Restoring the Penitential Heart of Celtic Orthodoxy

Recovering the Confessional Foundation of the Western and Celtic Liturgies

---

I. The Danger of “Starting Over”

A new generation seeks to start over with imported post-Bolshevik forms of Eastern Orthodoxy, claiming that Celtic Christianity somehow died out. Yet those same voices make pilgrimages to Iona, Lindisfarne, Glastonbury, and Santiago—venerating the very saints whose faith they say vanished. To claim that their Orthodoxy perished is to deny the Spirit who preserved it through the Western liturgical line.

Celtic Orthodoxy does not need reinvention; it needs recognition.
Its power lies not in exotic imitation but in repentance, humility, and the confession of sin—the same virtues that gave life to every Celtic monastery and altar.

---

II. Why This Matters Daily: The Biblical Command of Continual Repentance

Our Lord Himself set repentance at the rhythm of daily life. When He taught us to pray, He said:

“Give us this day our daily bread,
and forgive us our sins, as we forgive those who sin against us.”
(Matthew 6 : 11–12; Luke 11 : 3–4)

In the same breath that we ask for daily nourishment, we are commanded to seek daily forgiveness. The Lord’s Prayer unites physical sustenance and spiritual cleansing; both are to be renewed every day. The early Church understood this not as poetic metaphor but as a rule of life: confession and reconciliation belong to the Church’s heartbeat.

To neglect confession is therefore to ignore one-half of Christ’s daily command. A Church that feeds the body without cleansing the soul ceases to be apostolic.

This truth, embodied for centuries in the Western and Celtic rites, is what our age must recover.

---

III. The Modern Crisis: Form Without Power

Across the West a new fashion has appeared: “Celtic-style” of “Eastern-mission” liturgies that omit any corporate confession of sin. Services begin with music or readings and move quickly to the Eucharist. The ancient words—

“Let us humbly confess our sins unto Almighty God”—
are nowhere to be heard.

When sin is never named in public prayer, the vacuum does not remain empty. The surrounding culture rushes to define virtue and vice in the Church’s silence. In our time this means that the State, media, and educational systems—often hostile to moral absolutes—become the de facto catechists of the younger generation.

Foreign priests or new mission clergy who arrive without understanding this Western condition may assume that omission of a public confession is harmless. Yet here it creates moral collapse. To the average listener, if the Church never speaks of sin, it must therefore approve of what the State sanctions. Within a single generation, worshippers begin to believe that there are no moral boundaries left at all, and that repentance itself is an outdated idea.

This is why the public confession of sin—spoken, audible, and repeated—was always treated by the Celtic and Western Fathers as a civic as well as spiritual safeguard. It catechized the people against the creeping redefinition of good and evil. When that safeguard is removed, the altar ceases to form the conscience, and the conscience is instead formed by the powers of the age.

The effect is subtle but devastating. In societies where sin is re-defined as self-expression, silence from the altar implies approval. As St Paul forewarned, such religion has “a form of godliness but denies the power thereof.” (2 Tim 3 : 5)

Historically the Western and Celtic Churches were the opposite: penitence was not peripheral but the organizing principle of Christian worship. To approach the altar without confession was unthinkable. The following survey shows how that penitential framework pervaded every Western Orthodox tradition—from Spain and Gaul to Ireland, Britain, and the English Prayer Book—and how its removal today amounts to a loss of Orthodoxy itself.

---

IV. The Ancient Western Family of Liturgies

1. Mozarabic (Hispanic–Celtic) Rite

In Galicia and Compostela—the very cradle of the Celtic pilgrimage routes—the Mozarabic or “Hispanic” rite retained the Reconciliation of Penitents as a living ceremony. The Ad Nonam pro indulgentia on Good Friday re-enacted the ancient public restoration of sinners described at the Fourth Council of Toledo (633). The daily structure likewise contained:

• Preces – kneeling penitential litanies before the altar;

• a dialogic Confiteor, priest and people alternating lines of repentance;

• frequent invocations of miserere nobis before Communion.

This liturgy, still heard in Toledo today, represents a living Western Orthodoxy in which confession is architectural—not optional.

---

2. The Gallican Rite and Early Councils of Gaul

The Gallican liturgy—the mother of the Celtic rites—was formed amid councils obsessed with moral discipline. The Council of Agde (506) under St Caesarius of Arles codified detailed canons on penance and clerical purity. In Gallican books the pre-Mass of Mass of the Catechumens began with intercessions for pardon; the celebrant’s private preparation included the Confiteor, Ecce Agnus Dei, and Domine non sum dignus, prayers attested long before their formal Roman adoption. The rule was simple:

No Christian approaches the Holy Table unreconciled.

