Is Pres. G. W. Bush really a Christian? Is it remotely possible that 911 wasn't an inside job (Thermate cutter-charges)?
I wonder why our "patriotic" President and Congressmen never told us about this obvious "backdoor"? And why would any sane patriotic American President and Congressman allow this to be approved and to go forward?!? Could it be that they are traitors, or just idiots? Well, they aren't idiots. That leaves only.... And don't let it be lost on the reader that those above agencies (NSA, CIA, DIA, CIFA, etc.) that are now collectively 70% owned, controlled, run, and staffed by private multi-national (International) corporations, are the same ones that are executing all the "Domestic Surveillance" programs that we keep hearing about. The "Patriot Acts," etc didn't protect Americans, it put us under International Judaic surveillance and control. In other words, the International Judaics, through their control of these corporations that do most of America's spying at home and abroad, have real-time access to personal data on every person in America (and this is happening all over the Christian Western Nations), and the authority to gather more info and to conduct electronic surveillance on them. Now you don't have to wonder how antichrist and his International Judaics knows where to find all the Christians during the Tribulation—they (you!) are all in his database!
Regarding Bush. Yes, he is a pawn, a beautiful idiot even, but he is far from innocent. He is purposely setting up the Martial Law apparatus (I have the bills listed on the Website, all five of them1, then now he made the new one2 that implies that "obstructing" the actions in Iraq means that you get all your property confiscated. How long will it take to charge anti-war leaders and protest leaders with "obstructing the actions in Iraq "? There is a purpose for every secret law that Bush, through his "Executive Privilege," signs into being.
And the controlled-Congress, Supreme Court, most everybody in power!—99% of them lawyers who should know better—are purposely pretending not to notice what Bush is rearing-up. These men—these American leaders—are traitors, they are guilty of Capital Offence crimes. They are held in place by bribes, black-mail, and fear. They have sold America's policy to a foreign nation—Israel! High Treason is one of the very few Federal crimes that carries the death sentence. (See 6 Min. video on AIPAC and Zionist control of U.S. Government and so-called "Christian" church leaders: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JMuNNHnT1w)
On a video recently John McCain pretended to not to have ever heard of the position that some people think that 911 was an inside job. Now, McCain is a Presidential Candidate—but one would have to live under a rock to not at least know that some are challenging the official explanations of 911. Ergo, McCain lied through his teeth. But why, that is the question.
And on the recent much touted CNN YouTube debates, out of I believe the 37 or 47 that were used, not one question was selected about the 911-Truth Movement for airing. Now, go to YouTube and type in "911" in the search engine—there are, as of this moment, 204,000 (I just checked) 911 related videos. Are we to believe that out of the 3000+ video submissions to CNN by YouTube film makers that none of them asked about 911??? No, they just screened out those videos. But, why, is the question to ask. —without you even realizing it, they are giving you your opinion. I believe that Bush has been promised that he would be President when the takeover happens, and that he would be dictator. I also believe that he has been lied to, and that he will be assassinated once he completes his task of placing America under military rule. Then the International Judaics OWN America by whatever puppet they put in place. And then they own every life within America's borders. That's the plan, anyway.
The International Judaics have shifted focus off of America as the final Empire and are now, as I am beginning to see it, moving plans back into Europe and the European Union as the seat of the beast. Until now America was doing everything that the beast in Revelation was to do, we "lit-up" nations that are mentioned in the Bible endtimes, we controlled the world's finances, we were the lone super-power, we were confederated and in league with most of the world, we set up the United Nations, ....
But just wait until Bush does Iran (Persia in the Bible), then the stuff shall really hit the fan. Bush stated that he did not want to leave Iran an undone deal before he leaves office in 18 months. What do you think that means!
But now, If I am seeing things right, that "honor" (of world seat of power) is going back to Judaic-controlled Europe. Watch for that. But the real end game is for that power to settle in Jerusalem, then we are close to the end. Watch also for that. And watch Russia, she is rising and she is strong. Russia is evil and is Judaic controlled—has been since the 1917 Revolution. If you believe the lie about so-called AntiSemitism in Russia and Europe then you are just buying into the lie, into the diversionary tactic. The International Judaics OWN lock, stock, and barrel, both Russian and Europe; they are not persecuted there! All the rich "Oligarchs" in Russia, that you hear so much about, that own the vast wealth of Russia, are Jews. The "Russian Mafia" is a Jewish Mafia.
And Russia is not done fulfilling prophecy.
America as a power isn't seen in Revelation for a reason. I believe that after the turmoil, America will be the "wilderness" where true-Israel ("the woman;" i.e., Christians) is carried to in Revelation 12. But that is just my opinion at this time. I cannot now prove it, so take it as opinion, speculation, or whatever.
George W. Bush is not a Christian, he is a Satanist. He just claims to be a Christian so we stupid Christians support him. He is—and has admitted to being—Skull and Bones. S & B is an Illuminati organ, they are pure Satanists. The Bohemian Grove is a place where many of the world's leaders (including the Bush's) go, and there they perform a mock human sacrifice (I have Alex Jones’s undercover video on it, they really did it! [ Video is here, the visuals clear up after the first two minutes, watch the whole 9 Min. video] [Part two HERE; where at 6:15 Min. they burn the screaming "effigy"] Some feel that there are real human sacrifices here and deeper in the woods, which makes total sense, but why speculate? The point is, is that; I'm sorry, but Christians do not participate in mock human sacrifices. They just don't. And anybody who does participate in them isn't a Christian. They just aren't. It really is that simple. "...Judge a tree by its fruit..." Simple!
In his initiation to Skull and Bones, Pres. Bush had to drink (God knows what) out of a real human skull. He had to sleep in a coffin. These are not things that a Christian would do. G. W. Bush has hoodwinked Christians, including dear Pastor Murray—that is exactly why the International Judaics chose him to be President. That, and the fact that he is stupid and vain and easily led. When the dust settles there shall be a lot of Christians feeling betrayed and duped by George Bush. But it will be too late for them, they will be being persecuted and garrisoned in "relief camps." Why do Americans feel that this is so impossible or far-fetched? Has not history even yielded us many such examples?
Regarding the plane piloting on 911: I respect your brother's opinion, but did he mean that he, an experienced pilot, could turn those planes and bring them on target at the very limits of their structural capacity; or, did he mean that the purported pilots, those Arabs that couldn't even handle a small Cessna well, could do it?
Even if you or I could do it (doubtful), that does not explain why they were allowed to roam above America for so long without being intercepted. You do remember the U.S. Open golf champion Payne Stewart, when his plane became a derelict because everybody died on it, how that we intercepted it with fighter jets right away? (It took of from Orlando, Florida, and was intercepted by the time it was over Memphis, Tennessee; and it was just a small civilian plane, how much more rapid attention should four hijacked Jumbo-jets have been given by the Air Force! Excerpt from aforementioned article: " ...The aircraft drifted off course shortly after it left Orlando, Florida, for Dallas . . . Air Force Capt. Chris Hamilton said there was nothing he could do when his F-16 caught up with the Learjet over Memphis, Tennessee.")
How come four jumbo-jets weren't intercepted? Why did NORAD stand down? Why were most of our interceptor jets relocated North towards the Canadian border that day (on "war games"), and why did they not return? Why were there several scenarios (war games) played out that day, mimicking what was really happening? Just like the London Subway bombings--they were running a drill that day that exactly mimicked what really happened. Coincidence? Stop it!
Also, Tower #7 came down the same way that Towers #1 & #2 did—yet no plane hit Tower #7. Those building were brought down by pre-placed explosives (actually they weren't explosives, per se, they were cutting charges which ignite and burn at super-hot temperatures and melt the steel beams. That is why you don't hear explosions, per se; what you hear are the floors slapping down upon each other one at a time in sequence), the planes did not bring those buildings down. I don't care what anybody says, I don't care what any traitor or useful idiot says, both within the media and government and without.
