QUESTION LIST; Page Number 50
| To list of all questions on Website |   

 

1. Jehovah's Witnesses

2. The beast starts cutting its teeth―The U.S. "Office Of Global Anti-Semitism" comes on-line quietly

3. The Gnostics and the Da Vinci Code hoax; Survivalism/Preparation; the Tribulation; the state of our upcoming book; etc.

4. Article "REVELATION OF THE METHOD AND THE MURDER OF SPIRIT", showing the inner workings of the Int. Judaics today

5. Scriptures that declare that Jesus was God in the flesh―not a second God

6. Link to a (downloadable) able exposé on the Jewish Talmud, including the rabbi's 1936 English  language translation (it blows all the "Talmud apologist's" arguments right out of the water!)

7. What changes family-wise when a woman marries;  Command Structure of the NWO; Miscegenation; is Ezekiel 44 in the Millennium?

8. Ancient Sodom, the Modern Homosexual/Lesbian Movement, and Contemporary Jewish Talmudic Traditions on Homosexuality

9. Is the truth AntiSemitism? Ignorance answered with documentation; Also, shocking info on the origin of the Da Vinci Code movie and book―a must-hear radio interview!

| To list of all questions on Website |

 
 

Question #1

| Back To Top |

 

Jehovah's Witnesses

A reader writes:

2 Corinthians 13:1
13:1 This is the third time I am coming to you. In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.  KJV

"Heb. 1:8 - This is a verse where God the Father is calling Jesus God: "But about the Son he says, ‘Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever, and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.'" Since the Jehovah's Witnesses don't agree with that they have changed the Bible, yet again, to agree with their theology. They have translated the verse as "...God is your throne..." The problem with the Jehovah's Witness translation is that this verse is a quote from Psalm 45:6 which, from the Hebrew, can only be translated as "...Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever; a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom." To justify their New Testament translation they actually changed the OT verse to agree with their theology, too!" --

Christian Apologetics & Research Ministry 

Hebrews 1:1-9
1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,
2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;
3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;
4 Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.
5 For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?
6 And again, when he bringeth in the firstbegotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.
7 And of the angels he saith, Who maketh his angels spirits, and his ministers a flame of fire.
8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.  KJV

Psalms 45:6-7
6 Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre.
7 Thou lovest righteousness, and hatest wickedness: therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.  KJV

"...The question that comes to mind about Satan being the tree of good and evil is confusing because Jehovah said they could eat from all the other trees in the garden but that one.  So that statement seems to emphasize that the tree of good and evil is an actual fruit bearing tree.  What are your thoughts? "

• Just what exactly was the "forbidden fruit" of the Garden of Eden?

• Eve; semantics: did she eat from the wrong fruit tree, or partake of the forbidden thing?

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

The beast starts cutting its teeth―The U.S. "Office Of Global Anti-Semitism" comes on-line quietly

 

A reader sent us the below article.  We have been following this development for over a year now, and I feel that now is a good time to visit it.  We have no affiliation with the below Website (whether they be good or bad, I don't know), but are merely posting their article here so that people don't think that WBSG is the only ones noticing and writing of this stuff.  Call it a second witness, if you will.  We comment briefly after the article.

Peace to you in Christ Jesus.

Nick Goggin; WBSG.

 

Jewish Activist Heads
Office Of Global Anti-Semitism
By Rev. Ted Pike
6-15-6
Source
 

Vowing to combat global anti-Semitism by every means at his disposal, veteran Jewish activist Gregg Rickman was recently sworn in by Condoleezza Rice as head of the State Department's office of global anti-Semitism. Jewish activists view Rickman's appointment as a victory against a U.S. State Department which had protested establishment of yet another Jewish special interest agency. Several years ago the State Department claimed it already adequately monitored global human rights abuses and promoted Holocaust remembrance. Yet Jewish lobbyists persuaded Congress 18 months ago to create a special federal agency dedicated solely to silencing "virulent criticism" of Israel and matters Jewish or questioning the six million figure of alleged Holocaust victims.   UNITING SYNAGOGUE WITH STATE DEPARTMENT   Rickman's appointment, as a veteran protagonist of all things Jewish, makes it clear that the office of global anti-Semitism will not be bipartisan.  Rather, as I have warned since its inception, it is merely a front for ADL/B'nai B'rith's anti-Christian hate laws agenda -- a foundation upon which to federalize and internationalize persecution of Christians.   Are you still unfamiliar with this new thought crimes bureaucracy in our midst? Are you aware of its many perverse definitions of anti-Semitism?  Here is the article I published last summer on this subject. It answers many questions yet poses many more concerning the "Office to Monitor and Control Anti-Semitism," mandated as H.R. 4230 by Congress.     THE REAL MOTIVE BEHIND THE "DEPARTMENT OF GLOBAL ANTI-SEMITISM" By Rev. Ted Pike   On October 16, 2004 President Bush signed into law the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act. It establishes a special department within the U.S. State Department to monitor global anti-Semitism, reporting annually to Congress.   This is more "Hate Crimes" legislation, orchestrated by the international Jewish religious, educational, and fraternal organization, B'nai B'rith, and its Anti-Defamation League. The new "Department of Global Anti-Semitism" is designed to make critics of Israel not only into "anti-Semites" but ultimately into "domestic terrorists."   But first, what is anti-Semitism? Simple: It is the racist belief that Jews, because of heredity, are evil, greedy, corrupting, subversive, degenerate, etc. Hitler believed this. So do the KKK and certain "Christian identity" and white supremacist groups.   Such dehumanization of Jews is evil, un-Christian, un-American.   On the other hand, if the actions of individual Jews, Jewish institutions, Jewish religious or secular leaders, or the nation Israel have been evil, then vehement criticism is not anti-Semitic. It is courageous and laudable. Certainly, the Biblical prophets, including Christ, engaged in vitriolic criticism of the sinful nation Israel and its false leaders. No one considers them anti-Semitic.   TWISTED DEFINITIONS OF "ANTI-SEMITISM"   However, in its "Report on Global Anti-Semitism" and "Global Anti-Semitism Report," the U.S. State Department ignores the above perspectives. Here is a list of beliefs or activities the U.S. government now considers anti-Semitic: 1 Any assertion "that the Jewish community controls government, the media, international business and the financial world" is anti-Semitic.   2 "Strong anti-Israel sentiment" is anti-Semitic.   3 "Virulent criticism" of Israel's leaders, past or present, is anti-Semitic. According to the State Department, anti-Semitism occurs when a swastika is portrayed in a cartoon decrying the behavior of a past or present Zionist leader. Thus, a cartoon that includes a swastika to criticize Ariel Sharon's brutal 2002 invasion of the West Bank, raining "hell-fire" missiles on hapless Palestinian men, women and children, is anti-Semitic. Similarly, when the word "Zionazi" is used to describe Sharon's saturation bombing in Lebanon in 1982 (killing 17,500 innocent refugees), it is also "anti-Semitic."   4 Criticism of the Jewish religion or its religious leaders or literature (especially the Talmud and Kabbalah) is anti-Semitic.   5 Criticism of the U.S. government and Congress for being under undue influence by the Jewish-Zionist community (including AIPAC) is anti-Semitic.   6 Criticism of the Jewish-Zionist community for promoting globalism (the "New World Order") is anti-Semitic.   7 Blaming Jewish leaders and their followers for inciting the Roman crucifixion of Christ is anti-Semitic.   8 Diminishing the "six million" figure of Holocaust victims is anti-Semitic.   9 Calling Israel a "racist" state is anti-Semitic.   10 Asserting that there exists a "Zionist Conspiracy" is anti-Semitic.   11 Claiming that Jews and their leaders created the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia is anti-Semitic.   12 Making "derogatory statements about Jewish persons" is anti-Semitic.   13 Saying Jews cannot re-inhabit Palestine as a nation, except in obedience to God, is anti-Semitic.   14 Alleging that Mossad was behind the 9/11 attack is anti-Semitic.   ANTI-SEMITISM IS A "HATE CRIME"   In the Global Anti-Semitism Report, State Department spokespersons Ambassador Edward O'Donnell and the head of the office of global anti-Semitism, Ambassador Michael B. Kozak, defend the State Department's definitions. O'Donnell's statement that he wants to "end all anti-Semitism and other hate crimes" reveals that he considers anti-Semitism a hate crime. Presumably, he would like such a "crime" to be punished.   These State Department reports repeatedly equate "strong, anti-Israel sentiment" and criticism of matters Jewish with "hate." They give no recognition to the possibility that such criticism might be sincerely motivated not by hate but by moral indignation or even love for the Jewish people.   The Report on Global Anti-Semitism repeatedly calls for passage, both nationally and internationally, of "hate crime" legislation. These laws, the brainchild of B'nai B'rith/ADL, also have as their ultimate goal making it a "hate crime" to criticize Jews, matters Jewish, or the state of Israel.   The Report on Global Anti-Semitism reeks with B'nai B'rith/ADL logic, phraseology, and evidence of their incredible worldwide organizational and statistic-gathering capacities. It contains thirty-three pages of minute documentation of "anti-Semitic incidents" in fifty-eight countries of the world, documentation which only B'nai B'rith/ADL, with its offices in more than fifty countries, could compile or even be that vitally interested in. Without a doubt, as with hate laws, this Global Anti-Semitism Review Act is their creation.   CRITICISM-FREE ZONE FOR JEWS   Thus, the Department of Anti-Semitism, applauded and advised by B'nai B'rith/ADL, is working to create a worldwide "criticism-free zone" for Jews in the "New World Order" that is coming. This report ignores whether criticisms of matters Jewish are true. What must be defended are the sensitivities of the Jewish people! Consequently, relating such unflattering realities as the anti-Christian, anti-Gentile contents of the Talmud and Kabbalah, Jewish origins of bolshevism, Jewish dominance of Hollywood and the media, Jewish control of Congress through AIPAC, Zionist atrocities and abrasiveness in the Middle East is anti-Semitic. It is "hate." It does not matter that such facts can be easily and extensively documented, often from impeccable Jewish sources such as the Encyclopedia Judaica.   All such anti-Semitism, this report says, is a "scourge," an "intolerable burden," which "for an increasingly interdependent worldmust be ended."   On the other hand, according to the U.S. State Department, there does exist some possibility that "objective criticism" of Israel and its leaders can be tolerated - that is, just as long as such criticism does not "cross the line" and become "strong anti-Israel sentiment" and "virulent." Such criticism should not "demonize" Jews, Jewish religious or political leaders, or the state of Israel.   However, what may be considered "virulence" or "demonization" by Zionists may be seen as nothing more than salty truth-telling by critics of Israel. Hypocritically, the State Department itself is not above "demonizing" strong critics of Israel in the most "virulent" terms as a "plague" and "scourge" on mankind!   TURNING "ANTI-SEMITISM" INTO "DOMESTIC TERRORISM"   The State Department's twisted definition of anti-Semitism provides exponential opportunities to persecute Bible-believing Christians, anti-war activists, Moslems, as well as publishers and broadcasters in the years ahead. In fact, by turning "strong" criticism of the American/Zionist coalition into "anti-Semitism and other hate crimes," the State Department opens the door to eventual characterization of those who criticize Israel as not only anti-Semites but also as "domestic terrorists."   Here's how it can be done:   Today, those who raise funds in America to support America's and Israel's terrorist enemies are arrested as "domestic terrorists." But what if articulate Americans provided something else, potentially even more valuable to Israel's enemies: "strong criticism" of Israel? Such could weaken Israel morally in the sight of the world, giving justification to the claims of her terrorist enemies. Should they also be punished?   As the Second World War was beginning in 1939, Charles Lindberg was publicly critical of international Jews for inveigling America into a war to destroy Hitler. Lindberg believed that Hitler should be allowed to do what he wanted to do most, move east and destroy "Jewish Communism" in Russia.   In 1944, 30 Americans, who agreed with Lindberg, were arrested for the crime of "sedition," weakening America's resolve in the fight against fascism. Later investigation under the Freedom of Information Act revealed that the ADL, attempting to equate criticism of international Jews with Nazism, had entirely created the FBI case.   Records revealed that the ADL was "only warming up" by pursuing sedition convictions against 30 innocent Americans. Their ultimate ambition was to imprison prominent critics of evil Jewish leadership, especially Charles Lindberg. Fortunately, ADL's attempt to transform 30 critics of international Jews into "Nazis" failed when the judge died and the case was dissolved.   Today, America and Israel are allies in the "war on terror." Tomorrow, especially if the war on terror intensifies and America and Israel cooperate even more closely, criticism of America's ally in the war on terrorism may be construed as "aiding and abetting the enemy." Such "strong criticism" or anti-Semitism may be seen as not only weakening Israel, but America itself.   Turning millions of Americans into anti-Semites for criticizing Israel is thus a transition toward ADL's ultimate goal: making such persons "enemies of the war on terror," i.e., "domestic terrorists."   They then can be prosecuted under Homeland Security laws.   CANADA: ALREADY MAKING "ANTI-SEMITES" INTO "DOMESTIC TERRORISTS"   In Canada, we are seeing exactly this happen. Ernst Zundel is a Holocaust revisionist who doubts that a full six million Jews were deliberately murdered by the Nazis, largely by gassing. He asserts that untold numbers of Jews in German internment camps, especially in the last years of the war, died not in gas chambers, but as a result of massive, well-documented typhus epidemics, which also killed countless Poles, Gypsies, Russians, etc. Yet in Canada, thanks to ADL/B'nai B'rith, it is a "hate crime" to lesson to any degree the six million figure of Holocaust dead, or that most of them died in gas chambers. Such diminishment is anti-Semitism, a "hate crime" punishable by harsh fines and imprisonment. Several years ago Zundel was deported from his home in Tennessee back to Canada to spend more than two years in solitary confinement in a Canadian prison. He was then deported back to his native Germany where he remains in prison.   Under what charge have Canadian authorities been holding him?   You guessed it. He is a "terrorist threat!"   So it will be for millions of Americans tomorrow if ADL/B'nai B'rith have their way and the Department of Anti-Semitism's twisted definitions of anti-Semitism are allowed to stand.   The Department of Global Anti-Semitism is informing the world who the "domestic terrorists" of tomorrow will be.   They are you and I.   [End of article]

Our (WBSG's) comments to the reader who sent in the article are as follows:

"Subject:  overloaded ,sorry - remove me"

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

The Gnostics and the Da Vinci Code hoax; Survivalism/Preparation; the Tribulation; the state of our upcoming book; etc.

