK, first let me represent the verses in
question as two separate clauses, two separate thoughts, two separate
statements. With one statement (the creation of general mankind) being
added parenthetically right in the middle of the greater subject (the man
Adam of the Garden and his family tree).
Remember, there is no justification in the
Hebrew to make one occurrence of 'aadaam into "Adam" and another
into "man." The Translators did what we are doing, choosing words based on
their interpretation. They were wrong.
Also, the Strong's Hebrew word #121 is a
construct, it is the same as #120; Dr. Strong just used it to show when the
King James Bible used "Adam" instead of "man" for the identical Hebrew word
'aadaam. The reason that the Translators capitalized the "A"
in "Adam" is because they used it as a proper name, I suppose; for there is
absolutely no reason in the Hebrew to capitalize it, and it isn't the first
letter in a sentence. But anyway, put any difference between Hebrew
words #120 & #121 out of your head. Even Dr. Strong in his dictionary
states that they are the same word, observe below from the Strong's
Concordance (Hebrew characters supplied by me):
OK, now to our Scripture again, observe:
Green text refers to the
man Adam.
Blue text refers to mankind
(humans).
SIDE NOTE: for explanation regarding the statement "in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them", see our `eth Ha-`adham = "This very self same man Adam".
So, to remove the
confusion of the King James word choice, if I may, I will replace every
occurrence of 'aadaam, whether represented as "Adam" or "man" with
 .
I trust that I am not taking liberties, as I am simply rendering the words
as they are found in the Hebrew. From there we can move on to the internal
evidence that I spoke of.
OK, now following along, let me further
delineate our Scripture for clarity. I will separate it into three
segments, disregarding the Bible's verse numbering, and rendering it as "a,"
"b," and "aa":
OK, that a
is a direct reference to aa
is perfectly clear in that "a
This is the book of the generations"
is a thought continued and explained by "aa
and begat a son in his own likeness,
after his image; and called his name Seth". It is speaking of Adam's
family line (his generations). So we may simply refer to two thoughts,
instead of the three that we had been dealing with. We will call them
simply, the A's (a &
aa) and B's (b).
Still with me? OK, that the A's
refer specifically to Adam is clear because what is spoken of in the A's
we see spoken specifically of Adam earlier in Genesis. There can be no
mistake that Adam is the subject here. Observe:
It is indisputable that these two verses are
speaking of the Adam from the garden, who was married to Eve, and had a son
named Seth. Also, incidentally, and greatly proving what I have thus far
said, the word rendered "Adam" in the above Gen 4:25 verse is the exact
same
not
having the Article nor the Particle--just as with every occurrence of the
Hebrew word in Gen 5:1-3. This goes to show that you can not always rely on
the Article and Particle 'aadaam to prove that it is speaking of the
man Adam from the Garden. The natural temptation is to look, and if we
don't see 'eth haa-'adam
then we don't think that it is talking about
the man Adam from the Garden. But Gen 4:25 shows us that this is
not at all a constant rule of the Hebrew language.By the way, I am getting these 'nifty' Hebrew characters from our study `eth Ha-`adham = "This very self same man Adam" wherein we have:
This is easy, for many things said in Gen
5:1b-2 are mentioned in Gen 1. I will supply them below for comparison.
First I will supply our B's Scripture, then I will supply the
account of the creation of the sixth day man from Gen 1, highlighting every
direct reference to Gen 5 in the familiar blue text,
thus proving undeniably that the two Scriptures are speaking of the same
event and the same subject:
Of course, our easiest witness to the fact
that the above could not possible be speaking of the man Adam from the
Garden is where it says "male and female created
he them", for Adam was "formed," and Eve was "made" quite some time
after Adam. They were not "created" at the same
time, like the sixth day creation male & female were.
So then, if I may be so bold, and placing my
'changes' in [Bracketed black italic text] so as not to appear to
tamper with the Scriptures, I would translate (and interpret) our Scripture
as:
How's that work for ya? Peace
to you.