Look into it and you will be convinced as well. Look into the molten steel in the basements of those buildings SIX WEEKS AFTER the collapses! Thermate (Thermite with sulfur) burns hot enough to do that—Thermate in the basement near the base of the core columns, that is—but not jet fuel (which is a common Kerosene mix) eighty stories up!
There is so much evidence that they were demolished. They (building owner, the Judaic Larry Silverstein) even admitted to demolishing Tower #7 ("we had to 'pull it'", he said on video [it's on the Website, or watch HERE the 46 Second video]), even though there was not enough time to rig the 47 story building for that demolition. Tower #7 was “pulled” I think five hours after #1 & #2 came down―absolutely no time to rig all the main columns on the 47 story building—hundreds, maybe thousands of (burning/cutting—they are not explosive) charges! Yet it was demolished in the same fashion, it came down like they were sisters. Ergo, the charges were pre-placed there in Tower #7. And if there, then also in #1 & #2. And that (the pre-rigged Tower #7) accounts for the final destination of the last plane (Flight 93) that didn't hit its target, the one that was SHOT DOWN over Pennsylvania.
And that is why they had to “pull” Tower #7, it was sitting there with all the evidence (explosives) in place just waiting to be discovered by NYC officials who would have had to inspect the building for safety before opening it to repairmen. Imagine if workmen starting holding up Thermate bars with electrical wires hanging out for the media cameras saying, “Hey, look what we found in Tower #7 strapped to all the main support columns! How did the terrorists get in here to place them…” You get the idea; that’s why they had to "pull" Tower #7, to cover their crime, to destroy the damning evidence.
Also of note regarding Silverstein's "Pull it" comments, he (or his spokesmen) then later tried to recant, saying that he meant to "pull the Firefighters out of the building"! When a simple view of that video leaves absolutely no room for doubt that he meant to pull the building (down). The term "Pull" is a demolition term for felling a structure. So, he lied. But the question is, Why did he lie?
There really is no other way to look at it. I consider it a done deal. 911 was an inside job. And I have investigated it to my satisfaction, so much so that I really require no further proof, though I know that there is more proof coming in. You just can’t do this magnificent of a deed and not leave any evidence behind. That’s why they try to ridicule 911-Truthers―so that nobody will listen to them, and so that weak people, fearing like kind ridicule, will not following in their footsteps.
I know that military men and good Americans don't want to believe that their government is complicit, not anymore than proud German soldiers and the decent Christian German citizens wanted to know Adolph Hitler's mad plans. But blind loyalty does not change reality.
America has been infiltrated at the highest levels and is being purposely suicided.
And it's gonna die real soon. Real soon. It's all but dead on its feet as we speak. And those soldiers of ours aren't ever coming home. They will just be redeployed in a phase three country. Watch for the Draft to start up—this time including females. Watch for that. Riots will follow the demonstrations that the Draft causes; a man will give his sons to war, but never his daughters. Never.
And w atch most of all for another False-Flag "terrorist attack” in America. It is coming. What is holding them back is that, because of the Internet, everybody is watching their hands. But it will come (I believe that there was at least one, maybe two, aborted attacks that were scrubbed at the last minute because the plans came out on the Internet [by defectors and change-of-heart'ers] before they occurred.) And then watch for Iran or some other "axis of evil" nation to get blamed. And then off we go again "regime-changing" for Israel and her International Judaic masters.
Don't misunderstand that I am an anti-war type, I'm not. But if the world is going to fall apart for wars, I'd rather be on the winning side; it will be a lot more comfortable—until the end, that is. Look at it like this: wouldn't you rather be an American right now than an Iraqi? That's what I mean.
And I am not here commenting on my opinion of what I want, or do not want, to happen; my personal wants and desires are irrelevant. I am just chronicling the events as information shows itself. And our interpretations must be allowed to change if and when new data presents itself. But I know that this thing cannot be stopped. It can just be survived by the wise and faithful.
So, keep your mouth shut and your eyes open, and watch, and prepare. (Not trying to bully you there, just giving good sound advice.)
PS: I really could have gone on and on with the evidence above, there is so much that doesn't add-up regarding the “official story” of 911. We didn't even talk about the Pennsylvania field and the disappearing Jumbo-Jet, or the Pentagon Super-liner with the wings that didn't go into the building but that aren't outside of it either. These anomalies deserve further investigation, investigation that shall never be permitted by the you-know-who's. So we are simply left to "guess," and getting tired of guessing, we forget. Which was the plan all along. Let's face reality here: Aren't you getting a little tired of hearing about 911 and conspiracies?
So then, they won.
And it was just that easy: ignore, deny, ridicule, confuse.
Meanwhile, they are planning to do it again. And when we revolt after catching them—because this time our eyes are wide open and we are ready for them—then they will place us under Martial Law by the Presidential Orders and Security Directives that they had Pres. Bush put into place within the last eight months or so, for "the good of the nations' continuity."
We are being used to enslave ourselves, just like the Germans were in WWII and the Russians in 1917, etc., etc., etc. Smart, aren't they?
Peace to you in Christ Jesus. Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top | 2008 Presidential Candidate Ron Paul and American Politics
July 30, 2007. A (female) reader writes:
Hi [Xxxxxx]. I have been following Congressman (Texas - Republican) Ron Paul for some time now. He is truly unusual; kind of a friend to those who know what is going on. Therefore he hasn't a chance to be elected. He has stated that he thinks another false-flag 911-type event is coming. He has said that we should get rid of the Federal Reserve. He isn't interested in systematically picking-off the countries that Israel can't play nice and get along with. Ron Paul is a strong Constitutionalist (believes in people's rights as contained in the unadulterated U.S. Constitution), he is Pro-Life (against Abortion), he is anti-Federal Reserve, and he is a Christian, having had once considered becoming a Lutheran minister (Source). In other words, he is hitting close to the International Judaic's hearts, and one who holds dear all that those Judaics who control American politics hate.
Definitely somebody that the International Judaic's can't work with (i.e., can't control)! So, Ron Paul is kept on the fringe; he can't get into debates, he can't get airtime, he can't get the big-money Jewish PAC donations that all the other front-runners are getting. In effect, "they" are keeping him out of the spotlight. They say that he is in the single digits as far as electability (but "they" use those false polls to mold opinion and to utilize the "herd mentality" of people to steer them to and/or away from candidates and issues). So, we are stuck with a Hillary Rodham (Mrs. non-Christian/pretend-Christian-when-it's-useful, closeted Lesbian, crypto-Jew (blood related to the crypto-Jew Pres. F. D. Roosevelt), and Socialist/nigh Communist) Clinton, or a Barack Hussein (Mr. false-Christian, inexperienced and naive freshman Congressman and, my best qualification is that I'm half-Black) Obama. My guess is that Hillary will win, because she has been proven to be controllable by the International Judaics who are hosting this (and all) U.S. Presidential Elections. Obama hasn't been tested and might not do what he is told when the time comes and he gets drunk with "being the first African American President." He's also dangerous to them because he isn't into war-mongering, and he really believes that he will be making his own decisions. (Though Mr. Obama made the obligatory visit to Israel this year to bow before the Holocaust Memorial idol, as had already every other main 2008 Presidential contender.) If Ron Paul won (which he can't), he wouldn't last half as long as John F. Kennedy did, which was the last President to attempt to circumvent the Judaic's Federal Reserve banking cartel (ten Jewish banking families OWN the ten so-called "Federal" Reserve banks of America, which our unconstitutional Income Tax money is used to pay unending interest to). JFK wanted to print our (America's) money based on Gold and Silver reserves, and apart from the privately-owned fiat-money Federal Reserve system. JFK's second sin was his desire to abolish the Secret Societies in government, of which the Judaics are the absolute masters of, and is the hidden means of their control over Gentile Useful Idiots (Bush, Cheney, Kennedy, etc. et al). His third sin was to try to reel in Israel and their Nuclear Weapons program. Vietnam had nothing to do with JFK's assassination—they could have just thrown up another false-flag (like the one they used [Gulf of Tonkin] to get us into Vietnam to begin with) and Kennedy would have not only left the troops there, but he would have sent more. Kind of like what is going to happen with America when they give Bush another American False-Flag "911 type incident," as Ron Paul noted ON THE RECORD (but which was controlled-media ignored) in the House of Representatives in January 2007:
Even the "peace-party" Democrats are chomping at the bit to bomb Iran for their masters, the owners of the illegal and unbiblical Israeli State. Those same Democrats who promised their Democratic voters to get the U.S. out of Iraq if they won the House and Senate, then after winning the majority in both houses of Congress, and under the chair of the Democratic Speaker of the House, the Judaic Nancy Pelosi, they voted to send more troops to Iraq! Now, I could care less about the Islamic Republic of Iran, so do not think that I wail because they are going to be attacked—I haven't had much favor for Iran since they took American hostages for 444 days on Christian-embarrassment President Jimmy Carter's watch—but I can see what the International Judaics "are up to" here. So, if we are going to bomb Iran, let's just call it what it is—Israel's dirty work—and quit with the false pretexts. You make a wise observation in your first paragraph: "IF there is another election." And, as you suspected; if Ron Paul were elected, we would have to examine the possibility that he was a plant, or that by whatever blackmail he was now compromised. Good eye, that's how you have to think to keep up with "them." He truly is "too good to be true," and he is getting away with it! I suspect that he may be unwittingly being used in a Ross Perot kind of tactic to later in the elections be utilized to weaken one of the main candidates by drawing from that candidate's voting base or by damaging that candidate during debates. We will see, won't we?
