![]() "Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path." Psalm 119:105 Contact Editor | Bible studies | Newer students | Bible Q & A's | Study tools | Search our site Library/Bookstore | Statement of faith | New material on site | Join our mailing list | Home Page | Donate QUESTION LIST; Page Number 45
| To list of all questions on Website |
| Back To Top | Can Christians Kill antichrist's forces during the Tribulation to avoid being arrested for forced-conversion?
A Reader Writes:
Hello. You can kill them if they try to take you to go worship the beast:
If you don't worship this beast, they will kill you; therefore, fighting to the death (theirs or yours) is no sin. And for those who take this mark of the beast and worship antichrist/satan, God shall first punish:
Then, a few verses down from the above Scripture we see that they do not repent of this (indicating that even at that late time they could repent):
So God kills them all:
Endtime Christianity is in big trouble. "We" are so docile and have been made so complacent, that "we" will do anything that we are told. "We" don't have any fight in us, "we" have been dumbed-down to believe that we are a walking mat for every dead-soul antichristian on the planet. "We" even go along with them taking Crosses off of water towers, prayer out of school, and the forbidding of us to mention our Lord Jesus Christ's name even! And we didn't bat an eye when the International Judaics replaced prayer-in-school with condom-handout-day and gay "tolerance" and false-god worshipers "tolerance" training. We are SO set up to fall! Like the frog in the pot of water, we are slowly being numbed till we die; only, "we" are dying from within not without. If God is looking for Christian warriors on the Earth, He may have to look very hard to find a fit handful nowadays. Many of our passive and saltless brethren will throw the below Scripture in your face, not understanding it themselves nor allowing you to understand it, and say: "See, we are to be docile, for we aren't to fight in the flesh. Just keep letting satan and his human henchmen make advance after advance until there is nothing left of us or the glorious and only God-approved religion founded upon the sacrifice of Jesus Christ." Ok, a little dramatic, admittedly; but it is in effect what they are allowing to happen to our endtime Christianity.
Okay, that's Paul and those who setup the early church; he used words in the above like "we," "I," and "our". Well, that was 2,000 years ago. But what about us who shall stare down the beast and all his human minions (which shall set up, head, and control the first beast, the NWO)? Are we not to "fight in the flesh" at that time? At the time of great oppression and persecution? Let's see what Jesus said about fighting in the flesh:
Why did Jesus tell us to get a defensive weapon? Could it be that He expects that we shall need it? He didn't tell them to even sell their very clothes if they have to, to buy a sword, just to pick figs! A sword is to slay an enemy with. Who are the enemies of Christians and Christ and God in the Great Tribulation? Well, if one of 'em comes after you, put the sword to them. :o) In the below, when the Jews came to arrest Christ to bring Him to trial for His life, one of the Apostles (in John 18:10 this Apostle is identified as Peter) took out a sword and swung it at one of the enemy, slicing off his ear. Jesus then tells them to allow them to take Him into custody "Suffer ye thus far". Jesus puts the man's ear back on but never admonishes Peter as though he had done something unacceptable; but only that the time was not yet for this kind of action:
Why did Jesus tell them to allow this arrest to happen? Jesus explains it in a parallel passage in John 18:
Jesus was telling Peter that this must be accomplished. Peter didn't understand, as he didn't understand once before in Mark 8:29-35 where Jesus then had to rebuke Peter most sternly:
Jesus didn't say in the above John 18 Scripture to Peter regarding the sword: "Hey, what the heck are you doing with that thing!" He simply told Peter to holster the sword for now. He didn't tell him to throw it away; nor, to the great dismay of many of today's Judeo-Christian play-clergy, did Jesus chastise Peter for not loving his enemy. :o) And the only reason that Jesus replaced the man's severed ear is because if He hadn't, then they would have arrested Peter for resisting arrest and attacking a guard―and Jesus had yet much work for Peter to do. Below Jesus states that it was not yet time for His servants to fight. He didn't say that there never would be a time for them to fight; in fact, He stated that had that time been the endtime, where His kingdom was to fully be brought in―then they would have fought:
Jesus understood what nobody else at the time knew: that this was to be His first of two Advents, and that there would be a Second Advent, wherein:
That is the time that you are (soon to be) living in, it immediately follows the (soon to be) Great Tribulation. However, if you fight, be prepared to die. Not that you necessarily will die, but that in all combat there is a chance of being killed. Many of out brethren, Christian women and men, shall go into captivity, being delivered up and killed. Some shall betray Christ to their own hurt. But some shall fight, and of these fighters some (many) shall die. But it is no sin to fight satan's henchmen (who our beguiled and corrupt clergy today call "the chosen of God"), and it isn't murder to kill a son of a [serpent] who is trying to arrest you and make you worship the beast system and the head of it, antichrist/satan! These same evil men shall kill many of your family and friends. Have no pity on them; for, their real troubles begin after they die; for, then they meet the One whom they persecuted. Below we see that some shall go into this captivity of satan and some shall fight it even to the death. There is no admonition in the Scripture not to fight, just that you be cognizant of the fact that if you try to fight satan's beast-controlled world at that time, you most likely will die trying.
Understand that for them to bring you to worship their image of the beast, they must necessarily arrest you. Many shall neither submit to worshiping the beast, nor submit to any illegal arrest (most likely some trumped-up tenth-generation "Hate Speech/Thought/Crime Law" like those that the International Judaics are currently silently instituting world-wide with alarming efficiency and ever-expanding scope). Well, They aren't done yet! What will you do when faced with arrest for simply believing upon Jesus Christ? Think that it can't happen, huh? Well, it happened before, so what makes you think that the International Judaics can't do it again? Have you forgotten that before Paul was converted by Jesus Christ, that he was a practitioner of the Jewish Talmud religion (Judaism, which HATES Jesus Christ); and how he rounded up whole families of Christians to be delivered to the jaws of the lion for not denying Jesus Christ; or better stated, for believing in Jesus Christ. If one of those early Christians would have killed Paul to keep him from arresting their family―do you think that they would have been sinning in doing so. No way! We always have the right under the Bible to protect ourselves and our's. Being a Christian does not make you into a free-kill zone. Jesus makes a curious statement that you, the reader who posted this Q&A, may understand:
And those who die resisting the mark of the beast and resisting satan/antichrist and his human NWO helpers are to be rewarded:
Personally, I'd rather die fighting on the field of battle than to die under a guillotine with my hands tied. Because worshipping the beast system and satan (antichrist) is not an option for me―so they shall seek my life. Yours too if you aren't planning to worship the Talmud's god antichrist anytime soon. However, the way that I look at it, is that if my Lord moves me to not fight, and inspires me to go willingly―then I shall. For, my life is His. He may preserve it, He may let it be taken―I leave that in His able hands. Nevertheless, if He lets me fight them, then I shall fight them. I'm fighting them as we speak by writing of their plans. You're fighting them by learning of their plans, becoming wise as those serpents, and teaching others. But understand that they shall come after those like us first before the great oppressions and persecutions begin for the general body of Christendom. Because they know that if they don't catch you unawares, then you will be awfully hard to take. That is the purpose of the "Patriot Acts" and the extreme security and surveillance and data-mining operations in the US and the other Christian Western Nations―not some bogey-man wholly ineffective so-called "terrorists." The "terrorists" who destroyed on 911 were working hand in hand with the hidden government over GW Bush, Tony Blair, and all other nations of consequence. Another subject for another day―just for now think, Hegelian Dialectic: Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis. In other words, they create a problem, create a solution that is too extreme, then have "us compromise" on a solution that is not as extreme as the first solution, but more extreme that the beginning point. Then they do it all over again, steadily gaining ground and moving their agendas forward. Thus and thus they are doing with with the Gay Marriage issue: Hegelian Dialectic in the Homosexual Marriage Movement First they bring the issue to the forefront with the Texas Sodomy law being struck down, then they propose Gay Marriages, we balk, and then "we compromise" on Gay Civil Unions. Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis; i.e., Problem-Solution-Compromise. They would have never gotten Gay Civil Unions had they not attempted to gain Gay Marriage―and we all, like lemmings, thought that we won some great victory in striking down Gay Marriage. Yet, they have all the rights of a married couple now, including insurance and retirement benefits. And if we say that their unions are evil, we are guilty of a Hate Crime. And they're not done yet! To them, this is just another round in the fight; to us, we thought that it was over. Hardy. It is only a matter of time until they wear us out and install full-blown Gay Marriage, and force the Christian churches by law to perform them. The way that they are writing the laws and the "Hate-Crime" laws, there won't be any legal grounds pretty soon to deny Gays the "right" to marry in their perverse lifestyles. Ten years ago you wouldn't have even stuttered when I called it perversion―but now they have you thinking differently, don't "they"? You ("we" all) are being changed by satan's minions on this earth. This has so much more to do than with Gay Marriage. In fact, when the International Judaics, who are now pushing for Gay Rights for the express purpose of bringing chaos and disorder to our civilization, come into their kingdom (the kingdom of antichrist), they will then ban Homosexuality (under the forth Noahide Law "Do not be sexually immoral") for all but themselves [the Jewish Talmud allows for sodomy between Jewish men and boys]. Do an Internet search under The Seven Noahide Laws (Jewish "laws" for all Gentiles who want to live in the Jew's new world order). See Merry Christmas, and OFF WITH YOUR HEAD! by Carol A. Valentine. That there is a hidden power which controls this world has been known by the elite for a long time, though kept from the public's eye:
You (we all) must pray to the Lord to show us the way that He wishes us each individually to act. When you pray to Him for guidance, and listen to what He touches your heart with, then you can't help but doing the right thing. We all must pray in that troublous time when the storm that took our Lord, His Apostles, and the early Martyrs―is burst upon us. Until then, do not physically assault satan's earthly minions―they have purpose. (And you will be arrested and therefore out of "the picture.") And they shall learn a whole new and deeper meaning of the word "assault" when they fall into the hands of the Ever Living God Almighty whom they persecute! A word to satan's earthly servants (who are with us today): "It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God." (Hebrews 10:31); and again: "Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord...." (2 Cor 5:11a). Perhaps we should read both those Scriptures more fully:
In closing: I know that the below is not a Bible quote, and that it is secular; however, it is so appropriate here to this, I feel, that I simply must post it. It is a quote from the Scottish resistance fighter and martyr William Wallace (1260/78- 23 August 1305), made famous in the Mel Gibson movie Braveheart. I will leave you with the below, which some Christians ought to absorb and apply to their own allowing of the international Judaics to destroy and outlaw Christianity one step at a time:
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our
MAILING LIST] Back to list of questions at top of page | Back To Top | A reader asks: "Were there any black people in the Bible, and were they cursed?"
Hello. yes, there are Black people in the Bible. We see them first here:
They are among all the various different races created by God BEFORE Adam (for an explanation of "before Adam, see our: Mankind; two separate 'creation events' ). Then we see Black people in the below Scriptures (they are called Ethiopians, and their land called Ethiopia in the Bible):
You asked if the Black people are cursed? No, they most certainly are not. That teaching is false. God loves His Black children (as well as His children of all races); in fact, in the below Scripture God made it a point to have Christ's apostle Phillip make a special trip to teach the Gospel to a Black man and to Baptize him into Jesus Christ―God saved that man―hardly something He would do had He cursed the Black people:
Have you seen our: The false 'teaching' that the Negro is the "Beast of the Field" of Genesis Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our
MAILING LIST] Back to list of questions at top of page | Back To Top | A reader asks if Moses (and Jesus) was a Black man
A Reader Writes:
Hello. Thanks for the article that you sent. I know that you did not write
it, but merely passed it on to me for comment.
Moses was not Black, Jesus was not Black, and God is not Black. When
will it ever end!?! This is all an attempt to lure Black people away from
Christianity. It is Afro-centricity like Farrakhan's (Sp?), that tries to,
with pride, lure Black people away from Christianity and into hell.
Your first red flag should have been when you noticed, as you said: "What
is confusing is his teaching that we are to let go of "Christianity"
and practice the original Hebrew teachings".
In other words, according to that teacher, Christ died in vain. The whole First Advent of Jesus Christ, the Crucifixion of Messiah, Christ's Resurrection, and the the whole of the 27 books of the New Testament are to be thrown out so that some racist Blacks can pretend that they are the original Hebrew people of the Old Testament? What a shame! I sense an antichristian Judaic in the woodpile here somewhere in the background regarding this blasphemous anti-Christian anti-God anti-Israel teaching. Substitution seems to be the watch word of the day; for, likewise do we see the so-called Jews of today pretend to be the Israel peoples of the Bible. The enemy is ever trying to suppress the identify of true Israel (the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic and kindred peoples who are descended from the 12 (not just 10 of them) tribes of Israel and settled Europe and moved on into North America). It is somewhat "funny" that the racist impulse of some Blacks is being used to make them reject God's written Word, the Bible, by making of themselves God's chosen; but the author of the foolish teachings is in effect practicing racism against these several racist Blacks. I refer to the author's statement:
What he is referring to is the false teaching that Noah's son Ham was punished for sinning against Noah―by God making his (ham's son Canaan) his (Canaan's) descendants Negros. That is a total lie, and it is racism against Blacks by saying that they are God-cursed! What feeds into this foolish teaching is that the Egyptians did mix with the Negro peoples of the region, but that was later on. At the first, the Egyptians were a homogenous people descended from Ham, who was descended from Noah, who was himself a long-distant descendant of Adam from the Garden of Eden. The Egyptians to Ham to Noah to Adam Noah is the descendant of Adam:
Ham is the son of Noah:
Ham's descendants settled Egypt. Below we see a recitation of God's plagues upon Egypt. In it we see that Egypt is the land of Ham:
Ham's people, the Egyptians, had brought Israel into bondage before the above happened. In the below, we see that Egypt is used interchangeably with Ham's land, just as Israel is used interchangeably with Jacob's people. "Israel" is Jacob's people, all twelve tribes of them; for, God changed Jacob's name to Israel and then called all his descendants "Israel." Likewise, observe that Egypt is to Ham as Israel is to Jacob:
What the author of the reader's article & false teaching is unaware of,
is that the first Egyptians were a white people.
Later on they began to mix with the indigenous Blacks, which proceeded their
downfall. Through statues and paintings we see that the early Pharaohs
were White; later on in statues and paintings of latter Pharaohs we began to
see the racial mixing in the later dynasties. In other words, the
early White Pharaohs began to take wives of the native Black people around
the area.
The article that you sent is so full of fundamental flaws that it would
take all day to identify and correct them all.
Regarding Moses, he was chastised by his brother and sister for marrying
an Ethiopian (Black) woman; this would not be so had Moses himself been a
Negro:
Moses was descended from Levi, the priest line of the twelve tribes of
Israel. Moses was a pure Levite; he was of the tribe of Levi on both his
mother and his father's side. Below, we also observe that the Bible is
quite clear that Moses was a Hebrew, not a Negro, or Egyptian,
or Chinaman, or anything else:
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST] ________________________________________________________________________ God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name! Nick Goggin
Back to list of questions at top of page | Back To Top | How to figure the exact day which Christians are to observe Passover (Easter otherwise called in the churches)
A Reader Writes:
Answer:
Hello. We get this question a lot at about this time every year. Here is how you can figure the exact day of Passover for this and any other year. Simply stated: the Passover is on the 14th day after the Spring Equinox, the day of the Spring Equinox being counted as the first day. Passover day in 2006 for us Christians is on Sunday, April 2nd. Below is the Biblical formula:
The Hebrew calendar marks the first day, of the first month of the year, as the exact day of the Spring (Vernal) Equinox, which is the day in Spring when night is as long as day. There is one other Equinox, in Fall, called the Autumn Equinox; which is irrelevant to this matter.
