Bible Questions & Answers (page #60) - Watchmen Bible Study Group

QUESTION LIST; Page Number 60
| To list of all questions on Website |

Mind-Control slaves and other such remarkable claims
Why don't otherwise good ministries speak as openly about the International Judaics?
Do we dare speak to satan?
Is Freemasonry safe to join?
Problems viewing Webpages
Noah's Flood and Kenites
The 134 places in the O.T. where the Sopherim altered "Jehovah" to "Adonai", and how the King James Bible in effect put it back
If the International Judaics control so much, then why don't average everyday "Jews" know of it?
AIPAC's (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) control of major Christian groups and Presidential hopefuls

| To list of all questions on Website |

Question #1

| Back To Top |

Mind-Control slaves and other such remarkable claims

A reader writes:

Sir,

I wanted to know if you have had the opportunity to read the below titled book? I undecided on whether this book is propaganda being that it is a book published (Judaic Controlled) that is exposing the mind control capabilities of the "elites" and specific people under their control. Do you have any opinions on this book or is it something you recommend to be left alone?

Thanks and God Bless

[Xxxxxx]

http://educate-yourself.org/mc/thankstableofcontents.shtml

Thanks for The Memories
The Truth Has Set Me Free!
The Memoirs of Bob Hope's and Henry Kissinger's mind-controlled Slave

Answer:

Hello; I have seen some stuff like that on the Internet. My opinion is that it is very far out there, if you know what I mean.

I am aware that there was (and possibly still is) some work on mind control, however, some of the claims in these type books are just too unbelievable.

It could be that it is "them" publishing stories that are so wacky and so unrealistic—that people will then not believe anything of their mind-control experiments.

My advice is to read things like that with caution, and anything that just sounds too weird should not be believed unless you find second witnesses in other trusted publications. "They" have an interest in making people like us look stupid—it makes everything that we say about "them" look foolish and paranoid. Watch out for that tactic. And as Pastor Murray says, "protect your credibility."

I agree with you, the way that you seem to be thinking is that if it is too wild to believe, it probably is baloney.

I feel that you are right to question works such as the one you linked for me.

Nevertheless, there were documented mind-control studies, like Project Montauk and some of the Timothy Leary LSD studies by our own CIA. But my (admittedly cursory) studies on the matter (mind control experiments) reveals that they were/are not successful, and that they just end up with burned-out mind-numb "zombies" (mostly from huge dosages of psychosomatic drugs and extreme electroshock therapy. Yes, evil men did this to people! Their intent was to so shock the psyche of a person that they separate them from their mind, hoping therefore to have a "blank slate to work with. God seems to get in their way at every turn, though, and just takes the people home, if you know what I mean. Die, or be in a "vegetative state"; i.e., soul going back with God, but body kept alive by machines and chemicals.

Nevertheless, they are controlling us in more subtle ways with environmental agents, such as the new fertilizers and foodstuff plastics which act on the human body increasing female hormones in both sexes, which explains why today females are more aggressive and males are more effeminate. This in no small way has contributed to the spike in violence among young women and the early onset of menstruation in very young girls (10+), and Lesbianism/BiSexuality in females as well; and the explosion of homosexuality/BiSexuality in young males. Of course there are other factors involved as well. But environmental agents (chemicals) do affect the body at fundamental levels.

Another way they hope to affect people is through ELF waves (Extremely Low Frequency radio waves) which do affect and stimulate certain centers in the brain temporarily (while the waves are being directed at a person) and can make people have emotional overload (extreme anger or sadness or fear). This seems to me to be quite well documented. It has to do with the HAARP Project in Alaska, and Russia's even more advanced research in this field. It works because our brain communicates within itself by electromagnetic impulses, and when they find the correct frequency they can confuse the brain by bathing it in waves of that frequency. But it is only temporary as long as they are "beaming" the waves at people (at high levels they kill by this manner, but presently it takes too much power to be feasible, and also it is indiscriminate; i.e., it kills everyone in the area).

If you search the Internet there are actually Law Enforcement tools that do this in a smaller way. Though I have never seen one in person, they are advertised in Law Enforcement journals. It is documented that they have a machine that can "beam" waves at a crowd and make them nauseous. So stuff like that is not junk-science or conspiracy-nut stuff; it is out there on the market to Law Enforcement agencies. But understandably, no jurisdiction is ready to be the first to deploy it. Can you imagine the six o'clock news reporting that Chicago Police pointed a new weapon at people sending them to the hospital, sick? Well, in the civil unrest leading up to the Tribulation they will use all kinds of stuff on us and the media won't be reporting it, because they will be in lock-down phase due to "national security issues." The don't make these weapons without intending to field them. They are called "Less Than Lethal Weapons" (if you want to search them out on the Internet), and they have Military as well as Law Enforcement applications.

But when they say that Vice Pres. Dick Cheney or Bob Hope has/had mind-programmed sex slaves servicing him—well, come on, give me a break! I mean, didn't somebody notice them?

People with their money and fame don't need zombies, they usually buy an "aspiring actress." What wouldn't Paris Hilton or her slut sidekick, Brittany Spears, do to sleep with, say, a President or a Frank Sinatra? Nothing, they're moral pigs. A lot of people making these claims are "disturbed" people or attention-seekers.

So take it all with a grain of salt until you receive competent verification that you can trust.

Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
_______________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST]

God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name!
Nick Goggin

Back to list of questions at top of page

Question #2

| Back To Top |

Why don't otherwise good ministries speak as openly about the International Judaics?

A reader writes:

Subject: Shepherds Chapel Student of 20 years
Hello Mr. Goggin,

I found your Web-site a few months ago. I have read several of your studies. I would like to thank you for going deeper into many of the subjects that Pastor Murray teaches. I really like how you go more into detail who the KENITE'S are. I have learned more about them with your site in 2 days than 20 years with Pastor Murray. Not to down grade Pastor Murray, but you know what I mean. Maybe it is because he is on TV and can't get into more detail of them. Again thank you so much for all of the very hard work you are doing with this Web-Site and for you strong stance on the issue's. Not many would have the gut's to speak the whole truth and for that I am sure many, many more are so thankful.

[Xxxx Xxxxxx].

[Xxxxxx], Alabama.

Answer:

Hello [Xxxxxxx]. Thank you for the kind words. And I agree with your assessment that Pastor Murray simply could not be as open as I am regarding the International Judaics (whose leaders are Kenites), because they control the very networks and airwaves that the Chapel broadcasts on. They would find a way to shut him down, and then all the people that are drawn into the Word would miss such a great opportunity. I, on the other hand, operate on the Internet, which presently is still relatively wide open—but not for long.