Peace to you in Christ Jesus. Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top | On July 12, 2007, for the first time in 220
years, the United States Congress was opened with a prayer by a Hindu clergyman
to his pantheon of false gods.
Hello. Yes, it was terrible. And we wonder why God is taking His hands off from protecting America! America was founded as a Christian nation, don't let anyone tell you different. The fathers of this nation in their writings and diaries made it clear that America was to be a Christian nation and blessed of God because of that. And we have been blessed. Until recently, that is. Now, since the Judaics have gained control of this nation we are no longer a Christian nation, we are no longer a Godly nation. We took God out of schools, government, and the public place. Can we blame Him for going? The Judaics who want to usurp Jacob/Israel's birthright are making true-Israel (the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian and kindred peoples) in America curse themselves, in an attempt to cause God to take His blessings off of this great nation founded by those true-Israel descendants, for sins against Him. That is what this is all about—all of it! And now our Congress is closing their eyes and bowing their heads reverently, while some forehead-marked (see video) idolater jointly worships a pantheon (multitude) of Hindu gods. Where the hell were our Christian leaders? Where was God's Christian ministers objecting! They have all become lukewarm and thereby have gone astray, taking their entire congregations down with them (look at the false preacher pastor John Hagee, for instance; the Judaized "Christian-Zionist"!). God has no mainstream representatives in America or the Christian Western nations any more. This is satan's world now, we are just living in it till the One and Only True Messiah Jesus Christ returns. It is us, you and I and thousands likes us, grass roots, few, unheard, ridiculed, persecuted under Political Correctness and Diversity and Ecumenism, that stand by the Lord God of the Heaven and the Earth and His only Christ, the Messiah Jesus Christ of Nazareth, born of Mary by the power of the Holy Spirit; whom they slew, but who did raise Himself forevermore. All the mainstream "Christian" churches have been infiltrated, diluted into irrelevance, and overthrown. Shame, shame, shame! "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities." (Rev 18:4-5). Our ancestors, seeking to worship as we ought, fled Europe from the corrupt churches there to come to new land to live under the Lord—they came to America. But the antichrist Judaics followed us here, and in two-hundred short years have corrupted us worse than old Europe (which they likewise infiltrated and destroyed of old) could have ever been, And now we wait here upon God's wrath. For now there is nowhere else for us to flee to; the world has been subdued by the adversaries and there is nowhere pristine left for us to start over in. Great Christian leaders of early America saw the antichrist spirit Jewish peril, and spoke of it; though the International Judaics have hidden those warnings today by rewriting history and burying truths. Below is Benjamin Franklin addressing the Constitutional Congress in May 1787. Sound familiar today?
Prophetic words; but unheeded. And they did come here, and in droves, making this spiritually the new Babylon. And they have taken over both financially and in the halls of every power, in media, government, education, social-change movements, and etc; and they have all but destroyed this Christian nation, last of all the Christian church. America was the last land of refuge in the world where God's Christian peoples fled to whereby to set up a nation where God was Sovereign Lord, Jesus was King of kings, Lord of lords and Messiah Savior, and the religion was Christianity. If there was somewhere to go, I would go there. But there isn't. And now we are stuck in this nation with it's perversion of Christianity, perversion of morals, and wholesale wickedness from the heights of government to the lowliest man on the street—abortion, vice, adulteries, sexual perversions normalized, dishonesty, idolatry, thievery, whoredoms, Mars hill, murders, blasphemies. And what will we now do? Below is an encyclopedia definition of the Hindu pantheon of gods that America's great leaders publicly paid homage to (and by their solemn reverence being therefore a form of worship) this July 2007—OUR elected representatives, YOUR's, MINE—those whom WE tacitly approved of by casting our lot for them in elections and by submitting unto their authority. If there was a man in that Congress that we voted for, and who did not object, did not noticeably get up and walk out, did not symbolically his back to the podium; but rather enabled and participated in this vile-to-God sin, then we too have blood on our own hands. And think not that God wasn't watching! He saw. He saw. He heard the prayers going to another other than Him, and He can remember the day when the prayers of the U.S. Congress were sent up to Him, and when they meant it. Thus, America as a nation is tempting God. "For thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God" (Ex 34:14). And Jesus, confirming the words of God which were delivered before through all of His holy servants, said: "And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment." (Mark 12:29-30). Fools that would tempt God! "And Jesus answering said unto him, It is said, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God." (Luke 4:12). "Ye shall not tempt the Lord your God, as ye tempted him in Massah." (Deut 6:16). "And the Lord sent fiery serpents among the people, and they bit the people; and much people of Israel died." (Num 21:6). "Neither let us tempt Christ, as some of them also tempted, and were destroyed of serpents." (1 Cor 10:9).
Below is an article on the Senate Hindu invocation with a short video that shows some Christian heroes protesting this great sin (I have placed the video link below the article). By the way, the Christians, whom the Judaic-controlled media slandered and degraded as "extremists," "activists," and the new pejorative "fundamentalists," were arrested. God bless them, they have more courage and steadfastness than the whole of Christianity today! I wish I had done what they did. I wish that you had. I wish that we all had. We only get one chance to do it right. How are you doing? I "wish" that I could be in Washington, in Washington, D.C.’s Superior Court on September 11, 2007, just to be present in that courtroom and to stand up silently from my seat in quiet support when those three Christian heroes are called up to the bench for their court case continuance. Would to God that thousands of real Christians went there peacefully to stand up for the Lord God and His Messiah Jesus Christ, and to let the world know that there are still some Christians left in America, some real Christians, men and women who declare that this is, was, and shall be a Christian nation! But who shall stand for the Lord? He who died for us has no help meet.
Video title: Christian extremists disrupt Hindu Senate invocation (Video 1:38 Min. long.) I have a prayer: Lord Jesus Christ please remember your faithful Christians when your wrath raises! We are not a part of them or the many things that they do against you; but as righteous Lot was in Sodom, we also are stuck in a country and a world that is going their way and far from you, and we cannot stop it. Therefore, please do not punish us when you are punishing them. And do know that you have some down here that truly do love you, Messiah. Strengthen us against the day!