 

A reader (an author on survivalist matters) writes:

...I have studied extensively on survival off
the grid and issues pertaining to it, with the acute
knowledge that practical, real term survival, has
nothing to do with fighting for a parking space to get
one's next cappuccino.  I keep an eye on RFID technology
[Radio Frequency Identification Devise ("chips")]
developments and law enforcement developments…  

…in physical terms of preparation ...contingency plans for
food, fuel, shelter, clothing/footwear/storage/concealment/
camouflage, lighting/heating/refrigeration, first aid,
medical and survival related supplies, water
supply/filtration/purification, toiletries, sanitation, insect
repellant mobilization/transportation, "secret
gardening" inclusive of non genetically modified seeds.
construction/tools/supplies, hunting, fishing, discreet
cooking/baking (no "smoke signals") quiet trained dogs.
firearms/ammunition, crossbows ("silent hunting")
surveillance (night vision quite possibly helpful here
too) maps/navigation, communications, self defense, caring
for the young, the elderly, the sick and infirm ( only
and realistically where it's possible without
hospitalization or a doctor's care, of course there is
always prayer for healing and God's guidance for
wisdom pertaining to any and all situations); with the
possible exception of radar (considering it's
availability and/or usefulness), toys/games/books for
the kids and/or the adults, I believe, barring some
Jack Daniels and/or cigarettes, I have it
covered.

...Whew! that's just shooting from the hip and memory,
and I do have a defined and orderly list that's just not on
hand at this second, but that is the gist of the
list.

This is the important part, the part that is of
far more importance than any of the above, that is to
be born again, having Jesus Christ as your Lord and
Saviour, believing that he came as the Son of God, dying
for us for the remission of our sins and being raised
the third day to be seated at the right hand of God,
and shall return as our Lord and Saviour, as King of
kings and Lord of lords. That is what I say is the
criteria for anyone who is interested in this
as a young Christian. I also tell them that the bible
and God's Word in it is THE survival manual and
without God-his Son, and his word, there is no survival
of the second death, and only with his blessing will
any physical preparation work, should he will that to
be for us. For those of us who have been in the Lord
for longer and are more familiar with his voice and
guidance I trust he will guide some to leave the
cities as in isaiah-5:8,13 or to stay, should he will
some to do....

Xxxxxxxxx

And again, he writes:

NICK:
  I forgot to ask you how your book is coming along,
and any ETA [estimated time of arrival]?  I'm polishing off my
work on survival - no working title as yet, but you will
be among the few and first who will get it- at this time.
I will keep you posted.

LOVE IN CHRIST - Xxxxxxx
 

John 18:36-38
36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
37 Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.
38 Pilate saith unto him, What is truth? And when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find in him no fault at all.  KJV

Hosea 4:6
6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.  KJV

Ecclesiastes 1:9-11
9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.
11 There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.  KJV

Isaiah 5:13
13 Therefore my people are gone into captivity, because they have no knowledge: and their honourable men are famished, and their multitude dried up with thirst.  KJV

Isaiah 30:8-19
8 Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever:
9 That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of the LORD:
10 Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits:
11 Get you out of the way, turn aside out of the path, cause the Holy One of Israel to cease from before us.
12 Wherefore thus saith the Holy One of Israel, Because ye despise this word, and trust in oppression and perverseness, and stay thereon:
13 Therefore this iniquity shall be to you as a breach ready to fall, swelling out in a high wall, whose breaking cometh suddenly at an instant.
14 And he shall break it as the breaking of the potters' vessel that is broken in pieces; he shall not spare: so that there shall not be found in the bursting of it a sherd to take fire from the hearth, or to take water withal out of the pit.
15 For thus saith the Lord GOD, the Holy One of Israel; In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness and in confidence shall be your strength: and ye would not.
16 But ye said, No; for we will flee upon horses; therefore shall ye flee: and, We will ride upon the swift; therefore shall they that pursue you be swift.
17 One thousand shall flee at the rebuke of one; at the rebuke of five shall ye flee: till ye be left as a beacon upon the top of a mountain, and as an ensign on an hill.
18 And therefore will the LORD wait, that he may be gracious unto you, and therefore will he be exalted, that he may have mercy upon you: for the LORD is a God of judgment: blessed are all they that wait for him.
19 For the people shall dwell in Zion at Jerusalem: thou shalt weep no more: he will be very gracious unto thee at the voice of thy cry; when he shall hear it, he will answer thee.  KJV

Revelation 21:1-7
21:1 And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.
2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
5 And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.  KJV

Isaiah 3:12-4:1
12 As for my [God's] people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
13 The LORD standeth up to plead, and standeth to judge the people.
14 The LORD will enter into judgment with the ancients of his people, and the princes thereof: for ye have eaten up the vineyard; the spoil of the poor is in your houses.
15 What mean ye that ye beat my people to pieces, and grind the faces of the poor? saith the LORD GOD of hosts.
16 Moreover the LORD saith, Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with stretched forth necks and wanton eyes, walking and mincing as they go, and making a tinkling with their feet:
17 Therefore the LORD will smite with a scab the crown of the head of the daughters of Zion, and the LORD will discover their secret parts.
18 In that day the Lord will take away the bravery of their tinkling ornaments about their feet, and their cauls, and their round tires like the moon,
19 The chains, and the bracelets, and the mufflers,
20 The bonnets, and the ornaments of the legs, and the headbands, and the tablets, and the earrings,
21 The rings, and nose jewels,
22 The changeable suits of apparel, and the mantles, and the wimples, and the crisping pins,
23 The glasses, and the fine linen, and the hoods, and the vails.
24 And it shall come to pass, that instead of sweet smell there shall be stink; and instead of a girdle a rent; and instead of well set hair baldness; and instead of a stomacher a girding of sackcloth; and burning instead of beauty.
25 Thy men shall fall by the sword, and thy mighty in the war.
26 And her gates shall lament and mourn; and she being desolate shall sit upon the ground.  KJV

Revelation 13:3-8
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
4 And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?
5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.
6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world [i.e., those who are not Christians].  KJV 

Luke 21:10-28
10 Then said he [Jesus] unto them, Nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: [the great last wars, which were set into motion on 9/11/01]
11 And great earthquakes shall be in divers [diverse] places, and famines, and pestilences; and fearful sights and great signs shall there be from heaven.
12 But before all these [the culmination of verse 10, and those things of verse 11 above], they shall lay their hands on you, and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues, and into prisons, being brought before kings and rulers for my name's sake.
13 And it shall turn to you for a testimony.
14 Settle it therefore in your hearts, not to meditate before what ye shall answer:
15 For I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to gainsay nor resist.
16 And ye shall be betrayed both by parents, and [Christian] brethren, and kinsfolks, and friends; and some of you shall they cause to be put to death.
17 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake.
18 But there shall not an hair of your head perish.
19 In your patience possess ye your souls [your lives--psuche, Grk. #5590].
20 And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.
21 Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto.
22 For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.
23 But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.
24 And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into [among] all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down [trampled upon] of the Gentiles [the non-Israel strangers (the so-called Jews) who are there even now], until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
25 And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring;
26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.
27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory.
28 And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh [near (but is not yet)].  KJV

 

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

Article "REVELATION OF THE METHOD AND THE MURDER OF SPIRIT", showing the inner workings of the Int. Judaics today

 

    This isn't really a Q&A, but I often use these pages to disseminate information helpful to the endtime Christian.  This is just such a case.  Below, we supply a recent article by a Mr. Michael Hoffman (whose book Judaism's Strange Gods is definitely a must-have!).  His article corroborates what we have been saying all along, and is therefore helpful to show the Christian the reality of their situation in these endtimes.  Mr. Hoffman does not write from a Christian perspective, per se, but more from a secular standpoint; which all the more makes my case more proven by his seeming agreement with it.  I am not saying that Mr. Hoffman is or is not a Christian―I don't know that―but just that he writes from a different perspective than do I.

Groundwork

    In a recent Q&A I stated that we (The Christian Western Nations, specifically America) have been changed, changed from with.  Mr. Hoffman's article gives a second witness to my assertion, though from a different angle.  I refer to my below:

“...The method of overcoming the Christian faith      Understanding the following will go a long way in understanding the seeming contradictions in today's world of Christian ministry (failing yet flourishing) and the 2000+ a.d. Christian faith generally:       What "they" did was to first scourge Christianity, discredit it, shame it, marginalize it, vilified it; then, they removed what was left of it from schools, government, and parents and their children's minds.  And while this plan was long in coming to fruition, it really began to bear lighting-speed and snowballing fruit with the 1960's me-first, protest, get high, sexual-revolution generation, forward; for, it was in that decade that the International Judaics had finally liberated us from God, country, and conscience.  It was then that the die was set, the clock wound, and the course inevitable.       Then, this '60s generation of God-forsaking overthrown social and moral misfits bore children (those who escaped the 1973-forward Abortion chambers, anyway), this is my generation, I am 45 years old.  Then that generation, two wits worse than their parents ever dreamt of being, bore children―and under the all-seeing watchful eye and ever-present guidance of the International Judaics, they had finally created a virtual pure generation of godless youth―stripped of love of God, Christ, country, or self―by which they could now move to phase two.  They had their Talmudic Golem.  Currently they are injecting a counterfeit brand of Christianity into these new young void-of-God minds.  Hence; the birth of antichristianity, which is being risen from the sad ashes of overthrown and dismantled traditional Biblical Christianity, tweaked and corrupted into what shall become known in the near future as the religion of antichrist―antichristianity, if I may coin a phrase.      And yes, I have been as guilty as the next Christian for allowing this to happen on our watch.  I do not judge you, I am with you in guilt.  And while I may be passionate, I am not more angry at you than I am angry at myself―God being angry at us both, and rightly so.    “To destroy you must replace”  ― Napoleon      "They" knew that Christianity could never be stamped out; they failed miserably at that with Christ's crucifixion which only sparked the religion, and later-on, when to their dismay, the more that they persecuted the early church and the early Christians (to death), the more Christianity spread and grew (this event occupies a great portion of the book of Acts), until it became the dominant religion of the planet.  And they learned a valuable lesson from that.  So, Christianity could never be persecuted out of existence; however, it could be changed, corrupted from within, replaced by a counterfeit, repackaged and sold to a generation that was to come.  But this final generation had to be prepared, fashioned, readied.  This has been accomplished.       It is these, our children, that shall be they who "And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast" (Rev 13:4a).  If you are forty years old or so, and have children―they have been taken from you and from God.  Utilized to take them was the Judaic-controlled television that you placed in their bedroom, and which you used to baby-sit them; the Judaic-controlled schools that you sent them to for six hours a day wherein God and Christ were expelled by the Judaic ADL's tireless efforts; the Judaic-controlled rebellious music and movies that you let them watch and listen to intently, all the while changing them within in ways that you could never grasp; the spouses that you divorced in Judaic-controlled sponsored legislation and lawyer's guilds "no fault Divorces," the baby-sitters that you hired instead to raise them; the Judaic-controlled government that you voted in, the Judaic-controlled anti-God anti-Christian laws that you winked at the passing of; the Judaic-controlled and overthrown from within "Christian" churches; the Judaic-controlled godlessness of your very own selves even.  Think that I am giving too much credit to the International Judaics, do you?  Once again, look around you, friend.       Just like you yourselves were likewise incrementally taken away from your own parents and the love of God, what's left of your children is long ago gone.  Your parent's parent's generation was the last one to have any hope―all now is corrupt.  The Tribulation has to happen in this generation because if it waited till your children's children's generation there would be no faithful true Christians left to resist satan and his minions.  The time is now or never, so to speak.  This is the legacy that we left our children: The final generation (walking among us today) Revelation 13:3-8 3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast. 4 And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? 5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. 6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. 7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. 8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, [who are among those] whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.  KJV      Simple plan, really.  But there was a problem. ...”

― Source "Answers page 49, question #1" Watchmen Bible Study Group website by Nick Goggin.

     The gist of what Mr. Hoffman is pointing out in his below article is that "they" are now at a stage where "they" are revealing their actions to see if the peoples are sufficiently mind-numbed for "them" to move forward into the later stages of their plans.  In other words, "they" are purposely exposing themselves a little bit to see if resistance is present.  Sadly, as you shall glean from the below article, "their" hunch paid off and we as a nation (and world even) didn't even blink.  This is not good for us, especially us endtime Christians.

Note on terms in below article

    Mr. Hoffman tends to use "three-dollar words" in many of his writings, which sometimes makes him hard to read.  So I will explain a key one that permeates the below text, as I understand the term to mean.  He uses the term "Cryptocracy," which I interpret to mean the organizational group behind the control of the world as we move into the New World Order.  Perhaps this is they whom I refer to as "the International Judaics"; I don't for sure―but they both seem to be doing the same thing; that is―controlling the world in these end times, and before.  But "crypto" is a prefix meaning hidden, secret, and "cracy" is a suffix meaning government, rule; so, "cryptocracy" is basically: hidden rule; or, when speaking of persons: hidden rulers.  Which is exactly what the Learned Elders of Zion are (the International Judaics, as I refer to them as).  These are the "hidden hand," so to speak.

Below is Mr. Hoffman's article, supplied with no further commentary:

 

REVELATION OF THE METHOD AND THE MURDER OF SPIRIT
A Page from the Cryptocracy's Psychological Warfare Manual
by Michael A. Hoffman II
RevisionistHistory.org | June, 21, 2006
Source

No, this isn't a column about ectoplasm or the Fox Sisters; but the
epistemology of mass suppression of spirit, soul and mind; in other
words, a page from the Cryptocracy's own psychological warfare manual.

In the June 5 edition of the New York Times, there appeared on one-third
of page A19, an illustrated report on the concept that the 9/11 terror
attacks were US government-sponsored. The article was titled "For 9/11
Conspiracy Buffs, A Chance to Compare Notes." It was reported by Alan
Feuer.

If we were not in the alchemical "Must Be" stage of the "Making Manifest
of All that is Hidden" era, then this NY Times report would have never
seen print, or the reporter would have merely poked fun, or suggested
that 9/11 conspiracy investigators are fit mainly for the booby hatch,
in the American tradition of what Richard Hofstadter sneeringly termed
"paranoid style."

Nothing of the kind in this report, however. The New York Times
graciously called the 9/11 investigators  "skeptics and scientists."
Even the website of these dissenters was provided: 911Truth.org

The anomaly that is the collapse of World Trade Center building 7, which
was not attacked in any discernible manner, but mysteriously fell
anyway, was cited rather than avoided. Also noted by the Times are
incendiary topics such as the collapse of the World Trade Center towers
through "controlled demolition," and the fact that "the military command
that monitors aircraft 'stood down' on the day of the attacks." This is
just the sort of sensitive, hidden data that ought to make the
Cryptocracy squirm, unless the Cryptocracy itself approved its release
for purposes of Revelation of the Method.