I will say that I am amazed that SCN students, some of the best Bible students in the world (!), are wholly uninformed regarding the Kenites. To most SCN students, the Kenites, whom I identify as "International Judaics" on this Website, are some mysterious people that they know are out there but cannot identify. I think that this is an inadvertent result of the International Judaic's power over broadcasting which serves to cloak their activities. So powerful is this cadre of remarkable men that they can even influence content on the Shepherds Chapel Network! I found that out five or seven years ago when Dennis asked me (nicely) to remove links to the Shepherds Chapel from my Website because "someone" complained that I "spoke ill" of the Jewish Talmud, and that wouldn't be good for SCN to be associated with (but all I really did was to quote directly some of the Talmud's insults of Jesus Christ, His blessed-forever mother, and Christianity in general). And this, of course, further documents my premises.

“If you want to identify the real rulers of any society, simply ask yourself this question: ‘Who is it that I cannot criticize?’” ― Strom

However, I truly do understand why PM has to skim over these matters. You've been a Chapel student for twenty years, and if you remember some of his older work you will remember that he used to speak a little more openly on "the Jewish question" years ago. Nevertheless, I totally respect Pastor Murray's work, he has cut roads where there once were no roads. He's the best out there!

Back to list of questions at top of page

Question #3

| Back To Top |

Do we dare speak to satan?

A reader writes:

...I will ask a very simple yes or no question of you.

Does Ezekiel 28:12 and Isaiah 14:12 document that at the prompting of the Holy Spirit, God's watchmen can and did, in fact, speak directly to the devil/Satan/Lucifer/King of Tyre. Note these two events were before the events of Calvary.

I'll let you post the actual verses cause you do it nice and neat.

[Xxxxx]

Answer:

Hello. No, we are not to speak to him at all! Even Archangel Michael (in Jude) dared not engage in conversation with satan.

Jude 9

9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst [dared] not bring against him a railing accusation, but [only!] said, The Lord rebuke thee. KJV

What you are referring to in the below was not the prophet's speaking to satan per sey; but rather, God through His Holy Spirit was inspiring these men to write His (God's) words to satan. The prophets were merely writing a book for God. There is a difference. You refer to:

Ezekiel 28:11-12
11 Moreover the word of the Lord came unto me, saying,
12 Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord God; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. KJV

Isaiah 14:12
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! KJV

It would be a grave (and dangerous) error to misinterpret the above to mean that we may operate at satan's level. Satan is a supernatural angel, we are flesh men. We are not to engage in conversations beyond this realm. The Old Testament refers to that as necromancy (communing with the dead), where it is expressly prohibited. They are also referred to as "familiar spirits," and we are also forbidden contact with them.

Deuteronomy 18:9-13

9 When thou art come into the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations.

10 There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,

11 Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.

12 For all that do these things are an abomination unto the Lord: and because of these abominations the Lord thy God doth drive them out from before thee.

13 Thou shalt be perfect with the Lord thy God. KJV

There's a lot of witchcraft going on nowadays. Many young people are being drawn into the occult through the Judaic's programming, such as Buffy the Vampire Slayer and the Harry Potter movies, etc. There are many TV programs recently which glorify witchcraft and spell-casting. Young people need to know what God really thinks of witches and all that sort of occult activity:

Exodus 22:18

18 Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. KJV

That's Capital Punishment! But since we don't do that here, God will do it when they get up there.

Back to list of questions at top of page

Question #4

| Back To Top |

Is Freemasonry safe to join?

A reader writes:

Good day,

whats your opinion of the Freemasons. and do you think it is a safe Group to join.

[Xxxx Xxxxx]

Answer:

Hello. No, it is a satanic group at the top. In the beginning they don't tell you. Do a google.com search under the search terms "Freemasonry satanic." This link will show you the results page where you can view many articles.

Back to list of questions at top of page

Question #5

| Back To Top |

Problems viewing Webpages

Note: While this isn't a Bible question, it does affect how one follows our studies here. And I include it for those who may be new to computers and don't really understand it all. I will also say that I am not a computer tech, and that there are many out there who know far more than I on this subject.

The problem: The below reader isn't seeing the full page when he goes to the Website (on some pages). In this case, on Q&A page #58 he only sees the first Q&A and the other eight do not show up for him.

A reader writes:

Thanks Nick,

I don't mean I cannot log on to your WebSite. What I mean is that when I click on any of the below 6 posts I get the empty page which I have pasted below it.

[Xxxxx]

Answer:

Hello [Xxxx]. I think I know what is happening to you. What you need to do is to refresh your browser. What happens is that your browser is set to not check for page updates; and what it does is to store a Webpage on your computer so that when you go there again it shows you the old page (stored in your computer's cache) without the updates. That's why you only see Q&A #1 when in reality that page has been updated to Q&A's 1-9.

So what you do is this: go to that page in your browser (like when you went there to copy & paste it to show me in your e-mail), and then right-click anywhere on that page. A dialog box will open with some choices. Click on "refresh" or "reload." (depending on your browser) and the page will disappear for a moment. It is then reloading from the Internet instead of from your computer's browser cache. It will then come back on with the latest information from the Internet (you will see all nine Q&As, instead of just the first one).

Let me know if this solves your problem. OK? I just checked that page and all was fine; so the problem is on your computer. And no-doubt this is happening to you with other Websites that update pages like ours does (instead of posting new pages for every article), but you just don't realize it. If this works for you, and it should; then, go into your browser's properties menu and set it to check for new updates on Webpages.

Unless, of course, you have an old slow computer. That is the reason why computers store Webpages in caches—so that you don't have to wait for a slow computer to download entire Webpages every time that you go there (presumably because they don't change from the first time you went there). With the new high-speed Internet connections (like Broadband, etc.) this feature is archaic, and as you see, actually causes more harm than good.

If you routinely have to wait a long time for Website pages to open (show up on your screen), pictures take a long time to show up on Webpages, and/or if you have trouble watching videos on the Internet (they break-up or stop and start, or take a long time to begin), then you need to either have your computer upgraded (more RAM or a faster processor [or a new computer—the new ones are phenomenal, even the cheaper new models], or go to a high-speed Internet connection (Broadband, cable modems, etc.).

Your local computer store can assist you with assessing your system and whether it is simply too old to update (three or four years) and that you must get a new one with the new motherboards and processors, etc. Computers evolve at break-neck speed nowadays. Every two years your computer becomes outdated. So that the cheapest new system is faster than the fastest ones of four or five years ago, so you needn't buy a mega-priced computer—$800-$1000 is fine. I update my entire system every other year to keep up with the new technologies. I am currently (Mar, 2007) running Windows XP-Pro with a 3.2 Gigabit Pentium 4 Processor and 3-1/2 gigabits of RAM, with a Broadband high-speed Internet connection—and I operate as smooth as silk. Though, already there are faster stock systems out there, and I will upgrade this summer, funds permitting.

All these new "Internet gadgets" (video, Flash media, high-density photos, etc.) that pop-up on your computer nowadays require faster systems and Internet connections. If you spend as much time on the computer and Internet as I do, then a fast system becomes a necessity. Some people buy golf clubs or go fishing—I invest in work-gear, that is to say my computers and software. Of course, I save a lot of money because I build my own computers.