In other words, on the day that there are 12 hours of night and 12 hours of day (happens on only two days/nights per year) the (true) Hebrew calendar starts for that year, and is in effect like our January 1st on our secular calendar.
The Spring (Vernal) Equinox of 2006 is on/at March 20th, 1:26 PM Eastern Standard Time:
The day of Passover (which marks the beginning of the seven-day feast of Unleavened Bread) is on exactly the 14th day after the Spring Equinox. Documentation:
Also note (as seen also in verse five above) that the Hebrew day starts at "even" (sundown), just like our "day" starts at 12:01AM the night before, not at sunrise that morning. So that Passover really begins on the night of April 1st, at sundown (which is, what, maybe 7-8 PM?); the day of April 2nd being the daylight portion of that first day (April 3rd beginning at sundown April 2nd by the Hebrew calendar reckoning).
Now, since, in the year of our Lord 2006, the Spring (Vernal) Equinox is on Sunday, March 20th, at 1:26PM, but the Hebrew day starts the night before at sundown―the Hebrew first day is actually on Saturday, March 19th at sundown. Passover begins on the 14th day of that first month; i.e., on Saturday, April 1st, at sundown; or, by our days, on Sunday April 2nd. Therefore, Passover day for us is on Sunday, April 2nd (as we reckon the night to end and the day to begin at 12:01AM).
Confusing? Easy to make a mistake at to the exact day? Don't worry: In Numbers chapter 9 we also see that if a man had a good reason why he couldn�t keep the Passover on the 14th day of the first month, he was allowed to keep it on the 14th day of the second month.
So the particular day was not as important as the fact that they did keep the Passover.
The Shepherds Chapel church celebrates Passover on the nearest weekend to the actual date because of the fact that their ministry's congregation is spread out all over the nation (and abroad) and most people travel to get there, and travel arraignments are much easier on the weekends when many people are already off of work. This year that happens to fall at the right time, and the Shepherds Chapel event is on Saturday and Sunday, April 1st & 2nd; but some years it is not on the exact date of the Passover, as Passover can be on different dates on our Calendar each year, and does not always fall on a weekend.
Hope that helps.
What may have confused you, is that apparently, for whatever reason, the Jews celebrate the Passover out of season. "Their Passover," from several Jewish sources including the below, falls on Wednesday, April 12th. This is in direct contradiction with what is written in Leviticus 23:5 by Moses, whom they claim to follow:
My presumption is that there is some conflict as to when the Jew's start their calendar, but I don't know what their problem is for sure. Nor should we care for their feast days, for they are not our feast days―their god is not our God. Or, as Moses testified against them: "For their rock is not as our Rock, even our enemies themselves being judges." (Deut 32:31). For, our God, the only true God, came in the flesh in the name of Jesus Christ to keep His promise and save His children―the Jew's god had no such Son (nor did the Muslim's Allah). Christians shouldn't let the false-Jews determine the Holy Days for them. The modern day "Jew's" are not the "Jews" (Judeans) of the New Testament, they are actually blood-relative ancestors of the Turko-Mongolian people known to history as the Khazars, their holiest book is the blasphemous Babylonian Talmud, their idol is mammon, and their god is satan, the coming antichrist. They are the perennial antichrists; yet, deceived Christians everywhere reckon them as "God's Chosen People," the Israel peoples of the Bible, and go further by esteeming the modern day "Jews" as though they were Jesus' cousins or something. What a great hoax, on so many levels! The Christian's feast days ought to be reckoned by the Holy Bible, by God's people, the Christians. Let the antichristians do what they will, when they will―it is of no consequence to the Christian.
On Judgment day, Passover will be the least of the worries to those who had denied Jesus Christ, and thus denied for themselves eternal life. Let them "play holy" all they want―it is far from holy to kill the Messiah of the Lord God Almighty, Jesus Christ, and then to gloat about for 2,000 years in their Synagogues. If the Jews of today are damned, it is because they each individually damned themselves by denying God's promised Savior, Jesus Christ, which Moses wrote of to come:
And not only Moses, but all the Prophets, even the prophets that the Jews esteem, spoke of this same Messiah:
Fulfilled in Jesus Christ:
This same Christ Jesus, speaking with all authority of the Heavenly Father, the Lord God of the Bible, "And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth" (Mat 28:18), states unapologetically and unambiguously: "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6).
Therefore, if you love a Jew, preach to him Christ Jesus, as Apostle Paul and others gave their lives doing. To placate a Jew (or Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, etc.) and to allow him to errantly believe that he can get to Heaven by any other way than Jesus Christ, is to hate that man―for it is to sit quietly while they err unto eternal death. A true friend of a Jew or other non-Christian is one who tells them the hard truth plainly and without yield. Ecumenism (co-faith fellowship) is satan's tool to keep men damned; and all Christians who practice it are servants of sin and evil, not servants of God and Christ. Christians who practice this (co-fellowship and implied acceptance as true other non-Christian religions) are going to answer most terribly for it on that Final Day when all men must give account before the Lord.
Nevertheless, the Judaic's 2006 Passover is:
But as stated earlier, the exact day is not as important as that whether or not one celebrates Passover. But then, since after Christ was once offered, He became our Passover; therefore, the Jew's Passover is void; for, they deny Jesus Christ (to their own destruction), and thus have no Passover at all.
Peace to you in Christ Jesus. ________________________________________________________________________ [P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST] God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name! Nick Goggin Back to list of questions at top of page | Back To Top | A defense of the King James Bible's use of the word "Easter" in Acts 12:4, and thereby; a defense of the King James version Bible itself
The Greek word pascha appears 29 times in the manuscripts of the King James Bible's New Testament (the Textus Receptus; i.e., the "Received Text"). On 28 of these occurrences, the word was translated to "Passover;" however, on one lone occasion that word was translated to "Easter." This has caused quite a controversy. Much ado has been made by Christians of the King James Bible's translation of pascha in Acts 12:4 to "Easter," instead of "Passover," which it was translated to the other 28 times pascha appeared in the New Testament manuscripts. Based upon this, the King James Bible has been vilified as having "a corruption" in it. However, as we shall see from the below article, the King James translators were actually correct in their choice of the word "Easter" over Passover in this place.