God
bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name!
Nick Goggin
Back to list of questions at top of page Is the Jew's god the God of the Old Testament? Are Jews the Hebrews and Israelites of the Bible? Modern Jew's own shocking comments on these questions.
We get this question allot. Many misguided Christians have been led to believe that that the so-called self-styled modern day Jews are the descents of the Hebrews of the Bible and that the god of today's so-called Jews is the Lord God of the Old Testament. Nothing could be further from the truth! Many also wonder why I get so upset at this, many say that it is not a display of "Christian love." I get "so upset at this" because I know that they (the International Jews) are the ones who will enable the below event; they even now are working diligently at it. They shall build the Temple below that satan (as the antichrist) shall sit in. If my detractors knew the truth they too would be angry, but they do not know the truth, they are sleeping. The reason that the Jews have all the money in this world is because satan gives it to them for their services. They (Jews) are his (satan's) ambassadors on Earth, they are his people, and he is their god. Yet deceived Christians everywhere call them "the chosen people of God! The apple of His eye!" Obviously there is a problem. The Jews themselves created the "antisemitism" boogey as a means to hide the fruit of their deceit. Yet Christians today attack other Christians, falsely defaming them as so-called "antisemites" for the Jews sake; these same Jews who hate Christ and His people―the Christians. Now I ask you, who, knowing this truth, would not get upset by all of this?!?
Then hirelings (John 10:12-13) like Billy Graham and other high profile so-called Christian leaders have deceived their flocks into virtually worshiping the enemies of God (the Jews), who, far being His "chosen people," but rather are His murderers and the persecutors of His real people, the Christians.
Below is an article that I will post here in it's entirety. It is of particular value to us here as it contains many direct quotes from Jews on Jews. This way no end-time play-Christian can turn his nose up at us and call us antisemitic. A term, as you shall see in the below article, which has no valid meaning, as modern day so-called Jews are not a Semitic people at all.
The Jews' God Isn't the "Jewish" god the God of the Old Testament? Isn't this why we refer to the popular belief in Christ as the Judeo-Christian religion? Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser wrote in "Judaism and the Christian Predicament" (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967) p. 59:
Rabbi Moshe M. Maggal, wrote:
So what is the nature of the "Jewish" god? It is not the God of the Hebrew Bible as we have just seen by their own admission. They have no need of the concept of God as they have "killed off God" a long time ago, as James Yaffe comments:
James Yaffe's statement was a comment to a statement made by Rabbi Sherwin Wine of the Birmingham Temple:
If the self-styled "Jews" have "killed off God", then what sort of "god" do they have? The Jewish God is the "Jew" as the Jewish Cabala (Kabbalah) puts it:
In the following quote we begin to understand this "Jewish" idea of their "god" a little better as it is applied more directly to today:
Who are these self-styled "Jews" then if they are not Israelites? One American Jew woke up to the lie after living in the Israeli occupational state in Palestine. He put it this way:
Are modern Jews Israelites? Are they Hebrews? In their own writings these self-styled "Jews" tell us it is incorrect to call a contemporary "Jew" an "Israelite" or a "Hebrew." Under the heading "A Brief History of the Terms for Jew," in the 1980 Jewish Almanac, is the following:
Judaism or Pharisaism? In "The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith," Rabbi Louis Finkelstein describes these self-styled "Jews" and their origins:
Jesus had quite a verbal scathing for the Pharisees in Matthew 23. He exposed them for the sort of people they were:
Not quite an endorsement by the Christian Savior. And some fools have the gall, or should we say "chutzpah," to call Jesus a "Jew!" What blasphemy! If modern Jews are not descendants of the original Israelites, who are they? Professor of Medieval Jewish History, Abraham N. Poliak of Tel Aviv University, has stated:
The people living in Palestine in the 20th century have no racial nor historic connection with Palestine and are, in reality, descendants from a Turko-Mongolian tribal people who created a kingdom called Khazaria which existed until the 10th century. These Khazarian "Jews" could just as easily have practiced Christianity, but for whatever reason they chose Judaism (Talmudic Pharisaism) and there is nothing that can be done about it. Obviously, if these people have no racial, or historic connection with Palestine they have no claim to the promises made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob/Israel or the land known as "Israel" (Palestine) today. If this is true then there should be more evidence to support this position, and there is. The American People's Encyclopedia for 1964 at 15-292 records the following reference to Khazars:
Alfred Lilienthal writes, in "What Price Israel" (Henry Regenery Co., 1953):
Arthur Koestler's book "The Thirteenth Tribe" (New York: Random House, Inc., 1976) blew the lid off this suppressed fact. Koestler notes:
He further states:
Koestler further quotes an early source indicating that the Khazars had some connection with Gog of the land of Magog.