Peace to you in Christ Jesus. PS: Here is a link to a 6 Min. video by an India Christian living in the nation of India explaining the persecution of Christians in India by Hindus. And he also makes some keen observations as to the result of America beginning to leave Christianity and God starting in the 1960's. Interesting off-shore interpretation of America and her current trends and woes: Hindu Prayer in US Senate: America in Spiritual Darkness
_______________________________________________________________________
Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top | Marriage, divorce, and "living in sin" in God's eyes
A reader writes:
Hello. Sounds like you got a good man, why leave him? He's a Christian (harder and harder to find nowadays) and you said that you were committed to him and that the kids like him; why traumatize the kids by taking them away from another man? Could it be that some self-righteous hypocrite in your church has been whispering in your ear about "living in sin" and divorce? Let's examine their case. First of all, you are married to the new man in God's eyes. In the Bible, in the old days the way that they got married was to perform the "marital act":
Today, in marriage we have legal documents and ceremonies either in a church or civilly through the courts. But in God's eyes, when a woman "sleeps" with a man she just married him; and when (or if) she goes off and "sleeps" with another man then she has committed adultery. The average woman today has had many husbands and doesn't even know it. However, I hasten to add: when a woman (or man) repents of their sin in Jesus Christ's name—they are washed clean by Christ's sacrifice and are no longer guilty in God's eyes for that sin. This is important to emphasis because many (almost half) of all women today have had an abortion (murder), and they need to know that upon repentance they are washed clean because of who Jesus Christ was and because of what He did, and not because they do or do not deserve it themselves. The bottom line is that in God's eyes, Jesus deserved it. And Jesus confers that forgiveness upon us when we, believing upon Him, ask it of God in Jesus' name. Only Christians have this help, all other shall stand Judgment Day with every single sin that they ever committed during their lives still on their soul. And had not God made a way for man to be forgiven, there would be none in Heaven. But other religions reject this ONLY WAY FROM GOD at salvation and are thus, needless to say, and to put it mildly, in great jeopardy on the Judgment Day that all man, both good and evil shall stand. And it is before Jesus Christ, whom many have denied, that they shall stand.
Men and women treated differently in the Bible Contrary to all the Feminist's hype, men and women are not the same. And feminism is of satan, not God. Feminism is against every precept in the Bible about male/female gender roles. A woman was to be a virgin till her husband, and then remain true to him alone. Men are not held so tight to one-woman based upon the whole concubine thing, which was never repealed. A woman could never have a "male concubine" (there is no such thing). And also, nowhere in Scripture is a male ever referred to as a virgin. But females are always identified by their marital/sexual status. For instance, whenever a female is being directly addressed or referred to, as using a pronoun (maiden, woman, damsel, etc.) instead of by the use of her proper noun name (Mary, Eve, Rachel, etc.) they are (in the Hebrew and Greek definitions) either: children, virgins (maidens for "maiden-head" [hymen]), engaged ("espoused"—but not sexual! As was mother Mary's case before Jesus' birth), wives or concubines, widows, adulteresses, and whores. Even when Jesus speaks to his mother in the Gospel of John He refers to her as "gune," a married woman:
Now, while it is impossible to verify whether or not "married woman" as opposed to "single woman" (i.e., a virgin in Bible parlance) is being referred to for every case regarding "gune"—because most often not enough information in that regard is given in each case—it can be said that when a married woman is being referred to she is referred to as a "gune." Sometimes gune is used to refer to a group of women, regardless of their individual marital status'. However, there is another Greek word that is never used of a married woman and is used to speak of unmarried women, that word is "thelus":
Below is an excellent example of where the Holy Spirit was referring to a full grown woman who was yet a virgin, and therefore couldn't accurately in this context be referred to a gune:
Also note that once a woman marries she is considered to be a gune, not because she took some wedding vow, but rather in that she lost her virginity. This is why a woman gune can also refer to a woman of an older age whereby it could be taken for granted that she was not a virgin, as women married young. So the key is not on marriage, per sey; but rather on the changing of innocence, her participation in the "marital act" which defined her marriage in the first place. Continuing to drift off-topic here, let's look at the below Scripture (1 Cor 7:34-39) which I believe hammer home some of what I am trying to say. In the below, Paul is speaking of chastity, he is not saying that it is a command of the Lord, but rather that he (Paul) discerns that one can be a better servant to God without all the hang-ups and strings attached to being married. He begins the below with the admission that this Scripture is a not by commandment of God. So don't anyone think that God is against marriage:
As we move down towards our target Scripture (1 Cor 7:34-39) Paul again tells us that this is not a command of God:
This would be along the same lines as Jesus' eunuch discourse: "For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb [born impotent medically]: and there are some eunuchs, which were made eunuchs of men [castrated males]: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs [abstained, remained chaste by choice] for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it." (Matt 19:12). And now our target Scripture:
In the Old Testament, in the Law (which has not been done away with, contrary to popular desires) an espoused woman was considered to be as a wife regarding the adultery laws, so that even though the engaged woman (espoused) was not yet a true wife by sexual intercourse, if another man had sex with her while she was in this relationship, he (and her) were punished according the adultery laws; i.e., they were both stoned to death.
This is why, had (Jesus' stepfather) Joseph's suspicions been correct that Mother Mary was pregnant by another man, then Mary would have had to be punished by the law with death by stoning; and it is why Joseph—though despondent with the overwhelming evidence that his espoused (engaged, betrothed) Mary had been unfaithful (for she was pregnant and yet Joseph had not had her)—in his love for her did not want her punished, but rather willed that she just be: "Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away [divorce] privily [privately, secretly]." (Matt 1:19). That is to say, he didn't want to expose her sin whereby she would have been punished by the law (killed) nor humiliated as a whorish woman. Notice also that Joseph was referred to as her "husband" even though they were not "married" (i.e., sexually active):
Some would say that the death penalty for adultery is too harsh, mostly adultery-minded people think this, but there was great wisdom in God's design. God had a way that would have solved all our heartbreaks in our relationships, the "cheating," the betrayals. However, man decided to cast God's Word aside and do as he pleased. That is why most everybody reading this has been cheated-on at least one time by a girlfriend/boyfriend or even in many cases (over 50%-60%) by a husband/wife. If we had kept God's law and the average Joe and Jane saw an adulterer publicly executed, we would have nary an adultery going on today. But "we" did it satan's way and not God's way, and now look at all the heartbreak we all have tasted of! Can men run around sleeping with lots of women today? However, a Biblical concubine is like a wife, she is a second wife, so the man has all the responsibilities of a husband to his concubine. The concubine lived with the man just as the wife did, he raised her children, paid her way, and protected/provided for her all her days. Her children were his children, having same legal status as the children of his wife. For instance, Jacob/Israel had twelve sons who became the patriarchs of the twelve Tribes of Israel, by four different women at the same time—two wives and two concubines. Jacob was also a wealthy man and was able to provide for them all. In other words, this was not a "nightclub love 'em and leave 'em" type thing, as some men today try to justify their indiscretions with the "concubine excuse." God is not fooled, men; and you only upset Him when you try. However, men today use these women like whores (which many of them are; the "Sexual Revolution" of the 1960's didn't liberate women, it separated them from God. Satan did that through his agents in these "social movements.") and men are in transgression by that, because they were only using them and did not perform the duties and responsibilities of a husband. And worse, by turning these women out as sex partners, these men then cause that woman to be an adulteress when she has her next sexual "partner," and the next, and next, etc. ad nauseam. This is the meaning of the below Scripture:
So do keep in mind that if you cheat on the man that you are with that it would fall under the adultery laws—even though you aren't "technically" married under the laws of your state. You can't have it both ways, either you are married in God's eyes or you are not. If you want the conjugal (sexual) privileges of a husband in your boyfriend then you must also accept the marriage laws in your boyfriend as that of a husband. But it seems like "everybody" likes to play house and live together with their boyfriend/girlfriend (of which I am also a partaker), which would be fine, IF, they didn't separate and then go do it with a new boyfriend/girlfriend. The sin in "living in sin" isn't in the act of sex "before marriage" (for sex is the marriage, Biblically), it is in the moving-on and doing it with another that makes it a sin. That becomes a divorce or an adultery depending on the circumstances of the break-up. And as far as your divorce? Divorce is allowable in the Bible, and you were free to find another:
Jesus affirmed that the above is still valid in modern times. Though you can see that while it is legal to get divorced, God never was never all that happy about it. Nevertheless, in His mercy God gave us a way out of impossible situations and affairs of the heart:
Sometimes Christians beat themselves up over things that aren't as bad as they think they are. As for any sins that you have committed, just pray to God and ask Him to forgive you of your sins in Jesus Christ's name. And you are free.