Let me know that this solved your problem.

The reader replies:

Howdy Nick,

Thanks a zillion for your explanation and the trick to solve my problem. And yes, as soon as I right clicked and refreshed the page in question it immediately reacted and now it works like a bomb. I'll definitely remember this solution while on other webSites. ....

[Xxxx]

WBSG comment:

The reader also attached an article to his reply that I will share here for those interested in such things. It is about the Netherlands (which is believed to have been populated by the true-Israel tribe of Zebulun).

Article source: http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/kinsfolk.html

OUR KINSFOLK IN THE NETHERLANDS
ALWAYS CLOSELY ASSOCIATED WITH BRITAIN

By
R. Cox

THE Netherlands must, undoubtedly, contain a significant portion of the Israelite remnant still outside the Company of Nations. Support for this contention appeared some years ago in The Voice of the Netherlands, in which H. Posthurnus, a Dutch writer, pointed out that 'few people in either Britain or the Netherlands realise the age and intimacy of Anglo-Dutch retations.' During the last 2,000 years by social, political and economic movements the influence of the Netherlands on British development has been considerable.

Many British and Dutch people have a common ancestry from which they have inherited similar qualities. Their passionate love of liberty has made them the pioneers of modern democracy and religious toleration. 'Nations of shopkeepers' both, their genius for commerce built up the strength which finally broke the power of Louis XIV and Napoleon and stimulated the love of enterprise which has made them explorers and colonists in the world.

Before Caesar's conquest of Britain, there were Low Dutch people who had immigrated into Britain from Flanders, because of floods; the Frisians conducted most of Britain's import and export trade before the invasions of the AngloSaxons in the fifth and sixth centuries. In the eighth century, England was a centre of learning. Some missionaries, like Willibrod and Boniface, worked among the Frislans. Then in the ninth and tenth centuries, the learned people of England - Alcuin among them - were driven by the attacks of the Danes to the Continent. In the latter half of the tenth century, the foreign trade of London laid the foundations of its future commercial greatness. Because of its relations with the merchants of the Dutch towns of Tiel and Dordrecht - the greatest commercial centres of that time - England's prosperity increased.

Following the Norman Conquest, there came many Flemish weavers who had a large share in the development of England. Dutch immigrants started sheep-farming, which was to contribute so much to England's early greatness. The Flemish type of industrial organisation inspired the formation of the English guilds of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. In the twelfth century Dutch merchants had their own private wharves in London and were members of the Guildhall. At the time of the Conquest, many Anglo-Saxon refugees settled in the Low Countries. Thomas a Becket escaped to Holland. Time and again Dutch soldiers have fought on English soil, where some of their descendants now are. In 1165, for example, Henry II fought the Welsh with Flemish and Brabant troops.

With Dutch help, England had, soon after the period of Edward I, become the chief wool-growing country in Europe and the services of the cloth manufacturers of the Netherlands were promised: "They shall feed on fat beef and mutton till nothing but fullness shall stint their stomachs." Again, thousands of weavers came over as instructors and assistants to the English. England at this time was still a farming country, and the capital and enterprise of the Dutch were also courted, with the result that such artisans as linen-weavers, feltmakers and clock makers were introduced. Dutch printing presses became famous at an early date. .... [Continued at source: http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/kinsfolk.html]

Back to list of questions at top of page

Question #6

| Back To Top |

Noah's Flood and Kenites

A reader writes:

Subject: Cain's seed
I read through your article and impressed your research. My question is how did Cain's descendants live through the flood? Was one of Noah's son's wives a descendant of Cain? Was Noah's wife of pure lineage to Seth also?

On a side note, was it Cain's lineage that created the Nephilim with the fallen angels, or was it also a branch of Seth's that was corrupted?

[Xxxxx Xxxxx]

Answer:

Hello. Thank you for the kind comment. I will answer your above, in order, okay?

Q: "My question is how did Cain's descendants live through the flood?"

Often we find that we must re-think long held assumptions. This is the case with commonly taught elements of Noah's Flood. The Flood of Noah was not global, Cain's ancestors lived in a region of the Earth that was not affected by that Great Deluge. You will find that in many ancient civilizations there are Deluge Stories.

In other words, take the Chinese for instance; they have a Flood Story that speaks of the waters washing over a mountain range. They could not have written that if they who had witnessed the event all died in it. Also, a global flood does not account for the different races of man that we see today. It is impossible for all the races to have sprung from Noah's party of eight which were on the Ark. (I am emphatically in disagreement with some teachers who state that there were other humans onboard Noah's Ark other than the eight listed in Scripture, by the way.) For a Biblical answer to this subject see our: Noah's Flood not global, nor does the Bible say it was: proofs

Q: "Was one of Noah's son's wives a descendant of Cain?"

Some have supposed so, but it cannot be true. The reason why it cannot be true is that we have later in Genesis the genealogical lists of the children of all three of Noah's sons (and of his wife's incestuous-born child Canaan [*see Scripture below]), and none of these are Kenites. Though Canaan's sons intermixed with the Kenites early on, but this is off-topic and worthy of greater treatment at some later time and place. So your answer is, no.

Genesis 9:18-19

18 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.

19 These are the three sons of Noah: and of them was the whole earth overspread. KJV

Q: "Was Noah's wife of pure lineage to Seth also?"

Yes, she would have to have been, or else Shem wouldn't be pure. And if Shem wasn't pure, then the Shemites (Semites) wouldn't be. And if they weren't, then Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Israel) weren't. And if they weren't pure, then Jesus Christ would not have been. So yes, she was pure Adamic stock (of Adam's line), as was Noah.

Now, some will try to challenge this (and your above question on Noah's sons) by saying that multiple wives may have been involved. This is not consistent with the Biblical account, and to unnaturally force a supposition such as this into the account is presumptuous, to say the least, and causes other Scripture-conflicts so as to be untenable.

Q: "On a side note, was it Cain's lineage that created the Nephilim with the fallen angels"

No, Cain had nothing to do with the Nephilim (the Giants of Genesis chapter six), they were fathered by (evil) angels and mothered by Adamic females. Which was the reason for the Flood of Noah to begin with, and why it was regionally centered upon Adam's tribe.

Q: "or was it also a branch of Seth's that was corrupted?"

Answered above (with the note that Adam was Seth's father, and that Seth was an Adamite by tribe). And It wasn't merely a branch of Seth's (and thus his father Adam's) line, it was all of it, except Noah's family.

Back to list of questions at top of page

Question #7

| Back To Top |

The 134 places in the O.T. where the Sopherim altered "Jehovah" to "Adonai", and how the King James Bible in effect put it back

A reader writes:

Hi Nick,

I read your website regularly and I see how busy you are, so, if you do not have time to respond or if your response is delayed, I understand. No rush. I greatly admire the work you've done in service to our Lord and I appreciate how fearlessly you move forward for the truth's sake. This cannot be said of many.