Many Christians are told that Easter is a pagan holiday and that they should not observe it. We have several articles on Easter/Passover on our Website, some of which are as follows: What Christians should really call "Easter" is Passover, that is what Christ and Paul called it in the New Testament:
An interesting anomaly: However, after the Crucifixion, the only time that Passover was mentioned was in the above, where Christ was called "our Passover." After that, the word is found only one more time in the Bible, that being in the below verse where Paul is speaking of the faithful men of old:
What can be gleaned by this odd fact is uncertain, but it appears that, in Scripture at least, that the Passover was not celebrated by the early Apostles after Christ's resurrection; or, if it was celebrated, it is not mentioned specifically (which is entirely possible). Perhaps they could not keep the Passover because of the great persecutions that they were under by the Jews, who were turning them over to the Romans for persecution. However, God had ordained Passover as an eternal celebration, to be kept forever:
Nevertheless, the day (Easter/Passover) is still the same for well-grounded Christians who would never practice pagan activities. The reason that Christians call it Easter is so that it is not confused with the Jew's Passover celebration. The Jews are still celebrating being preserved from the death angel in Egypt, the original Passover; which became associated with the liberation from Egyptian captivity. And by denying Jesus Christ, the Judaics of today do not celebrate the new meaning of Passover: "For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us" (1 Cor 5:7). Therefore, Christians needed to call their Passover by another name different than the Jew's Passover. This is understandable, as far as I am concerned. But what of this word Easter in Acts 12:4? Did the king James version translators make a mistake? Oddly enough, as some may feel; no, they did not make a mistake. Observe below. The below
article was not authored by Watchmen Bible Study Group. We
offer it here for It's value in explaining a matter that touches on the
Christian churches and their celebrations, and offers an excellent defense for the trustworthy King
James Bible. And being that I am a stanch proponent of the King James
Bible only controversy (KJO), I feel this well-written and documented
article deserves to be shared here (I do not personally know the author or
any of his other doctrine). By Missionary/Evangelist David Terrell
Back to list of questions at top of page | Back To Top | How to witness to unsaved loved-ones
A (female) Reader Writes:
Hello Mrs. Xxxx, here is the large print version (easier to read, but it
is the size of large dictionary). It is also the cheapest that I have
ever seen it. I have seen ministries charge $100.00 for the same book.
This is exactly the same as the standard size Companion Bible,
it even uses the same "printing plates," only enlarging them:
You asked:
Prayer, Mrs. Xxxx, prayer. For, "...The
effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.
" (James 5:16b). Also, you can just let him know that you are there if he ever has any questions. But, sometimes "pushing it on people" too much may drive them away. It's a delicate balance. But always let him know that you believe, and that your world-view is shaped by your faith in Jesus Christ. And, as shall happen to us all sometimes, If he asks something that you do not know, or that you are somewhat unclear-on yourself―then be honest and tell him that you are unsure―he will respect that answer more than a half-answer or a topic-changer answer, or God forbid: a made-up answer!
None of us has all the answers; being a Christian doesn't mean that
you can prove everything that you believe; but rather, that you
believe what God has written for us in His Bible―even
though we cannot always prove nor understand everything perfectly. Is
it not even written regarding that?:
It is this faith that pleased God, covered sins, and saved good men
made perfect:
Then, the wise prayer―is the
prayer for faith. For, even the Apostles, who walked with Christ,
talked face to face with Him, witness for themselves the miracles―they
asked for themselves that Jesus increase their faith. Therefore,
it is no shame to ask God to increase our own faith, and the faith of
unbelieving loved-ones:
But with the so-called "intelligent men, scholars, and the
wise of this world", this faith―which pleases God―is foolishness
to them.
To them, the so-called wise of this world, they must see
to believe. But, seeing is never believing,
seeing is knowing; for, where is "belief "
excercised
where evidence is seen?
And since it is impossible to please God without faith, then of what
good does proofs and evidences to the eye do for the soul of a man?
And in your witnessing, never yield regarding the
reality of Jesus Christ, God, and His written Word; never
compromise truth to win a convert. But also be kind and gentle. You
needn't correct a person's every misunderstanding all in the same one
day, else you will appear to be attacking them; and they may also become
afraid to say anything in front of you for fear of being
shamed. Be firm, wise, but also gentle and compassionate―kind
of like our Lord's admonition as He sent out the Apostles to spread the
Gospel:
Reading the above verse in context with the whole Scripture is
both enlightening, comforting, and informative:
Pray for your unsaved loved-one; and then trust God's wisdom and
justice, and hope for His good and merciful providence.
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
________________________________________________________________________ [P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our MAILING LIST] God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful name! Nick Goggin
Back to list of questions at top of page | Back To Top | The illusive "six million" Holocaust dead and the Tribulation
Any Christian who dares challenge the remarkable "6,000,000" number immediately draws the ire of the Judaic-beguiled Judeo-Christian play Christians. "Neo-Nazi!", Bigot!", they scream. "Blasphemy of 'God's Chosen'," they ignorantly mime. All manner of false allegations are heaped upon the historian who dares touch the sacred "six-million" doctrine (AntiSemite, Racist, Hitler apologist, Hate-monger, etc.) The International Judaics have, through propaganda, "education," Political-Correctness, and peer pressure, trained their Goyim useful-idiot Judeo-Christians to handle enforcement of propaganda and to police any who dare to think independent of the International Judaic's party line―and the Lemmings don't even know it! They should know it, though, because the Judaics planned for it long ago, and even wrote it down in 1897 in a compromised document for all the world to see. But these same beguiled and overthrown Christians won't read the below book (Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion) because the authors, who are the people whose plan it exposes (the International Judaics), told them that the book was a forgery, and that if the Christian even dares to read it, they will call them names like "AntiSemite"―that apparently was enough to scare-off the endtime watered-down Christian, notwithstanding that most every plan (protocol) in the book is coming to pass a century later. It makes one wonder how many of these Christians will make it through the Great Tribulation, when they run to the enemy for direction and instruction! Sadly, many won't. PROTOCOL No. 17
|
*Note
from above: Vishnu
by Alan G. Hefner |
Gee, forced/coerced to turn-in and betray "THEIR OWN FAMILY"??? Sound familiar?
Luke 21:16-17 [Christ speaking]
16 And ye shall be betrayed both by parents, and brethren, and kinsfolks, and friends; and some of you shall they cause to be put to death.
17 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake. KJV
Many wonder why the Judaics would lie and inflate the numbers of Jewish dead in World War II. The answer is simple: They extract reparation payment$ based upon the number of the dead. More dead = more $$$. Simple mathematics―It is as simple as that. As a Jewish leader candidly remarks:
". . . the Germans will have paid out a total of 80 billion. . . Without the German reparations that started coming through during its first ten years as a state, Israel would not have half of its present infrastructure: All the trains in Israel are German, the ships are German, and the same goes for electrical installations and a great deal of Israel's industry . . . and that is setting aside the individual pensions paid to survivors. Israel today receives hundreds of millions of dollars in German currency each year . . . In some years the sums of money received by Israel from Germany has been as much as double or treble the contribution made by collections from international Jewry. Nowadays, there is no longer any opposition to the principle." ― The Jewish leader Nahum Goldman, in his book, The Jewish Paradox, remarking candidly on the agreement Goldman obtained from Dr. Adenauer, the German State's first "Allied-appointed" chancellor. ppg 123-125.
Not to mention that the Holocaust story garners Israel, and the Jews in general, much sympathy; which allows them to, with immunity, plunder the world generally and decimate the Palestinian people specifically. For a non-Jew, Israel is an Apartheid state. See the free E-book of an American Jewish author's experience in his immigration to Israel: The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel by Jack Bernstein; 1985. Not quite the way they tell it in the world's Judaic-controlled media, huh?
I received the below link in my mail in-box and shall share it here. I receive many links in my E-mail in-box, and encourage readers to keep sending them. And now perhaps you can understand why the International Judaics refuse to allow any of the so-called Jewish "mass graves" to be exhumed―they are empty―just like the "human-fat soap" and "human-skin lampshades" tales turned out to be lies, even now admitted by Jewish authorities to be spurious stories. Not to mention the discovery of the faked Holocaust photos, and the legion of "Holocaust Survivor" tale$! including the portions of The Diary Of Anne Frank (immortalized in the Judaic director, Steven Spielberg's movie), written in ball-point pen―when ball-point pens weren't available to her at the time of the alleged writing; and also all of the infamous Holocaust Profiteer, Elie Wiesel's, fraudulent written works. The sun never shone on a bigger liar and accuser of God than it did when it lighted on Elie Wiesel, the International Judaic's Holocaust mascot (who VOLUNTARILY chose to leave with the German "Holocaust murderers" when they fled the camp before the brutal & feared approaching Judaic-controlled Russian Red Army which was to liberate the camp!!!).