Physics Prof. Steven E. Jones is recognized by the NY Times as the
antidote to the National Institute of Standards and Technology Report,
which claims to debunk the notion that the collapse of WTC building 7
was any kind of anomaly. A long URL is furnished for Prof. Jones'
rebuttal paper.

The tenor of the New York Times report is mostly respectful. It all but
affirms that there's a good case for believing the US government did
this to its own citizens. That's quite an astounding concession in the
nation's "newspaper of record," in an article taking up one-third of
page 19 in the paper's first section, under the headline "New York
Report."

The June 5 Times report is unprecedented; it should have made huge
waves: Bush's press secretary should have been asked about it, Ann
Coulter should have been confronted; Prof. Jones should have been on all
the news networks. The New York Times should have editorialized.
Instead, just a few tiny blips of reaction on the media screen and then,
flatline.

I promised at the beginning of this column to take you on a foray into
the control epistemology of the Cryptocracy, so here goes. The
"Revelation of the Method" is a deadly weapon in the hands of the
enemies of the Establishment, in those times past when the American
people were possessed of an alert mind, an awakened consciousness,
concentrated will-power and not too many distractions.

Today, amnesia, apathy and distractions both digital and consumer
cornucopic, are all-pervasive, except when people are cued by the
Establishment to become outraged, as in the outrage generated on behalf
of Darfur and a few years before that, for Kosovo. This is official
outrage. Unofficial, spontaneous, grassroots outrage is harder to find.

When the New York Times, an organ of the System itself, strongly hints
that the US government is complicit in the murder of thousands of its
own citizens - - and as a result of this revelation there are no
sustained street protests, mass rallies, riots, pickets, lawsuits,
televised hearings, booing and hissing of Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush and
Ashcroft whenever they attend public forums; no special investigations
by the newspaper and television journalists - - then murder of our
spirits is taking place on a mass scale and the Cryptocracy's gamble in
revealing this information, is paying off.

It is risky to reveal to the people what has been done to them by the
gangster class that lords it over them. Patently, in the wake of the
revelation, the risk is one of reprisal, retribution and rage by the
people. But where there is little or none of that, then the Cryptocracy
has tripled its hold on the minds and hearts of Americans: it has
strongly hinted about the mass murder it committed on Sept. 11 and yet,
there are few significant repercussions. This non-reaction tends to
demonstrate that the people of the US accept, at the subliminal level of
their consciousness, that their own leaders are mass murderers of their
fellow citizens, and mostly what they do in return is shake it off and
head to the mall.

If the Federal government succeeds in another big attack on America by
means of its Islamic patsies, it could well tip our country over into
military rule. Bringing the behind-the-scenes perpetrators of the first
9/11 attacks to justice, prevents the state's orchestration of a second
attack, the one that most likely would lead to martial law tyranny and
the eclipse of the American dream of liberty. But even after revelations
in the June 5 New York Times - - replete with directions to web pages
that give strong evidence of an official role in the terror attacks - -
Atlas shrugs.

This is a less-than-human response, a result of the alchemical
processing of humanity, the devolution from angel to beast.

There you have it, a page from the real-time psychological warfare
manual of the Cryptocracy.

[End of article]
 

    Peace to you in Christ Jesus.  And watch, watchmen, watch!

Back to list of questions at top of page

 

| Back To Top |

Scriptures that declare that Jesus was God in the flesh―not a second God

 

A reader writes:

a). what there Jews charged Him with: "...but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God." (John 10:33b);

b). violating the first commandment: "Thou shalt have no other gods before me [God]." (Ex 20:3), in that He (Jesus) accepted Thomas' worship: "...said unto him, My Lord and my God." (Jn 20:28b);

c). forgiving sin when only God can forgive sin: "I [God], even I, am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine own sake, and will not remember thy sins." (Is 43:25), in that He (Jesus) said: "...he [Jesus] said unto him, Man, thy sins are forgiven thee." (Luke 5:20b).

d). etc., etc., etc., "I [Jesus] and my Father are one." (Jn 10:30), etc., etc., etc., "...he that hath seen me [Jesus] hath seen the Father" (Jn 14:9b). etc., etc., etc.

 

Back to list of questions at top of page

 

| Back To Top |

Link to a (downloadable) able exposé on the Jewish Talmud, including the rabbi's 1936 English language translation (this blows all the "Talmud apologist's" arguments right out of the water!)

 

A reader writes:

Mr. Goggin;
I just got in from physical labor and am actually too worn out to be writing,
but I want you to know that you web site is superb, to say the least.
At your site I find a ready-made reference of nearly everything I've studied and researched for nearly thirty years, plus MUCH MORE !

To see someone who has the time and extreme intellect, put all this on a web site is very thrilling to me.

Seeing all these old documents I studied years ago, being displayed for truth seekers, is wonderful beyond measure.

You have a God-blessed mind and I pray for His shield around you to allow you to continue exposing the "jews" of Revelation 2:9 and 3:9.

There is a link you may want to post on your site if it's not there already, which will afford proof of the things you are exposing.

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/index.html

The lady that did all the work at that site, deserve accolade upon accolade !

God bless you sir.
[Xxxxx Xxxxxx]
Revelation 12:17

Acts 5:28 Saying, Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us.
29: Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
30: The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree.
 

 Answer:

Hello.  A Scripture comes to mind:

Mark 4:22-23
22 For there is nothing hid, which shall not be manifested; neither was any thing kept secret, but that it should come abroad.
23 If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.  KJV

     The link that you supplied above is to a Talmud exposing book that was reformatted and placed on the Internet.  It is excellent, and they supply a link to download the whole Website.  I have excerpted it often on our Website.

     It was the Talmud, or rather the Talmudic teachings which were then still in their uncodified form that Jesus was referring to here:

Acts 26:15-18
15 And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest.
16 But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;
17 Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,
18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.  KJV

     The Talmud's god is satan hidden, the angels of the Talmud are demons.  The Talmud was composed and finally codified from circa 500 b.c. through circa a.d. 500.  It represents the final and absolute falling of the Hebrews from the Old Testament religion of the Israelites into the evil and demonic teachings of the spiritually vile and offensive-to-God Talmud; i.e., the basis for modern-day Judaism.  Just like the religion of the coming Tribulation shall also reflect the final fall of Christianity into the spiritually vile religion of the beast―antichristianty.  Nothing new under the sun! (Ecc 1:9-11).  And its (the Talmud) teachings are what those Jews in the New Testament who sought to kill Christ referred to as "the tradition of the elders" [the learned elders of Zion, I might add.].  Yet, most of today's blind and misled Christians esteem the Jews and Judaism to be God's Chosen People and the religion of the Old Testament.  Absolutely nothing could be further from the truth!

Matthew 15:1-3
15:1 Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,
2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.
3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?  KJV

     Anyway, thank you very much for the kind words of encouragement, they really do mean much to me.  And it is refreshing to see that others have known of these things, and known of them for a long time.  Sometimes it can seem lonely....

     Regarding the above Website recommendation, it is available in its original book form from Amazon.com.  For those who like to read from books better than from computed screens, below is a direct ordering link to that work (different title―same book).  PS:  Don't believe a word of the Amazon.com's "reader reviews" at this link―they are all blatant and shameless lies by the you-know-who's; calling Mrs. Dilling (the now deceased author) a liar and AntiSemite, blah, blah, blah.  Someday they will lie about me like that.  The Master, Jesus Christ, spoke to and of these you-know-who's:  "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." (John 8:44).  Below is the book, and I highly recommend it:

The Plot Against Christianity
by Elizabeth Dilling
8½" x 11" soft cover, 310 pages, illustrated

(Approx. $15.00-$20.00)

     As we "go to press" with this Q&A page, some news from Israel reaches us.  In the below story, carried by the Israeli news source, Haaretz, we observe as fifty Christians learn the truth the hard way in Israel.  This is only a tiny taste of the Tribulation to come for us endtime Christians:

Ultra-Orthodox Jews attack Christian tourists in Jerusalem
By Jonathan Lis, Haaretz Correspondent
Last update - 14:24 28/06/2006
Source

Screen capture of Haaretz article, 29 June, 2006 (click picture to enlarge)

A group of 50 pro-Israel Christian tourists came under attack Wednesday from some 100 residents of the ultra-Orthodox neighborhood of Mea She'arim in Jerusalem.

Three of the tourists and a police officer were wounded in the attack. They received treatment at the scene.

The tourists arrived at Mea She'arim wearing orange T-shirts with the words "Love your neighbor as yourself" printed across them.

As they neared one of the squares, the local residents apparently identified them as Christians and began to hit them.

Police forces in the area stepped in to stop the violence, but did not make any arrests.

Police say they are waiting for the tourists to file official complaints.

    Okaaayy, waiting for an "official" complaint; as opposed to what, an "unofficial" complaint.  And the injured Cop, he's taking his time to file an "official complaint" as well?  Truth is, they didn't want to make any arrests because they really don't want this matter getting back to Americans who send Israel five-billion+ dollars a year in free aid, not to mention the countless millions raised by beguiled Christian groups in America for Jews in Israel.  I included the above screen-capture of the article in case it gets "disappeared" off the Internet, as these damaging stories often do. 

     Can you imagine the wake-up-call when these "pro-Israel" Christians went to Israel wearing their matching orange "love your neighbor as yourself" t-shirts, and then were mobbed in the street and attacked by a hundred Jews who hate them solely because of Jesus Christ?  The above is Hate-Crime by anyone's standards.  Obviously their pastor hasn't been telling them the truth (surely he didn't know the truth himself―until yesterday, that is).  They must think that Jesus was just play-preaching when He said:  "Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also." (Jn 15:20).

     Perhaps someone should send them a link to our Website―I can tell them why this happened to them; as I can imagine that they are absolutely dumbfounded right about now.  I wonder if they'll keep sending their money to the "poor persecuted 'God's Chosen People' in Israel" after they return to America and try to understand why they were attacked by mobs of "religious Jews" in the streets of the holy city Jerusalem?

     I'm surprised that this story saw the light of day outside of Israel (you've gotta love the internet!).  But I can guarantee you that it won't be on the nightly news tonight in America on the Judaic-controlled networks.  Not as would be, say, 100 Christians attacking Jewish tourists in America be all over the news for days and weeks.  That is the privilege when you control all the media outlets.

     And finally, how much do you want to bet that the Jewish-friendly http://www.worldnetdaily.com/ (Joseph Farah's Judaic-controlled propaganda apparatus Internet News Service masquerading as a "Christian News Website"), who even has a correspondent stationed in Jerusalem, Israel, that writes a daily column, doesn't make even a single mention of this?  I'll watch for it; today is June 29th, if they don't pick the story up by tomorrow (when I post this Q&A page)―they most likely won't be mentioning it at all.  After all, the event happened on 28 June, Wednesday.  Tomorrow is Friday the 30th, and Israel is even something like 8 or 12 hours AHEAD of us.

WorldNetDaily Headlines, 30 June 2006, including their Jerusalem Bureau.  No mention of the 100 Orthodox Jews attacking visiting Christians in the streets!                  Source, front page: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/

FROM WND'S JERUSALEM BUREAU WorldNetDaily Exclusive Global community slams Gaza incursion Prime Minister Olmert had assured 'world would understand' --WND Christian pilgrims back IDF troops 'Your God is my God': Group waves Israeli flags, sings religious songs --Associated Press NEWS ANALYSIS WorldNetDaily Exclusive Israel's Gaza incursion just a big show? Aaron Klein says PM Olmert afraid to order any significant operation --WND SPECIAL OFFER Christians become most important pro-Israel bloc in America Read all about it in the new book by David Brog --'Standing With Israel'

    Well, I was late posting this Q&A, as today is July 10th.  And as of today, I still find no mention of the above Hate Crime against Christians committed by religious Jews in Israel, in the WorldNetDaily headlines. 

     This same WorldNetDaily, who daily publishes a plethora of stories regarding persecutions of Christians world-wide, yet will NEVER post a story that shows Jews persecuting Christians, offered instead the below propaganda stories.  We see in the list at right, taken directly from their Website front page, that, 

• in the first story, "the world is persecuting the poor Jews in Israel" for attacking the Gaza region;

• in the second story we see that "Christians support the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF)";

• in the third we see that "Israel rally doesn't mean it" when they are attacking the Palestinians in Gaza;

• in the forth we see that "Christians in America are the largest pro-Israel block in America."

    I wonder, can you, the reader, see what is going on here with this spin of the "bad" stories, and the promotion of the idea that Christians are the Judaic's biggest supporters?  Well, the Islamic world sees this, that is why they hate us―to the Islamist, America is nothing more than the military arm of Israel.  And they would of course be correct.  However, the average American has no clue that they are working for the side of darkness.

     As mentioned above, WorldNetDaily is a false-flag "Christian" news Website.  It is an arm of the Judaic propaganda apparatus.  Joseph Farah, the "Arab" American who founded and runs WorldNetDaily, even has a radio talk show―he was trust from obscurity into a power-position in the new Internet news market in a very short time.  In the Internet news world WorldNetDaily is big, very big.  Now you know why he was aided by the international Judaic-controlled media empire―he is very good for Israel specifically and the Judaics generally.

     Perhaps now you can see how the international Judaics control all media; and that they do not necessarily have to put a Jewish face and name at the head of these media outlets to control them; their "Gentile" useful idiots are more than willing to be obedient.  Else they don't get to play in the media game.  It is that simple.  In WorldNetDaily we have an Arab front person doing the Judaic's bidding secretly.  This way, "they" can say: "look, we don't control all media, for here we have an Arab even in the media controlling his own operation." 

     Al Jazeera is likewise International Judaic-controlled, as is also all new media in the reconstituted Iraq.  The media apparatus in Iraq was one of the first infrastructure to be rebuilt; and through it, "they" are able to control the pace of the war and mood on the Arab street.  Remember, the International Judaics do not want the U.S. to pack up and take their war machines back home―"they" have further greater plans for America's lifeblood.  Bold statement?  Look at Iran right now, and also keep a keen eye on Syria.  Our troops in the Middle East shall never collectively come home―till the Tribulation is well underway, anyway.  And even then they will most likely be used to pacify pockets of resistance to the beast political system in Europe.  European, South American, and African troops being used to pacify America's streets.  All operating under the same global body―today known as the United Nations, but most likely going under restructuring near the onset of the Tribulation on into the time of antichrist.  (This may be the wound to the beast spoken of in Revelation chapter thirteen.)

False-Flag

A "Palestinian Terrorist" Wearing the Star of David [tattoo?]