For those interested in Bible prophecy, the implications of this last sentence are staggering. Read Genesis 10:2-3 to see from whom Ashkenaz descended; notice who his relatives are. Then read Ezekiel 38 & 39. Jewish author Alfred Lilienthal further stated:
This is now understandable from what Koestler revealed. The Jews fully understand their Khazarian heritage as the third edition of the Jewish Encyclopedia for 1925 records:
There are two main "racial" branches of modern Jewry. The smaller of the two is called the Sephardim, some of whose ancestors fled after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. and spread across North Africa to Spain. This group has been from the outset so small, in terms of a viable gene pool, and has mixed with such regularity over the centuries with the indigenous peoples wherever they lived that Dr. Raphael Patai, a leading Jewish scholar, felt compelled to write a book entitled `The Myth of the Jewish Race' (Scribners, 1975). In reviewing an earlier work by Dr. Patai, `Israel Between East and West,' Dr. Camille Honig, literary editor for the Voice (Jewish Voice of California, Sept. 25, 1953), stated:
In a book entitled "Races in Europe", the author, William Z. Ripley, states under ethnology:
Perhaps it can be understood why this is. The World Book Encyclopedia states: Since the majority of people in modern Palestine and the world who call themselves "Jews" are descendants from a "Turko-Mongolian tribal people" known as Khazars, and have "little or no trace of Semitic blood in them," the word anti-Semitic, as applied to Jews, is meaningless. [End of article] Back to list of questions at top of page The dating of the Flood of Noah (and the Great Pyramid of Egypt)
Answer:
Hello Arlo, you said/asked, "Could you tell
me how you arrive at the year 4390 as the time of the flood." I don't
know where you got that dating from me. And if it is somewhere on the
Website, like that, it is an error that I would like to correct (please
forward the page link, if you aren't mistaken).
Anyway, I go pretty much by Bullinger's dating
(which can become problematic in later years, regarding prophecy, because
his dating reflects the "Lo-Ammi" periods [the 110 year] adjustment when
Israel was in captivity and thus reckoned by God as being "not my people"
[Lo-Ammi]--so therfore Bullinger has Israel going into Assyrian captivity at
611 B.C. while other dating methods put the date of the end of the Northern
Kingdom Israel at 721 B.C.--see below links).
But that does not affect a dating of such
antiquity as the Flood of Noah. It is very simple to add-up the years of
the lives of the sons of Adam to arrive at the date of the Flood
year as 2348-2347 B.C. (Adam being reckoned as being formed
in the Garden of Eden at 4004 B.C. [due to a four-year error in our current
Gregorian Calendar])
Below are links to three appendices from the Companion
Bible, which we have reproduced on our Site, that might be
of special interest to your query:
God
bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name!
Nick Goggin Back to list of questions at top of page
Rabbi says that Jews might not need God; Judaism teaches that the Jewish people, collectively, shall be the Messiah.