The illusive "Six Million" Holocaust Jews
The 1934 World Almanac notes the following
pre-WWII populations of Christians and Jews:
In 1948, after WWII, the 1949 World Almanac notes the following populations:
Perceived difference:
― Source: "The 'Holocaust' of 6 million Jews during World War II is an immensely successful hoax!" Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party. Link: http://christianparty.net/holocaust.htm |
Therefore, according to the prestigious World Almanac, before Hitler's "Final Solution," there were 15,315,000 Jews in the world; after the war there were 15,753,638 Jews in the world; tragically, the remaining 6,000,000 Jews were lost to the genocide. And Israel has been enjoying reparation$ on-the-head for these "dead 6,000,000" for over 60 years, at once-Christian Germany's and other once-Christian nation's expense. You get the point.
Or, if you still don't get it, listen in on Professor Emeritus, Richard Lynn's observations:
The Missing Holocaust
"I've checked out Churchill's Second World War and the statement is quite correct; not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war.
"This is astonishing. How can it be explained?
"Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle's three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war." ― Richard Lynn, Professor Emeritus, University of Ulster, December 5, 2005.
Odd that the leader's of America and Great Britain (Eisenhower & Churchill) weren't informed about any Holocaust, or didn't see fit to mention the misery and evil in their comprehensive WWII books, is it not?
The only thing odder is that "they" have to make and enforce laws to get people to believe their Holocaust, and to silence-by-jailing any who dare present evidence against the hoax. Ironically, the people of Hiroshima didn't need to make "Hiroshima Denial" laws. Why? Because the nuclear devastation of Hiroshima happened just like history said it did.
It is considered true that approx. 1.4 million Jews died during WWII of all causes*. Compared to over 89.9 million (89,993,458) Christian deaths of all causes. And the loss of even one life, Christian or Jew, is tragic; however, that does not excuse lying and profiteering―much less arresting and imprisoning people who don't buy into the great lie.
*See: Did Six Million Really Die?...The Truth.
The great Holocaust exaggeration (many call it a hoax) is unraveling in a big way―which explains the stepped-up "Holocaust-Denial" laws being implemented in the Christian West, to keep "the Indians on the reservation."
It is not at all odd that the above authors (the prime Minister of England and the President of the United States of America) knew of no such thing as any Holocaust; the Holocaust story was built-up later after the war years and the decades that followed. Today it is a religion, complete with a set of beliefs and a clergy-class (Rabbis) to espouse them, and with Holocaust Museums being forced upon countries all over the world (funded and supported by those vassal states). And denying this "god" will land you in jail*. It's a new religion, Holocaustianity, and it is sweeping through the Judeo-Christians (Judaized "Christians") like wildfire. Below are some popular worshippers:
*See:
What is Historical Revisionism,
and an update
on Historical Revisionist David Irving's show trial
Worshipping At The New Judaic Altar | |
![]() |
|
Vice President Dick Cheney in Israel wearing Jewish Yarmulke (scull cap) laying a wreath at the eternal flame for the "6 million Holocaust" victims. |
|
![]() |
|
President George W. Bush wearing Jewish Yarmulke praying at the Jew's Wailing Wall in Jerusalem. |
What Of The German-Officer's Post-War "Confessions" Which Substantiated the
Holocaust?
Much is made of the "confessions" of high-ranking German officers regarding the Holocaust. What isn't told (in the suppressed Judaic-controlled media) is that the "Allie's" interrogators, lawyers, and judges at Nuremburg were Jewish men carefully selected and appointed by God-knows-who. Obviously, this isn't the perfect setting for objective interrogation, a fair trial, nor honest truth-seeking.
In a common term, the Nuremburg Trials were a Kangaroo Court (the outcome determined before the trials even began) just like the modern day "trials" of "Holocaust Deniers" are―and the world closed and closes it's eyes because of the Judaic-controlled media's vilification of the German people and army. I wonder if the reader would approve of the conduct we will see in the below article if it were to happen to our service-men should we lose the Iraq war or some other future war. Does the reader approve of the below conduct for any prostrated prisoner of war? What of the Geneva Conventions? Were (Judaic-controlled) America & Great Britain somehow exempt from this international agreement of civilized nations? Apparently so. observe:
Quote: "...Even setting aside questionable
"documentary" evidence, let's look at some of the accused's
"testimony"--how it was extracted, and what it really means.
This statement, tortured and terrorized out
of him, was the one we are all familiar with--the "proof" for
the so-called "gassing of the Jews."
A most convenient excuse! In 1989 I organized
a write-in campaign to persuade the then-Soviet Leader
Gorbachev to release the Auschwitz Death Registers captured
in 1945 when the Red Army took over the Auschwitz complex. A
few months afterwards this actually happened. Gorbachev
released these all-important documents to the Red Cross, which
showed in minute detail why people had died in Auschwitz, the
cause and time of death, their birth, address etc.
But does that invalidate the Revisionist
[Revisionists are historians who attempt
to locate evidence to correct falsified "history"]
claims
or their strategy? Not at all. On the contrary. After all,
Hoess's testimony was used as the skeleton on which the entire
Holocaust myth about mass gassings was constructed in the first
place. Revisionists have concentrated on Hoess precisely
because he is probably the most important source for
Holocaust historians' conclusions on and exaggerations about the
Holocaust. Raul Hilberg, who wrote the "Bible" of the
"Holocaust," The Destruction of the European Jews,
(Holmes & Meier, Revised Edition, 1985 ) relies on Hoess's
testimony heavily, and Hoess was the primary witness
relied upon by the Nuremberg Tribunal in their judgment
regarding the "extermination of the Jews," even though he
told the court of having been savagely tortured. ―"The
Torture of Rudolph Hess." The Christian Party. |
The answer to last above question is simple: $$$. For more descriptions of the Nuremburg Trials tortured-confessions; and documentation, including names, of the men of Jewish descent who ran the "tribunals" and conducted the fact-finding "interrogations," see the below free E-book:
Did Six Million Really Die?...The Truth More Jews (3 1/3 million) filed
for survivor compensation from West Germany after the war than were in all of German controlled Europe during the war (3 million). That doesn't even begin to try to account for the "exterminated" (six-million). Excerpt: "...how many of the 3 million European Jews under German control survived after 1945? .... the growing number of Jews claiming compensation from the West German Government for having allegedly suffered between 1939 and 1945. By 1965 the number of these claimants registered with the West German Government had tripled in ten years and reached 3,375,000 (Aufbau, June 30, 1965) ... Nothing could be a more devastating proof of the brazen fantasy of the Six Million. Most of these claimants are Jews, so there can be no doubt that the majority of the 3 million Jews who experienced the Nazi occupation of Europe remained, in fact, very much alive. It is a resounding confirmation of the fact that Jewish casualties during the Second World War can only be estimated at a fraction of 'Six Million'. Surely this is enough grief for the Jewish people? Who has the right to compound it with vast imaginary slaughter, marking with eternal shame a great European nation [Christian Germany], as well as wringing fraudulent monetary compensation from them?" (Continued at page.)