I'm writing because I have a question. In my own studies I've stumbled across Bullinger's appendix on the 134 places where the Sopherim altered "Jehovah" to "Adonai". Though I've read this before, it still comes as a shock to me that individuals entrusted with preserving the Scriptures would in fact alter them in 134 places. Moreover I find it appalling that the purpose was to erase God's name (supposedly to keep from 'taking it in vain', which I feel is a bullshit reason and that something more sinister was intended). In my opinion these are "The 134 sins of the Sopherim" as I am confident God will reward those evil men according to their works. I mean truly, what good was to come from taking God's name out of His own Bible? Is not Jehovah (or Yehovah, which is the correct pronunciation according to the Hebrew text underlying the KJV Bible) His name "forever" and His "memorial unto all generations" (Exo. 3:15)? This act of the Sopherim, to me, is a greater sin than if they actually had taken His name in vain.

Anyway, getting to my question; it would appear that the translators of the KJV Bible refused to correct this mistake and instead followed after the sin of the Sopherim. This time God's name wasn't altered in a mere 134 places but over 6,500 times, nearly completely eliminating it from the Bible. In only a handful of places was it transliterated for the Bible student to read. The rest of the time the generic title "LORD" was inserted in its place; just as the Sopherim did with "Adonai". This is a great evil I cannot lightly overlook. I refuse to refer to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ as "the LORD God of Israel" when truly He is "Jehovah, the God of Israel."

I admit I could be wrong and this is why I'm writing this question: Was it the right move for the Sopherim and the KJV scholars to blot out God's name from the Holy Bible? If so, why? And what was the purpose? I feel the controversy over pronunciation and the missing vowel points is an invalid excuse. But I am interested in hearing your take on it.

Keep up the good work on the website. I found the recently-posted article by Colonel Mohr particularly informative. Thank you for providing it.

[Xxxxx Xxxxx]

Answer:

Note: The reader refers to the following appendix of the Companion Bible: The 134 Passages where the Sopherim altered "Jehovah" to "Adonai".

See also related appendices: The "Eightteen Emendations" of the Sopherim, and The Fifteen Extraordinary Points of the Sopherim. Another excellent one is: The Massorah.

And though the data isn't perfect, WBSG nonetheless highly recommends the The Companion Bible by Bullinger (Large Print Edition).

Hi [Xxxx]. Sorry to take so long getting back. I agree that it is never right to alter God's Word. I refer to what the Sopherim did, not to what you say that the King James Bible translators did. More on this later.

And while you may see this "glass half empty," I see a "glass half full." What I mean is that this is just another opportunity to witness God's hand on the translation and Translators of the 1611 King James version Bible. For, they put back the words changed by the Judaics (the Sopherim during the years 410-300 B.C., according to Bullinger in The Massorah ¶5). The KJV reads "Lord" in every place where the Judaics altered Yehovah to Adonai. In other words, in the KJV they wrote "Adonai" as Lord, and Yehovah (Jehovah otherwise spelled in English, as you know), they spelled Lord. Now, the scholar may notice that one word (Lord) is simply a capitalized word, and that the other word (Lord) is actually capitalized and with small capitals for the following letters (ord), but the average reader will not notice this.

Magnified to show font detail (18 pt. version of the Times New Roman font used in KJV):

Adonai	=	Lord
Yehovah	=	Lord

So that in effect, in the great and faithful Bible translation, the King James version, the Lord's name was put back into its rightful place! A Scripture that has both versions of the word "Lord" is below for your comparison. I choose the first instance of this in the Bible, which is at verse Gen 16:3. And once again I have enlarged the text for better viewing. Also to be noted: in my BibleSoft software it does not (as does not the "newer Bible versions," either) follow the King James font usage, nor does it follow the King James use of Italic type, unfortunately. Therefore, I have added it in, in the below, to make it look exactly like the text of my trusty old King James Bible which retains a prominent place upon my work desk; it is our Carpenter's hammer, the Plumber's wrench, the Digger's shovel:

Genesis 18:1-3
18 And the Lord [Yehovah] appeared unto him in the plains of Mam'-re: and he sat in the tent door in the heat of the day;
2 And he lift up his eyes and looked, and, lo, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and bowed himself toward the ground,
3 And said, My Lord [Adonai], if now I have found favour in thy sight, pass not away, I pray thee, from thy servant: KJV

For closer inspection, same text from above, enlarged to 24 points:

Lord [Yehovah]
Lord [Adonai]

Regarding your opinion that the English word "Lord" is somehow insulting: I simply cannot disagree with you more. The Word "Lord," capitalized, is the name of God in the English language. If you want to see it written as in the Hebrew language (Yehovah, or actually, as it appears, simply YHVH), then you really should write it in its pure Hebrew form— (Hebrew text reads right to left, as you know). Which means that then you have to be able to read Hebrew to read it, which is why they made an English language translation to begin with.

The "Sacred Names" movement (and Bibles) I do not approve of; for, they cast doubt on the Bible in general and try to impress people with their command of the Hebrew language which few today understand. My question is, why make such a strong issue of this? Also, an improper teaching, or an irresponsible teaching, of the various names of God in the holy Scriptures, can inadvertently confuse a student into almost seeing more than one God!

And if some consider that God's name should only be written in Hebrew, then why not then use the original Hebrew for all names in the Bible, while you're at it? Or, why not just use all Hebrew for the whole Old Testament? Answer: because then 99.9% of the world could not read it. Which would undo God's purpose of making available an English translation in the first place. There is absolutely nothing wrong with writing the name of our—and the only true God—as Lord. Nothing! Capitalizing the "L" serves as the definite article, thus in the English language differentiating between Lord and lord. For as God has declared:

1 Corinthians 8:5-6
5 For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,)
6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. KJV

The "Sacred Names Movement" is an unnecessary and potentially injurious distraction. And the King James Bible is the only true rendition of God's written Word into English; may I repeat for emphasis, ONLY. None of the other versions keep true to the text as the King James translators have. None. And when two Bible versions, which both claim to be God's Bible, are different in thousands of places, then one of them is a liar. Period. In the King James Bible the Holy Spirit has perfectly defined the Holy Trinity (the Godhead otherwise called), but in all the newer Bible versions it has been removed. Observe the King James Bible compared to the most popular "newer Bible versions" on the 1st John 5:7 verse:

King James Version (the most-used Bible on the earth for 400 years)

1 John 5:7
7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. KJV

New International Version (popular with modern Protestants, Baptists, Charismatics, Pentecostals, etc.)

1 John 5:7
7 For there are three that testify: NIV

New American Standard (Updated version) (popular with modern Catholics)

1 John 5:7
7 For there are three that testify: NASU

New Living Translation: (popular with modern Amatuers)

1 John 5:7
7 So we have these three witnesses— NLT

No wonder so many Christians today have no grasp of the Holy Trinity, the nature of God, or the deity of Jesus Christ! The exact purpose of molesting the Scripture, by the way. And you can thank Adamantius Origen for the original corrupt text underlying them all (his Hexapla)! Regarding the Trinity, see our: The Holy Spirit & The Holy Trinity

So, which is it? Did the a.d. 1611 King James Bible lie by adding, or did the a.d. 1970's New International Version (and all others) lie by omitting? They can't both be correct, and they certainly cannot both be God's Word.