Photo Source

Below is a black and white of the above picture with a blow-up of the Star of David: Also related: "Israelis shoot militant in Nablus" Ibrahim Smeri, 23, was killed by members of a special [Israeli] unit disguised as Arabs, Palestinian sources said. ―  BBC News 14 April, 2005

     Consider this:  How could it possibly have been lost on the "insurgents" that if they simply laid low and pretended to disband, that America would withdrawal and take their war machines and troops home―they they could resurface the resistance and easily topple the young new Iraqi government long before America could ship its military infrastructure back to Iraq.  Well, the answer is that this wasn't lost on them, but "them" aren't who you think they are.  The "them" that controls the "insurgency" (the insurgents themselves being a lose band of uninformed useful idiots) answer to the International Judaics at the highest levels; therefore, the "insurgency" keeps committing blatant and open hostilities so that America can't leave Iraq!  There is no other answer to this anomaly.  While claiming to want America out, the insurgency only keeps them there by continuing to exhibit.

     Also key to the plans of the hidden hand (the International Judaics) is revolution in Iraq.  Revolution can only be sparked and controlled by access to the press.  The press unites or divides men in neighboring houses; for it reaches them all, exploiting differences, privileges, priorities, and atrocities (often these atrocities are committed by crypto agents of the hidden hand, and blame laid wherever the media wishes to lay the blame [this is what is called a "false-flag" operation]).  The truth does not matter, what matters is what every man reads in his newspaper and hears on the radio the next day.  Mobs do not wait for investigations to be concluded or for forensics to be analyzed.  The Protocols know this all to well, and write in depth on the power of the apparatus of the press in revolutions.

     Revolution is always the final solution for the International Judaics; for, from the ashes of revolution "they" may place their best minds in the chief seats of power, and conquer by political domination any country licking its wounds and rising from "brother fighting brother."  Genius, yes, but evil genius.  Look at the French Revolution (which the Protocols of Zion openly take credit for), the Russian Bolshevik Revolution (which even the most sympathetic Judeo-Christian can not honestly say wasn't Jewish-run), and America's Revolution before that.  Look at who picked up the pieces, rose to political and financial power and domination, and is now the undisputed (hidden) masters of those countries.

     And the beat goes on....

    Peace to you in Christ Jesus; and watch, watchmen, watch!

________________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST]

God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name!
Nick Goggin

 

Back to list of questions at top of page

 
 

| Back To Top |

What changes family-wise when a woman marries;  Command Structure of the NWO; Miscegenation; is Ezekiel 44 in the Millennium?

 

 

A (female) reader writes:

Subject: I Need Clarity, Please!

Hi, Nick:  Your clear, concise, bold truths are set out beautifully in your website.  Perhaps you can assist me with my question(s) regarding married women.  In the book of Revelation, during the millennium, God's Elect may go to talk to mother, father, brother, and sister THAT IS NOT MARRIED.  If one of God's Elect is a married woman, who is her mother, father, brother, and sister that is not married?

I also wonder this for life right here now on Earth, as well.  When a woman marries a man, she leaves her home (of origin) and is joined with her husband.  The two become one.  That woman's top priority is her husband.

I'm wondering if her husband's family is her family then.  Does scripture talk further to the married woman regarding identifying specifically who is her "family".  (I think that if a woman is married and is part of her husband's family then her mother-in-law is her mother, her father-in-law is her father, and her brothers-in-law are her brothers and her sister-in-laws (those women that married the brothers-in-law) are her sisters.  And, lastly, any females that were part of the husband's family of origin who are married are not really part of their "birth" family any longer as they are part of their own husband's family now.)  Please help me with this issue.

If what I have said about the mother-in-law being the married woman's mother, I then could see a lot of negative issues that women have with their mothers-in-law being stopped and women being free and happy with this truth. It would just be so. It also would shed further light on the Commandment to honor thy mother and father.  (I do know that I am to love both of my families anyway.)  I am reminded of the Dr. Seuss book entitled, "Are You My Mother?"

[Xxxxxxxx]

Answer:

Hello Xxxxx, thank you for the kind words about the work here, it really does mean mean much to me.  I enjoy and am bettered by reader feedback—both positive and negative; and as you may have observed, I do not shy away from posting negative feedback here.

     Your question, as I see it, is basically two overall questions, or has to do with two overall topics, better stated.  These being 1), the Millennium, and what happens therein; and 2), who is the woman's family once she marries.  We shall deal with the latter first.

     When a woman marries, she becomes part of the man; that is to say that she, with him, form a new family where once there was none.  She leaves much of her identity behind and takes the man's name and is considered to be "of his house."  In the Old Testament, her very salvation rested upon the condition of her husband and his house.  Noah's wife did nothing good or bad to be saved from the destruction that came with the flood or to perish in it with the rest; yet, she was spared because of her husband:  

Genesis 7:1
7:1 And the LORD said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation.  KJV

all: Greek word #3956  pas (pas); including all the forms of declension; apparently a primary word; all, any, every, the whole:  KJV - all (manner of, means), alway (-s), any (one), daily, ever, every (one, way), as many as, no (-thing), thoroughly, whatsoever, whole, whosoever.

     Noah's wife (and children) were saved because of Noah's position.  I wonder if more need be said to document this position?  Okay, in the Old Testament a woman could not offer sacrifice to God; but it was by that sacrifice that sin was removed.  So how did the woman stay right with the Lord?  Through first her father, then her husband after that she married.  For instance, Mother Mary, our Lord's mother, neither having been allowed to offer sacrifice to the Lord under the Old Covenant, nor at the first being covered by the New Covenant, was none the less saved because of her husbands obedience to God; for, we see that Mary was indeed saved, "And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour." (Lk 1:47), and even more, she was blessed for all time, "from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed." (Lk 1:48b).  But being that she could not offer sacrifice to God to atone for her sins (and we all sin, "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" [Rom 3:23]), and that "And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission" (Heb 9:22), then she was covered under her husband, and before him, under her father.

     Understand that this has changed with Jesus Christ.  Nevertheless, it did, for a time, also carry on in the New Testament until Paul and Peter had fully established the church and the Lord's promises then becoming fully exhibited:

Acts 11:12-15
12 And the spirit bade me go with them, nothing doubting. Moreover these six brethren accompanied me, and we entered into the man's house:
13 And he shewed us how he had seen an angel in his house, which stood and said unto him, Send men to Joppa, and call for Simon, whose surname is Peter;
14 Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved.
15 And as I began to speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, as on us at the beginning.  KJV

     So, before the New Covenant, it was of paramount importance who a man married his daughter off to.  This is the reason why that in the Old Testament, a woman's husband was chosen for her by her father.  Many woman today look back and feel that this was unfair.  Not so, for it was for the woman that this was done!  In this manner, all of Israel (who constituted the saved people of the world) would always marry their daughters into a saved house, thus insuring her salvation, as the two became one―unless, of course, her father was a reprobate and not saved himself, then he might marry her to a male of the heathen nations.  Heredity then was very important, as you can appreciate.  And this also answers as to why Israel was not to intermarry with other races and peoples.

Deuteronomy 7:1-4
7:1 When the LORD thy God shall bring thee into the land whither thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than thou;
2 And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:
3 Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.
4 For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the LORD be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.  KJV 

     Regarding the woman's salvation (not necessarily regarding her marrying within her people), this was changed with Jesus Christ.  For, since Christ, "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus" (Gal 3:28).  I am not attempting to address miscegenation here (marrying between different races), but I will touch on it briefly.  The verse that I quoted above (Gal 3:28) is not intended to annul the edict that Israel marries within Israel, it is intended to change the edict that a woman was saved or lost upon the fate of her husband's house; and, that the non-Israelite was no longer fated to perdition based upon his race and people. 

     In other words, through Jesus Christ, all these too can become children of the promise; i.e., "And so all Israel shall be saved:" (Rom 11:26a).  Jesus' bringing this to all (both Gentiles and women) is shown in the completion of the previous verse: "as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer [Jesus Christ], and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:" (Rom 11:26b).  "Israel" now incorporating not only by-blood Israelites, but also those of every race and both sexes who become children in Israel through adoption by Jesus Christ.  But this is for salvation matters only.  It does not nullify the differences in the races.  And since the aforementioned change, even a true by-blood Israelite can lose his salvation promise by denying Jesus Christ.  So it is a two-edged sword, so to speak.

     I know that is remarkable to many of the Judeo-Christians (Judaized, liberalized play-Christians) who have been indoctrinated into inclusion and pluralism.  Be that as it may.  Our Galatians Scripture, taken in context, bears out what I have just stated:

Galatians 3:26-29
26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female : for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.  KJV

     That the woman (and man) are to marry within their people was not removed, nor was it being addressed in the above Galatians Scripture.  However, no edict was given in the New Testament regarding who a woman could marry, save that he must be a Christian―which is really an extension of the Old Testament concept that she was to marry only an Israelite (i.e., the saved peoples of their respective day). 

1 Corinthians 7:39
39 The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord. [i.e., Christian]  KJV

all: Greek word #3956  pas (pas); including all the forms of declension; apparently a primary word; all, any, every, the whole:  KJV - all (manner of, means), alway (-s), any (one), daily, ever, every (one, way), as many as, no (-thing), thoroughly, whatsoever, whole, whosoever.

    "Christianity" in the New Testament taking the place of "Israelite" in the Old Testament; for, "And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. " (Gal 3:26), "Abraham" being used as figure to speak of the final recipients of the promise made to him―Israel, his great-grandchildren through Isaac and Jacob.  Though, I hasten to add; the promises of God made to blood-Israel in the Old Testament must be fulfilled in the end.  God's Word and His promises cannot return unfulfilled; it is just not possible, for God built into the world that He himself even, as Jesus stated: "God, that cannot lie" (Titus 1:2b).  So that while there is salvation open to all now in Christ Jesus, Israel sons are still rightfully expectant to receive the promises made of God long ago.  It just isn't about salvation any more, necessarily―one way or the other.  Nevertheless, we mustn't overlook: "And so all Israel shall be saved:" (Rom 11:26a).  It is a powerful statement, perhaps fully understood by God alone.

     Is interracial marriage a sin now?  No, but it is not good, either, for reasons that would be the subject of another question, another day.  But one comment must be made here.  In the above paragraph we mentioned that certain peoples were made certain promises (and curses) in the Old Testament, and that they must be fulfilled in the New Testament; therefore, whom a woman marries and has children with, is the determining factor of what nation/race that child shall be blessed or cursed with.  Unlike the modern day so-called Jews (who do it 180º backwards), in the Bible, the birthright and nationality is always determined by the father, not the mother.  Which is another reason why Israelite men were allowed to take concubines from among the other nations, but Israelite women were not. 

     Simply stated, when an Israelite woman took a strange husband, she ceased being of Israel and was of her husband's people, doubly so for her children by him.  Please understand that this is not regarding salvation, salvation is open to all through Jesus Christ—it is regarding national inheritance, both good and bad.  And indeed, contrary to today's watered down "truth," there is bad and good coming to people-groups in general:

Numbers 24:15-23
15 And he took up his parable, and said, Balaam the son of Beor hath said, and the man whose eyes are open hath said:
16 He hath said, which heard the words of God, and knew the knowledge of the most High, which saw the vision of the Almighty, falling into a trance, but having his eyes open:
17 I shall see him, but not now: I shall behold him, but not nigh: there shall come a Star out of Jacob, and a Sceptre shall rise out of Israel, and shall smite the corners of Moab, and destroy all the children of Sheth.
18 And Edom shall be a possession, Seir also shall be a possession for his enemies; and Israel shall do valiantly.
19 Out of Jacob shall come he that shall have dominion, and shall destroy him that remaineth of the city.
20 And when he looked on Amalek, he took up his parable, and said, Amalek was the first of the nations; but his latter end shall be that he perish for ever.
21 And he looked on the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwellingplace, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock.
22 Nevertheless the Kenite shall be wasted , until Asshur shall carry thee away captive.
23 And he took up his parable, and said, Alas, who shall live when God doeth this!  KJV

     So, for instance, when an Israelite woman takes a Edomite, Amalekite, or a Kenite as a husband, her children by him go from being group one to being group two, from being Israelites to being Kenites, Edomites, Amalekites, or even Ethiopians (Blacks), etc.  And when she has a child by a Black man, her children are no longer White, they are no longer her father's people (the child's maternal grandfather), they are the child's father's people—heritage and genealogy always go by the male. 

     These things do not sound fair to you?  Take it up with God, but please with that "taking up" also bear in mind:

Romans 9:18-23
18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.
19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?
20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
22 What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels [people] of wrath fitted to destruction:
23 And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels [people] of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,  KJV

      We see this even in today's society; when a White woman marries a Black man, they almost invariably go to live among his people in their neighborhoods, in their culture.  But when a Black woman marries a White man, they tend to live in his world.  The offspring of the above two affairs becoming a third race, Mulatto's, neither White nor Black any more.  And after three generations of such intermarriage, the original woman's great-grandchildren children become either White or Black, depending on the fathers along the way.  For instance:

	White Mother	+	Black Father
1st generation		= Mulatto Child
		Mulatto Mother	+	Black Father
2nd  generation			= Mulatto Child
			Mulatto Mother	+	Black Father
3rd generation				= Black Child

  Why three generations?  Because in three generations the blood is "purged," one way or the other, as witnessed by:

Deuteronomy 23:7-8
7 Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land.
8 The children that are begotten of them [by Israelites] shall enter into the congregation of the LORD in their third generation.  KJV

Moving on....

Back to the woman's new family

     However, when a woman marries, his parents do not become her (the married woman's) parents; her mother and father are forever her mother and father.  This is documented in the fact that in the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, we see the institution of the "in-laws."  This would not be so if the woman changed her parents at marriage.  So the answer to your question is that her birth (or adopted, if that be the case) parents are the ones that she is admonished by the Ten Commandments to honor.  Her in-laws are of lesser import to her, and she is not bound so harshly to honor them as "mother and father" (but all righteous people should be honored, it just isn't by commandment).  In the second below Scripture especially, we see that the mother in law does not replace the (biological [or adoptive]) mother:

Genesis 38:11
11 Then said Judah to Tamar his daughter in law, Remain a widow at thy father's house, till Shelah my son be grown: for he said, Lest peradventure he die also, as his brethren did. And Tamar went and dwelt in her father's house.  KJV

Matthew 10:35
35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.  KJV

     Regarding my double mention of "adoptive" parents being legal father and mother: remember, Jesus was adopted by Joseph; which is why Joseph, while not having any blood relation to Jesus, still has his (Joseph's) family tree (genealogy) written in Matthew chapter one.  This is Jesus' legal family tree by adoption.  This was necessary to fulfill the Scripture "And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse [David's father], and a Branch [the Messiah] shall grow out of his roots:" (Isa 11:1), and: "And hath raised up an horn of salvation [Jesus] for us in the house of his servant David" (Lk 1:69).  David and thus Jesus' adoptive father, Joseph, were of the tribe of Judah.  Mother Mary was a Levite on her mother's side, and a Judahite on her father's side; but she, being a woman, did not fulfill the need for Jesus to be (legally) a son of David.  (Today the so-called "Jews" use the mother to establish the son's (supposed) tribe and nationality, but this is not so in the Bible, in the Bible ONLY the father establishes the son.) 