Many of our readers, yea, many (most) mainstream Christians have been brought up on a lie regarding the remarkable people that are today called "Jews." They are taught by misinformed Pastors, Priests, Preachers, Bible Teachers, in all the Christian denominations, that the so-called Jew is the "chosen of God people, the apple of His eye." Nothing could be further from the truth! In fact, they are His enemy, His murderer, the ones who shall bring antichrist into power. On this Website there are many articles that explain the nature and origins of these people. And in future studies we shall establish the undeniable link between these people and the earthly rulers of the first half of the Great Tribulation. We are aware that we in fact do run risk here in addressing this "taboo" topic, because of the prearranged defenses built-in by the Jews to mask their true identity and to discredit as "hate-mongers" and "AntiSemites" any who dare tell the truth of them. We're not scared. Nor are we hate-mongers, nor antisemitic, nor racists, etc. ad nauseum.... Let the reader judge the facts and come to his/her own conclusions; we shall place some facts before you; what you do with these documented facts is entirely up to you. Will you observe them and prepare, or will you close your eyes and take a nap until they fall upon you, Christian? Many (misguided) Christians think that the Jews are just a confused people who didn't know that Jesus Christ was the Messiah sent from God. And that that is why they killed Him. Some of think that these Jews were blinded on purpose by God, because you have been lied to about who these people are, that call themselves Jews today. You think them to be the Israelites of the Bible―this was your first mistake―that is what they want you to believe, though they know it to be a lie (as we have documented above, in Question #6 Is the Jew's god the God of the Old Testament? Are Jews the Hebrews and Israelites of the Bible? Modern Jew's own shocking comments on these questions.). But why is this important to the end-time Christian? Why do we here daily risk our reputation to teach this? After all, can't our enemies, the enemies of Christ, misrepresent what we say and twist it into something that they can label as a social sin (antisemitism, hate-mongering, bias, prejudice, anti-diversity, racist, etc.)? Sure they can, but they would be lying: see our WBSG's position on AntiSemitism, so-called. The question is, will you be herded by subterfuge and trickery, or will you judge matters with your own intelligence? Will you believe what you are coerced, herded, and shamed into believing, or will you believe what you see to be true after honest investigation? If it were not important, we would not teach on it, we would not expose it at every turn, we would not warn of it, if it wasn't to come. And to come it is, and come it has been, it is coming even now; growing, building strength, creating it's own reality wherein truth is lie and lie is truth, good evil and evil good, right wrong and wrong right―did not our Lord even tell us that it would come on this wise? Did we listen, do we listen, will we listen? It doesn't matter whether we listen or not―it will still come. There are so very many "politically incorrect" teachings in the Bible that we do not address because they are not necessary to the Tribulation Christian. The reasoning being, why go to the trouble and suffer the defamation that shall surely come, to write of things that are not important to the end-time Christian? For as you know, anyone who dares to think outside of the politically correct, socially engineered, pseudo-reality box of today's overthrown society, is at once labeled with all kinds of so-called 'isms and 'phobias (antisemitism, homophobia, etc.). The system sustains itself till truth is relative and thus becomes nothing more than a pawn bartered for control of the minds and spirit of a society. Welcome to the New World Order, she is rising. So why speak of the International Jew? Well, now it is very important to the end-time Christian to know his oppressor. In our Scriptural Evidences That Christians Shall Die In The Great Tribulation study we documented beyond argument that Christians shall be killed during the Tribulation, but what we didn't tell you was who would be doing the killing. There are many things that we haven't come right out and said that need be said shortly. It is only for lack of research & composition time that we have not posted many Bible studies, that are all but done in concept, but not yet lain to paper and ink, which relate directly to the end-times that are rapidly happening upon us. Haven't you noticed that it is getting darker lately? Christ Jesus knew what was to come, He wrote of it for learning; but "we" (end-time Christians in general) have learned nothing from it, we deny it in our hearts because political correctness (the accepting, by popular demand, of that which we know is wrong) and ecumenism (fellowship among different faiths and religious traditions―especially the heathen/deniers of Jesus Christ) mean more to us than the Word of God does. Because our pastors and teachers have long-since betrayed us to worship at the altar of inclusiveness and tolerance, and that we being weak and malleable, "reeds blowing in the wind," "for fear of the Jews" preferred the "praise of men more than the praise of God." For this, our sin of "leaving our first love," it shall fall upon us, soon.