The number 6 million, as reported elsewhere on this Website, has a special occult significance to the Jewish Cabalists who study Kabbalah and Talmud. That is why they tried to claim 6,000,000 Jewish dead after World War ONE! Observe how they closely guard that magical (to them) number of 6 with 6 zeros (6,000,000):
Holocaust Math: 6Mil -2�Mil = 6Mil |
|
Holocaust Commemorative Plaque, Auschwitz, Poland |
|
Plaque on display at the Auschwitz camp as it appeared until 1989 (note the "4 million" victims). |
The plaque currently on display at Auschwitz since 2002 (note reduction in number of victims to 1.5 million)―the sudden 2� million reduction never reported in the Judaic-controlled media of the Western Nations. |
![]() |
![]() |
Inscription: "Four million people suffered and died here at the hands of the Nazi murderers between the years 1940 and 1945" |
Inscription: "Forever let this place be a cry of despair and a warning to humanity where the Nazis murdered about one and a half million men, women, and children, mainly Jews from various countries of Europe. Auschwitz-Birkenau 1940-1945" |
Dec. 31, 1945 | French Research Dept. for Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal | 8,000,000 |
April 20, 1978 | Le Monde (One of Frances largest newspapers) | 5,000,000 |
Jan. 23, 1995 | Die Welt (One of Germanys largest newspapers) | 5,000,000 |
April 20, 1989 | Kogon, Der-SS-Staat (Expert on III Reich) | 4,500,000 |
Oct. 1, 1946 | International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg document number 008-USSR | 4,000,000 |
Nov. 24, 1989 | Chief Prosecutor Majorowsky, Wuppertal File No. (12 js 1037/89) | 4,000,000 |
July 26, 1990 | Germany's largest Jewish Weekly, "Allgemeine J�dische Wochenzeitung" | 4,000,000 |
Dec. 08, 1993 | ZDF, Germany's second largest T.V. network | 4,000,000 |
Jan. 25, 1995 | German paper "Wetzlaer Neue Zeitung" | 4,000,000 |
Oct. 1, 1946 | International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg document number 3868-PS | 3,000,000 |
Jan. 1, 1995 | German magazine "Damals" (Magazine about history) | 3,000,000 |
July 18, 1990 | The Peninsula Times Tribune, San Fransisco (USA) | 2,000,000 |
July 25, 1990 | German newspaper Hamburger Adendblatt | 2,000,000 |
Jan. 27, 1995 | German newspaper "Die Welt" | 2,000,000 |
June 11, 1992 | Germany's largest Jewish Weekly, "Allgemeine J�dische Wochenzeitung" | 1,500,000 |
Oct. 8, 1993 | ZDF, Germany's second largest T.V. network | 1,500,000 |
Jan. 23, 1995 | German newspaper "Die Welt" | 1,500,000 |
Sept. 1, 1989 | French newspaper "Le Monde" | 1,433,000 |
Feb. 2, 1995 | Large German weekly magazine "Bunte" | 1,400,000 |
Jan. 22, 1995 | German newspaper "Welt am Sonntag" | 1,200,000 |
Jan. 27, 1995 | German newspaper "Die Welt" | 1,100,000 |
Dec. 21, 1994 | Institute for Contempory History, Semi-official organ of the German State | 1,000,000 |
Dec. 31, 1989 | Jean-Claude Pressac's book "Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chamber" | 928,000 |
Sept. 27, 1993 | German newspaper "Die Welt" | 800,000 |
Jan. 22, 1995 | German newspaper "Welt am Sonntag" | 750,000 |
May 1, 1994 | Focus newsmagazine. Over 2 million circulation | 700,000 |
Jan. 23, 1995 | German newspaper "Die Welt" | 700,000 |
Jan. 31, 1994 | Jean-Claude Pressac's book "The Auschwitz Crematorium" | 470,000 |
Jan. 8, 1948 | Allied censored post-war German News Reels (Wochenschau Nr. 137) | 300,000 |
Jan. 6, 1990 | Frankfurter Rundschau | 74,000 |
May 31, 1995 | Former Director of the Institute for Military History at Freiburg, Hoffmann in his book "Stalins war of Destruction" | 74,000 [30,000 of them Jews] |
From 4,000,000 down to 30,000 Jewish victims of Auschwitz! Quite a reduction. And the almost 4 million reduction is not reflected in today's often-touted number of "6 million" Jews dieing in WWII! The actual number of of Jewish deaths in all of World War II, of all causes, including the victims of Allied bombing, disease and injury, the Jewish soldiers killed fighting WITH Hitler's army, etc., is approximately 1.4 million. See Did Six Million Really Die?...The Truth for listings and documentation & rational for that number.
The above facts and figures on this page are available to anyone with just a cursory investigation. Yet, today―this very day―there are men in prison for stating these very facts (under the Judaics sweeping and ever-expanding-in-scope "Hate-Speech" (Thought-Crime) and "Holocaust-Denial" laws forced upon vassal once-Christian nations). I wonder, do you get the point?
If this author (myself) were writing this Webpage in Germany, Australia, Canada, and a legion of other smaller and ever-growing list of European nations, he could be arrested for a Hate Crime. I ask you: do see hate written on this page; or, just the ugly truth that the perennial liars, conspirators, and profiteers, desperately seek at all costs to keep hidden for their own self-serving and selfish reasons?
The Great Tribulation of Christians is not far off; and on this page you have seen her taskmasters in operation. You have in this story all the elements of the Tribulation: you have trumped-up charges, false accusations, tortured confessions, unfair trials, complicit "defense" lawyers, corrupt judges, justice suspended, new ex-post-facto laws (after the fact), kangaroo-Court tribunals, no right of appeal, and punishment and execution―welcome to the Great Tribulation model and her drivers―the International Judaics. "Yesterday" it was the Nazis, "tomorrow" it will be Christians―the two great enemies of the International Judaics.
Yet, even today, from pulpits in corrupt, compromised, lukewarm and water-down Christian churches all over the Western Nations, we hear Christian preachers, men that should have known better from reading their Bibles, ignorantly state that the Jews are "God's Chosen People." "Chosen" for what, to kill His Son, hunt down and hinder His Christian churches, and to persecute unto death His Christian people?
Does writing this article here today make me an "AntiSemite?" Don't even bother me with that false term, I won't even dignify the accusation―it doesn't work anymore―they played-out their hand for far too long on that one. There is no such thing as an AntiSemite, there is no such thing as AntiSemitism. The word was always only used to stifle criticism of their world-conquest schemes and to suppress the exposition of their crimes against God's humanity. And the whole world of Lemmings everywhere just simply bought into it. Don't just take my word for it; observe from them themselves:
Jewish Author Warns Of the Convenient and Meaningless "AntiSemitism" Libel:
"The word 'anti-Semitism' is another word which should be eliminated from the English language. 'Anti-Semitism' serves only one purpose today. It is used as a 'smear word.'
When so-called or self-styled Jews feel that anyone opposes any of their objectives they discredit their victims by applying the word 'anti-Semite' or 'anti-Semitic' through all the channels they have at their command and under their control.
I can speak with great authority on that subject. Because so-called or self-styled 'Jews' were unable to disprove my public statements in 1946 with regard to the situation in Palestine, they spent millions of dollars to 'smear' me as an 'anti-Semite' hoping thereby to discredit me in the eyes of the public who were very much interested in what I had to say.
Until 1946 I was a 'little saint' to all so-called or self-styled 'Jews.' When I disagreed with them publicly on the Zionist intentions in Palestine, I became suddenly 'Anti-Semite No. 1.'" ― Facts are Facts, by Benjamin H. Freedman. (Benjamin Freedman is himself a Jew; at once illustrating the absurdity of the made-up charge of "AntiSemitism".) See free E-book: Facts Are Facts � The Truth About Khazars
The "AntiSemitism" Libel:
�Ever since the Jews invented the libel charge of �anti-Semitism� in the 1880s [The word �anti-Semitism� was first printed in 1880], it has been built up with Jewish money, organizations, propaganda, and lies...so that now the word is like snake venom which paralyzes one�s nervous system. Even the mention of the word �Jew� is shunned unless used in a most favorable and positive context.� ― Charles A. Weisman, Who is Esau‑Edom?, p. 63. Order at: Who Is Esau-Edom?