And this is not directed to you personally, [Xxxx], but it is directed right into the face of those several people that say that "all Bible versions are good," even though they differ in many places! It is a shame that we even have the term "Bible versions," a word itself (versions) which casts doubt upon the purity and faithfulness of God's holy written Word. Shame on them!

Only an apostate would have ever re-written the Bible with other manuscripts, as ALL newer Bible version's New Testaments are based upon the horribly corrupt & altered codex Vaticanus and codex Sinaiticus. It is these later Bible version makers that shall share the fate of the Sopherim, and not the faithful King James Bible version translators—Godly men who operated under the direct inspiration of the Holy Spirit of God. Bold statement? Yes, bold and unshakable, and it is "a hill that I am willing to die on."

People babble about how the newer versions are just as good as the King James Bible, and that the matter is a small one regarding the various "versions"—totally willing to overlook the fact that the newer version's New Testaments are as much a five-thousand words SHORTER! How can that be acceptable to any true Christian? See our: Adulterations in the Newer Bible Versions (NIV, NASB...); Proof that the King James Bible (KJV) is the True Word of God

The Sopherim's witness against them:

Old Testament

Deuteronomy 4:2
2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you. KJV

The newer Bible version maker's witness against them:

New Testament

Revelation 22:18-21
18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
20 He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.
21 The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen. KJV [End of the Bible]

[Xxxx], in your letter you seemed very angry at the King James Bible, saying of its Translator's work "This is a great evil I cannot lightly overlook"; who is turning your heart against the written Word of God? Could it be so-called "Scholars"??? Percentage wise, there shall be more "Bible Scholars" in hell than shall there be prostitutes in hell. For the prostitute defiles the flesh, but the Bible-corrector defiles the holy written Word of God.

Oh foolish scholars, charging to the Bible as error things which they understand not!

Galatians 6:7
7 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. KJV

Watch out for so-called "Bible scholars," most of them work for satan. And why not; where else would we expect to find satan working but in corrupting the very written Word of God (in the "newer versions") and deluding the people of God into doubting it (in the King James version)? He also has many men at pulpits deceiving God's precious Christian children with false doctrine.

And the below excerpt which may make it into my upcoming book will illustrate what is happening to the "scholars," and why they are so apostate:

Rabbis lie to defame the Messiah Jesus Christ

"The Jewish records of the Rabbis are of extreme importance in determining Gospel origins and the value of the church presentation of the virgin birth story of Jesus Christ. A common appellation for Jesus in the Talmud was Yeshu'a ben Panthera [English reads: Jesus, son of Panthera], an allusion to the widespread Jewish belief during the earliest centuries of the Christian era that Jesus was the result of an illegitimate union between his mother and a Roman soldier named Tiberius Julius Abdes Panthera."¹

    The above excerpt is from a blasphemous book, The Bible Fraud, which includes sub-chapters titled, (in the Index): “Was this book foreseen by Nostradamus?”, (in Chpt.5): “How to make a clergyman squirm”, (in Chpt.9): “Jesus adopted the Druidic wisdom”, (in Chpt.10): “Jesus’ third marriage”, (in Chpt.14): “The expansion of the Krist knowledge.” Well, you get the idea.

    And for something even more shocking, observe what the President of Holos University Graduate Seminary says about the above blasphemous book:

"The Bible Fraud should be read by everyone .... I have made it required reading for all my students." ― C. Norman Shealy, M.D., Ph.D. President, Holos University Graduate Seminary ²

    At the above University's website we see that they offer training in many religious degrees (see below). So that many people will be entering the Bible-research fields bearing high degrees in religious studies who are absolutely Godless and reprobate. Satan is leavening the scholar field, and poor uninformed Christians might give ear to these men and women because they bear great scholarly titles (and are also ordained ministers in some cases). Observe the University's training programs:

....The University [Holos University Graduate Seminary] prepares graduates to serve in such roles as Spiritual Directors, Spiritual Intuitive Counselors, and Ordained Ministers.
MASTER OF THEOLOGY
DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY
EXTENDED EMPHASIS
POST-DOCTORAL
and
CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS.... — source

Below is Dr. Shealy's full quote which was only excerpted above:

How I wish I had been able to research the many references in this book!

I have studied the history of the Bible most of my life and there seems to be no doubt that the entire New Testament is a fabrication created by edict of Constantine, a ruthless dictator not unlike Saddam Hussein.

Once one recognizes that there is not just one distortion but also thousands of distortions, how can any statement be honored??

The Bible Fraud should be read by everyone. Whether Jesus was one of twins, a first report to me, is relatively immaterial. That he lived and was the foundation for the Myth of Christianity is the fascinating story.

The fact is that facts in the Bible are not facts!!

Intelligent thinking individuals need to read this. I have made it required reading for all my students. — C. Norman Shealy, M.D., Ph.D. President, Holos University Graduate Seminary - November 2002 Source

Footnotes:
¹ “The evidence of the Rabbis,” The Bible Fraud, by Tony Bushby. Source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biblianazar/esp_biblianazar_7.htm² Advertisement for the book, The Bible Fraud by Tony Bushby. Source: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/internal/fraud.htm

The end truly is nigh! And the above intellectual garbage is the natural progression from doubting that the King James Bible is God's written Word in the English language.

For a defense of the trusted King James version Bible (the Authorized Version, or the A.V.) see our: Adulterations in the Newer Bible Versions (NIV, NASB...); Proof that the King James Bible (KJV) is the True Word of God

Back to list of questions at top of page

Question #8

| Back To Top |

If the International Judaics control so much, then why don't average everyday "Jews" know of it?

A (Judaic Christian) reader writes:

Dear Nick,   Remember me? I have been out of touch for a long time, but still check things on your web site every now and then.

    I am currently reading the abridged edition of Henry Ford's [THE INTERNATIONAL JEW, THE WORLD'S FOREMOST PROBLEM], which you have posted. I am puzzled by something that keeps getting reiterated in his writings. Over and over again, he stresses the near-total unity of the Jews in the US, giving numerous examples of the control exercised by the Kehillas in mobilizing the people to work together for the aims of the Protocols.