     This was accomplished by adoption of Jesus to the son of David, Joseph, Mary's husband.  Her (father's) genealogy is in Luke chapter three (don't confuse the "Joseph" of Luke 3:23 with the "Joseph" of Matthew 1:17, check their father's name [Jacob verses Heli] to document that they are not the same Joseph), and her mother's is contained in Luke chapter one; in that she (Mary) was the cousin of Elizabeth.  Now Elizabeth was Levite, as she was of Aaron who was of Levi (see Scriptures below).  And Mary being Elizabeth's cousin means that Mary's and Elizabeth's mothers had the same father.  Elizabeth being "of the daughters of Aaron" (Luke 1:5b) means that the common father was a Levite (the priest line).  Ergo (therefore), Mary was a Levite on her mother's side (and a Judahite on her father's side).

Exodus 6:16-20
16 And these are the names of the sons of Levi according to their generations; Gershon, and Kohath, and Merari: and the years of the life of Levi were an hundred thirty and seven years.
17 The sons of Gershon; Libni, and Shimi, according to their families.
18 And the sons of Kohath; Amram, and Izhar, and Hebron, and Uzziel: and the years of the life of Kohath were an hundred thirty and three years.
19 And the sons of Merari; Mahali and Mushi: these are the families of Levi according to their generations.
20 And Amram took him Jochebed his father's sister to wife; and she bare him Aaron and Moses: and the years of the life of Amram were an hundred and thirty and seven years.  KJV

Luke 1:5
5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abia: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisabeth.  KJV

Luke 1:34-36
34 Then said Mary unto the angel, How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?
35 And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.
36 And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her, who was called barren.  KJV

     And that, while Joseph is referred to a Jesus' "father," this was only in a legal sense, for God forever was Jesus' real Father; as the young Jesus pointed out to His mother:

Luke 2:48-49
48 And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.
49 And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business?  KJV

     Now you know why Joseph's (Mary's husband) genealogy is placed in Mathew chapter one, and why it is called Jesus' "generations" when Joseph had nothing to do with the birth of Christ.  the generations (family line) in the book of Matthew begins with: "The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham." (Mat 1:1), and concludes with: ..."And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ." (Mat 1:16).  Jesus' adoption by Joseph, while not specifically outlined or fully described in the Bible, is found completed in verse 51 below:

Luke 2:48-52
48 And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.
49 And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business?
50 And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them.
51 And he [Jesus] went down with them [autos (Plural form)], and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them [autos (Plural form)]: but his [autos (singular form)] mother kept all these sayings in her [autos (singular form)] heart.
52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.  KJV

subject unto: Greek word #5293  hupotasso (hoop-ot-as'-so); from NT:5259 and NT:5021; to subordinate; reflexively, to obey:  KJV - be under obedience (obedient), put under, subdue unto, (be, make) subject (to, unto), be (put) in subjection (to, under), submitself unto.

NT:5259  hupo (hoop-o'); a primary preposition; under, i.e. (with the genitive case) of place (beneath), or with verbs (the agency or means, through); (with the accusative case) of place (whither [underneath] or where [below] or time (when [at]):  KJV - among, by, from, in, of, under, with. In comp. it retains the same general applications, especially of inferior position or condition, and specifically, covertly or moderately.

NT:5021  tasso (tas'-so); a prolonged form of a primary verb (which latter appears only in certain tenses); to arrange in an orderly manner, i.e. assign or dispose (to a certain position or lot):  KJV - addict, appoint, determine, ordain, set.

     Or, in this case, where He (Jesus) is doing this (being subject unto) with His mother's husband (whom she called His "father" [!!!] in verse 48 of Luke 1), this word, in this sense, means that Jesus was adopted by Joseph.

     As an interesting side note here; the second occurrence of the word "father" in the above Scripture: "...wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business?" (Luke 2:49b), has the definite article, indicated by the use of capitalization of the letter "F" in the King James Bible above.  In fact, the above actually has a double article; once to indicate Jesus' Father's work ("this work"), in other words, "this work" (of the Father's) above all other works done for others; and the second to indicate THE Father [God], in other words, this special one (Father) among all others (other fathers).  And while I admit that I haven't been looking for it, I have never noticed a doubled article before.  Thought that I would share it here:

The Doubled Definite Articles in Luke 2:49 Source: the Greek Interlinear and the Strong's Concordance;  PC Study Bible Version 4 Reference Library +

Strong's definition: Greek word #3588  ho (ho); including the feminine he (hay); and the neuter to (to); in all their inflections; the def. article [definite article]; the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in English idiom):  KJV - the, this, that, one, he, she, it, etc...

     Sorry for straying so far off-topic.  So, in conclusion:  You are always the daughter of your childhood parents.  When you marry, you are then the daughter in law of your husbands parents, but you forever remain the daughter of your own parents.  For, when you divorce, do not go back to your father?  How could you go back to your father if your husband's father replaced your father as your father? 

Deuteronomy 22:13-21
13 If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her,
14 And give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid:
15 Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate:
16 And the damsel's father shall say unto the elders, I gave my daughter unto this man to wife, and he hateth her;
17 And, lo, he hath given occasions of speech against her, saying, I found not thy daughter a maid; and yet these are the tokens of my daughter's virginity. And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city.
18 And the elders of that city shall take that man and chastise him;
19 And they shall amerce him in an hundred shekels of silver, and give them unto the father of the damsel, because he hath brought up an evil name upon a virgin of Israel: and she shall be his wife; he may not put her away all his days.
20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel:
21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.  KJV

     Ergo, even though she did become the man's wife, she never stopped being her father's daughter.  It's just that the husband took charge of her whilst they were married.  So to is it today (or was supposed to be, anyway―before the you-know-who's, the great enemy of both God, Christ, and man, brought in Women's "Liberation" and messed up everything that God had ordained regarding the family unit and gender roles).  And good Christian women just "went along with it," and good Christian men did nothing.  So here we are today, in virtual domestic chaos, our children being wholly corrupted, even worse than we are; and we are ourselves in this generation destroyed both domestically without and morally within!

     Secretly piggy-backed onto the Women's Liberation movement was the machinery which engendered the moral decline of the female.  Today, women are more morally corrupt than males―this was not always the case―it used to be the other way around.  When the issuing wombs and the suckling breasts become decadent, a whole society is doomed.  And it is not that men got any better, they did not; it is that women got twice as bad, twice as fast, and caught up to―then surpassed―men in indecency and moral corruption and perverted lifestyle. 

  Can anything be more selfish than a woman killing her baby because it doesn't fit in with her career goals, or because she doesn't want to "settle down" with the man she has been sleeping with!  And by the time these miserable old gals realize what is really important and what their rightful place is, their biological clock will have played a cruel trick on them.  I have seen them, it is not pretty―very sad, actually.  Seeking to "have it all" they are left with nothing.  And at the end of that long day, looking out over their careers, their possessions, their string of failed loves, and their empty nest―they are desolate inside.  They were formed and put here to do everything Women's Liberation fights against―they are overthrown, having lost the internal battle with themselves.  For, there is a part of them within from God that knows this, and they war against it all their days.  And in the end, they come to know that they have made a terrible irreversible decision; and that it is too late for them.

     Yet the Women's Liberation Movement was and is sold to us as "the benevolent social change of a society with conscience."  And we bought it, we all bought into it (for there male Feminists as well as female Feminists).  And now look at us!  Thinking to shoulder their way in and take more than they ought, women were not liberated by Women's Lib., they were enslaved to something far darker that they could know.  They were changed, changed from within, both morally and spiritually.  Just look at them today!

     Women's Liberation did not liberate women, far from it; it enslaved them to self.  Women were much more happy in the 1950's than they are today―just look at them; I mean, really look within one of them.  It isn't a nice place. 

     And the great problem for any true Biblically-minded decent Christian woman is finding a Biblically-minded decent Christian man.  Most men today are not worthy of leading nor of being followed.  We are have become  corrupted, both men and women.  This has been done to us.  What do I mean by "this has been done to us?"  "Done," by whom?  Observe: 

The Coming Storm Called The Great Tribulation by Nicholas Goggin.  Excerpt of chapter 14

J ewish Author, Marcus Eli Ravage, writing to “Gentiles” (specifically Christians) in his article in The Century magazine, "A Real Case Against the Jews", unashamedly, unapologetically, and matter-of-factly makes the below startling admission.  We are in total agreement with his bold assessment, and remain awed that the Judaics can repeatedly make these kinds of declarations only to be totally ignored by the non-Jewish world in general, and the Christian world in toto.  Ravage said in 1928: “...If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about?  What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization...     …You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt.  We are intruders.  We are subverters.  We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them.  We have been at the bottom of not merely of the latest war [WWI] but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major revolution in your history [French, Russian, and American, etc., Revolutions].     We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life.  We are still doing it.  No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it ... Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.     But we did not leave you alone.  We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history.  We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia.  And we did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...”[1]      If a non-Jew said the above (say, perhaps―myself), it would instantly be maligned, and summarily labeled AntiSemitic, and quickly dismissed; however, when a Jew himself says it, it is wholly ignored.  That is why we (Christians) are going to lose this Earthly battle, and why Revelation chapter 13 shall come to pass: “…and all the world wondered after the beast.  And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast?  who is able to make war with him?”  (Rev 13:3b-4).[2]

Footnotes [1] Marcus Eli Ravage, “A Real Case Against the Jews,” The Century monthly magazine, Feb. 1928. [2]  Excerpt, pre-publication in-edit version of The Coming Storm Called The Great Tribulation, by Nicholas Goggin.  Chapter 14: "antichrist’s (Satan’s) Judaic-Founded, Financed, Managed, Controlled, And/Or Hijacked, Anti-God Organs For Societal Ruin"  pg. 137 (pagination uncertain).

     So it seems that the world and those forces that run her have rubbed-off even on many of our Christian brothers and sisters―making it difficult for the Christian woman to live her God-given role and the Christian man to live up to his God-given role.  Nevertheless, here and there, there are yet good Christian men and women; the key then, is for them to find each other and the world be damned. 

     The difficulties that the Biblically-minded Christian woman face today are not lost on me.  I do understand what they are up against.  And to be honest with you, I myself, if I were a woman, wouldn't want to be governed over by one of these worldly and lukewarm Christian men (much less a heathen non-Christian!).  Most men today that I speak with have no inner fortitude, no convictions, no faith, no courage to dare to be different when the world is going to Hell in a hand basket all around them.  I surely wouldn't be following one of them.  But then, neither would I, if I were a Jesus Christ loving Christian woman, be sleeping around with these men, either, as so many of our Christian sisters do.  I would wait till our Lord sent the right man, then to him would I submit in strength and love―expecting him to be a good Christian man to and for me and our future children.  Would he ever be found?  I really don't know anymore nowadays—perhaps not.  This is the end of the world, you know; wherein all things must be fulfilled.

How it was and how it is―what
happened to effect the change?    

     God made woman to be less than man, He placed the man in a position of authority over the woman; but satan's people taught us otherwise in Feminism―and "we" sided with satan's way over God's way.  This was a huge victory for satan, sad to say.

     For a good short article on the agenda, tactics, outcome, and dangers of feminism, see HOW FEMINIST ABSOLUTISM DRIVES MORAL RELATIVISM by David R. Usher, Legislative Analyst for the American Coalition for Fathers and Children.  (Yes, today, decent men and children must form coalitions to combat the morality lapses of their mothers, wives, "lovers," partners, "hook-up girls," shack-up queens, "baby's mommas," etc. ad nauseum.) 

    Thanks Jews.

     Can I say that?  I guess that I just did.  Not all "Jews" mind you, but the International Judaics who control everything, and their "lesser brethren" who take advantage by being "part of the club."  And yes, along also with the useful idiot "Gentiles" who allow themselves to be used for their own personal gain, wealth, notoriety and advantage.

I know

     I know that criticism of any Jew is taboo today, and even the very use of the word "Jew" is deemed offensive if it isn't a Jew saying it; but what we couldn't have known is that this was all by the engineered design of the International Judaics; so that, now, in our noble quest to avoid blaming all "Jews," we exonerate the guilty ones along with the innocent; hence, the great service to the International Judaics that their common everyday "lesser brethren" provide (often with their own blood and tears).

The "lesser brethren" in the The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

PROTOCOL No. 9 [1.] In applying our principles let attention be paid to the character of the people in whose country you live and act; a general, identical application of them, until such time as the people shall have been re-educated to our pattern, cannot have success. But by approaching their application cautiously you will see that not a decade will pass before the most stubborn character will change and we shall add a new people to the ranks of those already subdued by us. [2.] The words of the liberal, which are in effect the words of our masonic watchword, namely, "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," will, when we come into our kingdom, be changed by us into words no longer of a watchword, but only an expression of idealism, namely, into "The right of liberty, the duty of equality, the ideal of brotherhood." That is how we shall put it, -- and so we shall catch the bull by the horns ... DE FACTO we have already wiped out every kind of rule except our own, although DE JURE there still remain a good many of them. Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us it is only PRO FORMA at our discretion and by our direction, for THEIR ANTI-SEMITISM IS INDISPENSABLE TO US FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF OUR LESSER BRETHREN. I will not enter into further explanations, for this matter has formed the subject of repeated discussions amongst us. ...

― "Protocol No. 9", The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

     Of course not all "Jews" are involved in this evil design to overthrow the world and prepare it for antichrist (satan); nevertheless, at the top of every anti-God, anti-Christian, anti-moral, anti-societal, anti-ordered, movement, cause, and social schema, sits a man who calls himself a Jew―an International Judaic.  Try me; name any such movement and I shall show you the International Judaic behind it―fomenting it, founding it, financing it, driving it, and controlling it by surrogates.  And if you want to move one rung up higher than the International Judaics on the control ladder for all these movements, you would end up at the very top of the command structure, and there your eyes would gaze upon satan himself.