---

3. The Irish and Insular Penitentials

Nowhere was repentance systematized more fully than in Ireland and its mission lands. The Penitential of Finnian (6 th c.), of Cummean (7 th c.), and of Columbanus (7 th c.) introduced regular, private confession with precise penances—monetary, dietary, or temporal. What had once been a single public rite after baptism became a continual discipline of the baptized.

De Rule of St Columbanus orders that common prayer begin “for our sins” and prescribes penances measured in seasons or years. Far from primitive, the Celtic monastic system was the prototype of the later Western sacrament of confession. Its export through Iona, Luxeuil, and Bobbio reshaped Europe’s conscience.

De Culdees who succeeded these houses continued the same ethos: daily self-examination, confession to one’s spiritual father, and reconciliation before the Divine Liturgy. Their Orthodoxy lay not in Eastern import but in perpetual repentance.

---

V. Safeguards of the Western Church

1. The Roman Tradition

Long before Trent, the Roman and other Western liturgies began Mass with a Penitential Act—either the Confiteor or the Kyrie eleison sequence. This was not uniquely “Roman” but inherited from the older Gallican and Mozarabic models. Rome’s strength was continuity: the daily repetition of contrition ensured that, even as theology developed, the ordinary faithful heard at every Mass the words “mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.” The West never permitted the conscience to drift far from repentance.

2. The Anglican Continuation

De Book of Common Prayer, rooted in the Sarum Use of pre-Reformation England, preserved that penitential architecture intact. Morning and Evening Prayer, the Litany, and the Eucharist all open with confession:

“We have erred and strayed from thy ways like lost sheep…”

followed by priestly absolution:

“Restore thou those who are penitent.”

Russian Synod (1904–1907) Recognition

Under Bishop Tikhon of Moscow (later Patriarch and martyr-saint), the Russian Holy Synod examined the English liturgy and declared it theologically and liturgically Orthodox, deriving from the Sarum Rite. The judgment came before the Bolshevik captivity, when Russian theology still spoke freely. The Synod’s conclusions:

1. The Prayer Book upholds Nicene faith and Orthodox sacramental form.

2. Its structure is consistent with the Western Orthodox tradition.

3. Its penitential emphasis corresponds to Eastern doctrine of metanoia.

The 1928 Book of Common Prayer

De 1928 BCP, widely used in America and other Anglican provinces, codified those Orthodox-compatible reforms. Among its explicitly Orthodox features:

• retention of the full general Confession in both Offices;

• de Prayer of Humble Access, confessing unworthiness before Communion;

• invocation of the Holy Ghost in sacramental forms;

• de Apostolic Absolution with laying-on of hands;

• continued discipline requiring repentance prior to Communion.

These are not Anglican novelties but living Western Orthodoxy, preserved in English speech.

Recognition of Britain’s Ancient Autocephaly

Eastern Patriarchs and Russian Tsars alike acknowledged Britain as an independent Orthodox jurisdiction since the first centuries (see Lathbury, History of the Nonjurors). The Celtic and English Churches never needed to “borrow” Orthodoxy; they had possessed it from the beginning.

---

VI. Why the Penitential West Endured

The genius of the Western tradition is its clarity. It never relied on cultural atmosphere or mystic feeling to convey repentance; it spoke repentance aloud. Each worshipper, high or low, had to say the words. This prevented nominalism and anchored the faith when empires, languages, and monarchies fell.

By contrast, many modern adaptations of Eastern practice in Western missions have retained the externals—icons, chant, vesture—but dropped the corporate confession. Private confession remains officially required, yet the newcomer seldom hears of it. The result is an Orthodoxy of aesthetics rather than contrition—a religion that, again, “has a form of godliness but denies the power thereof.”

---

VII. Conclusion — Without Confession There Is No Orthodoxy

When repentance disappears, religion collapses into sentiment.
When confession is silenced, the altar becomes theatre.
When sin is unnamed, salvation is undefined.

To restore true Celtic Orthodoxy we must restore:

1. Corporate confession in every service;

2. Personal sacramental confession as a normal discipline;

3. A culture of humility, tears, fasting, and amendment of life.

Then, with our fathers, we may again pray:

“ALMIGHTY and most merciful Father,
We have erred and strayed from Thy ways like lost sheep…”

Only there can the Kingdom begin.

---

Suggested Citations & Reading

• Fourth Council of Toledo (633), Can. VI – Reconciliation of Penitents.

• Dom Fernand Cabrol, The Mass of the Western Rites.

• The Rule of St Columbanus & Penitential of Cummean.

• History of the Nonjurors, Lathbury (1845).

• Russian Synod Acts (1904–1907) on the English Liturgy.

• Book of Common Prayer (1928 ed.) – Preface and Penitential Offices.