�Nobody outside of America can possibly begin to imagine the extent to which hysterical and fanatical Jewish Americans and hysterical and fanatical Jewish groups in America have successfully created through great effort over time a climate of moral, political and psychological blackmail. Even I, a Jewish man whose grandmother is a [concentration] camp survivor, a Jewish man who has personally visited camps in Germany, Holland and Poland, and who has read endless books on the Holocaust, and who holds an extremely deep concern for Israel's safety and security, and has so held for years - even I cannot dare to raise my voice in criticism of Israel, or even address some of the blindingly obvious facts, for fear of an instantaneous and abominable backlash and assault.� ― David Rosen, review of Norman Finklestein�s Beyond Chutzpah : On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History. November 10, 2005.
"AntiSemitism" Is:
��Anti-Semite� used to mean someone who hates Jews. Now it means someone whom the Jews hate.� ― L.A. Rollins
The great question that no Christian seems to be asking: "WHO?"
Who is it that is going to control the world in the Tribulation just prior to antichrist's arrival? Answer: the same ones who control it now―only in a more totalitarian manner. What you see today is only the dress rehearsal for what you shall see in the Great Tribulation, when all the limits are lifted, even to the opening-up of execution chambers for "non-believers" (in the beast). Can't happen? Won't happen? Well, if in the enlightened year of 2006, men can be arrested, deported, and imprisoned from and in "free" "Democratic" once-Christian nations (Germany, Australia, Canada, etc.) for doubting, on scientific and historical basis and evidence (inadmissible in the kangaroo courts), that 6,000,000 Jews were genocided in WWII―then how far are we really from the execution of same? We are ThisFar away from that.
Perhaps now you can understand why I cringe when I see an educated-seeming, Christian-appearing, supposed Bible-literate, Christian clergyman, call the so-called Jews of today―God's chosen people. Only supernatural agency from the dark side could explain how a people & religion can murder another religion's Savior and God Jesus Christ, and then in a scant 2,000 years have the victim-religion calling the murderers of this Jesus Christ―the "chosen of God." How could this be?
Stay tuned, you absolutely haven't seen anything yet; if you want to see real insanity, just wait till the Tribulation kicks-off!
See:
What is Historical Revisionism, and an update on Historical Revisionist David Irving's show trial
See also:
The Talmudic (Jewish Mysticism) Significance Of The Number 6,000,000 (Also: the Roman 4 Bil. and WWI 6 MIl. Holocaust tales)
The Global Witch-Hunt for "Holocaust Deniers" and the Great Tribulation
Race-baiting and the 108 Countries the Judaics were expelled-from since 250 a.d.
The International Judaics: Protocols, Abu Graib, and Usury
An Englander Speaks of the Coming [International-Judaic Instigated and orchestrated] Racial Unrest in Europe
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top |
The Swastika, the Five-Pointed Star, and the Six-Pointed Star; a prelude to the beast's mark?
A Reader Asks:
I can't help but wonder that the swastika is a four sided emblem, the pentagram a five sided one, the star of David/Solomon a six sided one, should we expect the new world order/luciferian system to present us with a seven folded symbol as a "logo" for the mark of the beast? Does this make sense? Any ideas?
Answer:
Revelation 13:14-18
14 And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save [expect for] he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. KJV
Another thing about these symbols: the Five-Pointed Star antedates (precedes) the Six Pointed Star as a symbol of Judaism. The 5 pointed one is called the Seal of Solomon. The 6 pointed one is called the Mogen David, though the term Mogen David has come to be variously used to (inaccurately) denote either. As for the Swastika, it is an ancient Hindu symbol, used also by several early Indian tribes, and also used in the occult long before Hitler made it famous. In my neighborhood (in Chicago) there can still be found buildings from the early 1900's that incorporate a Swastika in their ornamental brickwork just below the roof line on the front facade of the building (there is one on a building in the 2500-2700 block of N. Central Park Ave. [on the odd side of the street]).
"The Magen David (shield of David) is a six-pointed star which has come to symbolize Judaism and the Jewish people. Despite its name, the association of the six-pointed star with the Jewish people is relatively recent. The first known connection was in 1354 when Emperor Charles IV of Czechoslovakia permitted the Jewish community to create its own flag. They employed two gold six-pointed star on their banner and used it to welcome the king to the city of Prague, in addition to two red pentacles (five-pointed stars, known as Solomon's Seal)." ― Source: http://scheinerman.net/judaism/rituals/star.html
The original "Jewish Star" shown in the design of our own (U.S.)
Pentagon Building:
|
![]() |
Pentagon building, aerial (AP) |
State Flag of the Soviet Union
The flag is of red or scarlet cloth, length to width, 2:1. In the left upper corner are a golden sickle and hammer, surmounted by a five-pointed red star with a golden border. ― Soviet Union Information Bureau.
![]()
Peace to you in Christ Jesus.
________________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our
MAILING LIST]
God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful
name!
Nick Goggin
Back to list of questions at top of page
| Back To Top |
Taunting Satan
A Reader (amateur "heretic-hunter") Writes:
As you and I know, if one were to praise both lucifer and jesus, that would make you a luciferic NOT a christian. Because there are so many fakes in this world, I have started asking anyone that claims to love yeshua [Jesus' name in Hebrew] to simply renounce lucifer. The luciferics think that satan is the devil but lucifer is god! What blasphemy. That's why it doesn't mean anything for them to renounce satan. It's got to be Lucifer by name. Now there are obviously folks who don't know the word who will renounce lucifer, but I certainly wouldn't trust someone who wouldn't. So for the record, I renounce lucifer, and I would like to ask you to do the same, in writing just once on your website.
Folks reading this should try it with their pastors, you might be shocked to hear their response. If it is anything other than "I renounce Lucifer", then as far as I'm concerned, they are supsect.
Rxxxxxx
Answer:
You are suspect! Odd request! I am not at all comfortable with a stranger on the Internet trying to entice me to name satan's name. Why is it so important for you to cause Christians to speak to/of satan/lucifer? This whole thing doesn't feel right.
We are not to speak to him, save to rebuke him in Jesus Christ's name. I have done so on numerous occasions, none of which would be any of your business. But it is dangerous to be playing with him. Not knowing you, I would have to suspect some kind of satanic trap in your little game. Christians are NOT to even speak to satan/lucifer or whatever name you wish to call him by, he has so many names, you know.
And I am not all that comfortable with your word "renounce" either―how can one renounce someone that he never followed? In the Great Tribulation, Christians will be forced to renounce Jesus Christ whom they once followed. From the Thesaurus we see that your word "renounce" can have TWO different connotations:
renounce:
VERB:
1. To give up a possession, claim, or right: abandon, abdicate, cede, demit, forswear, hand over, quitclaim, relinquish, render, resign, surrender, waive, yield. See KEEP.
2. To refuse to recognize or acknowledge: deny, disacknowledge, disavow, disclaim, disown, reject, repudiate. Idioms: turn one's back on. See ACCEPT.
―Roget�s II: The New Thesaurus, Third Edition. Copyright � 1995 by Houghton Mifflin
Company. Published by the Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Even Archangel Michael dared not play games with satan. You should read the below Scripture and quit possibly causing weak Christians to conjure up this evil spirit:
Jude 9
9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. KJV
Don't play games when you don't know all the consequences. And if you were trying to trap and deceive me―then get thee hence satan, in Jesus Christ' precious and powerful name!
I swear unwavering and sole allegiance to the Lord God of the Bible and His only begotten Son Jesus Christ, our Savior; rejecting all other supernatural entities who do not worship that Lord God and Jesus Christ, as enemies of God and Christ Jesus, and therefore enemies of mine. And I deeply resent you challenging my faith!