Diagram showing the command structure of the crypto-"religious" and the quasi-governmental tentacles of the New World Order; that is to say, two of the components of the first beast of Revelation chapter 13

      The above is the hierarchy and organizational structure of the coterie of remarkable personalities that is destroying God's ordered and moral world and rearing up in her place a world suitable for satan (antichrist) to arrive to and rule as antichrist.  Remember, in Revelation 13 we see antichrist "another beast" come to a world prepared for him.  Much happens BEFORE he physically gets here, though he spiritually (and from afar) is controlling these apparatuses even now, always has been.  Did not Apostle John even say in circa a.d. 80, "this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world." (1st Jn 4:3b).

     That is what is going on here, this is what I speak of, nothing less.  (We did not include in the above diagram their financial and educational [to include all media venues] tentacles.)  And even now, at this very date, they have almost everything in place for the changeover―from God to satan, from Jesus Christ to antichrist.  And when it happens you shall be amazed at how easily the world and the people changed their God.  Did not our Heavenly Father muse on this phenomenon of man:

Jeremiah 2:8-13
8 The priests said not, Where is the LORD? and they that handle the law knew me not: the pastors also transgressed against me, and the prophets prophesied by Baal [a false god], and walked after things that do not profit.
9 Wherefore I will yet plead with you, saith the LORD, and with your children's children will I plead.
10 For pass over the isles of Chittim, and see; and send unto Kedar, and consider diligently, and see if there be such a thing.
11 Hath a nation changed their gods, which are yet no gods? but my people have changed their glory for that which doth not profit.
12 Be astonished, O ye heavens, at this, and be horribly afraid, be ye very desolate, saith the LORD.
13 For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.  KJV

     In other words, as before, we shall also (collectively as a people, but not every person) also forsake the Living Waters and operate with a cistern (water storage pit) that cannot save; that is to say, the world shall turn from Jesus Christ to antichrist.

The Living Water

John 4:10-14
10 Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.
11 The woman saith unto him, Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep: from whence then hast thou that living water?
12 Art thou greater than our father Jacob, which gave us the well, and drank thereof himself, and his children, and his cattle?
13 Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again:
14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.  KJV

John 7:37-39
37 In the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink.
38 He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.
39(But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)  KJV

     Sorry for the topic-drift, it is a idiosyncrasy of my writing it seems.  :o)

Now to your next question.

You said:

"In the book of Revelation, during the millennium, God's Elect may go to talk to mother, father, brother, and sister THAT IS NOT MARRIED.  If one of God's Elect is a married woman, who is her mother, father, brother, and sister that is not married?"

     Regarding this question; I cannot answer it, as it is a bad question.  That is to say that it is founded on a faulty premise, two faulty premises in fact.  The one being that Ezekiel chapters 40-48 are referring to the Millennium of Revelation chapter twenty, and the second being that anyone can "go back to" deceased loved ones and cause them to reverse the decision that they made to reject Jesus Christ whilst they were alive.

     Also, I might add, what Ezekiel was speaking of did not include women—it was only the priests who could bury their own relatives and not be injuriously defiled by doing so.  And women are not to be priests (1st Cor 14:34, 1st Tim 2:11-12, 1st Tim 3:2 & 12, etc.).  Only males were priests of God in the Bible (Lev 1:5, etc.).

Ezekiel 44:25-27
25 And they ["the priests the Levites, the sons of Zadok" from verse 15] shall come at no dead person to defile themselves: but for father, or for mother, or for son, or for daughter, for brother, or for sister that hath had no husband, they may defile themselves.
26 And after he is cleansed, they shall reckon unto him seven days.
27 And in the day that he goeth into the sanctuary, unto the inner court, to minister in the sanctuary, he shall offer his sin offering, saith the Lord GOD.  KJV

     Now, I know how a good pastor from Arkansas teaches the above the Scripture (that 'God's Elect' can preach a salvation message, and convert postmortem [after death] their relatives after both they and those relatives are deceased off the Earth).  And I love that pastor, and I do not feel that he is a false teacher; but I know that he is not perfect (for no man is), and that the above is just one of the things that he is incorrect about.  The above Scripture answers to the Scripture below:

Leviticus 21:1-4
21:1 And the LORD said unto Moses, Speak unto the priests the sons of Aaron, and say unto them, There shall none be defiled for the dead among his people:
2 But for his kin, that is near unto him, that is, for his mother, and for his father, and for his son, and for his daughter, and for his brother,
3 And for his sister a virgin, that is nigh unto him, which hath had no husband; for her may he be defiled.
4 But he shall not defile himself, being a chief man among his people, to profane himself.  KJV

(For context, see also Ezek 24:15ff.)

How is one "defiled for the dead"?  Observe:

Numbers 19:11-22
11 He that toucheth the dead body of any man shall be unclean seven days.
12 He shall purify himself with it on the third day, and on the seventh day he shall be clean: but if he purify not himself the third day, then the seventh day he shall not be clean.
13 Whosoever toucheth the dead body of any man that is dead, and purifieth not himself, defileth the tabernacle of the LORD; and that soul shall be cut off from Israel: because the water of separation was not sprinkled upon him, he shall be unclean; his uncleanness is yet upon him.
14 This is the law, when a man dieth in a tent: all that come into the tent, and all that is in the tent, shall be unclean seven days.
15 And every open vessel, which hath no covering bound upon it, is unclean.
16 And whosoever toucheth one that is slain with a sword in the open fields, or a dead body, or a bone of a man, or a grave, shall be unclean seven days.
17 And for an unclean person they shall take of the ashes of the burnt heifer of purification for sin, and running water shall be put thereto in a vessel:
18 And a clean person shall take hyssop, and dip it in the water, and sprinkle it upon the tent, and upon all the vessels, and upon the persons that were there, and upon him that touched a bone, or one slain, or one dead, or a grave:
19 And the clean person shall sprinkle upon the unclean on the third day, and on the seventh day: and on the seventh day he shall purify himself, and wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and shall be clean at even.
20 But the man that shall be unclean, and shall not purify himself, that soul shall be cut off from among the congregation, because he hath defiled the sanctuary of the LORD: the water of separation hath not been sprinkled upon him; he is unclean.
21 And it shall be a perpetual statute unto them, that he that sprinkleth the water of separation shall wash his clothes; and he that toucheth the water of separation shall be unclean until even.
22 And whatsoever the unclean person toucheth shall be unclean; and the soul that toucheth it shall be unclean until even.  KJV

     As you can see, Ezek 44:25 has absolutely NOTHING to do with second-chance salvation after death.  I lay out my case in the below article which you may appreciate.

     Is there a second chance for the unsaved in the Millennium (the 1000 years of Rev 20)?

     Peace to you in Christ Jesus.

________________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST]

God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name!
Nick Goggin

 

 

Back to list of questions at top of page

 

| Back To Top |

Ancient Sodom, the Modern Homosexual/Lesbian Movement, and Contemporary Jewish Talmudic Traditions on Homosexuality

 

A reader writes:

Subject: Sodom

Was Sodom destroyed because of sexual deviancy (homosexuality) or because of their greed and lack of tolerance and compassion? The gay community want you to believe the latter. Need some answers. Amen.

Answer:

     Hello, Sodom was destroyed for their sexual deviancy.  What you are referring to is (surprise, surprise) an old Jewish tradition and folklore, it is not in the Bible.  I know you (they) referring to, I have read it before but don't have it at hand now.  The story goes basically like this:  In Sodom they had a custom that would chain someone up in the public square and not feed them or give them drink.  Then they would place vessels of water and platters of food just outside of the reach of the person being chained up and mocked.  They would also place money and gold on the platform just out of reach of the person who was chained there.  This is a Jewish story (notice how money and gold played a key part; I mean, why mention money?  A starving person or one thirty to the point of death cares nothing of Gold), but I cannot remember what book it was in, and I don't really want to devote the time right now to searching it out.  But I know that that is the story that you (or rather, the Gays) are referring to about Sodom.

    Belw is what really happened in Sodom according to God's Word.  The men of Sodom tried to get the angels of the Lord (whom they thought were just traveling men) out of Lot's house so that they could gang-rape them.  Another Jewish fable ("Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth." [Titus 1:14]) is that God destroyed Sodom because the Sodomites were "inhospitable," they weren't good "hosts" to visiting strangers.  This would be laughable if it wasn't so serious a subject.  Below is the Scripture in the Bible:

Genesis 19:1-13
19:1 And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground;
2 And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant's house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night.
3 And he pressed upon them greatly; and they turned in unto him, and entered into his house; and he made them a feast, and did bake unleavened bread, and they did eat.
4 But before they lay down [this at night, not a time to travel to "meet and greet" in an age without street lights], the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:
5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them [have sex with them; as Adam had sex with Eve when he "knew her" "And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son..." (Gen 4:25a)] .
6 And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him,
7 And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly [documentation that the men of Sodom weren't just the "welcoming committee" as may Gays try to claim] .
8 Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man [virgins]; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes [this is a difficult passage; yet it is the Word of God, even though we cannot fathom it.]: only unto these men do nothing [documenting that they wanted to use the two men (the angels) as men would use women; i.e, sexually]; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.
9 And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the door.
10 But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door.
11 And they smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to find the door.
12 And the men said unto Lot, Hast thou here any besides? son in law, and thy sons, and thy daughters, and whatsoever thou hast in the city, bring them out of this place:
13 For we will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen great before the face of the LORD [their evil is greatly manifest]; and the LORD hath sent us to destroy it.  KJV

     The New Testament confirms the proper interpretation of the above Scripture (as though that were necessary for anyone other than the most perverse-minded):

Jude 7
7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.  KJV

     Jesus always held Sodom up as one of the great measures of damned people.  To be compared to Sodom, and come up wanting, was the greatest of rebukes:

Luke 10:8-12
8 And into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you, eat such things as are set before you:
9 And heal the sick that are therein, and say unto them, The kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.
10 But into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you not, go your ways out into the streets of the same, and say,
11 Even the very dust of your city, which cleaveth on us, we do wipe off against you: notwithstanding be ye sure of this, that the kingdom of God is come nigh unto you.
12 But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city.  KJV

Matthew 11:23-25
23 And thou, Capernaum, which art exalted unto heaven, shalt be brought down to hell: for if the mighty works, which have been done in thee, had been done in Sodom , it would have remained until this day.
24 But I say unto you, That it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment, than for thee.
25 At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes.  KJV

     The gay community has been misled by the International Judaics, who use their hireling rabbis to make their case.  Or rather, the gay community uses the excuses offered to them by the International Judaic's rabbi class.  Judaism is very gay-friendly, and many Jews are Homosexuals, and the majority of Gay activists are Jews―which explains why we are being constantly bombarded by Homosexuality in all media venues and educational centers, for the Judaics control all these as well.  More on this in my upcoming book, including names and organizations.

     Do not find it a strange thing that I stated that many Jews are Homosexuals; for, the ancestors of most today's Jews (Ashkenazi Jews―95+% of modern Jewry) were the Turko-Mongoloid Khazars, who, before converting to Judaism in the circa 8th century a.d., worshipped the male sexual organ (Phallic Worship).  Shocking?  Never heard that about the so-called "God's Chosen People," the Jews, before?  Observe as the Judaic author, Benjamin Freedman confirms: 

"They [the Khazars] were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of that now.

But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By spinning a top, and calling out “eeny, meeny, miney, moe,” he picked out so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura [cities in ancient Babylon wither the "Jews" resorted after the destruction of the second Temple in 69-70 a.d.] and brought up thousands of [Pharisee] rabbis, and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call ["]Jews["]. There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land." ― A Jewish Defector Warns America by Benjamin H. Freedman (Free E-book on our Website at https://watchman.news/watchman-bs-site-arcv/jewishdefector.htm. )

     Also, in the corruption of Judah there was intermingling with the Sodomites―so that some so-called "Jews" (Khazars, better called) of today are direct (blood) descendants of the men of Biblical Sodom―the cursed of God Sodomites:

1 Kings 14:22-24
22 And Judah did evil in the sight of the LORD, and they provoked him to jealousy with their sins which they had committed, above all that their fathers had done.
23 For they also built them high places, and images, and groves, on every high hill, and under every green tree.
24 And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the LORD cast out before the children of Israel.  KJV

     Doesn't that make it a little easier to understand why in every television Sit-Com and almost every movie (all media forms are Judaic-controlled) there is a Gay character; and that he is always portrayed in the most respectful manner?  And that the Christians (most usually the White Male, true-Israel kind [Anglo-Saxons]) are always portrayed as the dupes of Blacks, Gays, Feminists, and Judaics?  Thought that that was just a coincidence, did you? 

     In fact, the Talmud condones Homosexuality for a Jewish man as long as the other male is under nine years of age.  No, I am not kidding―I couldn't make this stuff up!  Nobody needs to lie about Judaism to impugn it―they just need to study its "holy" texts.  Sadly, most Jews themselves don't know even their own texts, as do many Christians not know their own Bibles.  If you (Jew or non-Jew) are going to place your eternal soul on the line for something, you ought to at least know what it is that you are pledging allegiance with.  Observe from the Jewish Talmud itself:

Sodomy of male children, and general pedophilia (both male and female) allowed in Judaism according to the Jewish Talmud
References	Facsimiles of Talmud page
Gentile Babies Defile "Sodomy is an accepted privilege in Judaistic Talmudism, and we learn from the Talmud, Abodah Zara, 36b, 37a, (see Exhibit 188 and Exhibit 189 [at right]) that the exception may be if the subject is a Gentile baby, and then only on the ground of alleged defilement. The "Sages" decree that a heathen child causes "defilement by seminal emission, so that an Israelite child should not become accustomed to commit pederasty [i.e. sodomy] with him." Then a harangue commences as to the age when a heathen child starts defiling by discharges (which, in fact, are only possible after adolescence). "The standard idiotic Talmud doctrine is then repeated that a male is "capable of the sexual act" at "nine years and one day" and a female from the age of "three years and one day." From those ages on they can "defile" the Jew, goes the argument in this passage." ― The Plot Against Christianity by Elizabeth Dilling "A Jew may have sex with a [male] child as long as the child is less than nine years old." ― Talmud, Sanhedrin 54b.      Young girls are not safe in Judaism either: "A Jew may marry a three year old girl" (specifically, three years "and a day" old).  ― Talmud,  Sanhedrin 55b.  "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing.”  ― Talmud, Kethuboth 11b.      Jewesses (female Jews) are also allowed to indulge themselves in Pedophilia according to Judaism's most sacred book, the Babylonian Talmud: “Although the intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a sexual act, nevertheless the woman is injured by it as by a piece of wood.”  ― Talmud, Kethuboth 11b.	Source: Talmud, Abodah Zara, 36b - 37a Exhibit 188   Source: Talmud, Abodah Zara, 37a Exhibit 189

     Yes, in a civilized moral God-fearing society we call this Pedophilia and grossly wrong and evil; but I am not talking about a civilized Christian mindset, I am referring to the Jewish mind under the influence of satan's Talmud.  Unfortunately, these people are controlling the world; which is why it is "going to hell in a hand basket."  And good Christians do nothing.  Well, they do do something, they call people like myself "AntiSemites" for exposing the ugly truth.  Other than that, they do nothing―yea―they even join in with the them in ever increasing numbers.