I have prayed for you. Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
_______________________________________________________________________
Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top | Antichrist's (satan's) hierarchy
A reader writes:
Thanks [Xxxxx], I will check that video out tomorrow. And no, you aren't crazy. But when one actually begins to be able to see what "they" have done, are doing, and plan to do—he can feel crazy.
“Their” power truly is absolute.
You said:
“Personally, I think television as it is today, is now the mind control medium of choice for our "intelligence agencies".”
True; but let’s look all the way down the rabbit hole, let’s not stop just below the surface.
The Judaics own and control all television networks, as well as all substantial media venues, both print, voice, picture, antenna, satellite, and cable. And not just in America, but in all the Western Christian Nations. Need documentation? Just ask, there is ample, but I think that we have documented that so many times here that why bother again? (But for new people here, just go to www.Jewwatch.com and search the page for "media.")
And the International Judaics secretly control from the top all the intelligence agencies in every nation of any global significance, both “Democratic” and Communist.
So when you say that the Intelligence agencies are utilizing modern media to indoctrinate the peoples of their respective nations; what you are really saying is that the International Judaics chain of operation in their brainwashing and docile-izing campaign is that through their Intelligence assets they present to their media network assets any information that they deem to be important to their opinion-molding and perspective-shaping operations, and withhold or vilify any information that would counter their agenda.
If you can see the evidence of a conspiracy then you necessarily must conclude that there are conspirators. And if you can comprehend the existence of a group of conspirators then it is a small leap to realizing that there must be a management hierarchy. Immediately upon realizing that every conspiracy has its masters, it is then left for you to follow the trial upwards until you find no higher authority. It is there and then that you have identified the leaders and makers of the conspiracy that is playing out scores of layers down the chain in the public venue. No man, no conspirator, knowing of any level higher than the one immediately above himself, many actually being used where they thought that they were exhibiting altruistic intentions.
Do you want crazy? Here:
Search in vain, look here and there, search all you want; and you will never find a terrestrial leader of this global conspiracy any higher than the International Judaics. Who, to those in the know, are the Kenites, the sons of Cain sired by the serpent (satan) in the Garden of Eden by an adulterous liaison with Adam’s once-innocent wife.
I said “terrestrial,” as in earthbound. But there is one level higher than the International Judaics themselves—and only one—and that is satan himself, operating from his place of holding and channeling his instructions to the hierarchy of the International Judaics/Kenites. Or, to put into plain terms, he is directing his children in the preparations for his ultimate usurpation of God when he, for God's good reasons, and as prophesied in chapter twelve of the book of Revelation, is cast to this Earth by Archangel Michael and seats himself in Jerusalem claiming to be God.
But before that can come about this world must be prepared for him. It is the International Judaics—working closely with their ignorant (but malleable for their greed and godlessness) "lesser brethren" everyday Judaics, as well as the non-Jewish useful idiots—that are doing this preparing.
These remarkable personalities from the ghettos of Europe have risen to become the—albeit hidden—undisputed masters of the Earth. All that is wanting now is their ultimate coming out.
Now that’s "crazy," but it is true. It's "crazy" because modern day preachers won't touch it with a ten-foot pole. It's true because it is God's written Word, the Holy Bible, with just a little bit of open-minded investigation.
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top | Men as trees A reader writes:
Hello [Xxxxxxx]. So many questions! :o) That's okay; but I could I just answer some of them briefly since there's so many?
You asked:
The word will be a Hebrew word; the Old Testament is written in Hebrew (with a very small amount of Aramaic text in places), and the New Testament is written in Greek. There is no difference in the Hebrew definitions for those various instances of the word "tree" (except for affixed [attached] particles, prepositions, and conjunctions, which basically form more than one word in one word , which we needn't concern ourselves with here). But the definition is the same, it is a "tree." Below are the Scriptures that you referenced, and below is the Strong's definition
The Greek word used for "tree" is defined below from the Strong's Concordance dictionary:
(Pay no attention to the extra "e" in `eets compared to `ets, it just reflects different author's spelling in the transliteration. Minor spelling variations such as this are acceptable.) One more thing about the above Strong's Dictionary definitions that may be helpful to the newer student: near the end of every word's definition you will see a "KJV -" followed by a list of words. This is the listing of every English word that that Hebrew or Greek word was translated into in the King James Version Bible (KJV). And while this word-list is helpful oftentimes in securing for ourselves the meaning of the targeted Hebrew or Greek word, it actually forms no part of the definition itself, and cannot be considered a definition. So, for instance, in our above word definition (tree: Hebrew word # 6086) we see that it was in various places in the Bible translated to "carpenter," "gallows," "tree," "wood," etc. Why? Because they all have to do with wood; and wood was so-called because it is firm, which the above definition points out to us with the statement "(from its firmness)". See below for an explanation on that last point. Now, as you can see, the above word (tree: Hebrew word # 6086) is "from" another Hebrew word, that word is indicated above as being "OT:6095," which means "Old Testament (OT) word #6095." The program that I use ( PC Study Bible) refers to Hebrew (and Aramaic) words as "OT" (for Old Testament) and Greek words as "NT" (New Testament); so the "OT:" and "NT:" are not actually part of the Strong's numbering system. Below is that base word which `ets (tree: Hebrew word # 6086) was made from:
Oftentimes we can find deeper and/or underlying meanings in the base words (or root words otherwise called) which form part of other words, as every word in the Hebrew means something, as the Holy Spirit made them and incorporated them in God's written Word, the Bible. However, one can sometimes read too much into a word root, and get off-track by adding other definitions and ideas into words where perhaps the holy Spirit had not intended. Some would read into the above root word and see the "to close (the eyes)" and then use that to compare to satan's first lie when he was trying to deceive Eve where he said to her:
And I'm not saying that that can't be a possible deeper measning, and I'm not saying that it is. I feel that the evidence is not strong enough to make a definitive statement either way on the matter. But but is interesting nonetheless. One widely cited example of Bible words having underlying meanings which can be found in the root words is contained in Moses' name. In the Hebrew, Moses means "drawn from the water." Well, why did they name him that? Because he was drawn from the water by Pharaoh's daughter in Exodus chapter two. : Hebrew word #4872 Mosheh (mo-sheh'); from OT:4871; drawing out (of the water), i.e. rescued; Mosheh, the Israelite lawgiver: KJV - Moses. And the root word means: mashah (maw-shaw'); a primitive root; to pull out (literally or figuratively): KJV - draw (out). You get the point. Moving on.... But I think that you may be looking in the word definitions for evidence that the tree in the Garden of Eden was representative of satan or a symbol of his influence. You can't find that in the definitions, you find it in the context of the verses that the words occur in. But you can find it in our full-length Bible study on the matter at: What was the Real sin in the garden of Eden? It's kind of like our language today where in English I might say to you, a Chinese-only speaker: "I got extremely wet because it was raining cats and dogs", and then you take a concordance, lexicon, and English-to-Chinese dictionary and try to figure out what I meant—you will be baffled! Well, it's the same with the Hebrew word for trees in the book of Genesis. Elsewhere in the Bible (I will just focus on the Old Testament here, but it occurs in the New Testament as well) the word "trees" is speaking of men, yet it is the exact same word used for regular (wood) trees elsewhere in the Scriptures. Observe:
See also Ezek 31:2-18, and etcetera. So as we see, "trees" definitely can refer to people; but "trees" do not always refer to people. Determining the difference must be done by the context of the Bible passage and with other Bible study techniques. And that takes more time and work, but it is more easily accepted when given as proof to a novice. And it isn't just in the Old Testament where men were referred to as trees. Observe also from the New Testament:
You stated:
Nor do you see "that the Bible says that any creatures other than those on the ark" didn't survive the flood. See our: Noah's Flood not global, nor does the Bible say it was: proofs , and, The non-global nature of Noah's Flood, and what is a soul?