I don't know who the heck that you think that you are testing/tempting people, but I don't like it one bit. If you are simply an innocent self-important blunderer, then I suggest that you reevaluate your little game here; you may be inviting demons in unawares. Perhaps that is why you have gotten responses from clergymen that, as you said, made you "shocked to hear their response".
There is a time rebuke satan, but not just for kicks. If you play with him you will have opened the door and invited him in. Is that what you want?!?
Also, may I also suggest that you start capitalizing the words "Jesus, "Yeshua, and "Christian"? After all, you capitalized your own name at the bottom of your E-mail. The only proper pronoun, other than your own, that you capitalized was "Lucifer" in line 5 of paragraph one of your E-mail: "It's got to be Lucifer by name.", and "Lucifer" again in line 2 of your second paragraph "If it is anything other than 'I renounce Lucifer', then as far as I'm concerned, they are supsect. ".
Now that's "suspect." Leave the heretic hunting to those more able.
Peace in Christ Jesus.
________________________________________________________________________
[P.S. Are you on
our E-mail Mailing List yet? Join our
MAILING LIST]
God bless the study of His Word; in Jesus Christ's Precious and powerful
name!
Nick Goggin
The Reader Writes back:
That was all I needed. Good riddance.
I chose to post this correspondence (sans the man's name, as is my policy for lay-people [only posting teacher's/pastor's names]) as a means to illustrate the kind of things that we Christians can and will all be harassed with. So-called's promoting themselves as Christians setting up "hoops for us jump through" to appease their bizarre ideas. We will never know who this man was or what agenda he is on, or if he is even a Christian brother―but one thing is for sure, I have never heard of a Christian running around church demanding that people make vows of renunciation to satan, much less bringing that game to their pastors/preachers/teachers--and then implying that if one doesn't play the game, then they "must" be a worshipper of lucifer! Thus, through pressure-tactics, these sort cause Christians to do a very foolish thing―taunt satan. Don't fall for this type of stuff. As I mentioned in the reply above to the reader, I sensed something very wrong about his E-mail―it felt evil; i.e., where I stated to him: "This whole thing doesn't feel right."
As the endtime nears many of these nuts will begin to come out of the woodwork, accusing, attacking, making weird statements, and generally confusing the heck out of the Christian churches. In the endtime, true Christians will be persecuted, slandered, identified to antichrist's minions for arrest, and attacked, by other (so-called) Christians and close-ones:
Luke 21:16-19
16 And ye shall be betrayed both by parents, and brethren, and kinsfolks, and friends; and some of you shall they cause to be put to death.
17 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake.
18 But there shall not an hair of your head perish.
19 In your patience possess ye your souls. KJV
What kind of "spiritual trip" would cause a (presumed) Christian to make the below remarkably absurd statement?
"As you and I know, if one were to praise both lucifer and jesus, that would make you a luciferic NOT a christian. Because there are so many fakes in this world, I have started asking anyone that claims to love yeshua [Jesus' name in Hebrew] to simply renounce lucifer. "
What, pray tell, Christian would EVER "praise lucifer"?!?!??!?!?! And as though a "secret satan worshipper" couldn't just lie to this goof and make his silly oath without meaning it. This man sounds like one of Lance Knight's henchmen who have been harassing me since I exposed the blasphemy in his "new" teachings (see our: The Overnight fall of Pastor Lance Knight and his Flock (with audio excerpts of Lance's heretical 'teachings')). I can always sense evil spirits when one of Lance's blasphemers writes to me (see our: Excerpt of Lance Knight's dangerous "new" (false) doctrine (learn to identify the heresies, so you won't get drawn in)).
Peace to in Christ Jesus.
Nick Goggin; WBSG.
The Reader Writes Back:
A colon introduces the list of words synonymous with destroy: bankrupt, break down, cross up, demolish, finish, ruin, shatter, sink, smash, spoil, torpedo, undo, wash up, wrack2, and wreck. Labeled synonyms, in this case, total with its label Slang, appear after the main list of synonyms. |
When appropriate, idioms equivalent to the synonyms are shown at the end of a synonym list. These idioms are phrases with the same meaning as the basic meaning shared by all the synonyms. In the entry shown here, put the kibosh on is an idiom that is equivalent to destroy and its synonyms. Idioms are not listed as main entries. |
Each synonym list concludes with a Category reference, such as See HELP in the entry destroy shown above. For an explanation of this see �Category Index.� |
This is the exact reference you used to slander me. The word ACCEPT that you referenced is a CATEGORY Index not a synonym list. This means the CATEGORY of whether to ACCEPT or RENOUCE is listed. Renouce can be one thing only and if you had done your homework you would know this. It is the exact OPPOSITE of conjuring lucifer which you accused me of. You can't have any authority to proclaim that "The Lord rebuke thee" if you don't first renounce EVERYTHING EXCEPT YESHUA icluding lucifer. I renounce lucifer in the name of the YESHUA MESSIAH and you owe me one heck of an apology. I won't hold my breath after the way you attacked me. Do you think HELP is a synonym for DESTROY too?rxxxx
Answer:
2 Timothy 3:15-17
15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof , for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. KJV
The bottom line is this: You, Rxxxx, woke up one day and decided to add to what God's Word says that we Christians must do. You arbitrarily, and without Divine authority, set out to hound every Christian and Christian preacher and Christian Bible teacher that you meet, coercing them into this "renouncement ritual" that you fabricated somewhere in the depths of your own heart.
Rxxxx's new ritual:
"You can't have any authority to proclaim that "The Lord rebuke thee" if you don't first renounce EVERYTHING EXCEPT YESHUA icluding lucifer. I renounce lucifer in the name of the YESHUA MESSIAH"
Luke 11:45-4645 Then answered one of the lawyers, and said unto him, Master, thus saying thou reproachest us also.46 And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers. KJV
Jude 5-135 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever. KJV
Matthew 15:1-3
15:1 Then came to Jesus scribes and Pharisees, which were of Jerusalem, saying,2 Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the elders [Talmud]? for they wash not their hands when they eat bread.3 But he answered and said unto them, Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition? KJV
A Scripture for you to begin at would be:
2 Peter 2:1-19
2:1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.
2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.
3 And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.
4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;
5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;
6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;
7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
8(For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)
9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:
10 But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.
11 Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.
12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;
13 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;
14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:
15 Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;
16 But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man's voice forbad the madness of the prophet.
17 These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever.
18 For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error.
19 While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. KJV
Back to list of questions at top of page
|
To top |
In
His Service:
Nick Goggin
Editor;
www.biblestudysite.com
WATCHMEN
BIBLE
STUDY GROUP
Contact
Editor |
Bible
studies |
Newer
students |
Bible Q
& A's
|
Study
tools
|
Search
our site
Library/Bookstore
|
Statement
of faith |
New material on
site |
Join
our mailing list |
Home
Page |
Donate
NOTE: To insure quality and content integrity, these In-depth Bible Studies are � copyrighted and may only be downloaded for study and shared private use. They may not be reproduced or distributed for sale or publication without prior written approval. Other Christian Web sites are welcome to link up to this Website or any page on it.
hosts several archives of Bible studies such as these by the Watchmen Bible Study Group. Although we are not affiliated with this or numerous others using the term Watchman in their names, we believe it important keep the full content intact for research and analysis for Bible students of future generations. We keep it available as good members of the body of Christ, for Christian unity. We do so on a non-profit basis. As the original owner's site went offline years ago, no one has paid to keep it online but us. We pray and hope such ministries are more careful about having successors to carry on their works in the future. Although we do not agree on every point of doctrine, we still believe it very important to not edit any of the original contents.
Our own statements of beliefs are found at www.CelticOrthodoxy.com,
and for example in the book "7th Day Sabbath in the Orthodox Church" etc.