     Observe the below rabbi lie for the Homosexual cause.  The first thing that shall jump out at you (other than the perverted mindset, and absolute lack of fear of God) is that the rabbi does not believe the Bible to be the written Word of Almighty God.  He will also introduce to us the Jewish Babylonian Talmud, referring to it as Jews do, as the "oral tradition" (they refer to the Old Testament as the "written Torah").  Observe the anti-God spiritual filth that masquerades as a religion of the so-called "Chosen People Of God":

Caution, False Doctrine!        Caution, False Doctrine!        Caution, False Doctrine!
C a u t i o n   F a l s e   D o c t r i n e	Justice and Sexual Orientation: One Jewish Perspective An address by Rabbi Lindsey bat Joseph to the Diversity Conference, March 10, 2002 at Grant MacEwan College, Edmonton Source ..."The "Clobber Verses" - Changing our Understanding So, how do I contend with Leviticus, and the two so-called "clobber verses"? By using the same tools employed by generations of rabbis before me." [WBSG Note:  The rabbi refers to the below verses, which he must know "clobbers" any argument for the agreement between God and Homosexuality: Leviticus 18:22 22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.  KJV Leviticus 20:13 13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.  KJV Below, the rabbi will now go on to change God's written Word to suit his own Homosexual agenda.  This is ever the way with the Jewish rabbis, which is why Christ came at his First Advent―to relive them of command of God's religion which they had corrupted.  Yet, destitute of salt & knowledge Christians today call these people "God's Chosen."  observe how freely and fearlessly the rabbi disannuls God's commandments and judgments] ..."Jewish Approach to Text & Tradition Our tradition teaches that the entirety of the Torah was dictated to Moses on Mount Sinai. There are all kinds of textual and archaeological evidence that suggests different origins of the Bible, of course, but that's not the issue here. What's important is that along with the written Torah, an equally authoritative oral tradition, one of interpretation and explication -- also came down from Sinai. [he speaks of the Jewish Talmud, but it did not come down from Sinai - WBSG] The name "Yisrael" - Israel, means to struggle with God. Jacob, our forefather wrestled with angels - we wrestle with text, tradition, and contemporary sensibilities. This is not something that is unique to the Reform movement. It is an inherent part of Jewish tradition. For generations rabbis have engaged in creative biblical and legal exegesis, seeking newer, deeper understanding of biblical texts. This process, which resulted in the generation of volumes of Midrash, Mishna and Talmud, has allowed us to interpret and reinterpret our texts and traditions so that they continue to meet the needs of every age. This process has also, on more than one occasion resulted in the circumventing of a literal interpretation of the text in order to make the law more compassionate. The "Clobber Verses" - Changing our Understanding So, how do I contend with Leviticus, and the two so-called "clobber verses"? By using the same tools employed by generations of rabbis before me. An often-cited example is the case of the cheiresh. In Hebrew, the word cheiresh means deaf. According to halakhah, Jewish law, a cheiresh was not allowed to testify in a Jewish court, nor could he receive any of the other rights and privileges that were guaranteed for other so-called "unblemished" Jews. This is because of the assumption that someone who was deaf and mute was mentally defective. However, with the advancement of our understanding of this particular condition, the rabbis long ago determined that someone who is deaf is in fact quite competent and should, therefore, be given the same rights and privileges as everyone else. So how did they resolve the disparity between the interpretation of the text and their understanding of the deaf? By reinterpreting the word cheiresh. The word cheiresh still means deaf, but within the context of applying biblical law, it now only signifies and applies to the deaf-mute who is actually mentally incompetent. I could site dozens of other examples - cases involving the stranger, the divorcee, the leper, the sabbatical year. In each and every case, as Judaism matured, and this includes Orthodox Judaism, biblical laws based on superstition and ignorance were revised and often altogether suspended. So too, the Levitical texts regarding homosexuality must be brought into alignment with our contemporary understanding of human sexuality. The letter of the law must be reinterpreted, understood in a new light, to preserve the spirit of the law - the spirit of justice, compassion, and inclusion. Leviticus 18:22 states "Do not lie with a male as one lies with a woman; it is an abhorrence." I am always surprised by people who want to seize on the literal translation of this particular text, treat it as if it were carved in stone, and not open to any other kind of interpretation. In Jewish exegetical tradition, however, the p'shat or simple interpretation of a text is typically viewed as the most unsophisticated level of understanding. Is there another way to understand this text? Contemporary exegetes offer several possibilities: To begin with, the Hebrew word, to'eivah, is usually translated as "abhorrence". This word can be interpreted in a number of different ways. a. A to'eivah is typically understood as something that is not a wilful act, but rather something that one is compelled to do. This mitigates the so-called "criminal" aspects of homosexuality by acknowledging that sexual orientation is an inherent part of who we are as human beings. Someone is compelled to be homosexual in exactly the same way as someone else is compelled to be heterosexual. It's not a conscious choice - it's just who we are. However, from the perspective of biblical tradition, pro-creative heterosexuality is the established ideal, so traditionalists argue that even though you may feel driven toward your own gender, one should not heed that compulsion. Essentially, it's okay to be gay as long as you don't act on it. b. Others look at that particular interpretation and say it's ridiculous! Still following in the tradition of the reinterpretation of cheiresh, some contemporary exegetes suggests that to'eivah in this instance is referring to something that a person is being compelled to do by another person. I.e. this is not a reference to consensual homosexual relations, but is an injunction against homosexual rape. c. Others argue, also in the tradition of the cheiresh, stating that we now have a much better understanding of human sexuality than our ancestors possessed and we must judge in light of that new knowledge. Therefore, we can accept that to'eivah is indeed, a natural compulsion and not a wilful act, which means there is nothing inherently wrong or evil in being gay. We are who we are. And each of us deserves to be accepted. d. Lastly, on the subject of "to'eivah", we should also remember that the Bible condemns many practices as abhorrent including: the reading of horoscopes, the consultation of psychics, and eating cheeseburgers and shrimp. I'm not saying that using the Bible selectively is inherently wrong, but, we should at least be responsible about how we're doing it. Leviticus 20:13 presents a little bit more of a challenge. The text reads: "If a man lies with a male as one lies with a woman, the two of them have done an abhorrent thing; they shall be put to death - their bloodguilt is upon them." Again the word "to'eivah" comes into play, but we are also confronted with an apparent call for the death penalty. The Hebrew words for that penalty, by the way, are "mot yumtu", which more accurately are translated: "they shall surely die". Furthermore, the so-called "bloodguilt", which in the Hebrew text is "d'meihem", actually says "their blood is upon them". What is this referring to? One possibility is a public act, which is deemed lewd. For the record, public fornication between heterosexuals was equally frowned upon with the same penalty. And I would argue that it must have been referring to a public act, because without spies checking out what's going on in people's bedrooms how would anyone know? [Do you see how the mind and reasoning of the rabbis becomes perverted when they set out to change God's Word?] Another possibility hearkens back to the biblical ideal of pro-creative relationships. Given an age without invitro fertilisation and adoption agencies, the biological reality of gay and lesbian relationships is that they are not pro-creative. In Jewish tradition there is nothing more tragic than the loss of a child's life or the loss of the potential to create life. "They shall surely die" may, quite simply, be a reference to their loss of legacy due to the fact that these relationships can't produce children. Their blood is upon them, because they are the end of their bloodline. ..."   [End excerpt]	C a u t i o n   F a l s e   D o c t r i n e
Caution, False Doctrine!        Caution, False Doctrine!        Caution, False Doctrine!

   Observe the aforementioned Scripture (Lev 20:13) in context with the verses before and following it.  There is no doubt that God made Homosexuality a capital offence (death sentence) in the Bible.  And that the above rabbi is just doing what rabbis always do―fight against God by their lies.  Thus, could Jesus say of them: "Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition." (Mat 15:6b).

Leviticus 20:7-16
7 Sanctify yourselves therefore, and be ye holy: for I am the LORD your God.
8 And ye shall keep my statutes, and do them: I am the LORD which sanctify you.
9 For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him.
10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.
11 And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
12 And if a man lie with his daughter in law, both of them shall surely be put to death: they have wrought confusion; their blood shall be upon them.
13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
14 And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness: they shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that there be no wickedness among you.
15 And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: and ye shall slay the beast.
16 And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.  KJV

Peace to you in Christ Jesus.

________________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST]

God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name!
Nick Goggin

Back to list of questions at top of page

 

| Back To Top |

Is the truth AntiSemitism?  Ignorance answered with documentation; Also, shocking info on the origin of the Da Vinci Code movie and book―a must-hear radio interview!

 

A Judaic (?) "Internet Surfer" writes:

Subject: RE: Your ARTICLE

I was searching google and this came up . I don't know who on this planet would ever even think to speak such bullshit. I want to know how you could even think to publish something like that on a WEB page and you should be ashamed of yourself. I find this article [referring to an unknown/unspecified article on WBSG Website] to be repulsive and to be very immature. From a religion that I once respected for their warmth and hospitality, this article has strayed me. It is stuff like this that starts Wars and will only create Disaster. 

Another thing that pisses me off because you can sit there and call Jewish people Stingy, cheap or a Kike and thats ok but when they Call a Christian or a Catholic Goya or Goyim which I checked that out in a dictionary right now and it actually means a Gentile or someone from another NATION not place, they aren't calling you ANIMALs or as you SAY "COW"  You really outa be a little more educated than that c'mon you're suppossed to be a Christian not a freaking ANTI SEMIT concentrate on something important, like helping the community or having peace.

Maybe you haven't had good experiences with the Jewish people, or Maybe your jealous of them but if you stopped concentrating on making jews look so bad you too could find self peace without trying to convince others your discusting untrue immoral animalistic Idea of what jewdism is because Jewdisim is beautiful just like all of the other religions in this world. Everyone can have their opinion because G-D gave a a freedom of choice and voice to be heard but if you are a true believer of the Man above you, I would seriously reconsider my path choice and do some good for the world. I am very sad to see such antisemitism coming from the religion brought to you from a Jew who wanted peace happiness and no more suffering HIS NAME IS JESUS the jew  and you are insulting jesus and his followers.

Remember, regardles of what religion you are G-D created everyone equally, regardless of what happened thereafter is not our digression, we're only placed here for a short amount of time and that is to set an example, make this world a better place and have a purpose. Writing anti semitic things is an unexceptable behavior and just cruel. 

P.S. make sure the next article you write is factual because this piece seems more like propaganda to make others hate Jews. ANTISEMITS would do and say anthing to make jews look bad, Just like your BEST BUD HITLER. I wish you all the best and hope you can open your eyes and change your hatred into LOVE. 

PEACE BE WITH YOU!

Answer:

    It is surprising to me that I don't get more of this type stuff.  Actually, those like you are in the greatest minority, and only constitute perhaps less than one-percent of all the mail that I receive, and I do revive as lot of mail.

    I referred to you as possibly being Jewish ("A Judaic (?) 'Internet Surfer' writes") because of your use of the Jewish form for writing God; i.e., "G-d." Jews are the only ones forbidden by their clergy-class (rabbis) to write or even speak the name of God.  This speaks volumes to the true character and spirit of Judaism, but we won't go there now.

    I publish your letter (without your name or info, of course) so as to be fair and to "give both sides of the picture."  If I only published comments that agreed with me or that congratulated me, then I would be guilty of selective reporting.  I am so not afraid of the naysaying of the naysayers; and truth be told, many Bible students here can glean valuable information on what they themselves shall one day be up against by reading what is set upon myself now.  Those who learn here shall go on to teach elsewhere, then they will themselves be in the hot seat.  I will address your concerns and statements as you gave them:

You wrote:

"From a religion that I once respected for their warmth and hospitality, this article has strayed me. It is stuff like this that starts Wars and will only create Disaster. "

     Because of what I wrote, you no longer respect Christianity in general?  Sorry, but I do not believe you, Sir.  A little too melodramatic for my taste.  And regarding wars and disasters?  Oh, there comes disaster and war, all right.   I refer to One whom you know not:  "Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:" ― (Jesus Christ in Luke 12:51).

You wrote:

"Another thing that pisses me off because you can sit there and call Jewish people Stingy, cheap or a Kike and thats ok..."

     Sir, I never used the word "Kike," I do not lend myself to racial and ethnic slurs.  I will stop short of calling you a liar here, giving you the benefit of the doubt that you may be merely in your mind lumping me in with all your imaginary enemies; which, by the way you write E-mails, we can see that you bring upon yourself.  And as far as "stingy" and "cheap"?  I don't know that I used those terms either, though they oftentimes be true.  But then, so too are non-Jews cheap at times―so what's the point?  I do not state on this Website that "cheapness is an attribute of the 'Jews'."  So far you are "batting a 1000" regarding false witnesses against me.  Need I remind you:  "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour." (Ex 20:16 [Ten Commandments]).

You wrote:

"...but when they Call a Christian or a Catholic Goya or Goyim which I checked that out in a dictionary right now and it actually means a Gentile or someone from another NATION not place, they aren't calling you ANIMALs or as you SAY "COW"  You really outa be a little more educated than that c'mon you're suppossed to be a Christian not a freaking ANTI SEMIT concentrate on something important, like helping the community or having peace. "

     You keep speaking of a "peace" that is foreign to the end of the Christian Bible.  There shall be no peace; your spiritual leaders shall kill and persecute Christians everywhere in the Tribulation―how, you being an endtime so-called Jew, speak of peace to an endtime Christian?  Did not our Lord and God [Jn 20:28] Jesus Christ warn us in Revelation of those like you?

Revelation 2:8-10
8 And unto the angel of the church in Smyrna write; These things saith the first and the last, which was dead, and is alive;
9 I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
10 Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.  KJV

     And regarding the Jewish term "goyim"; and I'm glad that you brought this us as I have been meaning to speak on this for quite some time.  Thank you for the present opportunity.  Many Christians simply do not know that when a Talmudic Jew uses the term "goyim" it is not the meaning used in the Hebrew Old Testament by the Israelites of God.  From the Strong's Bible Concordance and Dictionary we see the Bible's usage of "goyim".