    Now I do indeed agree that America has been "Judaized". Ted Weiland's 4-part tape series, "Beware of the Leaven of the Pharisees", makes the case for this viewpoint very well, and has the advantage of being put together much more recently than Ford's materials.   BUT...I have to say that my own experience, and that of my parents and aunts and uncles and cousins, does NOT bear out Ford's claims. I know of few if any in my extended family who belonged to Jewish organizations, lodges, secret societies, etc.   Indeed, most had little or no contact with synagogues, rabbis, etc. My parents had nothing whatsoever to do with organized Judaism. If they had run into the rabbis in the New York suburban cities where they lived during my childhood years, they would not have recognized who these men were. No rabbi or other Jewish official ever visited my parents' home, or contacted them on the telephone or by mail. In my own case, I have never had anything to do with any Jewish organization whatsoever. During my years at Cornell University, I never once attended religious services, or any "function" sponsored by the campus Jewish organization. And no one, at any time, during scores of family reunions during my childhood and young adult years, ever spoke of any obligation to "work for the good of the Jewish people", or anything similar. Everyone was too materialistic, too self-indulgent, to contribute time or money or even emotional energy to such matters. Only one member of my family was "anti-goy", and she was merely an aunt by marriage. My parents detested such sentiments, and would have been very troubled if I had become bigoted like my aunt. (My aunt was an adulterous criminal, the mistress of an Italian mafia figure, and spent time in prison for embezzlement. My parents despised her.)

     So...to conclude:   I understand what Henry Ford was saying, and I do agree with many of his claims. Certainly the de-Christianization of America has proceeded, and is proceeding today, just as he stated. But his descriptions of Jewish solidarity, control of rank-and-file Jews by the hierarchy, etc., sound totally foreign. He might as well have been describing social organization in Uzbekistan or the islands of Indonesia.

     Indeed, I never even heard the word, "Kehilla", until the last year or so, and his descriptions of how the Kehillas operate is totally foreign to my experience. Indeed, only twice in my 60+ years has anyone ever exhorted me toward any Jewish goals. In one case this was because I was not attending services on the "high holy days", and in the other case it was because I had been attempting to convert a Jewish woman, a member of my former new age study group, to Christ!   Neither of these people had any power to coerce me. Their exhortations could not have come as the result of any "orders" from a Kehilla, as they were merely spontaneous responses to words I had spoken to them.

     By the way, in the eight and one half years I have lived in this village, I have never met any resident who seemed Jewish.   I may indeed be the only year-round resident (this is a tourist area) who has a Jewish background. The nearest synagogue is almost 25 miles away.

     If you have any response I would be interested to hear from you.

   Blessing in the Lord Jesus Christ, [Xxxxx]

Answer:

Hello [Xxxx], nice to see that you are doing well. I know what you mean. And this is why I am always careful to distinguish between "everyday average Jewish people" like yourself, and the International Judaics (Int. Judaics).

As you no-doubt know, there are different "kinds" of Judaics. There are religious ones, Atheist ones, etc. The group that is running the world are a small percentage of Jews over all. And they have hidden (entrenched) themselves within global Jewry. These Judaics are the ones that Mr. Ford was familiar with because he was rich and powerful, and that is where the Int. Judaics gravitate to, money and power. Mr. Ford would never meet you, and you wouldn't be socializing with the Int. Judaics that the Ford's, Wilsons, and Clinton's, etc. do. All Presidents, Kings, and heads of State, and business leaders, and men of power everywhere, have met them, and they know to fear them. Not even daring to publicly admit that there is a "them." But they've all "done business" with them. If you want to get elected for anything more than the local PTA, then you will meet them. Win a state-wide or greater election and you shall know them.

They will come to the surface wherever money and especially power is to be found. They are like vampires on the scent of blood, but this blood has zeros after it. It's not the money really, it is what that thing called money represents. Money is the undisputed idol of this world, and he who holds the purse binds the world over to his will. Control the idol and you become a god.

"Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." ― Former President Woodrow Wilson, in his 1913 book, The New Freedom.

Don't read over the fact that Mr. Wilson in the above dared not identify them, either. It would have been easy to, he knew them, they had blackmailed him regarding the son of an adulterous woman who he had had liaisons with. Clinton is controlled in this same manner (both Bill and Hillary). All men in high office were carefully selected to have been men (and women) having a great secret, a "Panama" as the Protocols of Zion call it (in Protocol 10, ¶13, "We name Presidents"). So that they will be ever beholden to them, for fear of exposure and ruin. That is why Politicians generally have a bad reputation―they are bad human beings, carefully selected and nurtured and financed for that very “quality.”

And that is why the world's Intelligence Agencies are infiltrated and dominated by the Int. Judaics, including our own "Homeland Security Department," which they are using to subjugate us. Information is power. By Information, knowing beforehand the planned outcome of Napoleon's war, then bringing it about by failing to re-supply his army, the (Judaic) Rothschilds (who funded Napoleon's endeavors) were able to make a fortune on the British markets, which were purposely told by Rothschild couriers that all was well with the battle, when in fact just the opposite was true. It's easy to make money on wars when you know beforehand that they shall start, and you afterwards who shall be victorious, and who shall pay reparations. And like Mel Gibson regrettably said, "the 'Jews' start all wars." He should have said "the International Judaics cause all wars," to be correct. No matter, the Judaics put him down, nonetheless. Gibson is broken.

Or how about our own Great Depression? It is said that the (Judaic) Rockefellers increased their net worth ten-times over. All the Int. Judaics got rich off the Depression, as well as in all wars everywhere. There isn't a pin that hits the floor, in any far reach of this planet, that the International Judaics do not know about. Indeed, they might well have tipped it over themselves through their many unwitting half-informed agents (called agentures in the Protocols).

The Jewish people are unique among all peoples of the world in that they are international, having no national loyalties to any nation. Never mind that tiny place called Israel today, no real Int. Judaic would ever live there. That Israel has a purpose for satan that we shall see during the Great Tribulation. But by networking, certain Jews in all of the countries of this world were and are able to unite against the world, having no "horse in the race," so to speak. That is to say that they have nothing to lose; for, they are strangers in all the lands, though they live in them all. But their heart is far from those nations best interests, as we have seen countless times down through the world's sad history, as by political intrigue nations rose and fell at great loss of purse and blood to those who fell, and new opportunities in those that rose. They seek a kingdom-universal, with themselves as masters and all others as servants. They care not about America (did not the Roman and Babylonian Empires too fall? And great Egypt, and the Persians, the Assyrians, etc.), nor do the Int. Judaics about the best interests of Great Brittan, Russia, China, the Arab States, etc.; to them these are all feudal states to be brought under their terrible and cruel yoke. All under one government, headed by the Int. Judaics in what their sages referred to as "The Kingdom of the Jews."

But as for you, the average everyday Jewish person? Your family suffered right along with the rest of us "Goyim." Most notably in WWII, which was funded on both sides by Jewish Banking Houses, as was our War of Independence and our Civil War. People make the mistake in thinking that the Int. Judaics have some kinship to "Jews" everywhere, or that they will rise in defense of them, other than when it is advantageous to the Internationalist Judaics. They do not, they use the other "Jews" and cast them aside when it is politically expedient.