Behold your oppressors and your murderers, the ones
who shall persecute you from city to city and cast you out of their synagogues,
the ones that shall kill and crucify you; who, having though to have killed God
and who have denied and killed Christ, presume to become both at the end of the
world: Judaism teaches that the Jewish people, collectively, shall be the Messiah.
Aside from the obvious text of
interest, that is, of the Jews being Messiah, look also at the reference to the
"New World Order," keeping in mind the date of the writing (1928). I bet
that you thought that in the 1980's when then President George Bush I uttered
the words "New World Order" that it was the first mention of such a concept?
But anyway, red below as the (Jewish) Baruch Levy prophesies to the
(Jewish) father of Communism, Karl Marx. Is it just a coincidence that the
leader of every anti-Christian, anti-God movement has been a Jew? Hardly!
It is their destiny to be at enmity with God's children
"And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and
between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise
his heel." (Gen 3:15).
Bold words, huh? But in them can you not see a people who have been lied to by satan, a people who really believe that that they shall rule the world? Look at Rev chapter thirteen, these people (the Jews) think that they are to be the masters of the planet. But what they fail to realize is that satan shall use them to set up his kingdom on Earth, and after satan is seated as the antichrist in Jerusalem in the new temple that the jews even today are planning to build, he shall turn and kill them. No, they don't know that. Below we see from their own Manifesto, the Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion, written probably in 1897 from plans and ideas that have been in operation millennia before then, the systematic, calculated destruction of not only Christianity, but of all other religions on the planet. Observe below how just true-to-the-letter their plans have played out into our Twenty-First Century. How much longer do you think that it will take till completion?
Below they speak of their "secret" religion, the new world religion for the planet. It is not Judaism that they speak of, for that is no mystery; but they speak of "our faith from its true point of view...will be fully learned by none save ours who will never dare to betray its secrets." What "faith" do they speak of, that is kept secret at this time till the end? "And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed." (Rev 13:15). Also notice the reference to "old order," i.e., as opposed to new (world) order.
Below we see that those who have at this time in our current generation accomplished taking God out of the schools (this is wholly a Jewish endeavor!), will in the future replace the true God with their god and this false god will be taught. Will you notice that when it happens? Will it be too late then? Yep, it's almost too late now, for as they declare "Christianity will be abolished." Why is that so hard to believe? How else could the "whole" world worship the dragon (satan) unless Christianity had by that time been so diluted and overthrown as to render it impotent? "...and all the world wondered after the beast ... And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast..." (Rev 13:3-4). Well, there is an apparatus in place, there is a people who for two thousand years have been planning for the burial of the Christian church; they work for satan, called by them Lucifer. Sadly, ignorant Christians 'run around' calling the Jews "God's chosen people." Fools!
Oh, don't be deceived, the Jews do not intend to
convert you to Judaism, for most Jews are Atheists and Satanists, Secular
Humanists and the like, they intend to turn you away from the Holy Trinity and
the Holy Spirit towards their god satan, whom Christians will come to know as
the antichrist when he sits in Jerusalem in the Jewish Temple claiming to be
God. "Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all
that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the
temple of God, shewing himself that he is God." (2 Thess 2:4). It
is then that he shall "cause that as many as would not
worship the image of the beast should be killed." (Rev 13:15). Will
it be too late then? Duh! You think?
Don't be scared, for they were wrong when they asked to stupid question below. God lives, and He shall never forsake nor leave His true Christians. But let's face it, if God in His infinite wisdom chooses to not save our lives, then it is better to die a martyr than to live another couple months serving satan―then dying eternally. "And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes? and whence came they? And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation [the martyrs, not a Rapture], and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb." (Rev 7:13-14).