You asked:
Actually, the Kenites prove that the Flood of
Noah wasn't global, for we see them in the book of Genesis,
seven chapters AFTER the Flood of Noah was over. And the
Kenites aren't the only other non-Adamic race to make it out of the Flood:
[circa 2347 B.C.] 13 And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry. 14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried. 15 And God spake unto Noah, saying, 16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee. KJV Gen 15:18-21 [circa 1921-1911 B.C.]18 In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: 19 The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, 20 And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, 21 And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites. KJV That's a lot of different races in just 400 years. And I don't like to make "common sense points" because they can sometimes sound snotty and rude; but if you believe that the Negros descended from the Aryan children of Noah then you believe in the Theory of Evolution. And if you believe in Evolution then you do not believe the Bible. Blacks were here before the Flood of Noah and they are here after the Flood. And they weren't once White. They were created on the sixth day when God created men and women, when god created all races of men and women except the Adamites (of Adam) and the Kenites (of Cain). Now, I know that you, reader, believe the Bible to be the true written Word of God because of your questions and way that you phrased them, but why can't you see that the error that was told to you was the false teaching of a global flood, and not what I say about that the Flood of Noah was regional, not global, and that it was only in the locating of Adam's tribe where they were intermixing (miscegenation) with the fallen angels? Don't listen to the Judaic scholars who try to explain away the existence of the Kenites. They do this because other scholars believe that some of the Judaics are actual descendants of the Kenites. And as you know, the Kenites are the sons (descendants) of Cain, who himself was born of an adulterous affair between the serpent (satan) and Adam's wayward wife Eve. So they have an interest in lying about the Kenites. What interest have I in speaking falsely on the matter? Did you know that in some Jewish writings they say that Gentiles are the offspring of the serpent from the Garden of Eden? And in their Talmud they say in several places that "the serpent infused Eve with lust..."? So that proves that certain Jewish scholars do indeed know that satan's (the serpent's) progeny are alive on this Earth today, and they know the true father of the Kenites (Cain, satan's son). The true-Israel descendants (i.e., the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian & kindred peoples) are the only ones who don't know it. And that is because they were purposely dumbed-down by the false teachers. Would it interest you to know that I can right now without leaving my desk put my hand on dozens of Jewish sources that have Jewish scholars and rabbis saying that the overwhelming majority of today's "Jews" are NOT descended from Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? I can, and I have—all over this Website. And I speak this next line not to you, reader, but rather to the Christian clergy who dumb us down in church every week with the errors and outright lies that they have learned in their seminary universities: Christians ought not to be turning to Jewish teachers and rabbis for their Old Testament instruction. But most universities (including most every Christian university and seminary) is top-heavy with Judaic professors in their Bible study classes (both Old and New Testament studies, I might add). Gee, now why do you think that could be? Why would Jewish professors be drawn to teach at Christian universities and seminaries? And might that not explain why the average Christian has no clue as to what a great portion of God's written Word, the Bible, really means? And could it explain why the true-Israel descendants, the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian & kindred peoples, think that they are Gentiles, and they think that the descendants of the Khazars (the Ashkenazi Jews) are true-Israel? When in reality, circa 95% of today's Jewish people are Gentiles! Yes, there is a plan, there is a conspiracy. For, if the "Jews" are really Gentiles then they have no claim to the land called Israel today, they have not cloak for their extermination of the Palestinian Arabs, and they have no right to be virtually "worshipped' by so-called Judeo-Christians as though they were Jesus' cousin or something. And it would also throw-off the so-called Christian-Zionists' interpretation of prophecy where they presume that the "Jews" will convert and be saved because, as they claim, they are "God's chosen people." That's why they are lying, that is why they are engaged in a conspiracy to turn the truth absolutely upside down. You want motive?—there it is. Does the average everyday Jewish person know all this? Nope, they are being lied to right along with us. Moving on....
You asked:
Oh yes, it does:
Peace to you in Christ Jesus. Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top |
[Caution, mature subject matter] A (female) reader writes:
Answer: Hello. Your question is more common than you might think. And I know that it isn't the kind of thing that one is comfortable with talking over the table to their pastors about. Can you imagine raising your hand in church, standing up, and asking this question?!? So, this is another reason why Internet Bible study ministries can be an excellent supplement to your church participation. (And contrary to any other impression, I am not at all against churches. Would to God that we could all find a good church that teaches God's Word instead of the vanity taught in most churches today.) However, I hasten to add, of course any Internet Bible study ministry MUST answer all questions by the written Word of God, else they are only "advice columns." So we shall answer your question today with the Bible and Scripture as documentation that you can check against, then you can make choices for your own conduct based upon those Scriptures. That truly is the only God-pleasing way to answer questions of a moral/sexual nature. The question is, if I may be permitted to just bluntly put it out here without the window dressing: "Is a married couple's anal (and oral) sex against God's commandments?" The short answer is no. Now let's document that. Let us first take your Prooftext Scripture and determine the subject being spoken of within it. In this case it is imperative that we determine what subject God was speaking on in verses 26 & 27 below. The two choices are: "women having anal sex (with men) like Gay men practice," or, "women having Gay sex (with women) like Gay men practice (with men)." After our below Scripture we shall zero in on the subject, but pay careful attention to the subject in verses 26 & 27:
In verse 26 above, the Holy Spirit (through Paul) tells us that women will be doing something of a vile nature, but we are not told what exactly that is. We are simply told that it is "against nature." However, verse 27 begins with an interjection that explains the nature of what the women in verse 26 would be doing which was so vile. Verse 27 begins with "And likewise also the men". In other words, whatever it was that women would be doing which was so vile, the same thing shall the men be doing. So, what do the men in verse 27 have in common with the women of verse 26? Let's focus our above Scripture down to to the two main verses:
Verse 27 continues and yields more information that explains the subject of verse 26. These men, who would be acting as vile as the women, were "leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly". In other words, instead of having sex with women, which would have been natural way; i.e., "the natural use of the woman"; they had sex with other men, which is unnatural. They lusted sexually for other men instead of for women; i.e., they "burned in their lust one toward another". And they engaged in Homosexual sex acts, "men with men working that which is unseemly". Likewise, the endtimes women would be having sex woman with women "working that which is unseemly". Not that it should be further necessary besides the specific wording itself of the Scripture, but let's take a quick moment to document that this Scripture is indeed speaking of sexual activity:
Focusing on the three key words from the above, "...leaving the natural[1] use[2] of the woman[3]....", let's look at the accepted-by-all Strong's Bible Concordance and Dictionary definitions:
In the definitions of those three Greek words above we the answer to what the women of verse 26 were doing that was so vile to God; for the men in verse 27 were doing likewise as the women in verse 26. Observe below, and know that the definitions for "[1], [2], [3]" below are the same as given above:
The final word definition from our above ("against nature[4]") is given below. Notice that it is, in this case, speaking of being against the normal sex-gender (women/Lesbianism) rather than sex-orifice (anus/Sodomy):
Also relevant is the Greek word used that was translated to "women" in this Scripture. it is the Greek word thelus which means "female" or "woman/en," not wife. The Greek word for wife is gune. Let's take a look at your verse, paying attention to the underlying Greek word for "women" in the New Testament manuscripts:
This same Greek word (thelus) is used in the below Scriptures for woman/women:
You get the point. Moving on... You will also notice that nowhere in the whole of this Romans 1:26-27 Scripture (or the entire chapter for that matter) is the term sodomy used; the verbiage was, "men with men working that which is unseemly", which includes Sodomy certainly, but which was the only way to correctly compare the male Homosexual act with the female Lesbian act (i.e., "which is unseemly"). For, the male Homosexual act often centers on the act of Sodomy, whereas the female Lesbian act necessarily does not. The actual act of anal sex is not specifically mentioned in the New Testament, whether between two men, or a man and a woman; though it is implied in the case of two Homosexual men. No manner of acceptable/unacceptable sexual relations between a man and his wife alone is ever itemized in the Bible, neither in the Old or the New Testament, which indicates that God had no special directions/admonitions regarding the marriage bed. He did however speak of all manner of sexual perversions and dysfunction, from Incest to Adultery, to Homosexuality/Lesbianism, to Rape, to Bestiality. So it isn't that God was shy about speaking on the sexual matters of humans. Verse 26 states of these corrupt endtime women: "even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature", and verse 27 explains that "the natural use" is not the natural use of a body orifice (the anus), but rather is "the natural use of the woman" herself. By the way, all you college girls who think that having bi-sexual experiences is cool, and you college men that likewise are toying with bi-sexuality as a way to skirt the Homosexual label, the below Scripture speaks of you both, and not just hardcore Homosexual and Lesbians:
And what is the "receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet"? It is death:
But that Bible Scripture is quite different than your liberal university professors, the Gay activists, and the Judaic-controlled media have taught you, huh? So what will it be, what will you believe—God's written Word, the Bible—or the degenerate influences that have surrounded you in satan's corrupt world here? How you choose, so shall you be judged. The above Scripture in Leviticus chapter twenty and the one we have studied in depth (Romans 1:26-27) are by far not the only admonitions from God against Homosexuality, Lesbianism, or so-called "Bi-Sexuality" (which is just Gays in denial or disguise).