The Int. Judaics are not your brethren, though they will claim to be when resistance rises and pogroms and expulsions occur, as they always do, in cycles, as the host-peoples discover how their hidden masters have abused them. So-called AntiSemitism, on a national scale, is the result of an awakened people. That is currently happening globally in many Western Nations (America, France, Germany, Australia, Spain, etc., and in the east, Russia), fueled by the Internet, usually found in the form of Nationalist Movements, which of course, the Judaic-run media establishment vilifies.

The International Judaics are rising up a terrible enemy to the Jewish people; that is to say—the Western world—not to mention the Arab empires. I would not want to be an average everyday Judaic person when the world wakes up to what the international Judaics have done to her. You see a small sample of this in the Palestinian situation. Like I said, the wrong people shall suffer for the sins of the few who have commandeered an entire people's identity and committed great tragedies in their name, then submerge again to weather the storm. And above all, AntiSemitism is indispensable to the Int. Judaics; it is by this that they change the world. Ask Germany after WWII, or post-1917 Russia, or the modern day Palestinian people. Or soon ask America and the West as we lose all freedom of speech and thought by "AntiSemitism" and "Hate" Laws.

When we are denied the basic human right to think freely, to have our own independent opinion—we are at that moment enslaved, though the chains that rest upon us are invisible, oddly placed upon ourselves. Orwell's novel, 1984, is true; he had inside info and wrote a book based upon the program. 1984 is the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion realized. We Christians shall come to know that time as the Great Tribulation. What kind of Europe imprisons men for "Holocaust Denial" but turns a blind-eye to Jesus Christ denial? How could this thing come about in a Christian Europe! Need any man still ask who their masters are?

Remember that Hitler's NAZI party was called the NATIONAL[IST] Socialist Party, it rose on the nationalist feelings of a Germany who realized they'd been betrayed in WWI by Judaics living in their country who were, until then, treated better than Jews had been ever treated anywhere else in the world where they wandered and destroyed. Nationalism is the non-Jew’s reaction to hidden “Jewish” instigation discovered. Unfortunately, the wrong "Jews" suffer, as happened in WWII. 1.4 million* Jewish people died for something that they had no control over (*the [suppressed] Red Cross official numbers for all WWII Jewish fatalities). As did 60 million non-Jews lay down their lives for intrigue and empire which they knew not. Who won? The International Judaics, in their Israel, their United Nations (after their League of Nations failed after the first World War), their War Reparation$ for blood not theirs, which they caused to be spilt, their Communist Block states, etc.

These top Judaics use their "lesser brethren," as they call them in the Protocols, which would be mainly Jewish people somewhere between yourself and the Int. Judaics. (Every “Jewish” person should sit down and read the Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion one time, and they would see that there isn't an AntiSemitic word in the document. But they will not; for, the Int. Judaics convinced them beforehand that the Protocols are AntiSemitism, when in fact they are actually raw and unguarded AntiGentile-ism.) Fear in average Jewish people is the International Judaics trustiest weapon.

PROTOCOL No. 9 ¶1-2

[1.] In applying our principles let attention be paid to the character of the people in whose country you live and act; a general, identical application of them, until such time as the people shall have been re-educated to our pattern, cannot have success. But by approaching their application cautiously you will see that not a decade will pass before the most stubborn character will change and we shall add a new people to the ranks of those already subdued by us.

[2.] The words of the liberal, which are in effect the words of our masonic watchword, namely, "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," will, when we come into our kingdom, be changed by us into words no longer of a watchword, but only an expression of idealism, namely, into "The right of liberty, the duty of equality, the ideal of brotherhood." That is how we shall put it, -- and so we shall catch the bull by the horns ... DE FACTO we have already wiped out every kind of rule except our own, although DE JURE there still remain a good many of them. Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us it is only PRO FORMA at our discretion and by our direction, for THEIR ANTI-SEMITISM IS INDISPENSABLE TO US FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF OUR LESSER BRETHREN. I will not enter into further explanations, for this matter has formed the subject of repeated discussions amongst us. — Protocols of the learned Elders of Zion ("lesser brethren"

You, the average Judaic, are kind of like a non-actor, a not involved person, to them; you are a "lesser brethren." You are not of any use to them so you will never meet them. Mel Gibson met them, and was heeled like a good puppy-dog. In Mel Gibson we can see the terrible power of International Jewry. Saddam Hussein found it at his doorstep. As did the Christian German civilians after WWII, which I am sure that you never heard the plight of, and the poor once-Christian Russian peoples after 1917 when the Int. Judaics turned the nation into a godless Atheistic hell-hole, and the Whites in the Deep South after the Civil War; on and on we could go. This whole world, everything that you know as history, has been carefully scripted. The Syrians are kept up at night thinking about it (especially if they believe the Bible’s prophecies), living right next door to the beast's future seat.

There is a highly organized core-group within Jewry that does run this world, but it isn't the "Ma and Pa Delicatessen" Jews that are in this group; I would say that they are unaware of the Int. Judaic's existence, because it was meant that way. You yourself can't hardly believe it, but then you see so many Jewish men at the top of all Financial, Education, Media, Politics & Religion (in the back ground), Political Action Groups, Social Movements, Revolutions, Wars, etc., that you cannot deny that something intentional and planned certainly seems to be going on here. The odds are astronomical that the Judaic's prominence in high-positions could happen by chance in a world where they are only 0.2%* the population of.

* "The size of world Jewry at the beginning of 2002 is assessed at 13,296,100. World Jewry constituted about 2.19 per 1,000 of the world’s total population. One in about 457 people in the world is a Jew." [i.e., 0.218818380743982%] — "World Jewish Population Survey of 2002" by Professor Sergio della Pergola The Jewish Agency For Israel ; Department for Jewish Zionist Education. Working off of Sergio DellaPergola’s "World Jewish Population 2002", American Jewish Year Book, 102, New York, 2002. Source

Regarding your perceived Jewishness: There is no such thing as a “Jew by blood” anymore; that much is clear from the gross miscegenation that occurred all down throughout Jewry's winding past as she was cast out of nation after nation for the sins of the International Judaics who always knew ahead of time to flee. And if you are not a Jew by religion, then what ties you to the tribe? Nothing except that you parent/parents identified themselves as Jews. There are blond hair blue-eyed Jews, dark haired & olive-skinned Jews, "Gentile-looking" Jews, and Jews with the commonly known facial features, specifically the so-called "Jewish nose." Certainly these are not a race, or a tribe; for, they are too diverse. Nature simply doesn’t work like that. A people who are homogeneous (being the same) all look basically similar, you can see a resemblance as in a family-unit, like many of the German and Irish peoples, for instance.

I think that I can best sum this up with a quote from a Judaic, Benjamin Disraeli; the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, no less. Written in the year 1844, Disraeli writes in his Coningsby ; Or The New Generation cryptically of lord Rothschild (the only way it could be written and the author survive). The family name Rothschild, which was taken-on by the Judaic patriarch, Mayer Amschel Bauer, in the 1700’s to Germanize his family name and hide his Jewishness*, comes from the German language and means “red shield.” Disraeli’s main character in the book was named Sidonia. The word "Sedona" which Sidonia so nearly resembles means “red” (for instance, the red sandstone formations of Sedona, Arizona, is where that city gets its name). Sidonia is lord Rothschild.