Fear and quake all you so-called International Jews, you world's possessor, her controllers and her undisputed masters, whom seek to change times and seasons; for the above Scripture is not written for you but about you, it speaks not of your reward but of your punishment; for you have become the enemy of God. Have you not known "the terror of the Lord" (2 Cor 5:11), have you not considered that "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God." (Heb 10:31)? You shall. After your moment, it shall be required of you. You, some the smartest minds on the planet (rivaled only by True Israel―for Cain and Seth had the same mother) will have, at the end of the day, traded an eternity of heavenly bliss for a lifetime of rebellious riot, power, and bloodlust.
International Jews, it is not too late for you to: "...Thus saith the LORD, Let my people go , that they may serve me." (Ex 8:1). But you will not,
will you? Rabbi says that Jews might not need God
Are so-called Jews a religion, race, or a nation? And if neither, why then do they have a "Jewish look?"
EXCERPTED FROM: The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today by Elizabeth Dilling; chapter IX. JEWS NOT A RACE. Jews A Non-Racial Pharisee SectPresent-day Jews are a pot-pourri of every race of man, and they do not have any genealogical or racial derivation from the ancient peoples of the Holy Land. Since “Jews” were a mixed race from the beginning, the term “Semites” applied to them, admittedly, is silly. Thus, “Anti-Semitism,” actually means “Anti-Pharisaism.” The Chazars, for example, were part of an Asiatic horde which adopted Talmudism in the 8th Century [A.D.], when their King, Bulan, and his Court did so. Their descendants constituted the Ashkenazi Jews of Russia, Poland, and Germany, who in turn migrated in large numbers to the United States. There have been Chinese “Jews” for centuries, also India “Jews,” and Falasha Negro “Jews.” The Negro Jews of New York City have recently been asking for money for a new
synagogue, claiming that they number about 120,000 members, maintain five
synagogues and need money for a new one. Marilyn Monroe, Elizabeth Taylor, Negro
Sammy Davis, and many others have been notable additions to the Pharisee sect of
“Chosen People.” (See accompanying photostats, Exhibits
A,
B,
C,
D,
E,
F,
G, and
H, pages 59, 60, 61,
62, 63, 64, 65, 66 [original page numbers]) Why Do They “Look Jewish”?A long article, with pictures and charts, in the Jewish Encyclopedia, under “Types, Anthropological,” seeks to answer the question as to why there is a recognizable “Jewish look” as to so many self-styled “Jews.” Subjects such as percentages of blonde and brunette types, their origins, skull formations, are discussed. Then, to quote: “What is popularly known as ‘the Jewish type’ is not a correlation of definite anthropological measures or characteristics, but consists principally in a peculiar expression of face, which is immediately and unmistakably recognized as ‘Jewish’ in a large number of cases … It has also been remarked that persons who do not have the Jewish expression in their youth acquire it more and more as they grow from middle to old age.” Illustrations of how Negroes, as well as Gentile adults and children, recognize this Jewish look, are related. That the “look” is not racial is illustrated by “the Little Russians, who apparently resemble their Gentile neighbors in every facial characteristic, but are differentiated from them by some subtle nuance which distinguishes them as Semites … It is seemingly some social quality which stamps their features as distinctly Jewish.” The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith has issued a series of leaflets for Fireside Discussion Groups. Number 7 is entitled: “Three Questions Jews Must Answer.” The question “Are Jews a Race?” is answered, briefly, with the conclusion that Jews are part of a “general admixture” of races. “Are Jews a Nation?’ is answered with the idea that Jews form parts of all nations; that some of them have the Zionist ideal of a Palestinian nation but “Jews have a consciousness of world unity.” To quote: Jews are “definitely a type, and consciously a unity, we are an historic people — a world community.” The question “Are Jews a Religion?” is answered by the assertion that “There are hundreds of thousands of Jews who are unbelievers. Yet they still consider themselves Jews.” The incident of Jews converted to Christianity asking to help build a Jewish Palestine is related. “It is true that there are hundreds of thousands of atheist Jews, but they need not fear to be represented by Judaism. Of this they may be sure: that Judaism will not misrepresent them.” This is a good place to stop and agree on that point. As noted more fully elsewhere, aside from the “whited sepulchre” which constitutes the showmanship and trimmings of so-called “Judaism,” its basic doctrine is that God is the “En Sof,” a nature essence which has no attributes and can neither know nor be known. That is atheism and the basis of all pagan pantheism. Communism merely calls the same concept “dialectical materialism.” The article ends: “In a race-mad world, we will not be one more race. In a world destroyed by nationalism, we will not add one more nationalistic fury. But in a world in which religion is trying to re-establish brotherhood, we … [are] the creators and bearers of one of the eternal faiths of the human race.” But Pharisaism is not an “eternal” faith of the “human” race and, in truth, teaches as a basic law that only Pharisees are “men” or humans [See exhibit 268]. That “the synagogue of Satan,” as Christ called Pharisaism ( Revelation 2:9, 3:9) is “eternal,” is denied by the whole Bible. The B’nai B’rith pamphlet previously quoted also states:
[page 58] Indeed, it is this “oneness” of World Jewry for anti-Christianity, anti-Gentilism, pornography, immorality and plain anti-humanity which brings about a “Jewish look.” As a man “thinketh in his heart so is he.” (Proverbs 23:7) We know that the gangster or the woman of the streets will acquire a “look,” not evident in the cradle. A glance at the photos of leading Jews in a Jewish Who’s Who reveals a striking, often fierce, “Talmudic look.” Isaiah the prophet in denouncing the Judah tribe for their abominations said: “The show of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! For they have rewarded evil unto themselves!” ( Isaiah 3:9) Whatever the “Jewish look” may be caused by, it is not a result of race or genealogy. The propaganda with which we are currently deluged, to the effect that the Jews who have taken the Holy Land by force, displacing Arabs who had lived there for many centuries, are merely “descendants” of the prophets, “returning to their homeland,” is the purest fiction and wholly false. [End of excerpt] Back to list of questions at top of page The Serpent Seed Doctrine in other non-Christian historical references, and In the written traditions of other non-Christian Religions
Rich writes:
Hello Rich.
You said/asked:
From a purely historical point of view we can
see many of these concepts. But they are loosely knit and do not combine
into a rational theory, except by Christian scholars.
As with all human teachers, many of those who
teach about the Kenites have their interpretations clouded by their own
preconceived notions and latent (racial) prejudices. So as you search into
others who teach this you unavoidably run into men of unsound doctrine and
questionable character. Sorry, but man is man, and if you are a historical
researcher, then I do not have to tell you that, oftentimes, the most
despicable characters in history reveal some great hitherto lost
information. The problem is that it is difficult to quote the fellow
without tainting what he said, because his own character was so maligned.
For instance, many Christian Scholars refer to
the works of Josephus. The problem is that Josephus was a
non-Christian Jew who even, apparently, betrayed his own people; his
writings and the stories within them also quite obviously embellished and
prejudiced with Jewish pride and lore. But he writes of events from a time
when so little other writings of that time survived (the fall of Jerusalem
and the 2nd Temple to the Roman General Titus). Josephus writes as one who
was in Jerusalem at the time, then having defected to the Romans where he
was allowed to chronicle the event―so the story goes, anyway. But he does
appear to have been in the region at the time. So Josephus may be
referenced, but always with the mind to take certain things that he says
with 'a grain of salt'.
The opposition to the serpent seed doctrine
(as they call it) use this phenomenon to attempt to refute the actual
teaching. You know, the ad hominem tactic, to attack the
speaker―not what he actually speaks about.
One example that illustrates perfectly what I
just stated would be the ancient Jewish writings (in the Talmud) which speak
in no uncertain terms that the serpent in the Garden had literal sex with
Eve, and that Cain was the fruit of that union.