Regarding so-called "Bi-Sexuals": how on Earth women (and men fall into this as well, but mostly women among the young) can think that if they also have sex with men, then when they on other occasions have sex with women that they aren't practicing Lesbianism, is beyond all reasonable understanding. It is like saying that if a woman has sex with a dog (Bestiality) and then on other occasions has sex with a man, that she then isn't guilty of the sin of Bestiality, but rather is, what, Bi-species sexual? is that what the Judaics have for us next? Actually, the next frontier is Pedophilia, and we can already today see the Judaic-media slipping the Pedophile theme into Hollywood movies. Just last night on Cable TV I saw a movie with Kevin Spacey (American Beauty) were he tongue-kissed, pulled the pants down, opened the shirt to fully expose the budding breasts of an obvious minor child, the friend of his young daughter! This is conditioning, this is what the next "sexual revolution" is that the media-Judaics have in store for society. And that isn't the only movie promoting Pedophilia by far. Last year you had little Dakota Fanning (I think her name is) being simulated-raped, and you also had a grown woman in a sexually charged bath scene with a minor boy. So this is where the Hollywood-Judaics are leading us. You see, to the Judaics it is not prohibited to have sex with a child as long as the boy child is under nine-years-old or the girl child is under three-years-old (and this includes an okay for Homosexual Pedophilia as well!). This is in their holiest book, a book which according to the rabbis trumps the Old Testament in Judaism—the Babylonian Talmud. (Elsewhere on this Site we provide facsimiles of those Talmud stanzas.) At this point (and after this Q & A was first posted) I would like to insert an article that a reader sent me regarding the above paragraph, for it bears out what I have said there, and second-witnesses are always good to supply. And if the reader also understands that the German government has been absolutely controlled by Judaics since WWII he/she will gain a far greater understanding from the below reader's article submission: A reader writes:
The article (caution mature perverted content matter):
I'm going to tell you something here that your gutless Christ & God-betraying preacher hasn't got the hoss (inner fortitude, courage) to say: It is high time that Christians spent more concern over condemning evil than they apparently do avoiding anything that could be misconstrued as "AntiSemitism." Hey, Christian: Wake up, these people in this religion killed your Jesus Christ. Pick a side, and get on it, Christian! You are sacrificing your own children's very eternal souls by turning them over to the Judaics in media, education, social engineering, Political-Correctness altar, .... Are all Jewish people involved in this? No, many of them are just as perplexed as Christians are. I, and those like me, have to say these things now, because soon, very soon, the International Judaics will finally get their global "Hate Crime" laws instituted here in America. Then I will be eligible to either recant or stand trial for "Hate Speech." Guess which way I'm leaning? But the end result is that you will not find Websites like this one on the Internet, and since your church has long ago forsaken God, Christ, and Bible, you haven't got a chance to hear the truth and learn of what your God and Savior has commanded you to do, and not to do, to attain eternal life. In other words, you'll be fit for hell and beyond. How much more will your children be "the child of hell" (Matt 23:15) who haven't the Christian-foundation that you might have? That is satan's whole purpose behind the agenda of his "chosen people."
Who do you think that God was speaking about when He referred to antichrists (plural)? Well, who fits:
We know that satan is the antichrist and that there is only one of him, but who are these antichrists (plural)? They are antichrist's (satan's) servants, his "chosen ones" that serve him and his agendas and goals. Apostle John speaking by the Holy Spirit in the above states that these antichrists were on the Earth already at his time (A.D. 1st century). So that precludes Muslims from being these antichrists because there were no Muslims till the the early A.D. 7th century when Islam was founded. And certainly no other religious systems who were in existence in A.D. 1st century (Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.) can even remotely be considered for this role of false religionists because these antichrists that John spoke of went out from us (had common fellows, diverged from their fellows who went with Christianity). What religion has adherents the diverged from Christians in the first century? You know the answer—Judaism—Talmudic Judaism, which was founded on the religion of the Pharisees of the A.D. 1st century when John was writing the above; those same that had Jesus Christ executed by their own false-witness (lying in a legal proceeding). Judaism today, in its yet un-settled final form, is the foundation of the antichristianity that we see as being the religion of the world in the Tribulation prophesies seen most notably in the Gospels, 2nd Thessalonians, and the book of Revelation. Few are the churches that dare declare that truth, almost as few even know it themselves due to neutered doctrine and Political-Correctness altars raised above the altar of Christ Jesus. Moving on... In the below Scripture it is saying that what a married man and woman do in their "marriage bed" is not defiling, it is not sinful, it does not defile them in God's eyes:
Also, it is not possible for a person to defile their bodies sexually with themselves. To defile oneself it is necessary to have another to be defiled with/by. However, when a man and woman marry, they become one flesh, they become one. Therefore it is not possible that whatever sexual acts that they do amongst themselves could defile them. Observe:
One final note. You made the below carefully worded statement. And I noticed the careful wording, but perhaps others have not. You said:
In other words, you are in a sexual relationship but not "legally married." I presume I make the correct analysis? This needs to be explained as well, and I'm glad that you brought it up. Simply put, regardless of what paperwork that you have from your government (i.e., the "Marriage Certificate," the legal paper that binds you under law of state to your spouse), you are married in God's eyes the moment that you have sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse is the marital act. In the Bible they became married when they had intercourse. We have spoken on this is other sexual-related Q & A's on this Site and won't revisit here. But a search with our in-site search engine should help the reader find more info on that (Search our site). And also specifically see question #4 above on this page for an in-depth treatment of the subject. Now you can see the reason why the International Judaics instigated the Sexual Revolution and free-sex movement of the 1960's—they have made most every single woman past their teens today into Adulteresses in God's eyes. Adultery is one of the circa less than ten Capital Offenses in the Bible. Satan wants to destroy God's children and drag them to hell with him. He (satan) uses his "chosen ones" to delude God's Christians. That is why the international Judaics (and many, many of their lesser brethren everyday Judaics) are so wealthy and influential—satan has "anti-blessed" his servants, just like the Holy Spirit blesses God's servants, the Christians. The antichristians have their rewards here and now, the Christians shall be rewarded in/with Heaven. For every positive there is a negative. Wouldn't it be nice if our modern day lukewarm, saltless, bought-off, and cowered by wrong-made-right "Political-Correctness," churches actually taught the Bible? They used to. And way back when—when they did teach God's Word instead the words and traditions of man—satan did not have this world under his thumb. When all these sinful things that are common and protected today were called sins, this was a very different society. But today the Christian that objects to Homosexuality, Feminism, Abortion, etc. ad nauseam, he/she is called a "hater" and backward and bigoted. How far we have fallen in just a short four decades since the 1960's! The rest of our fall shall be accelerated exponentially, as we see even today. Do we not? And if you are 40+ years old then I know that you know what I mean. (I'm 47 years old, and can remember a very different world even twenty-five years ago.) For you younger people—you are deluded, corrupted morally and spiritually, you never had the chance to see how things were supposed to be, you never had the concept of absolute-right/absolute-wrong instilled into you because people of my, and especially my parents generation have failed you. And your pastors and preachers have become servants at worst, and enablers at best, of the beast system. Your grandmothers were playing the whore in Woodstock and