* i.e., Mayer Amschel Bauer become a “crypto-Jew,” as so many others have, such as notables U.S. Presidents Franklin Delano Roosevelt (real name Rosenvelt), Dwight D. Eisenhower, and England's Prime Ministers, Winston Churchill and Benjamin Disraeli, and etc. — Documentary research source: Jew Watch I believe that there were upwards of seven or eight (perhaps more?) crypto-Jewish U.S. Presidents, to include Abraham Lincoln, but documentation on this is not complete at this present time. Call it speculation at this point; but well-founded speculation, in my humble opinion.

Below is “Sidonia” having a very enlightening conversation with "Coningsby" in Coningsby ; Or The New Generation by Benjamin Disraeli ; Earl of Beaconsfield; 1844:

…'I am going to Cambridge in a week,' said Coningsby. I was almost in hopes you might have remained as long.'

'I also; but my letters of this morning demand me. If it had not been for our chase, I should have quitted immediately. The minister cannot pay the interest on the national debt; not an unprecedented circumstance, and has applied to us. I never permit any business of State to be transacted without my personal interposition; and so I must go up to town immediately.'

'Suppose you don't pay it,' said Coningsby, smiling.

'If I followed my own impulse, I would remain here,' said Sidonia. 'Can anything be more absurd than that a nation should apply to an individual to maintain its credit, and, with its credit, its existence as an empire, and its comfort as a people; and that individual one to whom its laws deny the proudest rights of citizenship, the privilege of sitting in its senate and of holding land? for though I have been rash enough to buy several estates, my own opinion is, that, by the existing law of England, an Englishman of Hebrew faith cannot possess the soil.'

'But surely it would be easy to repeal a law so illiberal--'

'Oh! as for illiberality, I have no objection to it if it be an element of power. Eschew political sentimentalism. What I contend is, that if you permit men to accumulate property, and they use that permission to a great extent, power is inseparable from that property, and it is in the last degree impolitic to make it the interest of any powerful class to oppose the institutions under which they live. The Jews, for example, independently of the capital qualities for citizenship which they possess in their industry, temperance, and energy and vivacity of mind, are a race essentially monarchical, deeply religious, and shrinking themselves from converts as from a calamity, are ever anxious to see the religious systems of the countries in which they live flourish; yet, since your society has become agitated in England, and powerful combinations menace your institutions, you find the once loyal Hebrew invariably arrayed in the same ranks as the leveller, and the latitudinarian, and prepared to support the policy which may even endanger his life and property, rather than tamely continue under a system which seeks to degrade him. The Tories lose an important election at a critical moment; 'tis the Jews come forward to vote against them. The Church is alarmed at the scheme of a latitudinarian university, and learns with relief that funds are not forthcoming for its establishment; a Jew immediately advances and endows it.

Yet the Jews, Coningsby, are essentially Tories. Toryism, indeed, is but copied from the mighty prototype which has fashioned Europe. And every generation they must become more powerful and more dangerous to the society which is hostile to them. Do you think that the quiet humdrum persecution of a decorous representative of an English university can crush those who have successively baffled the Pharaohs, Nebuchadnezzar, Rome, and the Feudal ages? The fact is, you cannot destroy a pure race of the Caucasian organisation. It is a physiological fact; a simple law of nature, which has baffled Egyptian and Assyrian Kings, Roman Emperors, and Christian Inquisitors. No penal laws, no physical tortures, can effect that a superior race should be absorbed in an inferior, or be destroyed by it. The mixed persecuting races disappear; the pure persecuted race remains. And at this moment, in spite of centuries, of tens of centuries, of degradation, the Jewish mind exercises a vast influence on the affairs of Europe. I speak not of their laws, which you still obey; of their

literature, with which your minds are saturated; but of the living Hebrew intellect.

'You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews; that mysterious Russian Diplomacy which so alarms Western Europe is organized and principally carried on by Jews; that mighty revolution which is at this moment preparing in Germany, and which will be, in fact, a second and greater Reformation, and of which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews, who almost monopolise the professorial chairs of Germany. Neander, the founder of Spiritual Christianity, and who is Regius Professor of Divinity in the University of Berlin, is a Jew. Benary, equally famous, and in the same University, is a Jew. Wehl, the Arabic Professor of Heidelberg, is a Jew. Years ago, when I was In Palestine, I met a German student who was accumulating materials for the History of Christianity, and studying the genius of the place; a modest and learned man. It was Wehl; then unknown, since become the first Arabic scholar of the day, and the author of the life of Mahomet. But for the German professors of this race, their name is Legion. I think there are more than ten at Berlin alone.

'I told you just now that I was going up to town tomorrow, because I always made it a rule to interpose when affairs of State were on the carpet. Otherwise, I never interfere. I hear of peace and war in newspapers, but I am never alarmed, except when I am informed that the Sovereigns want treasure; then I know that monarchs are serious.

'A few years back we were applied, to by Russia. Now, there has been no friendship between the Court of St. Petersburg and my family. It has Dutch connections, which have generally supplied it; and our representations in favour of the Polish Hebrews, a numerous race, but the most suffering and degraded of all the tribes, have not been very agreeable to the Czar.

However, circumstances drew to an approximation between the Romanoffs [the murdered in the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution Russian Tsar family] ruling and the Sidonias [Rothschilds]. I resolved to go myself to St. Petersburg. I had, on my arrival, an interview with the Russian Minister of Finance, Count Cancrin; I beheld the son of a Lithuanian Jew. The loan was connected with the affairs of Spain; I resolved on repairing to Spain from Russia. I travelled without intermission. I had an audience immediately on my arrival with the Spanish Minister, Senor Mendizabel; I beheld one like myself, the son of a Nuevo Christiano, a Jew of Arragon. In consequence of what transpired at Madrid, I went straight to Paris to consult the President of the French Council; I beheld the son of a French Jew, a hero, an imperial marshal, and very properly so, for who should be military heroes if not those who worship the Lord of Hosts?'

'And is Soult a Hebrew?'

'Yes, and others of the French marshals, and the most famous; Massena, for example; his real name was Manasseh: but to my anecdote. The consequence of our consultations was, that some Northern power should be applied to in a friendly and mediative capacity. We fixed on Prussia; and the President of the Council made an application to the Prussian Minister, who attended a few days after our conference. Count Arnim entered the cabinet, and I beheld a Prussian Jew. So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.' .... [End of excerpt]

Indeed, "the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes"!

Back to list of questions at top of page

Question #9

| Back To Top |

AIPAC's (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) control of major Christian groups and Presidential hopefuls

A reader writes:

I thought you might find these interesting.

http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=13765