I will supply some quotes from their words,
but first I must preface: The Talmud is a vile satanically influenced book.
Satan transmuted it to the Jews in Babylon during their captivity there in
the Sixth Century B.C., and then again when Jewry was flushed out of
Palestine (many back into Babylon) after the destruction of the Second
Temple in A.D. 69-70
So please understand that I am not
supporting in any way the vile Jewish works now known to the world as the
Talmud. As a safeguard, and for conscience sake, I include
this below link that shows the depravity of mind, and the lack of any Godly
inspiration, in the Jewish Babylonian Talmud. See our:
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE
TALMUD: A Documented Exposéé of Jewish Supremacist Hate Literature .
OK, having properly and
responsibly prefaced this matter, let's look at what the Talmud says about
the serpent in the Garden. Why is it of any value to us what such a vile
book says of this matter, you may ask? The Talmud was composed and codified
in the years between 500 B.C. and A.D. 500 (approx.). So that any
value that we can take from the writings is not that they are God-inspired,
for they are not, quite the contrary, they are satan inspired; nor to be
necessarily trusted in any matter historical; but that they reflect the
ideas about the subject from a time of antiquity. In other words, it proves
that men on Earth had some conscious idea that the serpent in the Garden was
not a snake, that Eve wasn't eating apples, and that the serpent was in fact
satan, who had sexual intercourse with Eve, bearing Cain. Period, that is
the extent of the value of the citations.
Also, it will helpful to the reader to know,
because that you will see the name in some of the below excerpts, that the
Jews referred to satan as "the angel Sammael," who
they also refer to in Target
Pseudo-Jonathan as "the angel of the Lord"
thus expressing the Jewish predilection to worshipping satan as God.
Reader beware, the below is from the
Talmud which is satanic inspired Jewish tradition:
If any walks away from this thinking that I am saying that we got the so-called serpent seed doctrine from the Talmud, then they have entirely missed my point and haven't been listening at all to what I have been saying. (Now you know why I went to the great lengths to preface this―so that none could possible misunderstand―but some will, anyway.) The doctrine itself is correct, supported by the Bible, and it just so happens that satan's people also knew of it, though they don't consider that it is the genealogy of some of them, that it refers to. The Babylonians also have a Creation story and and a Deluge story which they corrupted from the original (the below book, Sargon The Magnificent, speaks on this). A much better source of hard to find info on the Kenites would be in Mrs. Sydney Bristowe's book Sargon The Magnificent published in 1928.
We have a link to the book and a short
description of it on our Homepage. Perhaps you have seen it? I
will reproduce that review of the book below. And I will add that
the book is full of info that the discerning eye can glean from.
Mrs. Bristowe didn't know anything about any sons of the serpent,
but inadvertently, in her book, she gives us a rare glimpse into
their genealogy, migrations, dating, ancient place-names, and
artifacts. The book is well worth the price. In fact, I have two
copies in case I loose one and the book becomes unavailable (as
often does with works that get a little too close to the fire).
So please do not use this as a reason
to launch into satanic writings, of to delve into Talmud, for Talmud
will eat your soul up from within, as it has done to the Jewish
people.
You asked for historical evidence,
Sargon The Magnificent is the best out there, though you must
connect the dots that Mrs. Bristowe either know or chose not to
link.
God bless the study of His Word, in Jesus Christ's name! Back to list of questions at top of page | To top |
In
His Service: Contact
Editor | Bible
studies | Newer
students |
Bible Q
& A's
| Study
tools
| Search
our site NOTE: To insure quality and content integrity, these In-depth Bible Studies are © copyrighted and may only be downloaded for study and shared private use. They may not be reproduced or distributed for sale or publication without prior written approval. Other Christian Web sites are welcome to link up to this Website or any page on it. |
haa-'adam
with
the Article is the man.
(Emphasis added) 