Hebrew word #1471  gowy (go'-ee); rarely (shortened) goy (go'-ee); apparently from the same root as OT:1465 (in the sense of massing); a foreign nation; hence, a Gentile; also (figuratively) a troop of animals, or a flight of locusts:  KJV - Gentile, heathen, nation, people.

     However, as Elizabeth Dilling (and countless others) so gracefully illustrates, when the Talmudic rabbis use the term "goyim" it is a pejorative.  Observe the below excerpts, to which, if time permitted, I could supply literally thousands of other witnesses, many of them from Jewish writers themselves.  In fact, out of the three documentations below, two are from Jewish sources―and all three reflect the spirit of the Jewish Talmud and reference it.  This matter really has long ago been settled―then forgotten―now it rears its head again in this overthrown and corrupted generation.

The below is excerpted from: A Jew is called man by Rabbi Bar Chayim.  Source

Between the Jews and the Gentiles -- In the Aggadah, the Kabbalah, and in Jewish Thought Until now we have dealt with differing Halachic sources, scattered throughout the Written and Oral Torah, which ridicule the aforementioned words of Professor Shaki: "For all human beings are born equal according to the viewpoint of Judaism...the equality of man... is primary and one of the foremost foundations of the Torah of Israel..."(!) (It must be emphasized that in the aforementioned list, not all of the halachot that make clear distinctions between the Jews and Gentiles were mentioned. There are dozens, if not more, of Halachic laws of this kind.) We will now deal with the spiritual aspect of the subject -- but first, a brief introduction. It is well known to all that the essence of the Torah is its inner aspect. This inner aspect is found in all parts of the Torah that are not Halachic: in the Aggadah, in Jewish thought, and in the Kabbalah. The Halacha represents the practical expression of this inner aspect, bringing it to action, but behind these Halachic laws stands a spiritual world whose result are these laws themselves. There is not one commandment from the Torah that stands on its own, without foundation or background in the spiritual level. In this section of the essay we will attempt to point out the inner/essential background of the Halachic laws we have previously dealt with. Below is an anthology of writings by great Jewish scholars, Rishonim, and Achronim which deal with and expand upon the difference between the Jews and the rest of the nations. Here too, we will concentrate only on the distinction the Torah makes between a Jew and a Gentile, and we will not deal with everything mentioned on this matter in these parts of the Torah. 'You Are Called Men' -- The Image of G-d in Man A. The Ra'avad We have already mentioned the words of the Ra'avad with regards to an animal slaughtered by a Gentile: "for the Gentiles are like animals...and one who thinks of them as something [worthwhile] will gather the wind in his fist." It is clear that this is not a simple Halachic argument merely explaining why he disagrees with Maimonides on matters of Halacha, but rather the expresof an entire outlook concerning the Gentiles. As far as an explanation is concerned, his words speak for themselves. B. Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi In the first part of his book The Kuzari, Rabbi Yehuda HaLevi explains at length the nation of Israel's exceptional nature and the difference between them and the other nations. To the Kuzari king's question (paragraph 102): "Why was the Torah not given to all mankind? Would it not have been better or more commensurate with Divine wisdom?" the Rabbi answers (paragraph 103): "Would it not have been best if all the animals could speak? You have apparently forgotten what I said earlier concerning the genealogy of Adam's progeny: that at first the spirit of Divine prophecy rested on one person, who was chosen from his brethren, and inherited the merit of his father. It was he in whom the Divine light was concentrated. He was the kernel, while the others were as shells which had no share in that light. Thus it was until the sons of Jacob came, who all were the meritorious kernel, distinguished from all the other people by G-dly qualities, which made them, so to speak, an different genus -- an angelic one. Each of them, Divine endeavored to attain the degree of prophecy, most of them succeeded in so doing; even those who were not successful were close to that degree in their pious acts, sanctity, purity, and interaction with the prophets." So we see that the Jews, because of their special spiritual level, are considered to be a genus different from all the other people. C. The Maharal The Maharal of Prague OBM, explains the saying of Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, "You are called men" in a number of places. In the book Gevurot HaShem chapter 44 (page 167) he wrote: "...for even if all human beings have a common shape, there still is a distinction...there are nations who have more of a tendency towards the physical and their actions testify to this, for they are inclined towards lust and abominable things. This is evidence of their materialistic nature...and as we find animals, which are like an intermediary between man and the rest of the animal world, such as the monkey...likewise there exist men -- who are not completely men. Therefore he [Rashbi] spoke of, the complete man who doesn't gravitate towards materialism too much -- these are the Jews, for they possess the complete form without a tendency towards materialism. However, as for the other nations, their form is nullified by their material aspect, until they, so to speak, cease to be 'men,' because their material aspect is primary and their form is secondary -- and in everything which has both a primary and a secondary aspect, the secondaryaspect is always nullified by the primary aspect. With the Jews, however, the opposite is true, for their form is primary and their material aspect is secondary, and is therefore nullified." ...

And another:

The third excerpt is from the International Judaic's manifesto, the Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion. Source

PROTOCOL No. 15 [GENTILES ARE CATTLE] [8.] And how far-seeing were our learned elders in ancient times when they said that to attain a serious end it behooves not to stop at any means or to count the victims sacrificed for the sake of that end .... We have not counted the victims of the seed of the GOY cattle, though we have sacrificed many of our own, but for that we have now already given them such a position on the earth as they could not even have dreamed of. The comparatively small numbers of the victims from the number of ours have preserved our nationality from destruction. [9.] Death is the inevitable end for all. It is better to bring that end nearer to those who hinder our affairs than to ourselves, to the founders of this affair. WE EXECUTE MASONS IN SUCH WISE THAT NONE SAVE THE BROTHERHOOD CAN EVER HAVE A SUSPICION OF IT, NOT EVEN THE VICTIMS THEMSELVES OF OUR DEATH SENTENCE, THEY ALL DIE WHEN REQUIRED AS IF FROM A NORMAL KIND OF ILLNESS ..... Knowing this, even the brotherhood in its turn dare not protest. By such methods we have plucked out of the midst of MASONRY the very root of protest against our disposition. While preaching liberalism to the GOY we at the same time keep our own people and our agents in a state of unquestioningly submission. [10.] Under our influence the execution of the laws of the GOYIM has been reduced to a minimum. The prestige of the law has been exploded by the liberal interpretations introduced into this sphere. In the most important and fundamental affairs and questions, JUDGES DECIDE AS WE DICTATE TO THEM, see matters in the light wherewith we enfold them for the administration of the GOYIM, of course, through persons who are our tools though we do not appear to have anything in common with them -- by newspaper opinion or by other means .... Even senators and the higher administration accept our counsels. The purely brute mind of the GOYIM is incapable of use for analysis and observation, and still more for the foreseeing whither a certain manner of setting a question may tend. [11.] In this difference in capacity for thought between the GOYIM and ourselves may be clearly discerned the seal of our position as the Chosen People and of our higher quality of humanness, in contradistinction to the brute mind of the GOYIM. Their eyes are open, but see nothing before them and do not invent (unless perhaps, material things). From this it is plain that nature herself has destined us to guide and rule the world. ...

"Maybe you haven't had good experiences with the Jewish people, or Maybe your jealous of them but if you stopped concentrating on making jews look so bad you too could find self peace without trying to convince others your discusting untrue immoral animalistic Idea of what jewdism is because Jewdisim is beautiful just like all of the other religions in this world. Everyone can have their opinion because G-D gave a a freedom of choice and voice to be heard but if you are a true believer of the Man above you, I would seriously reconsider my path choice and do some good for the world. I am very sad to see such antisemitism coming from the religion brought to you from a Jew who wanted peace happiness and no more suffering HIS NAME IS JESUS the jew  and you are insulting jesus and his followers."

     Aside from many other errors in your above paragraph, it must be pointed out that Jesus was not a Jew.  See the Judaic (later converted to Catholicism) author Benjamin Freedman's dissertation on this (below).  Below is an excerpt of the opening heading, and then the final paragraphs of the following article.  Source: A painfully honest Jewish author explains: Germany and the Jews; The Role of the Jews in WWI and WWI.  The true history that they wont (and can't) tell you in the controlled Media and the controlled-curriculum schools and Universities of the free world!:

You wrote:

"P.S. make sure the next article you write is factual because this piece seems more like propaganda to make others hate Jews. ANTISEMITS would do and say anthing to make jews look bad, Just like your BEST BUD HITLER. I wish you all the best and hope you can open your eyes and change your hatred into LOVE.  PEACE BE WITH YOU!"

     Ummm... OK...  Thanks for the blessing, I think.  But Hitler is not my "best buddy."  He was an occultist and a self hating Jew.  Hitler was 1/4 Jewish and was an occultist (Satanist).

     Listen, friend, I will give you the benefit of the doubt here, and just reason that you are ignorant to the above and many other facts; and that this is why you perceive me the way that you apparently do.  I, Sir, am not an "AntiSemite."  I am not a "Jew hater."  I am not a "Hitler lover."  Nor am I any other slanderous thing that you might make up about me.  I am a Christian follower of Jesus Christ who believes what He said and believes that He meant what He said in His Bible.  You, Sir, falsely accuse me.  And I shall be waiting for your apology.  Would it be wise of me to do so with held breath?  :o)

In closing

     I am attaching to this Q&A an interview regarding the origins of the Da Vinci Code "doctrine," as it validates so much of my own work generally, and it comments on the matter of the Da Vinci Code blasphemy specifically.  The below is an interview that is simply a must-hear for every endtime Christian watchmen!  The source is a June 25 2006, broadcast on WALK AM Radio station from Voice of Catholic Radio On Long Island.  It not only answers as to where the "doctrine" (teaching) for the Da Vince Code came from, but also to the greater monster that is destroying Christ and the faith based upon His work―Christianity.  It is 30 minutes long and worth every second of it.  There is not much more important things that you could do with the next thirty minutes than to listen to this interview.

     As many of you know, we do not endorse the teachings of the Catholic Church; and this link (supplied below) is for a Catholic broadcast;  however, while this interview is carried on Catholic radio, and the interviewee is a Catholic―the information is for Christianity in general, and does not touch too much on Catholic dogma.

A note on oftentimes 'offensive' sources

    Often, in our quest to uncover that which has been, and is still today, skillfully hidden by the International Judaics; we must supply documentation links to Websites and organizations, and cite books and other written works, that we are not necessarily in full agreement with.  Some of these are "Talmudic Jewish" Websites and books,  "Historical Revisionist" Websites and books, "Jewish-tyranny exposing" Websites and books, Catholic Websites, and Websites that may at times display a certain lack of tact regarding the Jewish Question; likewise also written works by authors who may present their evidence in a manner that we may feel is inappropriate in its wording and commentary.   Please bear this in mind at all times when following links from our Website to the outside Internet, and when checking sources.  I cannot apologize for every misplaced word or errant ideology of every other writer on the Internet or in the library whose Website or book which we might access for a small excerpt or article.  Please be bigger than that.  WBSG is only responsible for what is written on this Website.   So please observe who wrote what, as our above Judaic complainer obviously did not do.

Ad hominem An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin, literally "argument against the person") or attacking the messenger, involves replying to an argument or assertion by attacking the person presenting the argument or assertion rather than the argument itself. It is usually, though not always, a logical fallacy.... From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ― Source

     What happens is that "they" use a method called ad hominem attack; that is, to defame the man saying it, not to address the damaging truth that he stated.  And as a non-Jew I am not allowed liberty always to speak openly and honestly; for, for a non-Jew to speak hard truths about Jews is...well...AntiSemitism, of course. 

     But this limitation is not equally applied to Jewish writers.  Take the rabbi below for instance.  To a degree, he says what I have been saying all along―only he is allowed to say it because he is a Judaic.  Heck, he is even allowed to QUOTE ADOLPH HITLER (!) from his book, Mien Kampf ―imagine the outrage if any non-Jew tried to quote Adolph Hitler, and then tried to be taken seriously.  But then, that is the power of the "AntiSemite libel" (slander)―"you" (Judaics only) can use it as you wish to your own advantage; or, you can not use it, also to your own advantage.  In other words, it is a tactic to avert exposure, not a defense against "persecution."  Below is the rabbi's use of Adolph Hitler's quotes, and his tacit agreement with him (!), even; then we will get to the interview which we were speaking of.  Imagine if I, a non-Jew, wrote some of the things that the Jewish rabbi wrote in the below!  Then ask yourself: "Why is the truth censored if it is the truth?"

     So there you have it.  And while the above rabbi naturally hypes-up and exaggerates the Jewish condition in WWII (which is a main tenant of the new Jewish religion, Holocaustianity), he does illustrate that there definitely is a double standard regarding what Jews and non-Jews may write.  This ought not to be―if something is true, any man should be able to utter it.  But we see that thus is simply not the case.  Why are some men less than others?  Why are non-Jews (Goyim) less that Jews?  WHO really are the Racists here!?!  And why does the pot always call the kettle black? 

Back to the Interview

     WBSG note:  If the below interview "disappears" off the Internet, we have an archived copy (you yourself should always save anything that you think might be "cleansed" from the Internet archives).  Please inform us if the below link ever goes down.  [June 2, 2007 WBSG Note:  As suspected, Catholic radio took down the link.  But we have it here now on our server: AUDIO: The Da Vinci Code - What the Critics Aren't Telling You]

The Interview

The Da Vinci Code - What the Critics Aren't Telling You [archived AUDIO: The Da Vinci Code - What the Critics Aren't Telling You] ― Source:  Voice of Catholic Radio On Long Island Website. "Catholic Radio Presents an Interview with Craig Heimbichner, Author & Lecturer."  June 25 2006, as broadcast on WALK AM Radio [station] 7:00AM - 7:30AM.

     Talmud Master, Michael Hoffman reviews this audio:

     Click to hear the interview: The Da Vinci Code - What the Critics Aren't Telling You [archived AUDIO: The Da Vinci Code - What the Critics Aren't Telling You]

     Peace in Christ Jesus; and watch, watchmen, watch!

________________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST]

God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name!
Nick Goggin

Back to list of questions at top of page

| To top |  

In His Service:
              Nick Goggin 
Editor; www.biblestudysite.com
WATCHMEN BIBLE STUDY GROUP

 Contact Editor  | Bible studies  | Newer students  |  Bible Q & A's  |  Study tools  | Search our site
Library/Bookstore  |  Statement of faith  |  New material on site  | Join our mailing list  |  Home Page | Donate

NOTE: To insure quality and content integrity, these In-depth Bible Studies are © copyrighted and may only be downloaded for study and shared private use.  They may not be reproduced or distributed for sale or publication without prior written approval.  Other Christian Web sites are welcome to link up to this Website or any page on it.