your grandfathers loved to have it so. Everybody was deluded into a generational, serial, narcotic driven, sex orgy called a "social revolution" today by men and women who are become absolutely vile in God's sight, far from anything like Biblical morality, and worthy only of death, not salvation. Happily, Jesus is forgiving for those who come to Him. Because otherwise we'd all be going to hell. Your ancestors, your fathers and mothers and grandfathers and grandmothers, good Christians in many ways no doubt, closed their eyes when Abortion went from being murder to being a "woman's civil right"—a "choice," not extermination—in Political Correctness jargon. And good men did nothing when the Judaic front-organizations like the ACLU, SPLC, ADL, etc. etc. etc. took any mention God out of this country and her schools and public places; and took Jesus out of the mainstream to be treated with disdain and insult rather than thanks and reverence. The result is that they have unwittingly delivered you to satan through the vile influences of the International Judaics and their lesser brethren's vice-filled "social movements." That is the painful truth, and I myself an just as guilty as my fellows of that generation, it happened on my watch too. And I don't suppose that saying sorry to you is nearly enough. None of this garbage that we see in our world has happened by chance, there was a hidden hand behind it all. Satan moves the hidden hand of the International Judaics, who in turn guide their "lesser brethren" everyday Judaics and the useful-idiot "Gentile fronts;" these in turn change us. The rest is history—the history of the fall of God's ordered world, the history of our fall, of which the New Testament chronicles in some great detail. We are fulfilling prophecy in our day—negative prophecy—the prophecy of the final fall of God's man. Christians, apostle Peter speaking by the Holy Spirit has a word for us:
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top | Has God accepted me, has He forgiven
A (male) reader writes:
Hi [Xxxxx]. My name is Nick, by the way, not Rick. But that's okay. Also, you stated:
But I don't sell any DVDs, so maybe you wrote the wrong Website? But that is also okay, maybe it was supposed to be this way. You asked:
That is absolutely acceptable, because you are sincere in it and you have a good excuse for not remembering everything that you did to offend. One often does many things while drunk that he/she doesn't remember, and quite frankly things that they would rather not remember. So, knowing that you are a Christian, you have given a good confession to the Lord in Jesus' name. So then, Jesus said that when He sets you free that you are free INDEED!
Jesus isn't a "half-way" Savior, He doesn't forgive a sin partway, He is all the way, He gave it all on that cross, and God accepts is as all. What you are doing is beating yourself up for the past. Don't do that. You have done what God required of you, you believe all that the Scriptures spoke of Jesus Christ, you have had a change of heart in your life, you have repented of your sins and errors, and you are trying to do better day by day in your life. What more do you think that God requires of you? So, go, start fresh in Christ Jesus—He has set you free from yesterdays. Today is a new day dawning. Keep the faith, love the Lord, "eschew evil, and do good" (1 Peter 3:11a), and shall do wonderfully. Friend, we do not come to the Lord good and not needing, we come to the Lord bad and in great need of pardon; therefore, necessarily, in the beginning of our walk with the Lord we are not all that pretty. But He strengthens us, He wipes us off and cleans us up, He helps us with sinful temptations of all manner, He makes us a better person for having known Him. Jesus said it better than I ever could:
So enough with the "I'm bad and God isn't liking/blessing me because of it," and let's hear out of you more "I'm bad and with God's grace through Jesus Christ I will be better." Satan is bogging you down with guilt that isn't even on the table in God's eyes. He forgave your sin, quit bringing it back to His attention. It seems that Christians can often forgive others more than they can let themselves be free. Now, I know that you believe the Scriptures, so why have you not read in the place where He said: "...saith the Lord; for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more." (Jer 31:34b)? And if He has willingly forgotten it, why throw it back up on the table every day? Surely today's sins are sufficient for you, need you really bring up yesterday's sins again day by day? That brings me to your next question:
So you therefore feel that God is mad at you or that He isn't liking "your progress"? And you were expecting what, fireworks? Did you expect God to jump through some hoop and flicker the lights or something every time you pray? God doesn't work that way. He is gentle, not dramatic like those false preachers that claim to come in his name. I can tell that you have been exposed to some false teaching, most likely in some church that places more emphasis on feeling God than on believing Him. Here is your answer, and it come from the highest authority, God Himself:
God is in the small things—and why not?—He made all the big things. The point is that God does things and reveals His power in ways that are most usually not our ways. He had a word on that as well:
And know this of a surety: He was there, He has heard your every prayer—not one syllable was missed by Him. Let us resign ourselves therefore to do it God's way and to let God reveal Himself as He wills, not as we have been led to expect by those who really don't Him themselves anyway. He is there, ALWAYS. Surely you remember the words of the Master: "...and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen." (—Jesus Christ, Matt 28:20b). So you are doing fine, you just needed a little "kick in the backside." You are doing fine, and everything that you wrote here is common among all of us as well, we have all felt like that at one time or another. And yes, though we may try our best, we shall all let Him down here or there. Thank God that we have Jesus Christ to take the stripes for our transgressions! When, I hasten to add, when we repent to God in Jesus' name.
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
_______________________________________________________________________ [P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST] God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name! Nick Goggin
Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top | Pending
Back to list of questions at top of page
In
His Service: Contact
Editor |
Bible
studies |
Newer
students |
Bible Q
& A's
|
Study
tools
|
Search
our site NOTE: To insure quality and content integrity, these In-depth Bible Studies are © copyrighted and may only be downloaded for study and shared private use. They may not be reproduced or distributed for sale or publication without prior written approval. Other Christian Web sites are welcome to link up to this Website or any page on it. |
[SHORT
VIDEO] The job of a shaped charge is to cut
steel H-beams. "The way we do this is by cutting the beam at an angle
which through a series of beams cut at the same angle will tend to make
the building shift over and 'walk'"
[SHORT
VIDEO]
"This is how it's been since day one...and this is six weeks later. As
we get closer to the center of this it gets hotter and hotter - it's
probably 1500 degrees."
[SHORT
VIDEO] "Out on the rubble it's still, I believe, 1,100
degrees. The guys boots just melt within a few hours."
[SHORT
VIDEO] One of the more unusual artefacts to
emerge from the rubble is this rock-like object which has come to be
known as "the meteorite". "This is a fused element of molten steel and
concrete all fused by the heat into one single element."
and
give you the definition of "pizza" alone. Not the best
example perhaps, but you get the point. So, below is an
Interlinear (manuscripts) look at that word, including an
open pane with the Greek Parsing for the word. We notice
that in this particular case the word neos is in
the feminine gender and also in the plural. Observe:
BERLIN, July 30, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Booklets from a
subsidiary of the German government's Ministry for Family Affairs
encourage parents to sexually massage their children as young as 1
to 3 years of age. Two 40-page booklets entitled "Love, Body and
Playing Doctor" by the German Federal Health Education Center (Bundeszentrale
für gesundheitliche Aufklärung - BZgA) are aimed at parents - the
first addressing children from 1-3 and the other children from 4-6
years of age.
"The wiser and deeper position of most civilizations recognized that
children need a period of innocence," commented O'Brien. "Now the
state, the German state, is encouraging destruction of this state of
innocence," he added. "This is consistent with the materialist
philosophy that sees all moral norms and all truths about human
nature as repressive. Pleasure and their distorted concept of
freedom are their only guiding principles."